Perl: not an array reference while calculating array size
I'm trying to untangle some legacy code where an operation is done on $value iff its size is more than x (where x is a hard coded int). This is what it currently looks like:
if (scalar(@{$value}) > x) {
...
}
As with all legacy code, this $value can be almost anything (hash, scalar, array) although it's expected to be an array of different objects. This code currently fails with a "Not an ARRAY reference" around 5% of the time and I'm trying to figure out what's the possible $value that can break it.
I assumed it might fail if the $value is undefined so I even gave it a || but to no avail (same error):
if (scalar(@{$value || }) > x) {
...
}
I'm also trying to figure out why I need the @{}? My understanding is that that evaluates $value in a list context so that scalar can later ensure I get the size. Does that make the code more robust or can I just directly use scalar $value? Does @{} even do what I think it does?
I'm using perl 5.8.
perl perl5.8
add a comment |
I'm trying to untangle some legacy code where an operation is done on $value iff its size is more than x (where x is a hard coded int). This is what it currently looks like:
if (scalar(@{$value}) > x) {
...
}
As with all legacy code, this $value can be almost anything (hash, scalar, array) although it's expected to be an array of different objects. This code currently fails with a "Not an ARRAY reference" around 5% of the time and I'm trying to figure out what's the possible $value that can break it.
I assumed it might fail if the $value is undefined so I even gave it a || but to no avail (same error):
if (scalar(@{$value || }) > x) {
...
}
I'm also trying to figure out why I need the @{}? My understanding is that that evaluates $value in a list context so that scalar can later ensure I get the size. Does that make the code more robust or can I just directly use scalar $value? Does @{} even do what I think it does?
I'm using perl 5.8.
perl perl5.8
2
$value should be a reference to an array. @$value is the array referred to by $value. scalar(@$value) is the number of elements contained in that array. scalar($value) is a just string like "ARRAY(0xce1460)".
– Dave Mitchell
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
"I'm using perl 5.8." Why, oh why? :-(
– Dave Cross
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
@DaveMitchell you, sir, just rewired my brain. Thank you. I had no idea that it'd be a reference. I just assumed perl did some crazy concatenation to get it into a scalar context. Brilliant!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
@DaveCross Two things you don't choose. Your parents and which perl version currently runs your legacy systems :) I appreciate your prayers though hahah
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
add a comment |
I'm trying to untangle some legacy code where an operation is done on $value iff its size is more than x (where x is a hard coded int). This is what it currently looks like:
if (scalar(@{$value}) > x) {
...
}
As with all legacy code, this $value can be almost anything (hash, scalar, array) although it's expected to be an array of different objects. This code currently fails with a "Not an ARRAY reference" around 5% of the time and I'm trying to figure out what's the possible $value that can break it.
I assumed it might fail if the $value is undefined so I even gave it a || but to no avail (same error):
if (scalar(@{$value || }) > x) {
...
}
I'm also trying to figure out why I need the @{}? My understanding is that that evaluates $value in a list context so that scalar can later ensure I get the size. Does that make the code more robust or can I just directly use scalar $value? Does @{} even do what I think it does?
I'm using perl 5.8.
perl perl5.8
I'm trying to untangle some legacy code where an operation is done on $value iff its size is more than x (where x is a hard coded int). This is what it currently looks like:
if (scalar(@{$value}) > x) {
...
}
As with all legacy code, this $value can be almost anything (hash, scalar, array) although it's expected to be an array of different objects. This code currently fails with a "Not an ARRAY reference" around 5% of the time and I'm trying to figure out what's the possible $value that can break it.
I assumed it might fail if the $value is undefined so I even gave it a || but to no avail (same error):
if (scalar(@{$value || }) > x) {
...
}
I'm also trying to figure out why I need the @{}? My understanding is that that evaluates $value in a list context so that scalar can later ensure I get the size. Does that make the code more robust or can I just directly use scalar $value? Does @{} even do what I think it does?
