Is version field on package.json being used by libraries dependencies (yarn, npm…)?












2















I've been having problems when trying to update custom libraries stored in a git repo targeting those libraries on package.json like:



"dependencies": {    
"awesomeLibrary": "git+https://awesome-library-url.git"
}


If I go to awesomeLibrary repo and push new changes, there are sometimes where I don't get the latest version. I need to remark that I do not change the version field on the package.json of awesomeLibrary.



Can this behaviour be affecting yarn upgrade awesomeLibrary or npm update awesomeLibrary?



Cheers,
Javi.










share|improve this question





























    2















    I've been having problems when trying to update custom libraries stored in a git repo targeting those libraries on package.json like:



    "dependencies": {    
    "awesomeLibrary": "git+https://awesome-library-url.git"
    }


    If I go to awesomeLibrary repo and push new changes, there are sometimes where I don't get the latest version. I need to remark that I do not change the version field on the package.json of awesomeLibrary.



    Can this behaviour be affecting yarn upgrade awesomeLibrary or npm update awesomeLibrary?



    Cheers,
    Javi.










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      I've been having problems when trying to update custom libraries stored in a git repo targeting those libraries on package.json like:



      "dependencies": {    
      "awesomeLibrary": "git+https://awesome-library-url.git"
      }


      If I go to awesomeLibrary repo and push new changes, there are sometimes where I don't get the latest version. I need to remark that I do not change the version field on the package.json of awesomeLibrary.



      Can this behaviour be affecting yarn upgrade awesomeLibrary or npm update awesomeLibrary?



      Cheers,
      Javi.










      share|improve this question
















      I've been having problems when trying to update custom libraries stored in a git repo targeting those libraries on package.json like:



      "dependencies": {    
      "awesomeLibrary": "git+https://awesome-library-url.git"
      }


      If I go to awesomeLibrary repo and push new changes, there are sometimes where I don't get the latest version. I need to remark that I do not change the version field on the package.json of awesomeLibrary.



      Can this behaviour be affecting yarn upgrade awesomeLibrary or npm update awesomeLibrary?



      Cheers,
      Javi.







      npm version package.json yarnpkg






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jul 20 '18 at 16:41









      tk421

      3,82351627




      3,82351627










      asked Jul 18 '18 at 6:18









      Javier RodriguezJavier Rodriguez

      557




      557
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          If you plan to publish awesomeLibrary package or want to reference it from another project by pointing awesomeLibrary field in package.json to the package's repo, then yes, you'll have to add the name and version fields.



          Otherwise it's optional.



          Check "Configuring npm" from npm's official documentation for more details: link



          Note from their documentation: "Version must be parseable by node-semver"






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f51394835%2fis-version-field-on-package-json-being-used-by-libraries-dependencies-yarn-npm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            If you plan to publish awesomeLibrary package or want to reference it from another project by pointing awesomeLibrary field in package.json to the package's repo, then yes, you'll have to add the name and version fields.



            Otherwise it's optional.



            Check "Configuring npm" from npm's official documentation for more details: link



            Note from their documentation: "Version must be parseable by node-semver"






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              If you plan to publish awesomeLibrary package or want to reference it from another project by pointing awesomeLibrary field in package.json to the package's repo, then yes, you'll have to add the name and version fields.



              Otherwise it's optional.



              Check "Configuring npm" from npm's official documentation for more details: link



              Note from their documentation: "Version must be parseable by node-semver"






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                If you plan to publish awesomeLibrary package or want to reference it from another project by pointing awesomeLibrary field in package.json to the package's repo, then yes, you'll have to add the name and version fields.



                Otherwise it's optional.



                Check "Configuring npm" from npm's official documentation for more details: link



                Note from their documentation: "Version must be parseable by node-semver"






                share|improve this answer













                If you plan to publish awesomeLibrary package or want to reference it from another project by pointing awesomeLibrary field in package.json to the package's repo, then yes, you'll have to add the name and version fields.



                Otherwise it's optional.



                Check "Configuring npm" from npm's official documentation for more details: link



                Note from their documentation: "Version must be parseable by node-semver"







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 '18 at 15:09









                Consta GorganConsta Gorgan

                14614




                14614
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f51394835%2fis-version-field-on-package-json-being-used-by-libraries-dependencies-yarn-npm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Academy of Television Arts & Sciences

                    L'Équipe

                    1995 France bombings