JAVERS: Response issue when query has .withNewObjectChanges(true)
I am not sure if this is an issue or if I am doing something wrong. I noticed on application startup, when you query for changes with
.withNewObjectChanges(true)
the response is empty list of new objects, but if you call commit and then query for changes again, the response is complete.
Response on application startup:
Changes:
Commit 9.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:31:13 : * new object: USER/5
Commit 8.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:30:30 : * new object: USER/4
Commit 6.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 16:05:22 : * new object: USER/3
Commit 4.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:53:23 : * new object: USER/2
Commit 1.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:01:03 : * new object: USER/1
javers
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
add a comment |
I am not sure if this is an issue or if I am doing something wrong. I noticed on application startup, when you query for changes with
.withNewObjectChanges(true)
the response is empty list of new objects, but if you call commit and then query for changes again, the response is complete.
Response on application startup:
Changes:
Commit 9.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:31:13 : * new object: USER/5
Commit 8.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:30:30 : * new object: USER/4
Commit 6.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 16:05:22 : * new object: USER/3
Commit 4.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:53:23 : * new object: USER/2
Commit 1.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:01:03 : * new object: USER/1
javers
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
could you reproduce this case as a failing test case? see how we write this kind of cases - github.com/javers/javers/tree/master/javers-core/src/test/…
– Bartek Walacik
Nov 19 '18 at 6:56
Is it required to have the test case in Groovy?
– Acapulco
Dec 5 '18 at 4:23
add a comment |
I am not sure if this is an issue or if I am doing something wrong. I noticed on application startup, when you query for changes with
.withNewObjectChanges(true)
the response is empty list of new objects, but if you call commit and then query for changes again, the response is complete.
Response on application startup:
Changes:
Commit 9.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:31:13 : * new object: USER/5
Commit 8.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:30:30 : * new object: USER/4
Commit 6.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 16:05:22 : * new object: USER/3
Commit 4.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:53:23 : * new object: USER/2
Commit 1.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:01:03 : * new object: USER/1
javers
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
I am not sure if this is an issue or if I am doing something wrong. I noticed on application startup, when you query for changes with
.withNewObjectChanges(true)
the response is empty list of new objects, but if you call commit and then query for changes again, the response is complete.
Response on application startup:
Changes:
Commit 9.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:31:13 : * new object: USER/5
Commit 8.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 17:30:30 : * new object: USER/4
Commit 6.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 16:05:22 : * new object: USER/3
Commit 4.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:53:23 : * new object: USER/2
Commit 1.0 done by john at 15 Nov 2018, 15:01:03 : * new object: USER/1
javers
javers
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
asked Nov 16 '18 at 2:12
jpvjpv
1
1
could you reproduce this case as a failing test case? see how we write this kind of cases - github.com/javers/javers/tree/master/javers-core/src/test/…
– Bartek Walacik
Nov 19 '18 at 6:56
Is it required to have the test case in Groovy?
– Acapulco
Dec 5 '18 at 4:23
add a comment |
could you reproduce this case as a failing test case? see how we write this kind of cases - github.com/javers/javers/tree/master/javers-core/src/test/…
– Bartek Walacik
Nov 19 '18 at 6:56
Is it required to have the test case in Groovy?
– Acapulco
Dec 5 '18 at 4:23
could you reproduce this case as a failing test case? see how we write this kind of cases - github.com/javers/javers/tree/master/javers-core/src/test/…
– Bartek Walacik
Nov 19 '18 at 6:56
could you reproduce this case as a failing test case? see how we write this kind of cases - github.com/javers/javers/tree/master/javers-core/src/test/…
– Bartek Walacik
Nov 19 '18 at 6:56
Is it required to have the test case in Groovy?
– Acapulco
Dec 5 '18 at 4:23
Is it required to have the test case in Groovy?
– Acapulco
Dec 5 '18 at 4:23
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53330489%2fjavers-response-issue-when-query-has-withnewobjectchangestrue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53330489%2fjavers-response-issue-when-query-has-withnewobjectchangestrue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
could you reproduce this case as a failing test case? see how we write this kind of cases - github.com/javers/javers/tree/master/javers-core/src/test/…
– Bartek Walacik
Nov 19 '18 at 6:56
Is it required to have the test case in Groovy?
– Acapulco
Dec 5 '18 at 4:23