Link models from different databases
I have the following situation: I have a class Company, it is as simple as possible
public class Company
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
I also need to extend the IdentityUser class from ASP. NET Identity Core:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Not bad so far. But I also need a class Device :
public class Device
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Accordingly, we add the Devices property of the List<Device>
type to the Company class and Users property of the List<User>
type.
The problem is that I want to separate the data (Device table) from the data of ASP .NET Identity Core in different databases. Table Company I want to put in the database with Auth data. And table Device in other one. How can I tell the Entity Framework that the Company property of the Device class is from another database?
entity-framework asp.net-core ef-fluent-api
add a comment |
I have the following situation: I have a class Company, it is as simple as possible
public class Company
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
I also need to extend the IdentityUser class from ASP. NET Identity Core:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Not bad so far. But I also need a class Device :
public class Device
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Accordingly, we add the Devices property of the List<Device>
type to the Company class and Users property of the List<User>
type.
The problem is that I want to separate the data (Device table) from the data of ASP .NET Identity Core in different databases. Table Company I want to put in the database with Auth data. And table Device in other one. How can I tell the Entity Framework that the Company property of the Device class is from another database?
entity-framework asp.net-core ef-fluent-api
So,Company
has manyDevice
, andDevice
has oneCompany
?
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 3:36
Yes, you understood correctly
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 3:38
1
How can I tell ... You can't. One context = one database.
– Gert Arnold
Nov 20 '18 at 21:25
Please read other answers and comments
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
I have the following situation: I have a class Company, it is as simple as possible
public class Company
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
I also need to extend the IdentityUser class from ASP. NET Identity Core:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Not bad so far. But I also need a class Device :
public class Device
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Accordingly, we add the Devices property of the List<Device>
type to the Company class and Users property of the List<User>
type.
The problem is that I want to separate the data (Device table) from the data of ASP .NET Identity Core in different databases. Table Company I want to put in the database with Auth data. And table Device in other one. How can I tell the Entity Framework that the Company property of the Device class is from another database?
entity-framework asp.net-core ef-fluent-api
I have the following situation: I have a class Company, it is as simple as possible
public class Company
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
I also need to extend the IdentityUser class from ASP. NET Identity Core:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Not bad so far. But I also need a class Device :
public class Device
{
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
Accordingly, we add the Devices property of the List<Device>
type to the Company class and Users property of the List<User>
type.
The problem is that I want to separate the data (Device table) from the data of ASP .NET Identity Core in different databases. Table Company I want to put in the database with Auth data. And table Device in other one. How can I tell the Entity Framework that the Company property of the Device class is from another database?
entity-framework asp.net-core ef-fluent-api
entity-framework asp.net-core ef-fluent-api
edited Nov 20 '18 at 18:25
starmucks
asked Nov 20 '18 at 3:31
starmucksstarmucks
287
287
So,Company
has manyDevice
, andDevice
has oneCompany
?
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 3:36
Yes, you understood correctly
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 3:38
1
How can I tell ... You can't. One context = one database.
– Gert Arnold
Nov 20 '18 at 21:25
Please read other answers and comments
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
So,Company
has manyDevice
, andDevice
has oneCompany
?
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 3:36
Yes, you understood correctly
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 3:38
1
How can I tell ... You can't. One context = one database.
– Gert Arnold
Nov 20 '18 at 21:25
Please read other answers and comments
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
So,
Company
has many Device
, and Device
has one Company
?– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 3:36
So,
Company
has many Device
, and Device
has one Company
?– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 3:36
Yes, you understood correctly
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 3:38
Yes, you understood correctly
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 3:38
1
1
How can I tell ... You can't. One context = one database.
– Gert Arnold
Nov 20 '18 at 21:25
How can I tell ... You can't. One context = one database.
– Gert Arnold
Nov 20 '18 at 21:25
Please read other answers and comments
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
Please read other answers and comments
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
If the Company property is from another database, you may need to add a second database context for it, if you haven't already. Something like this:
public class CompanyModelContext : DbContext
{
public CompanyModelContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options){ }
public DbSet<Company> Company { get; set; }
}
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:03
Can you use separate contexts? One that contains a DbSet for the Device table and another context that contains DbSets for User and Company?
– Mike Black
Nov 21 '18 at 0:15
Yes I can. But since Company refers to User and Device, the Company table will be created in the first database and in the second one. This is the question: how to tell EF table Company is needed only in one database?
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
You can try to set your EF model like this:
Companies table:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
}
Devices table:
[Table("Devices")]
public class Device
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
public DbSet<Company> Companies { get; set; }
public DbSet<Device> Devices { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
I've added Devices
as a list in Company
class, then overriding the FK in the method OnModelCreating
.
