How to achieving abstraction in javascript ES6












-1















Is there any possible way to achieve the abstraction in JavaScript world like we have in OOPS?



The abstract class will serve as base and we will create concrete components out of it.
And how to implement the interfaces concepts in JavaScript?






javascript ecmascript-6







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    this might inform you well: stackoverflow.com/questions/3710275/…

    – Emtiaz Zahid
    Nov 20 '18 at 6:11
















-1















Is there any possible way to achieve the abstraction in JavaScript world like we have in OOPS?



The abstract class will serve as base and we will create concrete components out of it.
And how to implement the interfaces concepts in JavaScript?






javascript ecmascript-6







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    this might inform you well: stackoverflow.com/questions/3710275/…

    – Emtiaz Zahid
    Nov 20 '18 at 6:11














-1












-1








-1








Is there any possible way to achieve the abstraction in JavaScript world like we have in OOPS?



The abstract class will serve as base and we will create concrete components out of it.
And how to implement the interfaces concepts in JavaScript?






javascript ecmascript-6







share|improve this question
















Is there any possible way to achieve the abstraction in JavaScript world like we have in OOPS?



The abstract class will serve as base and we will create concrete components out of it.
And how to implement the interfaces concepts in JavaScript?






javascript ecmascript-6




javascript ecmascript-6






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 6:19









Pang

6,9291664102




6,9291664102










asked Nov 20 '18 at 6:08









GowthamanGowthaman

231415




231415








  • 1





    this might inform you well: stackoverflow.com/questions/3710275/…

    – Emtiaz Zahid
    Nov 20 '18 at 6:11














  • 1





    this might inform you well: stackoverflow.com/questions/3710275/…

    – Emtiaz Zahid
    Nov 20 '18 at 6:11








1




1





this might inform you well: stackoverflow.com/questions/3710275/…

– Emtiaz Zahid
Nov 20 '18 at 6:11





this might inform you well: stackoverflow.com/questions/3710275/…

– Emtiaz Zahid
Nov 20 '18 at 6:11












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














It makes little sense to have interfaces or abstract classes, as there are no typechecks.:



 function fn(sth) { console.log(sth.age); }



 fn(new Person());

 fn(new Animal());


If you want typechecks, including interfaces, use TypeScript






share|improve this answer
























  • "Abstract classes" could still be used for sharing behaviour (and supporting instanceof). Of course, mixins could solve most problems just as well.

    – Bergi
    Nov 20 '18 at 7:48











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53387164%2fhow-to-achieving-abstraction-in-javascript-es6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














It makes little sense to have interfaces or abstract classes, as there are no typechecks.:



 function fn(sth) { console.log(sth.age); }



 fn(new Person());

 fn(new Animal());


If you want typechecks, including interfaces, use TypeScript






share|improve this answer
























  • "Abstract classes" could still be used for sharing behaviour (and supporting instanceof). Of course, mixins could solve most problems just as well.

    – Bergi
    Nov 20 '18 at 7:48
















1














It makes little sense to have interfaces or abstract classes, as there are no typechecks.:



 function fn(sth) { console.log(sth.age); }



 fn(new Person());

 fn(new Animal());


If you want typechecks, including interfaces, use TypeScript






share|improve this answer
























  • "Abstract classes" could still be used for sharing behaviour (and supporting instanceof). Of course, mixins could solve most problems just as well.

    – Bergi
    Nov 20 '18 at 7:48














1












1








1







It makes little sense to have interfaces or abstract classes, as there are no typechecks.:



 function fn(sth) { console.log(sth.age); }



 fn(new Person());

 fn(new Animal());


If you want typechecks, including interfaces, use TypeScript






share|improve this answer













It makes little sense to have interfaces or abstract classes, as there are no typechecks.:



 function fn(sth) { console.log(sth.age); }



 fn(new Person());

 fn(new Animal());


If you want typechecks, including interfaces, use TypeScript







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 20 '18 at 6:27









Jonas WilmsJonas Wilms

59.1k53152




59.1k53152













  • "Abstract classes" could still be used for sharing behaviour (and supporting instanceof). Of course, mixins could solve most problems just as well.

    – Bergi
    Nov 20 '18 at 7:48



















  • "Abstract classes" could still be used for sharing behaviour (and supporting instanceof). Of course, mixins could solve most problems just as well.

    – Bergi
    Nov 20 '18 at 7:48

















"Abstract classes" could still be used for sharing behaviour (and supporting instanceof). Of course, mixins could solve most problems just as well.

– Bergi
Nov 20 '18 at 7:48





"Abstract classes" could still be used for sharing behaviour (and supporting instanceof). Of course, mixins could solve most problems just as well.

– Bergi
Nov 20 '18 at 7:48




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53387164%2fhow-to-achieving-abstraction-in-javascript-es6%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

圖片
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 I'm trying to build a Chat app UI, the idea of the Layout was pretty simple: When the input bar is focused, keyboard show up and "push" up the chat bar, as it's a grid, the ListView will resize to fit the screen: I update the input bar's margin to "push" it up: NSValue result = (NSValue)args.Notification.UserInfo.ObjectForKey(new NSString(UIKeyboard.FrameEndUserInfoKey)); CGSize keyboardSize = result.RectangleFValue.Size; if (Element != null){ Element.Margin = new Thickness(0, 0, 0,keyboardSize.Height); //push the entry up to keyboard height when keyboard is activated } And this is ...
閱讀完整內容

Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

圖片
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 Can someone explain to me how to implement the post-redirect-get pattern in Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf? What subscribes on the database save method? @GetMapping("/register") public String showRegisterForm(Model model) { model.addAttribute("user", new User()); return "register"; } @PostMapping public String processRegisterForm(@Valid User user, BindingResult bindingResult) { if (bindingResult.hasErrors()) { return "register"; } else { userRepository.save(user); //what subscribes on this? //how to redirect on e.g. "/login"? ...
閱讀完整內容

Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()

圖片
-2 I am building a railway station model. I want a train to depart when I click a button. I want to call stopDelay() for that but I am not sure how to do that and from which place. anylogic share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 10:12 Anupam Singh Anupam Singh 1 Hi Anupam, welcome to SOF. Please check how to ask good questions, see link below. Your question is...
閱讀完整內容