How to mock class inside another class that being tested?












1















I'm trying to write an integration test for authentification with Spring Security and JWT. My problem is that during authentification in authentification filter it checks that user is valid in the external system. How can I mock class that makes calls to external system during the test?



Here is a security config:



public class WebSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {

private final AuthService authService;

public WebSecurityConfig(AuthService authService) {
this.authService = authService;
}

@Bean
public AuthentificationTokenFilter authenticationTokenFilter() {
return new AuthentificationTokenFilter(authService);
}


@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
httpSecurity.addFilterBefore(authenticationTokenFilter, UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class);
}
}


I need to mock AuthService inside AuthentificationTokenFilter where actual authentification is happening, but I don't directly interact with it and security config. I only trying to make a rest request to RestController and if authentification is correct then this request should return 200 code.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/…

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:24
















1















I'm trying to write an integration test for authentification with Spring Security and JWT. My problem is that during authentification in authentification filter it checks that user is valid in the external system. How can I mock class that makes calls to external system during the test?



Here is a security config:



public class WebSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {

private final AuthService authService;

public WebSecurityConfig(AuthService authService) {
this.authService = authService;
}

@Bean
public AuthentificationTokenFilter authenticationTokenFilter() {
return new AuthentificationTokenFilter(authService);
}


@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
httpSecurity.addFilterBefore(authenticationTokenFilter, UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class);
}
}


I need to mock AuthService inside AuthentificationTokenFilter where actual authentification is happening, but I don't directly interact with it and security config. I only trying to make a rest request to RestController and if authentification is correct then this request should return 200 code.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/…

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:24














1












1








1








I'm trying to write an integration test for authentification with Spring Security and JWT. My problem is that during authentification in authentification filter it checks that user is valid in the external system. How can I mock class that makes calls to external system during the test?



Here is a security config:



public class WebSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {

private final AuthService authService;

public WebSecurityConfig(AuthService authService) {
this.authService = authService;
}

@Bean
public AuthentificationTokenFilter authenticationTokenFilter() {
return new AuthentificationTokenFilter(authService);
}


@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
httpSecurity.addFilterBefore(authenticationTokenFilter, UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class);
}
}


I need to mock AuthService inside AuthentificationTokenFilter where actual authentification is happening, but I don't directly interact with it and security config. I only trying to make a rest request to RestController and if authentification is correct then this request should return 200 code.










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to write an integration test for authentification with Spring Security and JWT. My problem is that during authentification in authentification filter it checks that user is valid in the external system. How can I mock class that makes calls to external system during the test?



Here is a security config:



public class WebSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {

private final AuthService authService;

public WebSecurityConfig(AuthService authService) {
this.authService = authService;
}

@Bean
public AuthentificationTokenFilter authenticationTokenFilter() {
return new AuthentificationTokenFilter(authService);
}


@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity httpSecurity) throws Exception {
httpSecurity.addFilterBefore(authenticationTokenFilter, UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class);
}
}


I need to mock AuthService inside AuthentificationTokenFilter where actual authentification is happening, but I don't directly interact with it and security config. I only trying to make a rest request to RestController and if authentification is correct then this request should return 200 code.







java spring spring-mvc spring-security mocking






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 23 '18 at 14:25









Nikolas

13.6k53669




13.6k53669










asked Nov 23 '18 at 11:21









user2452483user2452483

87111




87111








  • 1





    docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/…

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:24














  • 1





    docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/…

    – JB Nizet
    Nov 23 '18 at 11:24








1




1





docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/…

– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 11:24





docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/…

– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 11:24












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Do you really need to mock it using Mockito? Use the advantage of Spring profiles and the annotation @Profile to distinguish the AuthService interface implementation for the test and other environments.



@Service
@Profile("test")
public class MockAuthService implements AuthService {

// ... the mock implementation
}





share|improve this answer
























  • It only has one method that returns true or false, so I thought to mock it will be easier, but by doing it with profiles it will be easier to add it in every test

    – user2452483
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:53











  • @user2452483: Yes, with this approach you might control more of the implementations (against in-memory data, against the dev. database or another one...). I feel this way is easier to test and mainly, you focus on the testing itself than mocking.

