What is the best solution for multi lingual static Web site with GUI?
I'm looking for a Static Site Generator with GUI i.e. a static version of Wordpress.
After some searches on the Web, I found many solutions (Netlify CMS, Lektor, Grav and Publii).
- Which is the best solution in order to obtain multilingual Web site via a plugin or without a lot of coding as with Jekyll or other solution?
- In theory, all the previous solutions should support Gitlab or GitHub page. Which one is the best?
- Which one do you suggest to use?
Thank you.
web content-management-system
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
add a comment |
I'm looking for a Static Site Generator with GUI i.e. a static version of Wordpress.
After some searches on the Web, I found many solutions (Netlify CMS, Lektor, Grav and Publii).
- Which is the best solution in order to obtain multilingual Web site via a plugin or without a lot of coding as with Jekyll or other solution?
- In theory, all the previous solutions should support Gitlab or GitHub page. Which one is the best?
- Which one do you suggest to use?
Thank you.
web content-management-system
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
add a comment |
I'm looking for a Static Site Generator with GUI i.e. a static version of Wordpress.
After some searches on the Web, I found many solutions (Netlify CMS, Lektor, Grav and Publii).
- Which is the best solution in order to obtain multilingual Web site via a plugin or without a lot of coding as with Jekyll or other solution?
- In theory, all the previous solutions should support Gitlab or GitHub page. Which one is the best?
- Which one do you suggest to use?
Thank you.
web content-management-system
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
I'm looking for a Static Site Generator with GUI i.e. a static version of Wordpress.
After some searches on the Web, I found many solutions (Netlify CMS, Lektor, Grav and Publii).
- Which is the best solution in order to obtain multilingual Web site via a plugin or without a lot of coding as with Jekyll or other solution?
- In theory, all the previous solutions should support Gitlab or GitHub page. Which one is the best?
- Which one do you suggest to use?
Thank you.
web content-management-system
web content-management-system
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
edited Nov 21 '18 at 10:55
erotavlas
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
10811
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I would recommend looking at GatsbyJS for Static Site and integrating Contentful API to retrieve your content.
Contentful is a nice CMS service that supports localization.
Then you can easily deploy all to Netlify/Now.sh
Tutorial:
https://www.contentful.com/r/knowledgebase/gatsbyjs-and-contentful-in-five-minutes/
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
add a comment |
After several trials and testing, my final thoughts are the following:
- Grav it is the ideal successor of Wordpress. It is faster and provides multilingual support and a lot of plugin. Unfortunately, the plugin that provides static Web site generation does not work
- Lektor it is very simple to use. It provides multilingual support and static Web site generation. However, it is too spartan and in my opinion requires further improvement
- Publii it is the most promising (app written in javascript-electron). It works entirely locally, easy to install, easy to use and provides static Web site generation with deploy to gitlab. It lacks of multilingual support (expected next year) and it has few themes.
- Netlify it works online directly on gitlab. It supports both hugo and gatsby framework and static Web site generation. I tried a theme for the first that provide multilingual, but it is not very user friendly.
- Jekyll Now it is a faster way to use Jekyll as static Web site generation directly into gitlab. Unfortunately, it is not simple to use multilingual support and the "GUI" is not user friendly compared to the others.
In conclusion, my suggestion is to use Publii a new way to static Web site generation.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53410509%2fwhat-is-the-best-solution-for-multi-lingual-static-web-site-with-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I would recommend looking at GatsbyJS for Static Site and integrating Contentful API to retrieve your content.
Contentful is a nice CMS service that supports localization.
Then you can easily deploy all to Netlify/Now.sh
Tutorial:
https://www.contentful.com/r/knowledgebase/gatsbyjs-and-contentful-in-five-minutes/
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
add a comment |
I would recommend looking at GatsbyJS for Static Site and integrating Contentful API to retrieve your content.
Contentful is a nice CMS service that supports localization.
Then you can easily deploy all to Netlify/Now.sh
Tutorial:
https://www.contentful.com/r/knowledgebase/gatsbyjs-and-contentful-in-five-minutes/
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
add a comment |
I would recommend looking at GatsbyJS for Static Site and integrating Contentful API to retrieve your content.
Contentful is a nice CMS service that supports localization.
Then you can easily deploy all to Netlify/Now.sh
Tutorial:
https://www.contentful.com/r/knowledgebase/gatsbyjs-and-contentful-in-five-minutes/
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
I would recommend looking at GatsbyJS for Static Site and integrating Contentful API to retrieve your content.
