Is it possible to lock in a high interest rate in savings, when general interest rates are high?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1












I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s), that were opened when interest rates (federal funds rate) were high. The implication seemed to be that for some of these accounts, if one were to hold these accounts open, they'd still be getting the same rates after all these years. Do I misunderstand, or is this actually possible?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    Look for long running bonds. With 30-year treasuries you could have earned 14% for 30 years once. macrotrends.net/2521/30-year-treasury-bond-rate-yield-chart
    – Trilarion
    Nov 6 at 10:09








  • 5




    @Trilarion note, though, that bonds are almost always callable. This means that -- once interest rates dropped -- companies were more than eager to issue new bonds at the lower rate with which they retired the old, high-rate bonds.
    – RonJohn
    Nov 6 at 13:25






  • 1




    @Trilarion It would also be beneficial to mention that bond rates usually reflect mortgage rates for the period in question. freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30.html. Since I've already bought a house, I am very eager to see those rates to sky-rocket again! Pretty please Mr./Mrs. Government :-)
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 6 at 15:46








  • 1




    The problem with this as an investment strategy is that high interest rates usually occur in times of high inflation, so equal interest payments are worth less, year by year. In the long term (>10 years) this effect can be severe.
    – alephzero
    Nov 7 at 11:19






  • 1




    It got a lot better than 4.5% back around '06. My checking account earned 6.25% in early 2008. CDs over 5% were common, even for short terms.
    – reirab
    Nov 8 at 3:19

















up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1












I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s), that were opened when interest rates (federal funds rate) were high. The implication seemed to be that for some of these accounts, if one were to hold these accounts open, they'd still be getting the same rates after all these years. Do I misunderstand, or is this actually possible?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    Look for long running bonds. With 30-year treasuries you could have earned 14% for 30 years once. macrotrends.net/2521/30-year-treasury-bond-rate-yield-chart
    – Trilarion
    Nov 6 at 10:09








  • 5




    @Trilarion note, though, that bonds are almost always callable. This means that -- once interest rates dropped -- companies were more than eager to issue new bonds at the lower rate with which they retired the old, high-rate bonds.
    – RonJohn
    Nov 6 at 13:25






  • 1




    @Trilarion It would also be beneficial to mention that bond rates usually reflect mortgage rates for the period in question. freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30.html. Since I've already bought a house, I am very eager to see those rates to sky-rocket again! Pretty please Mr./Mrs. Government :-)
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 6 at 15:46








  • 1




    The problem with this as an investment strategy is that high interest rates usually occur in times of high inflation, so equal interest payments are worth less, year by year. In the long term (>10 years) this effect can be severe.
    – alephzero
    Nov 7 at 11:19






  • 1




    It got a lot better than 4.5% back around '06. My checking account earned 6.25% in early 2008. CDs over 5% were common, even for short terms.
    – reirab
    Nov 8 at 3:19













up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
17
down vote

favorite
1






1





I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s), that were opened when interest rates (federal funds rate) were high. The implication seemed to be that for some of these accounts, if one were to hold these accounts open, they'd still be getting the same rates after all these years. Do I misunderstand, or is this actually possible?










share|improve this question















I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s), that were opened when interest rates (federal funds rate) were high. The implication seemed to be that for some of these accounts, if one were to hold these accounts open, they'd still be getting the same rates after all these years. Do I misunderstand, or is this actually possible?







savings interest-rate






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 5 at 21:34

























asked Nov 5 at 21:25









horse hair

1,70021729




1,70021729








  • 6




    Look for long running bonds. With 30-year treasuries you could have earned 14% for 30 years once. macrotrends.net/2521/30-year-treasury-bond-rate-yield-chart
    – Trilarion
    Nov 6 at 10:09








  • 5




    @Trilarion note, though, that bonds are almost always callable. This means that -- once interest rates dropped -- companies were more than eager to issue new bonds at the lower rate with which they retired the old, high-rate bonds.
    – RonJohn
    Nov 6 at 13:25






  • 1




    @Trilarion It would also be beneficial to mention that bond rates usually reflect mortgage rates for the period in question. freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30.html. Since I've already bought a house, I am very eager to see those rates to sky-rocket again! Pretty please Mr./Mrs. Government :-)
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 6 at 15:46








  • 1




    The problem with this as an investment strategy is that high interest rates usually occur in times of high inflation, so equal interest payments are worth less, year by year. In the long term (>10 years) this effect can be severe.
    – alephzero
    Nov 7 at 11:19






  • 1




    It got a lot better than 4.5% back around '06. My checking account earned 6.25% in early 2008. CDs over 5% were common, even for short terms.
    – reirab
    Nov 8 at 3:19














  • 6




    Look for long running bonds. With 30-year treasuries you could have earned 14% for 30 years once. macrotrends.net/2521/30-year-treasury-bond-rate-yield-chart
    – Trilarion
    Nov 6 at 10:09








