To Squanch or not to Squanch: That is the Squanch
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
I've been thinking about Squanchics (how we Squanch words) and language in general.
I really Squanch that it matters not if Squanch uses words we are familiar with when they are Squanching or writing. We can figure out what they mean Squanchively. It only takes a few clues.
Squanch this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a squanch, would you know what they were Squanching about? Squanch'd bet money that you would. There is Squanch more adaptable on God's Squanch earth than the human mind.
Have you ever Squanched how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You Squanch have to be a rocket Squanchist to realize that you actually Squanch a Squanch percentage of them.
By now, you should have Squanched out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you Squanch it in four words?
Bonus: Can you tell which animated TV series I've been watching?
cipher language
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
I've been thinking about Squanchics (how we Squanch words) and language in general.
I really Squanch that it matters not if Squanch uses words we are familiar with when they are Squanching or writing. We can figure out what they mean Squanchively. It only takes a few clues.
Squanch this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a squanch, would you know what they were Squanching about? Squanch'd bet money that you would. There is Squanch more adaptable on God's Squanch earth than the human mind.
Have you ever Squanched how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You Squanch have to be a rocket Squanchist to realize that you actually Squanch a Squanch percentage of them.
By now, you should have Squanched out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you Squanch it in four words?
Bonus: Can you tell which animated TV series I've been watching?
cipher language
1
I believe the correct answer has already been posted, but as for your bonus question rot13(Lbh'ir orra jngpuvat gur Fzhesf.)
– generalcrispy
Nov 6 at 14:19
2
I'm going with the bonus as: (ROT13)Evpx naq zbegl
– Stidgeon
Nov 6 at 18:32
add a comment |
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
up vote
16
down vote
favorite
I've been thinking about Squanchics (how we Squanch words) and language in general.
I really Squanch that it matters not if Squanch uses words we are familiar with when they are Squanching or writing. We can figure out what they mean Squanchively. It only takes a few clues.
Squanch this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a squanch, would you know what they were Squanching about? Squanch'd bet money that you would. There is Squanch more adaptable on God's Squanch earth than the human mind.
Have you ever Squanched how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You Squanch have to be a rocket Squanchist to realize that you actually Squanch a Squanch percentage of them.
By now, you should have Squanched out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you Squanch it in four words?
Bonus: Can you tell which animated TV series I've been watching?
cipher language
I've been thinking about Squanchics (how we Squanch words) and language in general.
I really Squanch that it matters not if Squanch uses words we are familiar with when they are Squanching or writing. We can figure out what they mean Squanchively. It only takes a few clues.
Squanch this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a squanch, would you know what they were Squanching about? Squanch'd bet money that you would. There is Squanch more adaptable on God's Squanch earth than the human mind.
Have you ever Squanched how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You Squanch have to be a rocket Squanchist to realize that you actually Squanch a Squanch percentage of them.
By now, you should have Squanched out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you Squanch it in four words?
Bonus: Can you tell which animated TV series I've been watching?
cipher language
cipher language
edited Nov 6 at 14:01
asked Nov 6 at 13:00
Chowzen
13k239176
13k239176
1
I believe the correct answer has already been posted, but as for your bonus question rot13(Lbh'ir orra jngpuvat gur Fzhesf.)
– generalcrispy
Nov 6 at 14:19
2
I'm going with the bonus as: (ROT13)Evpx naq zbegl
– Stidgeon
Nov 6 at 18:32
add a comment |
1
I believe the correct answer has already been posted, but as for your bonus question rot13(Lbh'ir orra jngpuvat gur Fzhesf.)
– generalcrispy
Nov 6 at 14:19
2
I'm going with the bonus as: (ROT13)Evpx naq zbegl
– Stidgeon
Nov 6 at 18:32
1
1
I believe the correct answer has already been posted, but as for your bonus question rot13(Lbh'ir orra jngpuvat gur Fzhesf.)
– generalcrispy
Nov 6 at 14:19
I believe the correct answer has already been posted, but as for your bonus question rot13(Lbh'ir orra jngpuvat gur Fzhesf.)
– generalcrispy
Nov 6 at 14:19
2
2
I'm going with the bonus as: (ROT13)Evpx naq zbegl
– Stidgeon
Nov 6 at 18:32
I'm going with the bonus as: (ROT13)Evpx naq zbegl
– Stidgeon
Nov 6 at 18:32
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Filling in the squanches with their implied meanings:
I've been thinking about semantics (how we understand words) and language in general.
I really believe that it matters not if someone uses words we are familiar with when they are talking or writing. We can figure out what they mean intuitively. It only takes a few clues.
Take this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a unicycle, would you know what they were talking about? I'd bet money that you would. There is nothing more adaptable on God's green earth than the human mind.
Have you ever wondered how often you actually read every word in a sentence? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that you actually ignore* a small* percentage of them.
By now, you should have figured out what the underlying, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you name it in four words?
The ones marked with asterisks stolen from @gabbo1092 :)
When you
Take the first letter from each word
It reads
SUBSTITUTING WORDS IS FUN
Title:
To be or not to be: That is the question.
Which produces BBQ :)
2
Possible last few words rot13:(vtaber, fznyy, znxvat gur ynfg gjb jbeqf vf sha (fgvyy pna'g svaq fbzrguvat sbe h naq a gubhtu))
– gabbo1092
Nov 6 at 14:04
3
@jafe the last word could be anzr
– El-Guest
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
@El-Guest great minds... was just typing that in :)
– jafe
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
OK, you'll get the squanch. I really enjoy seeing collective collaboration like this! Makes me go all squanchy inside.
– Chowzen
Nov 6 at 14:24
1
There is some irony in the squanch that for about 1/3 ofsquanch
es I thought they were obviously something else.
– WAF
Nov 6 at 14:52
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
Bonus
You've been watching a lot of Rick and Morty lately like me
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
My attempt at deciphering the paragraph:
I've been thinking about (phon)ics (how we (learn?) words) and language in general.
I really (think) that it matters not if (one) uses words we are familiar with when they are (speak)ing or writing. We can figure out what they mean (relat)ively. It only takes a few clues.
(Take) this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a (unicycle), would you know what they were (talk)ing about? (I)'d bet money that you would. There is (few?) more adaptable on God's (great) earth than the human mind.
Have you ever (wonder/notic)ed how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You (would) have to be a rocket (scient)ist to realize that you actually (read) a (small) percentage of them.
By now, you should have (figured)ed out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right? Can you (describe) it in three words?
My answer:
Based on what I think this post means my three word answer would be: Understanding replacement words.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I’m really unsure about this, but is it the
The redundancy in the English language?
Three words?
Context in English?
Explanation:
You can figure out the meaning of most of the Squanch words just from context
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Filling in the squanches with their implied meanings:
I've been thinking about semantics (how we understand words) and language in general.
I really believe that it matters not if someone uses words we are familiar with when they are talking or writing. We can figure out what they mean intuitively. It only takes a few clues.
Take this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a unicycle, would you know what they were talking about? I'd bet money that you would. There is nothing more adaptable on God's green earth than the human mind.
Have you ever wondered how often you actually read every word in a sentence? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that you actually ignore* a small* percentage of them.
By now, you should have figured out what the underlying, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you name it in four words?
The ones marked with asterisks stolen from @gabbo1092 :)
When you
Take the first letter from each word
It reads
SUBSTITUTING WORDS IS FUN
Title:
To be or not to be: That is the question.
Which produces BBQ :)
2
Possible last few words rot13:(vtaber, fznyy, znxvat gur ynfg gjb jbeqf vf sha (fgvyy pna'g svaq fbzrguvat sbe h naq a gubhtu))
– gabbo1092
Nov 6 at 14:04
3
@jafe the last word could be anzr
– El-Guest
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
@El-Guest great minds... was just typing that in :)
– jafe
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
OK, you'll get the squanch. I really enjoy seeing collective collaboration like this! Makes me go all squanchy inside.
– Chowzen
Nov 6 at 14:24
1
There is some irony in the squanch that for about 1/3 ofsquanch
es I thought they were obviously something else.
– WAF
Nov 6 at 14:52
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Filling in the squanches with their implied meanings:
I've been thinking about semantics (how we understand words) and language in general.
I really believe that it matters not if someone uses words we are familiar with when they are talking or writing. We can figure out what they mean intuitively. It only takes a few clues.
Take this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a unicycle, would you know what they were talking about? I'd bet money that you would. There is nothing more adaptable on God's green earth than the human mind.
Have you ever wondered how often you actually read every word in a sentence? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that you actually ignore* a small* percentage of them.
By now, you should have figured out what the underlying, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you name it in four words?
The ones marked with asterisks stolen from @gabbo1092 :)
When you
Take the first letter from each word
It reads
SUBSTITUTING WORDS IS FUN
Title:
To be or not to be: That is the question.
Which produces BBQ :)
2
Possible last few words rot13:(vtaber, fznyy, znxvat gur ynfg gjb jbeqf vf sha (fgvyy pna'g svaq fbzrguvat sbe h naq a gubhtu))
– gabbo1092
Nov 6 at 14:04
3
@jafe the last word could be anzr
– El-Guest
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
@El-Guest great minds... was just typing that in :)
– jafe
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
OK, you'll get the squanch. I really enjoy seeing collective collaboration like this! Makes me go all squanchy inside.