I'm using perl 5.8.
perl perl5.8
perl perl5.8
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:10
Abdo SalemAbdo Salem
167
167
2
$value should be a reference to an array. @$value is the array referred to by $value. scalar(@$value) is the number of elements contained in that array. scalar($value) is a just string like "ARRAY(0xce1460)".
– Dave Mitchell
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
"I'm using perl 5.8." Why, oh why? :-(
– Dave Cross
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
@DaveMitchell you, sir, just rewired my brain. Thank you. I had no idea that it'd be a reference. I just assumed perl did some crazy concatenation to get it into a scalar context. Brilliant!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
@DaveCross Two things you don't choose. Your parents and which perl version currently runs your legacy systems :) I appreciate your prayers though hahah
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
add a comment |
2
$value should be a reference to an array. @$value is the array referred to by $value. scalar(@$value) is the number of elements contained in that array. scalar($value) is a just string like "ARRAY(0xce1460)".
– Dave Mitchell
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
"I'm using perl 5.8." Why, oh why? :-(
– Dave Cross
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
@DaveMitchell you, sir, just rewired my brain. Thank you. I had no idea that it'd be a reference. I just assumed perl did some crazy concatenation to get it into a scalar context. Brilliant!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
@DaveCross Two things you don't choose. Your parents and which perl version currently runs your legacy systems :) I appreciate your prayers though hahah
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
2
2
$value should be a reference to an array. @$value is the array referred to by $value. scalar(@$value) is the number of elements contained in that array. scalar($value) is a just string like "ARRAY(0xce1460)".
– Dave Mitchell
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
$value should be a reference to an array. @$value is the array referred to by $value. scalar(@$value) is the number of elements contained in that array. scalar($value) is a just string like "ARRAY(0xce1460)".
– Dave Mitchell
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
"I'm using perl 5.8." Why, oh why? :-(
– Dave Cross
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
"I'm using perl 5.8." Why, oh why? :-(
– Dave Cross
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
@DaveMitchell you, sir, just rewired my brain. Thank you. I had no idea that it'd be a reference. I just assumed perl did some crazy concatenation to get it into a scalar context. Brilliant!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
@DaveMitchell you, sir, just rewired my brain. Thank you. I had no idea that it'd be a reference. I just assumed perl did some crazy concatenation to get it into a scalar context. Brilliant!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
@DaveCross Two things you don't choose. Your parents and which perl version currently runs your legacy systems :) I appreciate your prayers though hahah
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
@DaveCross Two things you don't choose. Your parents and which perl version currently runs your legacy systems :) I appreciate your prayers though hahah
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You have two questions there. I'll answer them separately:
Question: What is @{}
doing?
When you write @{$thing}
, you are dereferencing $thing
into an array. As you have noticed, this only works when $thing
is an array reference. (Other dereferencing operators are %{$thing}
for hash references and ${$thing}
for scalar references.)
You do need a dereferencing operator there. Consider this:
my $arrayref = [ 'Alice', 'Bob', 'Charlie' ];
my $hashref = { x => 4, y => 5 };
my $string = "Hello, world";
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
print "thing --> ", $thing, "n";
print "scalar(thing) --> ", scalar($thing), "n";
}
Output:
thing --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
scalar(thing) --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
thing --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
scalar(thing) --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
thing --> Hello, world
scalar(thing) --> Hello, world
There's no point in forcing $thing
to a scalar context. It's already a scalar!
Question: How can I safely dereference a scalar?
If you don't know what kind of reference is contained in $thing
, you can use Ref::Util
to inspect it:
use Ref::Util qw( is_arrayref is_hashref );
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
if (is_arrayref($thing)) {
print "array: thing --> ", @{$thing}, "n";
print "array: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(@{$thing}), "n";
}
elsif (is_hashref($thing)) {
print "hash: thing --> ", %{$thing}, "n";
print "hash: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(%{$thing}), "n";
}
else
{
print "else: thing --> ", $thing, "n";
}
}
Output:
array: thing --> AliceBobCharlie
array: scalar(thing) --> 3
hash: thing --> y5x4
hash: scalar(thing) --> 2/8
else: thing --> Hello, world
Observations:
- The arrayref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of its elements.
print
outputs every element with no separators:AliceBobCharlie
- The arrayref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes the number of elements:
3
- The hashref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of keys and values.
print
outputs every pair with no separators:y5x4
- The hashref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes a string where the first number is the number of keys and the second number is the number of buckets in the hashtable:
2/8
Beautifully explained. Thank you! Reading Dave Mitchell's comment above, it seems you could also do scalar(@$value) without the {}. Does that mean that the {} is just like an anonymous subroutine? Or does it serve some other functionality?