Contentful is a nice CMS service that supports localization.
Then you can easily deploy all to Netlify/Now.sh
Tutorial:
https://www.contentful.com/r/knowledgebase/gatsbyjs-and-contentful-in-five-minutes/
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:20
ShanoShano
57110
57110
add a comment |
add a comment |
After several trials and testing, my final thoughts are the following:
- Grav it is the ideal successor of Wordpress. It is faster and provides multilingual support and a lot of plugin. Unfortunately, the plugin that provides static Web site generation does not work
- Lektor it is very simple to use. It provides multilingual support and static Web site generation. However, it is too spartan and in my opinion requires further improvement
- Publii it is the most promising (app written in javascript-electron). It works entirely locally, easy to install, easy to use and provides static Web site generation with deploy to gitlab. It lacks of multilingual support (expected next year) and it has few themes.
- Netlify it works online directly on gitlab. It supports both hugo and gatsby framework and static Web site generation. I tried a theme for the first that provide multilingual, but it is not very user friendly.
- Jekyll Now it is a faster way to use Jekyll as static Web site generation directly into gitlab. Unfortunately, it is not simple to use multilingual support and the "GUI" is not user friendly compared to the others.
In conclusion, my suggestion is to use Publii a new way to static Web site generation.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
add a comment |
After several trials and testing, my final thoughts are the following:
- Grav it is the ideal successor of Wordpress. It is faster and provides multilingual support and a lot of plugin. Unfortunately, the plugin that provides static Web site generation does not work
- Lektor it is very simple to use. It provides multilingual support and static Web site generation. However, it is too spartan and in my opinion requires further improvement
- Publii it is the most promising (app written in javascript-electron). It works entirely locally, easy to install, easy to use and provides static Web site generation with deploy to gitlab. It lacks of multilingual support (expected next year) and it has few themes.
- Netlify it works online directly on gitlab. It supports both hugo and gatsby framework and static Web site generation. I tried a theme for the first that provide multilingual, but it is not very user friendly.
- Jekyll Now it is a faster way to use Jekyll as static Web site generation directly into gitlab. Unfortunately, it is not simple to use multilingual support and the "GUI" is not user friendly compared to the others.
In conclusion, my suggestion is to use Publii a new way to static Web site generation.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
add a comment |
After several trials and testing, my final thoughts are the following:
- Grav it is the ideal successor of Wordpress. It is faster and provides multilingual support and a lot of plugin. Unfortunately, the plugin that provides static Web site generation does not work
- Lektor it is very simple to use. It provides multilingual support and static Web site generation. However, it is too spartan and in my opinion requires further improvement
- Publii it is the most promising (app written in javascript-electron). It works entirely locally, easy to install, easy to use and provides static Web site generation with deploy to gitlab. It lacks of multilingual support (expected next year) and it has few themes.
- Netlify it works online directly on gitlab. It supports both hugo and gatsby framework and static Web site generation. I tried a theme for the first that provide multilingual, but it is not very user friendly.
- Jekyll Now it is a faster way to use Jekyll as static Web site generation directly into gitlab. Unfortunately, it is not simple to use multilingual support and the "GUI" is not user friendly compared to the others.
In conclusion, my suggestion is to use Publii a new way to static Web site generation.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
After several trials and testing, my final thoughts are the following:
- Grav it is the ideal successor of Wordpress. It is faster and provides multilingual support and a lot of plugin. Unfortunately, the plugin that provides static Web site generation does not work
- Lektor it is very simple to use. It provides multilingual support and static Web site generation. However, it is too spartan and in my opinion requires further improvement
- Publii it is the most promising (app written in javascript-electron). It works entirely locally, easy to install, easy to use and provides static Web site generation with deploy to gitlab. It lacks of multilingual support (expected next year) and it has few themes.
- Netlify it works online directly on gitlab. It supports both hugo and gatsby framework and static Web site generation. I tried a theme for the first that provide multilingual, but it is not very user friendly.
- Jekyll Now it is a faster way to use Jekyll as static Web site generation directly into gitlab. Unfortunately, it is not simple to use multilingual support and the "GUI" is not user friendly compared to the others.
In conclusion, my suggestion is to use Publii a new way to static Web site generation.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
answered Nov 28 '18 at 10:51
erotavlaserotavlas
10811
10811
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53410509%2fwhat-is-the-best-solution-for-multi-lingual-static-web-site-with-gui%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