    – Nikolas
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:15












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53445760%2fhow-to-mock-class-inside-another-class-that-being-tested%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Do you really need to mock it using Mockito? Use the advantage of Spring profiles and the annotation @Profile to distinguish the AuthService interface implementation for the test and other environments.



@Service
@Profile("test")
public class MockAuthService implements AuthService {

// ... the mock implementation
}





share|improve this answer
























  • It only has one method that returns true or false, so I thought to mock it will be easier, but by doing it with profiles it will be easier to add it in every test

    – user2452483
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:53











  • @user2452483: Yes, with this approach you might control more of the implementations (against in-memory data, against the dev. database or another one...). I feel this way is easier to test and mainly, you focus on the testing itself than mocking.

    – Nikolas
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:15
















1














Do you really need to mock it using Mockito? Use the advantage of Spring profiles and the annotation @Profile to distinguish the AuthService interface implementation for the test and other environments.



@Service
@Profile("test")
public class MockAuthService implements AuthService {

// ... the mock implementation
}





share|improve this answer
























  • It only has one method that returns true or false, so I thought to mock it will be easier, but by doing it with profiles it will be easier to add it in every test

    – user2452483
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:53











  • @user2452483: Yes, with this approach you might control more of the implementations (against in-memory data, against the dev. database or another one...). I feel this way is easier to test and mainly, you focus on the testing itself than mocking.

    – Nikolas
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:15














1












1








1







Do you really need to mock it using Mockito? Use the advantage of Spring profiles and the annotation @Profile to distinguish the AuthService interface implementation for the test and other environments.



@Service
@Profile("test")
public class MockAuthService implements AuthService {

// ... the mock implementation
}





share|improve this answer













Do you really need to mock it using Mockito? Use the advantage of Spring profiles and the annotation @Profile to distinguish the AuthService interface implementation for the test and other environments.



@Service
@Profile("test")
public class MockAuthService implements AuthService {

// ... the mock implementation
}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 23 '18 at 12:07









NikolasNikolas

13.6k53669




13.6k53669













  • It only has one method that returns true or false, so I thought to mock it will be easier, but by doing it with profiles it will be easier to add it in every test

    – user2452483
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:53











  • @user2452483: Yes, with this approach you might control more of the implementations (against in-memory data, against the dev. database or another one...). I feel this way is easier to test and mainly, you focus on the testing itself than mocking.

    – Nikolas
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:15



















  • It only has one method that returns true or false, so I thought to mock it will be easier, but by doing it with profiles it will be easier to add it in every test

    – user2452483
    Nov 23 '18 at 12:53











  • @user2452483: Yes, with this approach you might control more of the implementations (against in-memory data, against the dev. database or another one...). I feel this way is easier to test and mainly, you focus on the testing itself than mocking.

    – Nikolas
    Nov 23 '18 at 14:15

















It only has one method that returns true or false, so I thought to mock it will be easier, but by doing it with profiles it will be easier to add it in every test

– user2452483
Nov 23 '18 at 12:53





It only has one method that returns true or false, so I thought to mock it will be easier, but by doing it with profiles it will be easier to add it in every test

– user2452483
Nov 23 '18 at 12:53













@user2452483: Yes, with this approach you might control more of the implementations (against in-memory data, against the dev. database or another one...). I feel this way is easier to test and mainly, you focus on the testing itself than mocking.

– Nikolas
Nov 23 '18 at 14:15





@user2452483: Yes, with this approach you might control more of the implementations (against in-memory data, against the dev. database or another one...). I feel this way is easier to test and mainly, you focus on the testing itself than mocking.

– Nikolas
Nov 23 '18 at 14:15




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53445760%2fhow-to-mock-class-inside-another-class-that-being-tested%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()