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:40
1
@AbdoSalem@$value
and@{$value}
are exactly the same... it's just syntactic sugar. :) The braces are useful (sometimes needed) when you have to disambiguate access to an arrayref that's nested inside other objects:@{ $thing->{foo}->{bar} }
– Pedro LM
Nov 16 '18 at 13:52
Brilliant! Really appreciate your detailed answer! :)
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 14:03
2
@AbdoSalem perlmonks.org/?node=References+quick+reference
– ysth
Nov 16 '18 at 15:42
@ysth that's a mini treasure right there. Thank you!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 16:31
|
show 1 more comment
The following code will solve:
if ($value and ref $value eq 'ARRAY' and @$value > x) { ... }
Basically you can de-reference to ARRAY only if it's a ARRAY ref. So making sure it's a ARRAY ref is must, so that it won't fail for HASH etc
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337646%2fperl-not-an-array-reference-while-calculating-array-size%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have two questions there. I'll answer them separately:
Question: What is @{}
doing?
When you write @{$thing}
, you are dereferencing $thing
into an array. As you have noticed, this only works when $thing
is an array reference. (Other dereferencing operators are %{$thing}
for hash references and ${$thing}
for scalar references.)
You do need a dereferencing operator there. Consider this:
my $arrayref = [ 'Alice', 'Bob', 'Charlie' ];
my $hashref = { x => 4, y => 5 };
my $string = "Hello, world";
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
print "thing --> ", $thing, "n";
print "scalar(thing) --> ", scalar($thing), "n";
}
Output:
thing --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
scalar(thing) --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
thing --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
scalar(thing) --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
thing --> Hello, world
scalar(thing) --> Hello, world
There's no point in forcing $thing
to a scalar context. It's already a scalar!
Question: How can I safely dereference a scalar?
If you don't know what kind of reference is contained in $thing
, you can use Ref::Util
to inspect it:
use Ref::Util qw( is_arrayref is_hashref );
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
if (is_arrayref($thing)) {
print "array: thing --> ", @{$thing}, "n";
print "array: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(@{$thing}), "n";
}
elsif (is_hashref($thing)) {
print "hash: thing --> ", %{$thing}, "n";
print "hash: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(%{$thing}), "n";
}
else
{
print "else: thing --> ", $thing, "n";
}
}
Output:
array: thing --> AliceBobCharlie
array: scalar(thing) --> 3
hash: thing --> y5x4
hash: scalar(thing) --> 2/8
else: thing --> Hello, world
Observations:
- The arrayref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of its elements.
print
outputs every element with no separators:AliceBobCharlie
- The arrayref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes the number of elements:
3
- The hashref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of keys and values.
print
outputs every pair with no separators:y5x4
- The hashref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes a string where the first number is the number of keys and the second number is the number of buckets in the hashtable:
2/8
Beautifully explained. Thank you! Reading Dave Mitchell's comment above, it seems you could also do scalar(@$value) without the {}. Does that mean that the {} is just like an anonymous subroutine? Or does it serve some other functionality?
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:40
1
@AbdoSalem@$value
and@{$value}
are exactly the same... it's just syntactic sugar. :) The braces are useful (sometimes needed) when you have to disambiguate access to an arrayref that's nested inside other objects:@{ $thing->{foo}->{bar} }
– Pedro LM
Nov 16 '18 at 13:52
Brilliant! Really appreciate your detailed answer! :)
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 14:03
2
@AbdoSalem perlmonks.org/?node=References+quick+reference
– ysth
Nov 16 '18 at 15:42
@ysth that's a mini treasure right there. Thank you!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 16:31
|
show 1 more comment
You have two questions there. I'll answer them separately:
Question: What is @{}
doing?