Once you delete an item in table Company
, all items with the same Id
in table Devices
(comparing to CompanyID
) will be delted automatically.
Since we use the 2 properties [Table]
and [Key]
to define table name and the primary key. So in the OnModelCreating
, you can ignore to define the name, PK, FK of table Device
.
Company has many User
In this case:
User class:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public int CompanyId { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
}
Company class:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
public ICollection<User> Users { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Users)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:01
@starmucksCompany
table cannot have relationshop one-to-one withUser
table since it has relationshipmany-to-one
withDevice
table. You can remove it.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 4:17
Not one-to-one. one-to-many. Company has many User
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:49
@starmucks I've updated the entities.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
Well now. Table Company in one database and table Device in another.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:02
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385816%2flink-models-from-different-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If the Company property is from another database, you may need to add a second database context for it, if you haven't already. Something like this:
public class CompanyModelContext : DbContext
{
public CompanyModelContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options){ }
public DbSet<Company> Company { get; set; }
}
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:03
Can you use separate contexts? One that contains a DbSet for the Device table and another context that contains DbSets for User and Company?
– Mike Black
Nov 21 '18 at 0:15
Yes I can. But since Company refers to User and Device, the Company table will be created in the first database and in the second one. This is the question: how to tell EF table Company is needed only in one database?
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
If the Company property is from another database, you may need to add a second database context for it, if you haven't already. Something like this:
public class CompanyModelContext : DbContext
{
public CompanyModelContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options){ }
public DbSet<Company> Company { get; set; }
}
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:03
Can you use separate contexts? One that contains a DbSet for the Device table and another context that contains DbSets for User and Company?
– Mike Black
Nov 21 '18 at 0:15
Yes I can. But since Company refers to User and Device, the Company table will be created in the first database and in the second one. This is the question: how to tell EF table Company is needed only in one database?
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
If the Company property is from another database, you may need to add a second database context for it, if you haven't already. Something like this:
public class CompanyModelContext : DbContext
{
public CompanyModelContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options){ }
public DbSet<Company> Company { get; set; }
}
If the Company property is from another database, you may need to add a second database context for it, if you haven't already. Something like this:
public class CompanyModelContext : DbContext
{
public CompanyModelContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options){ }
public DbSet<Company> Company { get; set; }
}
answered Nov 20 '18 at 3:47
Mike BlackMike Black
1112
1112
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:03
Can you use separate contexts? One that contains a DbSet for the Device table and another context that contains DbSets for User and Company?
– Mike Black
Nov 21 '18 at 0:15
Yes I can. But since Company refers to User and Device, the Company table will be created in the first database and in the second one. This is the question: how to tell EF table Company is needed only in one database?
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:03
Can you use separate contexts? One that contains a DbSet for the Device table and another context that contains DbSets for User and Company?
– Mike Black
Nov 21 '18 at 0:15
Yes I can. But since Company refers to User and Device, the Company table will be created in the first database and in the second one. This is the question: how to tell EF table Company is needed only in one database?
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:03
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:03
Can you use separate contexts? One that contains a DbSet for the Device table and another context that contains DbSets for User and Company?
– Mike Black
Nov 21 '18 at 0:15
Can you use separate contexts? One that contains a DbSet for the Device table and another context that contains DbSets for User and Company?
– Mike Black
Nov 21 '18 at 0:15
Yes I can. But since Company refers to User and Device, the Company table will be created in the first database and in the second one. This is the question: how to tell EF table Company is needed only in one database?
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
Yes I can. But since Company refers to User and Device, the Company table will be created in the first database and in the second one. This is the question: how to tell EF table Company is needed only in one database?
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36
add a comment |
You can try to set your EF model like this:
Companies table:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
}
Devices table:
[Table("Devices")]
public class Device
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
public DbSet<Company> Companies { get; set; }
public DbSet<Device> Devices { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
I've added Devices
as a list in Company
class, then overriding the FK in the method OnModelCreating
.
Once you delete an item in table Company
, all items with the same Id
in table Devices
(comparing to CompanyID
) will be delted automatically.
Since we use the 2 properties [Table]
and [Key]
to define table name and the primary key. So in the OnModelCreating
, you can ignore to define the name, PK, FK of table Device
.
Company has many User
In this case:
User class:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public int CompanyId { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
}
Company class:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
public ICollection<User> Users { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Users)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:01
@starmucksCompany
table cannot have relationshop one-to-one withUser
table since it has relationshipmany-to-one
withDevice
table. You can remove it.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 4:17
Not one-to-one. one-to-many. Company has many User
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:49
@starmucks I've updated the entities.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
Well now. Table Company in one database and table Device in another.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:02
|
show 2 more comments
You can try to set your EF model like this:
Companies table:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
}
Devices table:
[Table("Devices")]
public class Device
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
public DbSet<Company> Companies { get; set; }
public DbSet<Device> Devices { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
I've added Devices
as a list in Company
class, then overriding the FK in the method OnModelCreating
.
Once you delete an item in table Company
, all items with the same Id
in table Devices
(comparing to CompanyID
) will be delted automatically.
Since we use the 2 properties [Table]
and [Key]
to define table name and the primary key. So in the OnModelCreating
, you can ignore to define the name, PK, FK of table Device
.
Company has many User
In this case:
User class:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public int CompanyId { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
}
Company class:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
public ICollection<User> Users { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Users)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:01
@starmucksCompany
table cannot have relationshop one-to-one withUser
table since it has relationshipmany-to-one
withDevice
table. You can remove it.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 4:17
Not one-to-one. one-to-many. Company has many User
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:49
@starmucks I've updated the entities.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
Well now. Table Company in one database and table Device in another.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:02
|
show 2 more comments
You can try to set your EF model like this:
Companies table:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
}
Devices table:
[Table("Devices")]
public class Device
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
public DbSet<Company> Companies { get; set; }
public DbSet<Device> Devices { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
I've added Devices
as a list in Company
class, then overriding the FK in the method OnModelCreating
.
Once you delete an item in table Company
, all items with the same Id
in table Devices
(comparing to CompanyID
) will be delted automatically.
Since we use the 2 properties [Table]
and [Key]
to define table name and the primary key. So in the OnModelCreating
, you can ignore to define the name, PK, FK of table Device
.
Company has many User
In this case:
User class:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public int CompanyId { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
}
Company class:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
public ICollection<User> Users { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Users)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
You can try to set your EF model like this:
Companies table:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
}
Devices table:
[Table("Devices")]
public class Device
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
public int CompanyID { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
public DbSet<Company> Companies { get; set; }
public DbSet<Device> Devices { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
I've added Devices
as a list in Company
class, then overriding the FK in the method OnModelCreating
.
Once you delete an item in table Company
, all items with the same Id
in table Devices
(comparing to CompanyID
) will be delted automatically.
Since we use the 2 properties [Table]
and [Key]
to define table name and the primary key. So in the OnModelCreating
, you can ignore to define the name, PK, FK of table Device
.
Company has many User
In this case:
User class:
public class User : IdentityUser
{
public int CompanyId { get; set; }
public Company Company { get; set; }
}
Company class:
[Table("Companies")]
public class Company
{
[Key]
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Device> Devices { get; set; }
public ICollection<User> Users { get; set; }
}
ApplicationDbContext class:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
builder.Entity<Company>(buildAction =>
{
buildAction.ToTable("Companies");
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Devices)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
buildAction.HasMany(x => x.Users)
.WithOne(x => x.Company)
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
};
}
edited Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
answered Nov 20 '18 at 3:47
FooFoo
1
1
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:01
@starmucksCompany
table cannot have relationshop one-to-one withUser
table since it has relationshipmany-to-one
withDevice
table. You can remove it.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 4:17
Not one-to-one. one-to-many. Company has many User
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:49
@starmucks I've updated the entities.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
Well now. Table Company in one database and table Device in another.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:02
|
show 2 more comments
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:01
@starmucksCompany
table cannot have relationshop one-to-one withUser
table since it has relationshipmany-to-one
withDevice
table. You can remove it.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 4:17
Not one-to-one. one-to-many. Company has many User
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:49
@starmucks I've updated the entities.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
Well now. Table Company in one database and table Device in another.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:02
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:01
The problem is that the Device table (the first database) and the User table (the second database) refer to the Company table (the second database) and so EF creates the Company table in both databases.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:01
@starmucks
Company
table cannot have relationshop one-to-one with User
table since it has relationship many-to-one
with Device
table. You can remove it.– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 4:17
@starmucks
Company
table cannot have relationshop one-to-one with User
table since it has relationship many-to-one
with Device
table. You can remove it.– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 4:17
Not one-to-one. one-to-many. Company has many User
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:49
Not one-to-one. one-to-many. Company has many User
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 4:49
@starmucks I've updated the entities.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
@starmucks I've updated the entities.
– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 5:01
Well now. Table Company in one database and table Device in another.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:02
Well now. Table Company in one database and table Device in another.
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 6:02
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385816%2flink-models-from-different-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
So,
Company
has manyDevice
, andDevice
has oneCompany
?– Foo
Nov 20 '18 at 3:36
Yes, you understood correctly
– starmucks
Nov 20 '18 at 3:38
1
How can I tell ... You can't. One context = one database.
– Gert Arnold
Nov 20 '18 at 21:25
Please read other answers and comments
– starmucks
Nov 21 '18 at 10:36