– Chowzen
Nov 6 at 14:24
1
There is some irony in the squanch that for about 1/3 ofsquanch
es I thought they were obviously something else.
– WAF
Nov 6 at 14:52
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
up vote
21
down vote
accepted
Filling in the squanches with their implied meanings:
I've been thinking about semantics (how we understand words) and language in general.
I really believe that it matters not if someone uses words we are familiar with when they are talking or writing. We can figure out what they mean intuitively. It only takes a few clues.
Take this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a unicycle, would you know what they were talking about? I'd bet money that you would. There is nothing more adaptable on God's green earth than the human mind.
Have you ever wondered how often you actually read every word in a sentence? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that you actually ignore* a small* percentage of them.
By now, you should have figured out what the underlying, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you name it in four words?
The ones marked with asterisks stolen from @gabbo1092 :)
When you
Take the first letter from each word
It reads
SUBSTITUTING WORDS IS FUN
Title:
To be or not to be: That is the question.
Which produces BBQ :)
Filling in the squanches with their implied meanings:
I've been thinking about semantics (how we understand words) and language in general.
I really believe that it matters not if someone uses words we are familiar with when they are talking or writing. We can figure out what they mean intuitively. It only takes a few clues.
Take this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a unicycle, would you know what they were talking about? I'd bet money that you would. There is nothing more adaptable on God's green earth than the human mind.
Have you ever wondered how often you actually read every word in a sentence? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that you actually ignore* a small* percentage of them.
By now, you should have figured out what the underlying, basic idea of this post is, right?
Can you name it in four words?
The ones marked with asterisks stolen from @gabbo1092 :)
When you
Take the first letter from each word
It reads
SUBSTITUTING WORDS IS FUN
Title:
To be or not to be: That is the question.
Which produces BBQ :)
edited Nov 6 at 14:07
answered Nov 6 at 13:51
jafe
12.6k29133
12.6k29133
2
Possible last few words rot13:(vtaber, fznyy, znxvat gur ynfg gjb jbeqf vf sha (fgvyy pna'g svaq fbzrguvat sbe h naq a gubhtu))
– gabbo1092
Nov 6 at 14:04
3
@jafe the last word could be anzr
– El-Guest
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
@El-Guest great minds... was just typing that in :)
– jafe
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
OK, you'll get the squanch. I really enjoy seeing collective collaboration like this! Makes me go all squanchy inside.
– Chowzen
Nov 6 at 14:24
1
There is some irony in the squanch that for about 1/3 ofsquanch
es I thought they were obviously something else.
– WAF
Nov 6 at 14:52
|
show 4 more comments
2
Possible last few words rot13:(vtaber, fznyy, znxvat gur ynfg gjb jbeqf vf sha (fgvyy pna'g svaq fbzrguvat sbe h naq a gubhtu))
– gabbo1092
Nov 6 at 14:04
3
@jafe the last word could be anzr
– El-Guest
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
@El-Guest great minds... was just typing that in :)
– jafe
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
OK, you'll get the squanch. I really enjoy seeing collective collaboration like this! Makes me go all squanchy inside.
– Chowzen
Nov 6 at 14:24
1
There is some irony in the squanch that for about 1/3 ofsquanch
es I thought they were obviously something else.
– WAF
Nov 6 at 14:52
2
2
Possible last few words rot13:(vtaber, fznyy, znxvat gur ynfg gjb jbeqf vf sha (fgvyy pna'g svaq fbzrguvat sbe h naq a gubhtu))
– gabbo1092
Nov 6 at 14:04
Possible last few words rot13:(vtaber, fznyy, znxvat gur ynfg gjb jbeqf vf sha (fgvyy pna'g svaq fbzrguvat sbe h naq a gubhtu))
– gabbo1092
Nov 6 at 14:04
3
3
@jafe the last word could be anzr
– El-Guest
Nov 6 at 14:07
@jafe the last word could be anzr
– El-Guest
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
1
@El-Guest great minds... was just typing that in :)
– jafe
Nov 6 at 14:07
@El-Guest great minds... was just typing that in :)
– jafe
Nov 6 at 14:07
1
1
OK, you'll get the squanch. I really enjoy seeing collective collaboration like this! Makes me go all squanchy inside.
– Chowzen
Nov 6 at 14:24
OK, you'll get the squanch. I really enjoy seeing collective collaboration like this! Makes me go all squanchy inside.
– Chowzen
Nov 6 at 14:24
1
1
There is some irony in the squanch that for about 1/3 of
squanch
es I thought they were obviously something else.– WAF
Nov 6 at 14:52
There is some irony in the squanch that for about 1/3 of
squanch
es I thought they were obviously something else.– WAF
Nov 6 at 14:52
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
Bonus
You've been watching a lot of Rick and Morty lately like me
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Bonus
You've been watching a lot of Rick and Morty lately like me
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Bonus
You've been watching a lot of Rick and Morty lately like me
Bonus
You've been watching a lot of Rick and Morty lately like me
answered Nov 6 at 20:34
Adam
1966
1966
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
My attempt at deciphering the paragraph:
I've been thinking about (phon)ics (how we (learn?) words) and language in general.
I really (think) that it matters not if (one) uses words we are familiar with when they are (speak)ing or writing. We can figure out what they mean (relat)ively. It only takes a few clues.
(Take) this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a (unicycle), would you know what they were (talk)ing about? (I)'d bet money that you would. There is (few?) more adaptable on God's (great) earth than the human mind.
Have you ever (wonder/notic)ed how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You (would) have to be a rocket (scient)ist to realize that you actually (read) a (small) percentage of them.
By now, you should have (figured)ed out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right? Can you (describe) it in three words?
My answer:
Based on what I think this post means my three word answer would be: Understanding replacement words.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
My attempt at deciphering the paragraph:
I've been thinking about (phon)ics (how we (learn?) words) and language in general.
I really (think) that it matters not if (one) uses words we are familiar with when they are (speak)ing or writing. We can figure out what they mean (relat)ively. It only takes a few clues.
(Take) this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a (unicycle), would you know what they were (talk)ing about? (I)'d bet money that you would. There is (few?) more adaptable on God's (great) earth than the human mind.
Have you ever (wonder/notic)ed how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You (would) have to be a rocket (scient)ist to realize that you actually (read) a (small) percentage of them.
By now, you should have (figured)ed out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right? Can you (describe) it in three words?
My answer:
Based on what I think this post means my three word answer would be: Understanding replacement words.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
My attempt at deciphering the paragraph:
I've been thinking about (phon)ics (how we (learn?) words) and language in general.
I really (think) that it matters not if (one) uses words we are familiar with when they are (speak)ing or writing. We can figure out what they mean (relat)ively. It only takes a few clues.
(Take) this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a (unicycle), would you know what they were (talk)ing about? (I)'d bet money that you would. There is (few?) more adaptable on God's (great) earth than the human mind.
Have you ever (wonder/notic)ed how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You (would) have to be a rocket (scient)ist to realize that you actually (read) a (small) percentage of them.
By now, you should have (figured)ed out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right? Can you (describe) it in three words?
My answer:
Based on what I think this post means my three word answer would be: Understanding replacement words.
My attempt at deciphering the paragraph:
I've been thinking about (phon)ics (how we (learn?) words) and language in general.
I really (think) that it matters not if (one) uses words we are familiar with when they are (speak)ing or writing. We can figure out what they mean (relat)ively. It only takes a few clues.
(Take) this for an example: If someone told you that they love it when clowns juggle while riding a (unicycle), would you know what they were (talk)ing about? (I)'d bet money that you would. There is (few?) more adaptable on God's (great) earth than the human mind.
Have you ever (wonder/notic)ed how Squanch you actually Squanch every word in a sentence? You (would) have to be a rocket (scient)ist to realize that you actually (read) a (small) percentage of them.
By now, you should have (figured)ed out what the Squanching, basic idea of this post is, right? Can you (describe) it in three words?
My answer:
Based on what I think this post means my three word answer would be: Understanding replacement words.
answered Nov 6 at 13:46
gabbo1092
3,307535
3,307535
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I’m really unsure about this, but is it the
The redundancy in the English language?
Three words?
Context in English?
Explanation:
You can figure out the meaning of most of the Squanch words just from context
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I’m really unsure about this, but is it the
The redundancy in the English language?
Three words?
Context in English?
Explanation:
You can figure out the meaning of most of the Squanch words just from context
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I’m really unsure about this, but is it the
The redundancy in the English language?
Three words?
Context in English?
Explanation:
You can figure out the meaning of most of the Squanch words just from context
I’m really unsure about this, but is it the
The redundancy in the English language?
Three words?
Context in English?
Explanation:
You can figure out the meaning of most of the Squanch words just from context
answered Nov 6 at 13:46
JavaScriptCoder
1515
1515
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f74750%2fto-squanch-or-not-to-squanch-that-is-the-squanch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I believe the correct answer has already been posted, but as for your bonus question rot13(Lbh'ir orra jngpuvat gur Fzhesf.)
– generalcrispy
Nov 6 at 14:19
2
I'm going with the bonus as: (ROT13)Evpx naq zbegl
– Stidgeon
Nov 6 at 18:32