AWSQueueService UsageValue
I'm new to this AWS and SQS and playing with it. My SQS billing says I have used my free tier allocation limit in just 10 days for the month and I am not clear what is the reason for such a heavy usage, when 99.9% if time the Queues are empty.
I have a total of 6 queues including 2 DLQs. I have created them all using default settings and not set any throttling or assigned any extra resources.
The functional logic I implemented is, a Lambda checks if there is any notifications to send every 30 minutes and if there are then it creates a message which it puts in a SQS. 99.9% of the time the lambda returns empty results.
When a message is put on SQS then a Lambda is triggered which actually sends the notifications and any failures are put in DLQ. And if the lambda receives any error response when sending a notification then all these error messages are put in another Queue which triggers another lambda and logs these in a database. But all of this is skipped 99.9% of the time, unless I am manually testing the flow.
Below is a snippet of the SQS usage report.
Service, Operation, UsageType, StartTime, EndTime, UsageValue
AWSQueueService, Receive, EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00,11/01/18 01:00, 2699
AWSQueueService, GetQueueAttributes,EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00, 11/01/18 01:00, 180
AWSQueueService,GetQueueAttributes, EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18, 02:00,180
AWSQueueService,Receive,EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18,02:00,2696
In the snippet I see most of the usage is due to below actions.
AWSQueueService Receive
AWSQueueService GetQueueAttributes
It is not clear what is causing such high usage value. In some forums I have read I need to make the Queue implement LongPolling than short polling (which is the default).
It would be great if someone can explain what the actions "Receive" and "GetQueueAttributes" represent and how those can be reduced?
amazon-web-services amazon-sqs
add a comment |
I'm new to this AWS and SQS and playing with it. My SQS billing says I have used my free tier allocation limit in just 10 days for the month and I am not clear what is the reason for such a heavy usage, when 99.9% if time the Queues are empty.
I have a total of 6 queues including 2 DLQs. I have created them all using default settings and not set any throttling or assigned any extra resources.
The functional logic I implemented is, a Lambda checks if there is any notifications to send every 30 minutes and if there are then it creates a message which it puts in a SQS. 99.9% of the time the lambda returns empty results.
When a message is put on SQS then a Lambda is triggered which actually sends the notifications and any failures are put in DLQ. And if the lambda receives any error response when sending a notification then all these error messages are put in another Queue which triggers another lambda and logs these in a database. But all of this is skipped 99.9% of the time, unless I am manually testing the flow.
Below is a snippet of the SQS usage report.
Service, Operation, UsageType, StartTime, EndTime, UsageValue
AWSQueueService, Receive, EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00,11/01/18 01:00, 2699
AWSQueueService, GetQueueAttributes,EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00, 11/01/18 01:00, 180
AWSQueueService,GetQueueAttributes, EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18, 02:00,180
AWSQueueService,Receive,EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18,02:00,2696
In the snippet I see most of the usage is due to below actions.
AWSQueueService Receive
AWSQueueService GetQueueAttributes
It is not clear what is causing such high usage value. In some forums I have read I need to make the Queue implement LongPolling than short polling (which is the default).
It would be great if someone can explain what the actions "Receive" and "GetQueueAttributes" represent and how those can be reduced?
amazon-web-services amazon-sqs
add a comment |
I'm new to this AWS and SQS and playing with it. My SQS billing says I have used my free tier allocation limit in just 10 days for the month and I am not clear what is the reason for such a heavy usage, when 99.9% if time the Queues are empty.
I have a total of 6 queues including 2 DLQs. I have created them all using default settings and not set any throttling or assigned any extra resources.
The functional logic I implemented is, a Lambda checks if there is any notifications to send every 30 minutes and if there are then it creates a message which it puts in a SQS. 99.9% of the time the lambda returns empty results.
When a message is put on SQS then a Lambda is triggered which actually sends the notifications and any failures are put in DLQ. And if the lambda receives any error response when sending a notification then all these error messages are put in another Queue which triggers another lambda and logs these in a database. But all of this is skipped 99.9% of the time, unless I am manually testing the flow.
Below is a snippet of the SQS usage report.
Service, Operation, UsageType, StartTime, EndTime, UsageValue
AWSQueueService, Receive, EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00,11/01/18 01:00, 2699
AWSQueueService, GetQueueAttributes,EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00, 11/01/18 01:00, 180
AWSQueueService,GetQueueAttributes, EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18, 02:00,180
AWSQueueService,Receive,EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18,02:00,2696
In the snippet I see most of the usage is due to below actions.
AWSQueueService Receive
AWSQueueService GetQueueAttributes
It is not clear what is causing such high usage value. In some forums I have read I need to make the Queue implement LongPolling than short polling (which is the default).
It would be great if someone can explain what the actions "Receive" and "GetQueueAttributes" represent and how those can be reduced?
amazon-web-services amazon-sqs
I'm new to this AWS and SQS and playing with it. My SQS billing says I have used my free tier allocation limit in just 10 days for the month and I am not clear what is the reason for such a heavy usage, when 99.9% if time the Queues are empty.
I have a total of 6 queues including 2 DLQs. I have created them all using default settings and not set any throttling or assigned any extra resources.
The functional logic I implemented is, a Lambda checks if there is any notifications to send every 30 minutes and if there are then it creates a message which it puts in a SQS. 99.9% of the time the lambda returns empty results.
When a message is put on SQS then a Lambda is triggered which actually sends the notifications and any failures are put in DLQ. And if the lambda receives any error response when sending a notification then all these error messages are put in another Queue which triggers another lambda and logs these in a database. But all of this is skipped 99.9% of the time, unless I am manually testing the flow.
Below is a snippet of the SQS usage report.
Service, Operation, UsageType, StartTime, EndTime, UsageValue
AWSQueueService, Receive, EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00,11/01/18 01:00, 2699
AWSQueueService, GetQueueAttributes,EU-Requests-Tier1, 11/01/18 00:00, 11/01/18 01:00, 180
AWSQueueService,GetQueueAttributes, EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18, 02:00,180
AWSQueueService,Receive,EU-Requests-Tier1,11/01/18 01:00,11/01/18,02:00,2696
In the snippet I see most of the usage is due to below actions.
AWSQueueService Receive
AWSQueueService GetQueueAttributes
It is not clear what is causing such high usage value. In some forums I have read I need to make the Queue implement LongPolling than short polling (which is the default).
It would be great if someone can explain what the actions "Receive" and "GetQueueAttributes" represent and how those can be reduced?
amazon-web-services amazon-sqs
amazon-web-services amazon-sqs
asked Nov 12 '18 at 19:18
Mateen-Hussain
177114
177114
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53268706%2fawsqueueservice-usagevalue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53268706%2fawsqueueservice-usagevalue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown