Which has been the most gregarious rocket, launched from the most sites?
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
Which orbital launch vehicle has been "getting around" the most? Which rocket has put things in orbit from the largest number of different launch sites?
For the purposes of this question, allow for some flexibility; adding an extra side booster doesn't necessarily make it a different rocket. Two launch adjacent launch pads don't count as different sites, but Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and KSC would be different.
Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, but use of different ports, or substantially different areas at sea would.
launch launch-site
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
Which orbital launch vehicle has been "getting around" the most? Which rocket has put things in orbit from the largest number of different launch sites?
For the purposes of this question, allow for some flexibility; adding an extra side booster doesn't necessarily make it a different rocket. Two launch adjacent launch pads don't count as different sites, but Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and KSC would be different.
Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, but use of different ports, or substantially different areas at sea would.
launch launch-site
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
2
I like this question and it definitely has a canonical answer as of this point in spacetime. However, I’m concerned that the answer to this question is likely to change over time. Perhaps there is a way to modify this question so that the answer withstands the test of time...
– Paul
Nov 7 at 1:18
1
@Roger I would certainly consider that a good answer. I've mentioned that interpretation should be flexible, and launch from an airplane is something I didn't expect but it certainly fits. Launch from the Moon is at least from the surface of a body, much more of a launch site than an airplane's underbelly. I'd say just go for it in this case.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 15:26
1
@Puffin I'm using something like $d_{tot}=d_{t}+d_{ap}$ where $d$ stands for distance measured in "difficulty" units. There is both transportation difficulty or $d_t$ which measures how hard and far it would be to change your mind and move a rocket from one site to the other, and administrative and programatic difficulty which is sort-of self explanatory and redundant. Looking at ...difference between Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center? it sounds like it wouldn't be so easy to change your mind at the last minute and move between sites.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 1:32
1
@Puffin How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
3
@RedSonja I'd thought about working "strap-on" in there somehow, in place of "adding an extra side booster" but then I thought it just got weird.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 12:08
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
Which orbital launch vehicle has been "getting around" the most? Which rocket has put things in orbit from the largest number of different launch sites?
For the purposes of this question, allow for some flexibility; adding an extra side booster doesn't necessarily make it a different rocket. Two launch adjacent launch pads don't count as different sites, but Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and KSC would be different.
Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, but use of different ports, or substantially different areas at sea would.
launch launch-site
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
Which orbital launch vehicle has been "getting around" the most? Which rocket has put things in orbit from the largest number of different launch sites?
For the purposes of this question, allow for some flexibility; adding an extra side booster doesn't necessarily make it a different rocket. Two launch adjacent launch pads don't count as different sites, but Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and KSC would be different.
Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, but use of different ports, or substantially different areas at sea would.
launch launch-site
launch launch-site
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
edited Nov 7 at 4:37
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
asked Nov 7 at 0:54
uhoh
32.3k16112399
32.3k16112399
2
I like this question and it definitely has a canonical answer as of this point in spacetime. However, I’m concerned that the answer to this question is likely to change over time. Perhaps there is a way to modify this question so that the answer withstands the test of time...
– Paul
Nov 7 at 1:18
1
@Roger I would certainly consider that a good answer. I've mentioned that interpretation should be flexible, and launch from an airplane is something I didn't expect but it certainly fits. Launch from the Moon is at least from the surface of a body, much more of a launch site than an airplane's underbelly. I'd say just go for it in this case.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 15:26
1
@Puffin I'm using something like $d_{tot}=d_{t}+d_{ap}$ where $d$ stands for distance measured in "difficulty" units. There is both transportation difficulty or $d_t$ which measures how hard and far it would be to change your mind and move a rocket from one site to the other, and administrative and programatic difficulty which is sort-of self explanatory and redundant. Looking at ...difference between Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center? it sounds like it wouldn't be so easy to change your mind at the last minute and move between sites.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 1:32
1
@Puffin How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
3
@RedSonja I'd thought about working "strap-on" in there somehow, in place of "adding an extra side booster" but then I thought it just got weird.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 12:08
|
show 7 more comments
2
I like this question and it definitely has a canonical answer as of this point in spacetime. However, I’m concerned that the answer to this question is likely to change over time. Perhaps there is a way to modify this question so that the answer withstands the test of time...
– Paul
Nov 7 at 1:18
1
@Roger I would certainly consider that a good answer. I've mentioned that interpretation should be flexible, and launch from an airplane is something I didn't expect but it certainly fits. Launch from the Moon is at least from the surface of a body, much more of a launch site than an airplane's underbelly. I'd say just go for it in this case.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 15:26
1
@Puffin I'm using something like $d_{tot}=d_{t}+d_{ap}$ where $d$ stands for distance measured in "difficulty" units. There is both transportation difficulty or $d_t$ which measures how hard and far it would be to change your mind and move a rocket from one site to the other, and administrative and programatic difficulty which is sort-of self explanatory and redundant. Looking at ...difference between Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center? it sounds like it wouldn't be so easy to change your mind at the last minute and move between sites.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 1:32
1
@Puffin How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
3
@RedSonja I'd thought about working "strap-on" in there somehow, in place of "adding an extra side booster" but then I thought it just got weird.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 12:08
2
2
I like this question and it definitely has a canonical answer as of this point in spacetime. However, I’m concerned that the answer to this question is likely to change over time. Perhaps there is a way to modify this question so that the answer withstands the test of time...
– Paul
Nov 7 at 1:18
I like this question and it definitely has a canonical answer as of this point in spacetime. However, I’m concerned that the answer to this question is likely to change over time. Perhaps there is a way to modify this question so that the answer withstands the test of time...
– Paul
Nov 7 at 1:18
1
1
@Roger I would certainly consider that a good answer. I've mentioned that interpretation should be flexible, and launch from an airplane is something I didn't expect but it certainly fits. Launch from the Moon is at least from the surface of a body, much more of a launch site than an airplane's underbelly. I'd say just go for it in this case.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 15:26
@Roger I would certainly consider that a good answer. I've mentioned that interpretation should be flexible, and launch from an airplane is something I didn't expect but it certainly fits. Launch from the Moon is at least from the surface of a body, much more of a launch site than an airplane's underbelly. I'd say just go for it in this case.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 15:26
1
1
@Puffin I'm using something like $d_{tot}=d_{t}+d_{ap}$ where $d$ stands for distance measured in "difficulty" units. There is both transportation difficulty or $d_t$ which measures how hard and far it would be to change your mind and move a rocket from one site to the other, and administrative and programatic difficulty which is sort-of self explanatory and redundant. Looking at ...difference between Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center? it sounds like it wouldn't be so easy to change your mind at the last minute and move between sites.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 1:32
@Puffin I'm using something like $d_{tot}=d_{t}+d_{ap}$ where $d$ stands for distance measured in "difficulty" units. There is both transportation difficulty or $d_t$ which measures how hard and far it would be to change your mind and move a rocket from one site to the other, and administrative and programatic difficulty which is sort-of self explanatory and redundant. Looking at ...difference between Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center? it sounds like it wouldn't be so easy to change your mind at the last minute and move between sites.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 1:32
1
1
@Puffin How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
@Puffin How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
3
3
@RedSonja I'd thought about working "strap-on" in there somehow, in place of "adding an extra side booster" but then I thought it just got weird.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 12:08
@RedSonja I'd thought about working "strap-on" in there somehow, in place of "adding an extra side booster" but then I thought it just got weird.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 12:08
|
show 7 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
58
down vote
The Apollo Lunar Module has launched from six lunar sites:
Apollo 11 — Mare Tranquillitatis
Apollo 12 — Oceanus Procellarum
Apollo 14 — Fra Mauro
Apollo 15 — Hadley/Apennines
Apollo 16 — Descartes
Apollo 17 — Taurus-Littrow
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
8
Great! Launch sides on good-old Terra firma oh, that's Luna firma in this case. At least none of this air or water launching; these are real, solid launch sites, equipped with real launch platforms
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 16:04
15
Launching from a Mare scores half a point for water launch.
– Roger
Nov 7 at 16:05
2
Super answer! +1
– Organic Marble
Nov 7 at 16:12
9
Technically correct -- the best kind of correct! (Usually when I make this comment I don't mean it as a compliment, but this is the exception.)
– Russell Borogove
Nov 7 at 16:30
2
Plus one "air" launch (Apollo 10).
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 7 at 16:33
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
33
down vote
Pegasus, whose carrier plane has lifted off from
- Edwards AFB
- Cape Canaveral
- Wallops Flight Facility
- Base Aerea de Gando, Gran Canaria, Spain
- Vandenberg AFB
- Kwajalein Atoll
on successful space launch missions.
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
5
Aha! I totally forgot about air-launches, but indeed this jet-setting rocket certainly "gets around" quite a bit.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 4:23
1
@RonJohn I think they kinda ground ruled this out: "Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, " (although air launch isn't specifically listed, I thought this applied)
– Organic Marble
Nov 10 at 13:56
add a comment |
up vote
31
down vote
The Soyuz booster have been launched from:
- Baikonur
- Plesetsk
- Kourou
- Vostochny
Making it the only rocket to have been launched from 3 (4 if you count USSR) different countries and 3 different continents !
Contenders would be: the Falcon 9, launched from
- Kennedy Space Center
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Cape Canaveral
Tied with Minotaur IV and Athena 1
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Kodiak
- Cape Canaveral
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
you count KSC and Cape Canaveral as 2 sites?
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 7:18
6
@Hobbes I wouldn't, but OP specified they should be treated as different spaceports.
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 8:33
1
Soyuz has been launched from Plesetsk as well. If you count the number of distinct pads its 8: 4 at Plesetsk, some decomissioned now, 2 at Baikonur and one at each of the other two. Complicated, because I think the Russian pads are at the same base but not "adjacent" in the terms of the OP question.
– Puffin
Nov 7 at 15:44
@Puffin I had totally forgotten about this ! Since they share the same name I think we can consider them as the same spaceport?
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:12
1
For KSC versus Cape Canaveral see this comment. new question: How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
12
down vote
Scout:
- KSC
- Vandenberg
- Wallops
San Marco platform (owned by Italy, off the coast of Kenya)
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
1
yes, that's the one
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 14:48
not so fast ! It’s a tie with the Soyuz, see my edit thanks to Puffin :-)
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:15
8
Kerbal Space Center is a fictional location... wait... oh. I've been playing that game too much, haven't I?
– Coomie
Nov 8 at 1:32
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
58
down vote
The Apollo Lunar Module has launched from six lunar sites:
Apollo 11 — Mare Tranquillitatis
Apollo 12 — Oceanus Procellarum
Apollo 14 — Fra Mauro
Apollo 15 — Hadley/Apennines
Apollo 16 — Descartes
Apollo 17 — Taurus-Littrow
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
8
Great! Launch sides on good-old Terra firma oh, that's Luna firma in this case. At least none of this air or water launching; these are real, solid launch sites, equipped with real launch platforms
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 16:04
15
Launching from a Mare scores half a point for water launch.
– Roger
Nov 7 at 16:05
2
Super answer! +1
– Organic Marble
Nov 7 at 16:12
9
Technically correct -- the best kind of correct! (Usually when I make this comment I don't mean it as a compliment, but this is the exception.)
– Russell Borogove
Nov 7 at 16:30
2
Plus one "air" launch (Apollo 10).
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 7 at 16:33
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
58
down vote
The Apollo Lunar Module has launched from six lunar sites:
Apollo 11 — Mare Tranquillitatis
Apollo 12 — Oceanus Procellarum
Apollo 14 — Fra Mauro
Apollo 15 — Hadley/Apennines
Apollo 16 — Descartes
Apollo 17 — Taurus-Littrow
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
8
Great! Launch sides on good-old Terra firma oh, that's Luna firma in this case. At least none of this air or water launching; these are real, solid launch sites, equipped with real launch platforms
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 16:04
15
Launching from a Mare scores half a point for water launch.
– Roger
Nov 7 at 16:05
2
Super answer! +1
– Organic Marble
Nov 7 at 16:12
9
Technically correct -- the best kind of correct! (Usually when I make this comment I don't mean it as a compliment, but this is the exception.)
– Russell Borogove
Nov 7 at 16:30
2
Plus one "air" launch (Apollo 10).
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 7 at 16:33
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
58
down vote
up vote
58
down vote
The Apollo Lunar Module has launched from six lunar sites:
Apollo 11 — Mare Tranquillitatis
Apollo 12 — Oceanus Procellarum
Apollo 14 — Fra Mauro
Apollo 15 — Hadley/Apennines
Apollo 16 — Descartes
Apollo 17 — Taurus-Littrow
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
The Apollo Lunar Module has launched from six lunar sites:
Apollo 11 — Mare Tranquillitatis
Apollo 12 — Oceanus Procellarum
Apollo 14 — Fra Mauro
Apollo 15 — Hadley/Apennines
Apollo 16 — Descartes
Apollo 17 — Taurus-Littrow
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
answered Nov 7 at 15:59
Roger
779110
779110
8
Great! Launch sides on good-old Terra firma oh, that's Luna firma in this case. At least none of this air or water launching; these are real, solid launch sites, equipped with real launch platforms
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 16:04
15
Launching from a Mare scores half a point for water launch.
– Roger
Nov 7 at 16:05
2
Super answer! +1
– Organic Marble
Nov 7 at 16:12
9
Technically correct -- the best kind of correct! (Usually when I make this comment I don't mean it as a compliment, but this is the exception.)
– Russell Borogove
Nov 7 at 16:30
2
Plus one "air" launch (Apollo 10).
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 7 at 16:33
|
show 4 more comments
8
Great! Launch sides on good-old Terra firma oh, that's Luna firma in this case. At least none of this air or water launching; these are real, solid launch sites, equipped with real launch platforms
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 16:04
15
Launching from a Mare scores half a point for water launch.
– Roger
Nov 7 at 16:05
2
Super answer! +1
– Organic Marble
Nov 7 at 16:12
9
Technically correct -- the best kind of correct! (Usually when I make this comment I don't mean it as a compliment, but this is the exception.)
– Russell Borogove
Nov 7 at 16:30
2
Plus one "air" launch (Apollo 10).
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 7 at 16:33
8
8
Great! Launch sides on good-old Terra firma oh, that's Luna firma in this case. At least none of this air or water launching; these are real, solid launch sites, equipped with real launch platforms
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 16:04
Great! Launch sides on good-old Terra firma oh, that's Luna firma in this case. At least none of this air or water launching; these are real, solid launch sites, equipped with real launch platforms
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 16:04
15
15
Launching from a Mare scores half a point for water launch.
– Roger
Nov 7 at 16:05
Launching from a Mare scores half a point for water launch.
– Roger
Nov 7 at 16:05
2
2
Super answer! +1
– Organic Marble
Nov 7 at 16:12
Super answer! +1
– Organic Marble
Nov 7 at 16:12
9
9
Technically correct -- the best kind of correct! (Usually when I make this comment I don't mean it as a compliment, but this is the exception.)
– Russell Borogove
Nov 7 at 16:30
Technically correct -- the best kind of correct! (Usually when I make this comment I don't mean it as a compliment, but this is the exception.)
– Russell Borogove
Nov 7 at 16:30
2
2
Plus one "air" launch (Apollo 10).
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 7 at 16:33
Plus one "air" launch (Apollo 10).
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 7 at 16:33
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
33
down vote
Pegasus, whose carrier plane has lifted off from
- Edwards AFB
- Cape Canaveral
- Wallops Flight Facility
- Base Aerea de Gando, Gran Canaria, Spain
- Vandenberg AFB
- Kwajalein Atoll
on successful space launch missions.
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
5
Aha! I totally forgot about air-launches, but indeed this jet-setting rocket certainly "gets around" quite a bit.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 4:23
1
@RonJohn I think they kinda ground ruled this out: "Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, " (although air launch isn't specifically listed, I thought this applied)
– Organic Marble
Nov 10 at 13:56
add a comment |
up vote
33
down vote
Pegasus, whose carrier plane has lifted off from
- Edwards AFB
- Cape Canaveral
- Wallops Flight Facility
- Base Aerea de Gando, Gran Canaria, Spain
- Vandenberg AFB
- Kwajalein Atoll
on successful space launch missions.
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
5
Aha! I totally forgot about air-launches, but indeed this jet-setting rocket certainly "gets around" quite a bit.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 4:23
1
@RonJohn I think they kinda ground ruled this out: "Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, " (although air launch isn't specifically listed, I thought this applied)
– Organic Marble
Nov 10 at 13:56
add a comment |
up vote
33
down vote
up vote
33
down vote
Pegasus, whose carrier plane has lifted off from
- Edwards AFB
- Cape Canaveral
- Wallops Flight Facility
- Base Aerea de Gando, Gran Canaria, Spain
- Vandenberg AFB
- Kwajalein Atoll
on successful space launch missions.
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
Pegasus, whose carrier plane has lifted off from
- Edwards AFB
- Cape Canaveral
- Wallops Flight Facility
- Base Aerea de Gando, Gran Canaria, Spain
- Vandenberg AFB
- Kwajalein Atoll
on successful space launch missions.
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
answered Nov 7 at 4:16
Organic Marble
51.8k3135220
51.8k3135220
5
Aha! I totally forgot about air-launches, but indeed this jet-setting rocket certainly "gets around" quite a bit.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 4:23
1
@RonJohn I think they kinda ground ruled this out: "Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, " (although air launch isn't specifically listed, I thought this applied)
– Organic Marble
Nov 10 at 13:56
add a comment |
5
Aha! I totally forgot about air-launches, but indeed this jet-setting rocket certainly "gets around" quite a bit.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 4:23
1
@RonJohn I think they kinda ground ruled this out: "Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, " (although air launch isn't specifically listed, I thought this applied)
– Organic Marble
Nov 10 at 13:56
5
5
Aha! I totally forgot about air-launches, but indeed this jet-setting rocket certainly "gets around" quite a bit.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 4:23
Aha! I totally forgot about air-launches, but indeed this jet-setting rocket certainly "gets around" quite a bit.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 4:23
1
1
@RonJohn I think they kinda ground ruled this out: "Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, " (although air launch isn't specifically listed, I thought this applied)
– Organic Marble
Nov 10 at 13:56
@RonJohn I think they kinda ground ruled this out: "Launches from mobile launch platforms (on the ocean or land) shouldn't necessarily be counted as different just because each launch coordinate is slightly different, " (although air launch isn't specifically listed, I thought this applied)
– Organic Marble
Nov 10 at 13:56
add a comment |
up vote
31
down vote
The Soyuz booster have been launched from:
- Baikonur
- Plesetsk
- Kourou
- Vostochny
Making it the only rocket to have been launched from 3 (4 if you count USSR) different countries and 3 different continents !
Contenders would be: the Falcon 9, launched from
- Kennedy Space Center
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Cape Canaveral
Tied with Minotaur IV and Athena 1
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Kodiak
- Cape Canaveral
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
you count KSC and Cape Canaveral as 2 sites?
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 7:18
6
@Hobbes I wouldn't, but OP specified they should be treated as different spaceports.
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 8:33
1
Soyuz has been launched from Plesetsk as well. If you count the number of distinct pads its 8: 4 at Plesetsk, some decomissioned now, 2 at Baikonur and one at each of the other two. Complicated, because I think the Russian pads are at the same base but not "adjacent" in the terms of the OP question.
– Puffin
Nov 7 at 15:44
@Puffin I had totally forgotten about this ! Since they share the same name I think we can consider them as the same spaceport?
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:12
1
For KSC versus Cape Canaveral see this comment. new question: How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
31
down vote
The Soyuz booster have been launched from:
- Baikonur
- Plesetsk
- Kourou
- Vostochny
Making it the only rocket to have been launched from 3 (4 if you count USSR) different countries and 3 different continents !
Contenders would be: the Falcon 9, launched from
- Kennedy Space Center
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Cape Canaveral
Tied with Minotaur IV and Athena 1
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Kodiak
- Cape Canaveral
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
you count KSC and Cape Canaveral as 2 sites?