When you write @{$thing}
, you are dereferencing $thing
into an array. As you have noticed, this only works when $thing
is an array reference. (Other dereferencing operators are %{$thing}
for hash references and ${$thing}
for scalar references.)
You do need a dereferencing operator there. Consider this:
my $arrayref = [ 'Alice', 'Bob', 'Charlie' ];
my $hashref = { x => 4, y => 5 };
my $string = "Hello, world";
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
print "thing --> ", $thing, "n";
print "scalar(thing) --> ", scalar($thing), "n";
}
Output:
thing --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
scalar(thing) --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
thing --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
scalar(thing) --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
thing --> Hello, world
scalar(thing) --> Hello, world
There's no point in forcing $thing
to a scalar context. It's already a scalar!
Question: How can I safely dereference a scalar?
If you don't know what kind of reference is contained in $thing
, you can use Ref::Util
to inspect it:
use Ref::Util qw( is_arrayref is_hashref );
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
if (is_arrayref($thing)) {
print "array: thing --> ", @{$thing}, "n";
print "array: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(@{$thing}), "n";
}
elsif (is_hashref($thing)) {
print "hash: thing --> ", %{$thing}, "n";
print "hash: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(%{$thing}), "n";
}
else
{
print "else: thing --> ", $thing, "n";
}
}
Output:
array: thing --> AliceBobCharlie
array: scalar(thing) --> 3
hash: thing --> y5x4
hash: scalar(thing) --> 2/8
else: thing --> Hello, world
Observations:
- The arrayref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of its elements.
print
outputs every element with no separators:AliceBobCharlie
- The arrayref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes the number of elements:
3
- The hashref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of keys and values.
print
outputs every pair with no separators:y5x4
- The hashref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes a string where the first number is the number of keys and the second number is the number of buckets in the hashtable:
2/8
Beautifully explained. Thank you! Reading Dave Mitchell's comment above, it seems you could also do scalar(@$value) without the {}. Does that mean that the {} is just like an anonymous subroutine? Or does it serve some other functionality?
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:40
1
@AbdoSalem@$value
and@{$value}
are exactly the same... it's just syntactic sugar. :) The braces are useful (sometimes needed) when you have to disambiguate access to an arrayref that's nested inside other objects:@{ $thing->{foo}->{bar} }
– Pedro LM
Nov 16 '18 at 13:52
Brilliant! Really appreciate your detailed answer! :)
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 14:03
2
@AbdoSalem perlmonks.org/?node=References+quick+reference
– ysth
Nov 16 '18 at 15:42
@ysth that's a mini treasure right there. Thank you!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 16:31
|
show 1 more comment
You have two questions there. I'll answer them separately:
Question: What is @{}
doing?
When you write @{$thing}
, you are dereferencing $thing
into an array. As you have noticed, this only works when $thing
is an array reference. (Other dereferencing operators are %{$thing}
for hash references and ${$thing}
for scalar references.)
You do need a dereferencing operator there. Consider this:
my $arrayref = [ 'Alice', 'Bob', 'Charlie' ];
my $hashref = { x => 4, y => 5 };
my $string = "Hello, world";
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
print "thing --> ", $thing, "n";
print "scalar(thing) --> ", scalar($thing), "n";
}
Output:
thing --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
scalar(thing) --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
thing --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
scalar(thing) --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
thing --> Hello, world
scalar(thing) --> Hello, world
There's no point in forcing $thing
to a scalar context. It's already a scalar!
Question: How can I safely dereference a scalar?
