Rails 5 testing with Jasmine - “export class” required for Jasmine tests, but breaks my pages
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have a few javascript files which are define helper classes which used in some of my pages which use Angular for the user interaction. I just require these files in manifest for the controllers that need them, and it's all working fine.
The problem has come in trying to test these classes using Jasmine. My Jasmine tests were throwing type errors until I put the "export" keyword in front of the javascript class definitions in these files. Then the tests worked fine, but the web pages that use these classes would throw a syntax error on encountering the export keyword.
The javascript classes are pretty straightforward, just two ES6 class definitions like this;
class ProjectBudget {
constructor() {
this._map = new Map();
this._total = 0;
this._postedTotal = 0;
}
load(rowObject) {
[...]
}
//other methods
}
class ProjectBudgetItem {
constructor(id, name, amount, parent, hasBudgetDetail = false) {
this._accountId = id;
this._accountName = name;
this._rowState = "loaded";
}
//various methods
}
The test looks like this:
import {ProjectBudget, ProjectBudgetItem} from "../../app/assets/javascripts/budgeting_scripts/project_budget_classes.js"
describe("ProjectBudgets", () => {
it("can create a projectBudget", () => {
// expect(foo).toEqual("Foo");
let pb = new ProjectBudget();
expect(pb.dirty).toEqual(false);
let obj={accountId: 3, name: "Carpenters", budgetAmount: 1000, hasDetailedbudget: false}
pb.load(obj)
expect(pb.total).toEqual(1000);
})
});
The only way I can get the test to run is to change
'class ProjectBudget' to 'export class ProjectBudget' otherwise I get an error like this:
FAILED TESTS:
ProjectBudgets
✖ can create a projectBudget
Chrome 70.0.3538 (Mac OS X 10.13.6)
TypeError: o.ProjectBudget is not a constructor
at <Jasmine>
at UserContext.<anonymous> (webpack:///spec/javascripts/budget_spec.js:7:17 <- spec/javascripts/budget_spec-2f776bfad8fdb52497f7.js:1:711)
at <Jasmine>
Unfortunately once I do this, when the my application loads the webpage which uses these classes, the browser throws a syntax error on the word "export".
Not sure how to resolve this conflict.
ruby-on-rails rspec jasmine ruby-on-rails-5 rspec-rails
add a comment |
I have a few javascript files which are define helper classes which used in some of my pages which use Angular for the user interaction. I just require these files in manifest for the controllers that need them, and it's all working fine.
The problem has come in trying to test these classes using Jasmine. My Jasmine tests were throwing type errors until I put the "export" keyword in front of the javascript class definitions in these files. Then the tests worked fine, but the web pages that use these classes would throw a syntax error on encountering the export keyword.
The javascript classes are pretty straightforward, just two ES6 class definitions like this;
class ProjectBudget {
constructor() {
this._map = new Map();
this._total = 0;
this._postedTotal = 0;
}
load(rowObject) {
[...]
}
//other methods
}
class ProjectBudgetItem {
constructor(id, name, amount, parent, hasBudgetDetail = false) {
this._accountId = id;
this._accountName = name;
this._rowState = "loaded";
}
//various methods
}
The test looks like this:
import {ProjectBudget, ProjectBudgetItem} from "../../app/assets/javascripts/budgeting_scripts/project_budget_classes.js"
describe("ProjectBudgets", () => {
it("can create a projectBudget", () => {
// expect(foo).toEqual("Foo");
let pb = new ProjectBudget();
expect(pb.dirty).toEqual(false);
let obj={accountId: 3, name: "Carpenters", budgetAmount: 1000, hasDetailedbudget: false}
pb.load(obj)
expect(pb.total).toEqual(1000);
})
});
The only way I can get the test to run is to change
'class ProjectBudget' to 'export class ProjectBudget' otherwise I get an error like this:
FAILED TESTS:
ProjectBudgets
✖ can create a projectBudget
Chrome 70.0.3538 (Mac OS X 10.13.6)
TypeError: o.ProjectBudget is not a constructor
at <Jasmine>
at UserContext.<anonymous> (webpack:///spec/javascripts/budget_spec.js:7:17 <- spec/javascripts/budget_spec-2f776bfad8fdb52497f7.js:1:711)
at <Jasmine>
Unfortunately once I do this, when the my application loads the webpage which uses these classes, the browser throws a syntax error on the word "export".
Not sure how to resolve this conflict.
ruby-on-rails rspec jasmine ruby-on-rails-5 rspec-rails
add a comment |
I have a few javascript files which are define helper classes which used in some of my pages which use Angular for the user interaction. I just require these files in manifest for the controllers that need them, and it's all working fine.
The problem has come in trying to test these classes using Jasmine. My Jasmine tests were throwing type errors until I put the "export" keyword in front of the javascript class definitions in these files. Then the tests worked fine, but the web pages that use these classes would throw a syntax error on encountering the export keyword.
The javascript classes are pretty straightforward, just two ES6 class definitions like this;
class ProjectBudget {
constructor() {
this._map = new Map();
this._total = 0;
this._postedTotal = 0;
}
load(rowObject) {
[...]
}
//other methods
}
class ProjectBudgetItem {
constructor(id, name, amount, parent, hasBudgetDetail = false) {
this._accountId = id;
this._accountName = name;
this._rowState = "loaded";
}
//various methods
}
The test looks like this:
import {ProjectBudget, ProjectBudgetItem} from "../../app/assets/javascripts/budgeting_scripts/project_budget_classes.js"
describe("ProjectBudgets", () => {
it("can create a projectBudget", () => {
// expect(foo).toEqual("Foo");
let pb = new ProjectBudget();
expect(pb.dirty).toEqual(false);
let obj={accountId: 3, name: "Carpenters", budgetAmount: 1000, hasDetailedbudget: false}
pb.load(obj)
expect(pb.total).toEqual(1000);
})
});
The only way I can get the test to run is to change
'class ProjectBudget' to 'export class ProjectBudget' otherwise I get an error like this:
FAILED TESTS:
ProjectBudgets
✖ can create a projectBudget
Chrome 70.0.3538 (Mac OS X 10.13.6)
TypeError: o.ProjectBudget is not a constructor
at <Jasmine>
at UserContext.<anonymous> (webpack:///spec/javascripts/budget_spec.js:7:17 <- spec/javascripts/budget_spec-2f776bfad8fdb52497f7.js:1:711)
at <Jasmine>
Unfortunately once I do this, when the my application loads the webpage which uses these classes, the browser throws a syntax error on the word "export".
Not sure how to resolve this conflict.
ruby-on-rails rspec jasmine ruby-on-rails-5 rspec-rails
I have a few javascript files which are define helper classes which used in some of my pages which use Angular for the user interaction. I just require these files in manifest for the controllers that need them, and it's all working fine.
The problem has come in trying to test these classes using Jasmine. My Jasmine tests were throwing type errors until I put the "export" keyword in front of the javascript class definitions in these files. Then the tests worked fine, but the web pages that use these classes would throw a syntax error on encountering the export keyword.
The javascript classes are pretty straightforward, just two ES6 class definitions like this;
class ProjectBudget {
constructor() {
this._map = new Map();
this._total = 0;
this._postedTotal = 0;
}
load(rowObject) {
[...]
}
//other methods
}
class ProjectBudgetItem {
constructor(id, name, amount, parent, hasBudgetDetail = false) {
this._accountId = id;
this._accountName = name;
this._rowState = "loaded";
}
//various methods
}
The test looks like this:
import {ProjectBudget, ProjectBudgetItem} from "../../app/assets/javascripts/budgeting_scripts/project_budget_classes.js"
describe("ProjectBudgets", () => {
it("can create a projectBudget", () => {
// expect(foo).toEqual("Foo");
let pb = new ProjectBudget();
expect(pb.dirty).toEqual(false);
let obj={accountId: 3, name: "Carpenters", budgetAmount: 1000, hasDetailedbudget: false}
pb.load(obj)
expect(pb.total).toEqual(1000);
})
});
The only way I can get the test to run is to change
'class ProjectBudget' to 'export class ProjectBudget' otherwise I get an error like this:
FAILED TESTS:
ProjectBudgets
✖ can create a projectBudget
Chrome 70.0.3538 (Mac OS X 10.13.6)
TypeError: o.ProjectBudget is not a constructor
at <Jasmine>
at UserContext.<anonymous> (webpack:///spec/javascripts/budget_spec.js:7:17 <- spec/javascripts/budget_spec-2f776bfad8fdb52497f7.js:1:711)
at <Jasmine>
Unfortunately once I do this, when the my application loads the webpage which uses these classes, the browser throws a syntax error on the word "export".
Not sure how to resolve this conflict.
ruby-on-rails rspec jasmine ruby-on-rails-5 rspec-rails
ruby-on-rails rspec jasmine ruby-on-rails-5 rspec-rails
edited Nov 26 '18 at 19:55
user1023110
asked Nov 25 '18 at 3:27
user1023110user1023110
1,0341726
1,0341726
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The solution in this case was to eliminate the import statement and include the scripts I need (without the 'export' keyword) under the 'files' key in karma.conf.js. Maybe not the best solution as it would be nice to be able to specify in the test what files to load rather than in the configuration file, but at least it worked.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53464394%2frails-5-testing-with-jasmine-export-class-required-for-jasmine-tests-but-br%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The solution in this case was to eliminate the import statement and include the scripts I need (without the 'export' keyword) under the 'files' key in karma.conf.js. Maybe not the best solution as it would be nice to be able to specify in the test what files to load rather than in the configuration file, but at least it worked.
add a comment |
The solution in this case was to eliminate the import statement and include the scripts I need (without the 'export' keyword) under the 'files' key in karma.conf.js. Maybe not the best solution as it would be nice to be able to specify in the test what files to load rather than in the configuration file, but at least it worked.
add a comment |
The solution in this case was to eliminate the import statement and include the scripts I need (without the 'export' keyword) under the 'files' key in karma.conf.js. Maybe not the best solution as it would be nice to be able to specify in the test what files to load rather than in the configuration file, but at least it worked.
The solution in this case was to eliminate the import statement and include the scripts I need (without the 'export' keyword) under the 'files' key in karma.conf.js. Maybe not the best solution as it would be nice to be able to specify in the test what files to load rather than in the configuration file, but at least it worked.
answered Nov 26 '18 at 23:34
user1023110user1023110
1,0341726
1,0341726
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53464394%2frails-5-testing-with-jasmine-export-class-required-for-jasmine-tests-but-br%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown