Which library is the simpleHTTP function in?












0















I have installed using cabal install network, HTTP, http-conduit, and http-client. When I run ghc it still throws this error:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Simple'
Perhaps you meant
Network.HTTP.Base (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Stream (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Simple
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


or this error if I use Conduit:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Conduit'
Perhaps you meant Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Conduit (simpleHttp)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


What do in need to install?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Are you really using plain GHC or are you building a project with cabal? Double check you've installed http-conduit. Can you also import modules for http-client (Network.HTTP.Client)?

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:29











  • Using hoogle stackage.org/lts-12.18/hoogle?q=simpleHTTP you can see that simpleHTTP comes from the HTTP library, whereas http-conduit exports simpleHttp, which has a different case.

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:32











  • It won't import Network.HTTP.Client either. I want to use the simpleHttp which conduit exports

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • I am using plain ghc.

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • Try ghc -v -package HTTP SOURCE.hs. Your package paths should be listed.

    – tylerweir
    Nov 18 '18 at 1:02
















0















I have installed using cabal install network, HTTP, http-conduit, and http-client. When I run ghc it still throws this error:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Simple'
Perhaps you meant
Network.HTTP.Base (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Stream (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Simple
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


or this error if I use Conduit:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Conduit'
Perhaps you meant Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Conduit (simpleHttp)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


What do in need to install?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Are you really using plain GHC or are you building a project with cabal? Double check you've installed http-conduit. Can you also import modules for http-client (Network.HTTP.Client)?

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:29











  • Using hoogle stackage.org/lts-12.18/hoogle?q=simpleHTTP you can see that simpleHTTP comes from the HTTP library, whereas http-conduit exports simpleHttp, which has a different case.

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:32











  • It won't import Network.HTTP.Client either. I want to use the simpleHttp which conduit exports

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • I am using plain ghc.

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • Try ghc -v -package HTTP SOURCE.hs. Your package paths should be listed.

    – tylerweir
    Nov 18 '18 at 1:02














0












0








0








I have installed using cabal install network, HTTP, http-conduit, and http-client. When I run ghc it still throws this error:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Simple'
Perhaps you meant
Network.HTTP.Base (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Stream (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Simple
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


or this error if I use Conduit:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Conduit'
Perhaps you meant Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Conduit (simpleHttp)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


What do in need to install?










share|improve this question
















I have installed using cabal install network, HTTP, http-conduit, and http-client. When I run ghc it still throws this error:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Simple'
Perhaps you meant
Network.HTTP.Base (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Network.HTTP.Stream (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Simple
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


or this error if I use Conduit:



testRun.hs:1:1: error:
Could not find module `Network.HTTP.Conduit'
Perhaps you meant Network.HTTP.Cookie (from HTTP-4000.3.12)
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
|
1 | import Network.HTTP.Conduit (simpleHttp)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


What do in need to install?







haskell cabal-install






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 '18 at 19:26







Dick Chany

















asked Nov 17 '18 at 19:18









Dick ChanyDick Chany

13




13








  • 1





    Are you really using plain GHC or are you building a project with cabal? Double check you've installed http-conduit. Can you also import modules for http-client (Network.HTTP.Client)?

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:29











  • Using hoogle stackage.org/lts-12.18/hoogle?q=simpleHTTP you can see that simpleHTTP comes from the HTTP library, whereas http-conduit exports simpleHttp, which has a different case.

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:32











  • It won't import Network.HTTP.Client either. I want to use the simpleHttp which conduit exports

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • I am using plain ghc.

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • Try ghc -v -package HTTP SOURCE.hs. Your package paths should be listed.

    – tylerweir
    Nov 18 '18 at 1:02














  • 1





    Are you really using plain GHC or are you building a project with cabal? Double check you've installed http-conduit. Can you also import modules for http-client (Network.HTTP.Client)?

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:29











  • Using hoogle stackage.org/lts-12.18/hoogle?q=simpleHTTP you can see that simpleHTTP comes from the HTTP library, whereas http-conduit exports simpleHttp, which has a different case.

    – Li-yao Xia
    Nov 17 '18 at 19:32











  • It won't import Network.HTTP.Client either. I want to use the simpleHttp which conduit exports

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • I am using plain ghc.

    – Dick Chany
    Nov 17 '18 at 20:17











  • Try ghc -v -package HTTP SOURCE.hs. Your package paths should be listed.

    – tylerweir
    Nov 18 '18 at 1:02








1




1





Are you really using plain GHC or are you building a project with cabal? Double check you've installed http-conduit. Can you also import modules for http-client (Network.HTTP.Client)?

– Li-yao Xia
Nov 17 '18 at 19:29





Are you really using plain GHC or are you building a project with cabal? Double check you've installed http-conduit. Can you also import modules for http-client (Network.HTTP.Client)?

– Li-yao Xia
Nov 17 '18 at 19:29













Using hoogle stackage.org/lts-12.18/hoogle?q=simpleHTTP you can see that simpleHTTP comes from the HTTP library, whereas http-conduit exports simpleHttp, which has a different case.

– Li-yao Xia
Nov 17 '18 at 19:32





Using hoogle stackage.org/lts-12.18/hoogle?q=simpleHTTP you can see that simpleHTTP comes from the HTTP library, whereas http-conduit exports simpleHttp, which has a different case.

– Li-yao Xia
Nov 17 '18 at 19:32













It won't import Network.HTTP.Client either. I want to use the simpleHttp which conduit exports

– Dick Chany
Nov 17 '18 at 20:17





It won't import Network.HTTP.Client either. I want to use the simpleHttp which conduit exports

– Dick Chany
Nov 17 '18 at 20:17













I am using plain ghc.

– Dick Chany
Nov 17 '18 at 20:17





I am using plain ghc.

– Dick Chany
Nov 17 '18 at 20:17













Try ghc -v -package HTTP SOURCE.hs. Your package paths should be listed.

– tylerweir
Nov 18 '18 at 1:02





Try ghc -v -package HTTP SOURCE.hs. Your package paths should be listed.

– tylerweir
Nov 18 '18 at 1:02












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














It's using a different approach (Stack as a script interpreter), but most likely the following command will run the script with the necessary libraries available:



stack --resolver lts-12.9 script testRun.hs





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53354668%2fwhich-library-is-the-simplehttp-function-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    It's using a different approach (Stack as a script interpreter), but most likely the following command will run the script with the necessary libraries available:



    stack --resolver lts-12.9 script testRun.hs





    share|improve this answer




























      0














      It's using a different approach (Stack as a script interpreter), but most likely the following command will run the script with the necessary libraries available:



      stack --resolver lts-12.9 script testRun.hs





      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        It's using a different approach (Stack as a script interpreter), but most likely the following command will run the script with the necessary libraries available:



        stack --resolver lts-12.9 script testRun.hs





        share|improve this answer













        It's using a different approach (Stack as a script interpreter), but most likely the following command will run the script with the necessary libraries available:



        stack --resolver lts-12.9 script testRun.hs






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 18 '18 at 15:36









        Michael SnoymanMichael Snoyman

        27.7k23466




        27.7k23466






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53354668%2fwhich-library-is-the-simplehttp-function-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

            Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

            Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()