If you don't know what kind of reference is contained in $thing
, you can use Ref::Util
to inspect it:
use Ref::Util qw( is_arrayref is_hashref );
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
if (is_arrayref($thing)) {
print "array: thing --> ", @{$thing}, "n";
print "array: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(@{$thing}), "n";
}
elsif (is_hashref($thing)) {
print "hash: thing --> ", %{$thing}, "n";
print "hash: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(%{$thing}), "n";
}
else
{
print "else: thing --> ", $thing, "n";
}
}
Output:
array: thing --> AliceBobCharlie
array: scalar(thing) --> 3
hash: thing --> y5x4
hash: scalar(thing) --> 2/8
else: thing --> Hello, world
Observations:
- The arrayref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of its elements.
print
outputs every element with no separators:AliceBobCharlie
- The arrayref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes the number of elements:
3
- The hashref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of keys and values.
print
outputs every pair with no separators:y5x4
- The hashref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes a string where the first number is the number of keys and the second number is the number of buckets in the hashtable:
2/8
You have two questions there. I'll answer them separately:
Question: What is @{}
doing?
When you write @{$thing}
, you are dereferencing $thing
into an array. As you have noticed, this only works when $thing
is an array reference. (Other dereferencing operators are %{$thing}
for hash references and ${$thing}
for scalar references.)
You do need a dereferencing operator there. Consider this:
my $arrayref = [ 'Alice', 'Bob', 'Charlie' ];
my $hashref = { x => 4, y => 5 };
my $string = "Hello, world";
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
print "thing --> ", $thing, "n";
print "scalar(thing) --> ", scalar($thing), "n";
}
Output:
thing --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
scalar(thing) --> ARRAY(0x7f3b8054e468)
thing --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
scalar(thing) --> HASH(0x7f3b80560678)
thing --> Hello, world
scalar(thing) --> Hello, world
There's no point in forcing $thing
to a scalar context. It's already a scalar!
Question: How can I safely dereference a scalar?
If you don't know what kind of reference is contained in $thing
, you can use Ref::Util
to inspect it:
use Ref::Util qw( is_arrayref is_hashref );
for my $thing ($arrayref, $hashref, $string) {
if (is_arrayref($thing)) {
print "array: thing --> ", @{$thing}, "n";
print "array: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(@{$thing}), "n";
}
elsif (is_hashref($thing)) {
print "hash: thing --> ", %{$thing}, "n";
print "hash: scalar(thing) --> ", scalar(%{$thing}), "n";
}
else
{
print "else: thing --> ", $thing, "n";
}
}
Output:
array: thing --> AliceBobCharlie
array: scalar(thing) --> 3
hash: thing --> y5x4
hash: scalar(thing) --> 2/8
else: thing --> Hello, world
Observations:
- The arrayref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of its elements.
print
outputs every element with no separators:AliceBobCharlie
- The arrayref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes the number of elements:
3
- The hashref, when dereferenced, becomes a list of keys and values.
print
outputs every pair with no separators:y5x4
- The hashref, when dereferenced and forced into a scalar, becomes a string where the first number is the number of keys and the second number is the number of buckets in the hashtable:
2/8
edited Nov 16 '18 at 13:08
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:47
Pedro LMPedro LM
45727
45727
Beautifully explained. Thank you! Reading Dave Mitchell's comment above, it seems you could also do scalar(@$value) without the {}. Does that mean that the {} is just like an anonymous subroutine? Or does it serve some other functionality?
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:40
1
@AbdoSalem@$value
and@{$value}
are exactly the same... it's just syntactic sugar. :) The braces are useful (sometimes needed) when you have to disambiguate access to an arrayref that's nested inside other objects:@{ $thing->{foo}->{bar} }
– Pedro LM
Nov 16 '18 at 13:52
Brilliant! Really appreciate your detailed answer! :)
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 14:03
2
@AbdoSalem perlmonks.org/?node=References+quick+reference
– ysth
Nov 16 '18 at 15:42
@ysth that's a mini treasure right there. Thank you!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 16:31
|
show 1 more comment
Beautifully explained. Thank you! Reading Dave Mitchell's comment above, it seems you could also do scalar(@$value) without the {}. Does that mean that the {} is just like an anonymous subroutine? Or does it serve some other functionality?