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 7:18
6
@Hobbes I wouldn't, but OP specified they should be treated as different spaceports.
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 8:33
1
Soyuz has been launched from Plesetsk as well. If you count the number of distinct pads its 8: 4 at Plesetsk, some decomissioned now, 2 at Baikonur and one at each of the other two. Complicated, because I think the Russian pads are at the same base but not "adjacent" in the terms of the OP question.
– Puffin
Nov 7 at 15:44
@Puffin I had totally forgotten about this ! Since they share the same name I think we can consider them as the same spaceport?
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:12
1
For KSC versus Cape Canaveral see this comment. new question: How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
31
down vote
up vote
31
down vote
The Soyuz booster have been launched from:
- Baikonur
- Plesetsk
- Kourou
- Vostochny
Making it the only rocket to have been launched from 3 (4 if you count USSR) different countries and 3 different continents !
Contenders would be: the Falcon 9, launched from
- Kennedy Space Center
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Cape Canaveral
Tied with Minotaur IV and Athena 1
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Kodiak
- Cape Canaveral
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
The Soyuz booster have been launched from:
- Baikonur
- Plesetsk
- Kourou
- Vostochny
Making it the only rocket to have been launched from 3 (4 if you count USSR) different countries and 3 different continents !
Contenders would be: the Falcon 9, launched from
- Kennedy Space Center
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Cape Canaveral
Tied with Minotaur IV and Athena 1
- Vandenberg Air Force Base
- Kodiak
- Cape Canaveral
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
edited Nov 8 at 4:56
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
answered Nov 7 at 3:33
Antzi
7,65312450
7,65312450
you count KSC and Cape Canaveral as 2 sites?
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 7:18
6
@Hobbes I wouldn't, but OP specified they should be treated as different spaceports.
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 8:33
1
Soyuz has been launched from Plesetsk as well. If you count the number of distinct pads its 8: 4 at Plesetsk, some decomissioned now, 2 at Baikonur and one at each of the other two. Complicated, because I think the Russian pads are at the same base but not "adjacent" in the terms of the OP question.
– Puffin
Nov 7 at 15:44
@Puffin I had totally forgotten about this ! Since they share the same name I think we can consider them as the same spaceport?
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:12
1
For KSC versus Cape Canaveral see this comment. new question: How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
|
show 3 more comments
you count KSC and Cape Canaveral as 2 sites?
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 7:18
6
@Hobbes I wouldn't, but OP specified they should be treated as different spaceports.
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 8:33
1
Soyuz has been launched from Plesetsk as well. If you count the number of distinct pads its 8: 4 at Plesetsk, some decomissioned now, 2 at Baikonur and one at each of the other two. Complicated, because I think the Russian pads are at the same base but not "adjacent" in the terms of the OP question.
– Puffin
Nov 7 at 15:44
@Puffin I had totally forgotten about this ! Since they share the same name I think we can consider them as the same spaceport?
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:12
1
For KSC versus Cape Canaveral see this comment. new question: How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
you count KSC and Cape Canaveral as 2 sites?
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 7:18
you count KSC and Cape Canaveral as 2 sites?
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 7:18
6
6
@Hobbes I wouldn't, but OP specified they should be treated as different spaceports.
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 8:33
@Hobbes I wouldn't, but OP specified they should be treated as different spaceports.
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 8:33
1
1
Soyuz has been launched from Plesetsk as well. If you count the number of distinct pads its 8: 4 at Plesetsk, some decomissioned now, 2 at Baikonur and one at each of the other two. Complicated, because I think the Russian pads are at the same base but not "adjacent" in the terms of the OP question.
– Puffin
Nov 7 at 15:44
Soyuz has been launched from Plesetsk as well. If you count the number of distinct pads its 8: 4 at Plesetsk, some decomissioned now, 2 at Baikonur and one at each of the other two. Complicated, because I think the Russian pads are at the same base but not "adjacent" in the terms of the OP question.
– Puffin
Nov 7 at 15:44
@Puffin I had totally forgotten about this ! Since they share the same name I think we can consider them as the same spaceport?
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:12
@Puffin I had totally forgotten about this ! Since they share the same name I think we can consider them as the same spaceport?
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:12
1
1
For KSC versus Cape Canaveral see this comment. new question: How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
For KSC versus Cape Canaveral see this comment. new question: How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
12
down vote
Scout:
- KSC
- Vandenberg
- Wallops
San Marco platform (owned by Italy, off the coast of Kenya)
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
1
yes, that's the one
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 14:48
not so fast ! It’s a tie with the Soyuz, see my edit thanks to Puffin :-)
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:15
8
Kerbal Space Center is a fictional location... wait... oh. I've been playing that game too much, haven't I?
– Coomie
Nov 8 at 1:32
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
Scout:
- KSC
- Vandenberg
- Wallops
San Marco platform (owned by Italy, off the coast of Kenya)
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
1
yes, that's the one
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 14:48
not so fast ! It’s a tie with the Soyuz, see my edit thanks to Puffin :-)
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:15
8
Kerbal Space Center is a fictional location... wait... oh. I've been playing that game too much, haven't I?
– Coomie
Nov 8 at 1:32
add a comment |
up vote
12
down vote
up vote
12
down vote
Scout:
- KSC
- Vandenberg
- Wallops
San Marco platform (owned by Italy, off the coast of Kenya)
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
Scout:
- KSC
- Vandenberg
- Wallops
San Marco platform (owned by Italy, off the coast of Kenya)
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
edited Nov 7 at 14:48
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
answered Nov 7 at 14:42
Hobbes
81.9k2224367
81.9k2224367
1
yes, that's the one
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 14:48
not so fast ! It’s a tie with the Soyuz, see my edit thanks to Puffin :-)
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:15
8
Kerbal Space Center is a fictional location... wait... oh. I've been playing that game too much, haven't I?
– Coomie
Nov 8 at 1:32
add a comment |
1
yes, that's the one
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 14:48
not so fast ! It’s a tie with the Soyuz, see my edit thanks to Puffin :-)
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:15
8
Kerbal Space Center is a fictional location... wait... oh. I've been playing that game too much, haven't I?
– Coomie
Nov 8 at 1:32
1
1
yes, that's the one
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 14:48
yes, that's the one
– Hobbes
Nov 7 at 14:48
not so fast ! It’s a tie with the Soyuz, see my edit thanks to Puffin :-)
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:15
not so fast ! It’s a tie with the Soyuz, see my edit thanks to Puffin :-)
– Antzi
Nov 7 at 16:15
8
8
Kerbal Space Center is a fictional location... wait... oh. I've been playing that game too much, haven't I?
– Coomie
Nov 8 at 1:32
Kerbal Space Center is a fictional location... wait... oh. I've been playing that game too much, haven't I?
– Coomie
Nov 8 at 1:32
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31856%2fwhich-has-been-the-most-gregarious-rocket-launched-from-the-most-sites%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I like this question and it definitely has a canonical answer as of this point in spacetime. However, I’m concerned that the answer to this question is likely to change over time. Perhaps there is a way to modify this question so that the answer withstands the test of time...
– Paul
Nov 7 at 1:18
1
@Roger I would certainly consider that a good answer. I've mentioned that interpretation should be flexible, and launch from an airplane is something I didn't expect but it certainly fits. Launch from the Moon is at least from the surface of a body, much more of a launch site than an airplane's underbelly. I'd say just go for it in this case.
– uhoh
Nov 7 at 15:26
1
@Puffin I'm using something like $d_{tot}=d_{t}+d_{ap}$ where $d$ stands for distance measured in "difficulty" units. There is both transportation difficulty or $d_t$ which measures how hard and far it would be to change your mind and move a rocket from one site to the other, and administrative and programatic difficulty which is sort-of self explanatory and redundant. Looking at ...difference between Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center? it sounds like it wouldn't be so easy to change your mind at the last minute and move between sites.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 1:32
1
@Puffin How far is Cape Canaveral from Kennedy Space Center, administratively and programmatically?
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 3:30
3
@RedSonja I'd thought about working "strap-on" in there somehow, in place of "adding an extra side booster" but then I thought it just got weird.
– uhoh
Nov 8 at 12:08