Is it possible to rename or configure the discriminator column when using iheritance in Entity Framework?
I have a database with a table that contains the column of my POCO class
public class TypeOf
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0)]
public string Type { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1)]
public string Key { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
This table already contains a lot of data
HsCode | HP | 4821 1000
SubCode | 423 | T21
SubCode | 022 | 5XL
ProductionLine | X1 | Line one
ProductionLine | X2 | Line two
Country | CN | China
Country | IN | India
…
I would like to improve this by creating inheritance system of TypeOf
public class Country : TypeOf { }
public class ProductionLine : TypeOf { }
public class SubCode : TypeOf { }
public class HsCode : TypeOf { }
By using the "Type" column as discriminator.
At this moment when I start to use the inheritance the db migration still want to use a Discriminator column.
public partial class TypeOf : DbMigration
{
public override void Up()
{
AddColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator", c => c.String(nullable: false, maxLength: 128));
}
public override void Down()
{
DropColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator");
}
}
entity-framework-6
add a comment |
I have a database with a table that contains the column of my POCO class
public class TypeOf
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0)]
public string Type { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1)]
public string Key { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
This table already contains a lot of data
HsCode | HP | 4821 1000
SubCode | 423 | T21
SubCode | 022 | 5XL
ProductionLine | X1 | Line one
ProductionLine | X2 | Line two
Country | CN | China
Country | IN | India
…
I would like to improve this by creating inheritance system of TypeOf
public class Country : TypeOf { }
public class ProductionLine : TypeOf { }
public class SubCode : TypeOf { }
public class HsCode : TypeOf { }
By using the "Type" column as discriminator.
At this moment when I start to use the inheritance the db migration still want to use a Discriminator column.
public partial class TypeOf : DbMigration
{
public override void Up()
{
AddColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator", c => c.String(nullable: false, maxLength: 128));
}
public override void Down()
{
DropColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator");
}
}
entity-framework-6
As bonus question I also would like to create a composite key with this discriminator + key
– Bastien Vandamme
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
add a comment |
I have a database with a table that contains the column of my POCO class
public class TypeOf
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0)]
public string Type { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1)]
public string Key { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
This table already contains a lot of data
HsCode | HP | 4821 1000
SubCode | 423 | T21
SubCode | 022 | 5XL
ProductionLine | X1 | Line one
ProductionLine | X2 | Line two
Country | CN | China
Country | IN | India
…
I would like to improve this by creating inheritance system of TypeOf
public class Country : TypeOf { }
public class ProductionLine : TypeOf { }
public class SubCode : TypeOf { }
public class HsCode : TypeOf { }
By using the "Type" column as discriminator.
At this moment when I start to use the inheritance the db migration still want to use a Discriminator column.
public partial class TypeOf : DbMigration
{
public override void Up()
{
AddColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator", c => c.String(nullable: false, maxLength: 128));
}
public override void Down()
{
DropColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator");
}
}
entity-framework-6
I have a database with a table that contains the column of my POCO class
public class TypeOf
{
[Key, Column(Order = 0)]
public string Type { get; set; }
[Key, Column(Order = 1)]
public string Key { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
}
This table already contains a lot of data
HsCode | HP | 4821 1000
SubCode | 423 | T21
SubCode | 022 | 5XL
ProductionLine | X1 | Line one
ProductionLine | X2 | Line two
Country | CN | China
Country | IN | India
…
I would like to improve this by creating inheritance system of TypeOf
public class Country : TypeOf { }
public class ProductionLine : TypeOf { }
public class SubCode : TypeOf { }
public class HsCode : TypeOf { }
By using the "Type" column as discriminator.
At this moment when I start to use the inheritance the db migration still want to use a Discriminator column.
public partial class TypeOf : DbMigration
{
public override void Up()
{
AddColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator", c => c.String(nullable: false, maxLength: 128));
}
public override void Down()
{
DropColumn("dbo.TypeOfs", "Discriminator");
}
}
entity-framework-6
entity-framework-6
edited Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
Bastien Vandamme
asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:45
Bastien VandammeBastien Vandamme
6,1832167126
6,1832167126
As bonus question I also would like to create a composite key with this discriminator + key
– Bastien Vandamme
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
add a comment |
As bonus question I also would like to create a composite key with this discriminator + key
– Bastien Vandamme
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
As bonus question I also would like to create a composite key with this discriminator + key
– Bastien Vandamme
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
As bonus question I also would like to create a composite key with this discriminator + key
– Bastien Vandamme
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It's possible, although not so intuitive (IMHO, for EF designers it might seem logical and obvious).
You need to use Map
fluent API and repeat Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue()
for all derived types (and also the base type if it is not abstract
).
For the sample model from the post it should be:
modelBuilder.Entity<TypeOf>()
.Map(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<Country>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<ProductionLine>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<SubCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<HsCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
;
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426935%2fis-it-possible-to-rename-or-configure-the-discriminator-column-when-using-iherit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's possible, although not so intuitive (IMHO, for EF designers it might seem logical and obvious).
You need to use Map
fluent API and repeat Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue()
for all derived types (and also the base type if it is not abstract
).
For the sample model from the post it should be:
modelBuilder.Entity<TypeOf>()
.Map(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<Country>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<ProductionLine>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<SubCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<HsCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
;
add a comment |
It's possible, although not so intuitive (IMHO, for EF designers it might seem logical and obvious).
You need to use Map
fluent API and repeat Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue()
for all derived types (and also the base type if it is not abstract
).
For the sample model from the post it should be:
modelBuilder.Entity<TypeOf>()
.Map(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<Country>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<ProductionLine>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<SubCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<HsCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
;
add a comment |
It's possible, although not so intuitive (IMHO, for EF designers it might seem logical and obvious).
You need to use Map
fluent API and repeat Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue()
for all derived types (and also the base type if it is not abstract
).
For the sample model from the post it should be:
modelBuilder.Entity<TypeOf>()
.Map(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<Country>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<ProductionLine>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<SubCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<HsCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
;
It's possible, although not so intuitive (IMHO, for EF designers it might seem logical and obvious).
You need to use Map
fluent API and repeat Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue()
for all derived types (and also the base type if it is not abstract
).
For the sample model from the post it should be:
modelBuilder.Entity<TypeOf>()
.Map(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<Country>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<ProductionLine>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<SubCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
.Map<HsCode>(m => m.Requires(e => e.Type).HasValue())
;
answered Nov 22 '18 at 10:10
Ivan StoevIvan Stoev
107k785138
107k785138
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426935%2fis-it-possible-to-rename-or-configure-the-discriminator-column-when-using-iherit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
As bonus question I also would like to create a composite key with this discriminator + key
– Bastien Vandamme
Nov 22 '18 at 10:14