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:40
1
@AbdoSalem@$value
and@{$value}
are exactly the same... it's just syntactic sugar. :) The braces are useful (sometimes needed) when you have to disambiguate access to an arrayref that's nested inside other objects:@{ $thing->{foo}->{bar} }
– Pedro LM
Nov 16 '18 at 13:52
Brilliant! Really appreciate your detailed answer! :)
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 14:03
2
@AbdoSalem perlmonks.org/?node=References+quick+reference
– ysth
Nov 16 '18 at 15:42
@ysth that's a mini treasure right there. Thank you!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 16:31
Beautifully explained. Thank you! Reading Dave Mitchell's comment above, it seems you could also do scalar(@$value) without the {}. Does that mean that the {} is just like an anonymous subroutine? Or does it serve some other functionality?
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:40
Beautifully explained. Thank you! Reading Dave Mitchell's comment above, it seems you could also do scalar(@$value) without the {}. Does that mean that the {} is just like an anonymous subroutine? Or does it serve some other functionality?
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:40
1
1
@AbdoSalem
@$value
and @{$value}
are exactly the same... it's just syntactic sugar. :) The braces are useful (sometimes needed) when you have to disambiguate access to an arrayref that's nested inside other objects: @{ $thing->{foo}->{bar} }
– Pedro LM
Nov 16 '18 at 13:52
@AbdoSalem
@$value
and @{$value}
are exactly the same... it's just syntactic sugar. :) The braces are useful (sometimes needed) when you have to disambiguate access to an arrayref that's nested inside other objects: @{ $thing->{foo}->{bar} }
– Pedro LM
Nov 16 '18 at 13:52
Brilliant! Really appreciate your detailed answer! :)
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 14:03
Brilliant! Really appreciate your detailed answer! :)
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 14:03
2
2
@AbdoSalem perlmonks.org/?node=References+quick+reference
– ysth
Nov 16 '18 at 15:42
@AbdoSalem perlmonks.org/?node=References+quick+reference
– ysth
Nov 16 '18 at 15:42
@ysth that's a mini treasure right there. Thank you!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 16:31
@ysth that's a mini treasure right there. Thank you!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 16:31
|
show 1 more comment
The following code will solve:
if ($value and ref $value eq 'ARRAY' and @$value > x) { ... }
Basically you can de-reference to ARRAY only if it's a ARRAY ref. So making sure it's a ARRAY ref is must, so that it won't fail for HASH etc
add a comment |
The following code will solve:
if ($value and ref $value eq 'ARRAY' and @$value > x) { ... }
Basically you can de-reference to ARRAY only if it's a ARRAY ref. So making sure it's a ARRAY ref is must, so that it won't fail for HASH etc
add a comment |
The following code will solve:
if ($value and ref $value eq 'ARRAY' and @$value > x) { ... }
Basically you can de-reference to ARRAY only if it's a ARRAY ref. So making sure it's a ARRAY ref is must, so that it won't fail for HASH etc
The following code will solve:
if ($value and ref $value eq 'ARRAY' and @$value > x) { ... }
Basically you can de-reference to ARRAY only if it's a ARRAY ref. So making sure it's a ARRAY ref is must, so that it won't fail for HASH etc
edited Nov 16 '18 at 12:43
Dave Cross
47.3k33978
47.3k33978
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:36
Sachin DangolSachin Dangol
5918
5918
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337646%2fperl-not-an-array-reference-while-calculating-array-size%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$value should be a reference to an array. @$value is the array referred to by $value. scalar(@$value) is the number of elements contained in that array. scalar($value) is a just string like "ARRAY(0xce1460)".
– Dave Mitchell
Nov 16 '18 at 12:35
"I'm using perl 5.8." Why, oh why? :-(
– Dave Cross
Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
@DaveMitchell you, sir, just rewired my brain. Thank you. I had no idea that it'd be a reference. I just assumed perl did some crazy concatenation to get it into a scalar context. Brilliant!
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29
@DaveCross Two things you don't choose. Your parents and which perl version currently runs your legacy systems :) I appreciate your prayers though hahah
– Abdo Salem
Nov 16 '18 at 13:29