calling function for all elements in sequence one at a time xquery
I am trying to call a function for every element in a sequence but I either get only one of the elements or all of them at the same time.
My sequence has the form $y = ("N","K")and I want to run my function with first the letter N and then the letter K.
My code is:
for $nr in 1 to count($y)
let $n := ($y)[$nr]
return local:checking($n)
But that loop never ends... which I think is because the $n that i send to the function is both "N" and "K".
Any ideas?
function for-loop xquery sequence
add a comment |
I am trying to call a function for every element in a sequence but I either get only one of the elements or all of them at the same time.
My sequence has the form $y = ("N","K")and I want to run my function with first the letter N and then the letter K.
My code is:
for $nr in 1 to count($y)
let $n := ($y)[$nr]
return local:checking($n)
But that loop never ends... which I think is because the $n that i send to the function is both "N" and "K".
Any ideas?
function for-loop xquery sequence
1
Your code looks fine, though it could be simplified tofor $yy in $y return local:checking($yy)
. Whatever is wrong, it's not the code you have shown us.
– Michael Kay
Nov 18 '18 at 19:13
With XQuery 3 you can also shorten that to$y ! local:checking(.)
, see the simplemap
operator w3.org/TR/xquery-31/#id-map-operator.
– Martin Honnen
Nov 19 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
I am trying to call a function for every element in a sequence but I either get only one of the elements or all of them at the same time.
My sequence has the form $y = ("N","K")and I want to run my function with first the letter N and then the letter K.
My code is:
for $nr in 1 to count($y)
let $n := ($y)[$nr]
return local:checking($n)
But that loop never ends... which I think is because the $n that i send to the function is both "N" and "K".
Any ideas?
function for-loop xquery sequence
I am trying to call a function for every element in a sequence but I either get only one of the elements or all of them at the same time.
My sequence has the form $y = ("N","K")and I want to run my function with first the letter N and then the letter K.
My code is:
for $nr in 1 to count($y)
let $n := ($y)[$nr]
return local:checking($n)
But that loop never ends... which I think is because the $n that i send to the function is both "N" and "K".
Any ideas?
function for-loop xquery sequence
function for-loop xquery sequence
edited Nov 18 '18 at 14:36
Sara
asked Nov 18 '18 at 9:16
SaraSara
223
223
1
Your code looks fine, though it could be simplified tofor $yy in $y return local:checking($yy)
. Whatever is wrong, it's not the code you have shown us.
– Michael Kay
Nov 18 '18 at 19:13
With XQuery 3 you can also shorten that to$y ! local:checking(.)
, see the simplemap
operator w3.org/TR/xquery-31/#id-map-operator.
– Martin Honnen
Nov 19 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
1
Your code looks fine, though it could be simplified tofor $yy in $y return local:checking($yy)
. Whatever is wrong, it's not the code you have shown us.
– Michael Kay
Nov 18 '18 at 19:13
With XQuery 3 you can also shorten that to$y ! local:checking(.)
, see the simplemap
operator w3.org/TR/xquery-31/#id-map-operator.
– Martin Honnen
Nov 19 '18 at 12:34
1
1
Your code looks fine, though it could be simplified to
for $yy in $y return local:checking($yy)
. Whatever is wrong, it's not the code you have shown us.– Michael Kay
Nov 18 '18 at 19:13
Your code looks fine, though it could be simplified to
for $yy in $y return local:checking($yy)
. Whatever is wrong, it's not the code you have shown us.– Michael Kay
Nov 18 '18 at 19:13
With XQuery 3 you can also shorten that to
$y ! local:checking(.)
, see the simple map
operator w3.org/TR/xquery-31/#id-map-operator.– Martin Honnen
Nov 19 '18 at 12:34
With XQuery 3 you can also shorten that to
$y ! local:checking(.)
, see the simple map
operator w3.org/TR/xquery-31/#id-map-operator.– Martin Honnen
Nov 19 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53359374%2fcalling-function-for-all-elements-in-sequence-one-at-a-time-xquery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53359374%2fcalling-function-for-all-elements-in-sequence-one-at-a-time-xquery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Your code looks fine, though it could be simplified to
for $yy in $y return local:checking($yy)
. Whatever is wrong, it's not the code you have shown us.– Michael Kay
Nov 18 '18 at 19:13
With XQuery 3 you can also shorten that to
$y ! local:checking(.)
, see the simplemap
operator w3.org/TR/xquery-31/#id-map-operator.– Martin Honnen
Nov 19 '18 at 12:34