  • 5




    @Trilarion note, though, that bonds are almost always callable. This means that -- once interest rates dropped -- companies were more than eager to issue new bonds at the lower rate with which they retired the old, high-rate bonds.
    – RonJohn
    Nov 6 at 13:25






  • 1




    @Trilarion It would also be beneficial to mention that bond rates usually reflect mortgage rates for the period in question. freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30.html. Since I've already bought a house, I am very eager to see those rates to sky-rocket again! Pretty please Mr./Mrs. Government :-)
    – MonkeyZeus
    Nov 6 at 15:46








  • 1




    The problem with this as an investment strategy is that high interest rates usually occur in times of high inflation, so equal interest payments are worth less, year by year. In the long term (>10 years) this effect can be severe.
    – alephzero
    Nov 7 at 11:19






  • 1




    It got a lot better than 4.5% back around '06. My checking account earned 6.25% in early 2008. CDs over 5% were common, even for short terms.
    – reirab
    Nov 8 at 3:19








6




6




Look for long running bonds. With 30-year treasuries you could have earned 14% for 30 years once. macrotrends.net/2521/30-year-treasury-bond-rate-yield-chart
– Trilarion
Nov 6 at 10:09






Look for long running bonds. With 30-year treasuries you could have earned 14% for 30 years once. macrotrends.net/2521/30-year-treasury-bond-rate-yield-chart
– Trilarion
Nov 6 at 10:09






5




5




@Trilarion note, though, that bonds are almost always callable. This means that -- once interest rates dropped -- companies were more than eager to issue new bonds at the lower rate with which they retired the old, high-rate bonds.
– RonJohn
Nov 6 at 13:25




@Trilarion note, though, that bonds are almost always callable. This means that -- once interest rates dropped -- companies were more than eager to issue new bonds at the lower rate with which they retired the old, high-rate bonds.
– RonJohn
Nov 6 at 13:25




1




1




@Trilarion It would also be beneficial to mention that bond rates usually reflect mortgage rates for the period in question. freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30.html. Since I've already bought a house, I am very eager to see those rates to sky-rocket again! Pretty please Mr./Mrs. Government :-)
– MonkeyZeus
Nov 6 at 15:46






@Trilarion It would also be beneficial to mention that bond rates usually reflect mortgage rates for the period in question. freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30.html. Since I've already bought a house, I am very eager to see those rates to sky-rocket again! Pretty please Mr./Mrs. Government :-)
– MonkeyZeus
Nov 6 at 15:46






1




1




The problem with this as an investment strategy is that high interest rates usually occur in times of high inflation, so equal interest payments are worth less, year by year. In the long term (>10 years) this effect can be severe.
– alephzero
Nov 7 at 11:19




The problem with this as an investment strategy is that high interest rates usually occur in times of high inflation, so equal interest payments are worth less, year by year. In the long term (>10 years) this effect can be severe.
– alephzero
Nov 7 at 11:19




1




1




It got a lot better than 4.5% back around '06. My checking account earned 6.25% in early 2008. CDs over 5% were common, even for short terms.
– reirab
Nov 8 at 3:19




It got a lot better than 4.5% back around '06. My checking account earned 6.25% in early 2008. CDs over 5% were common, even for short terms.
– reirab
Nov 8 at 3:19










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
51
down vote



accepted










Flexible savings accounts are almost all variable interest, meaning the rates go up and down with market rates. The reason for this is that if they did not, people could pay into the fixed interest ones when rates elsewhere were low, and take money out when rates elsewhere were high (and invest it at a higher rate in other accounts), making a profit at the bank's expense.



There is a vehicle for 'locking in' savings at high interest rates. This is an account where the interest rate is fixed, but the money is also locked into it. In America these are called Certificate of Deposit (CD). In Canada they are called Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GIC). In the UK and other places they are called Term Deposits. In essence you agree to lock your money into an account for a fixed amount of time, in return for a guaranteed rate of return. (There is usually a clause that allows you to take your money out early, often with a penalty.)






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    13
    down vote














    I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s).




    Well, you heard wrong (g). In 1980-81 the Fed Funds rate peaked at 17.36%. Taxable money market funds were paying over 17%. Short term CDs were over 18%. The 10 and 30 year treasury bonds were over 15%. Baa corporate bonds were paying over 16%. Long term treasury and corporate bonds locked in these rates.



    I was fairly new to the market then. A market mentor of mine had recently retired and had sold his business for $600k. He put the bulk of it in 20-30 paper and happily cut coupons at an average rate of 15% until maturity. Think about that. 15% on say $500k is a tidy income of $75k per year. Not bad at all.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Yes, in Australia in the late 80s the short term money market was returning 19%. "Cash is king" was the order of the day.
      – Peter K.
      Nov 5 at 23:30










    • I remember having a basic savings account that returned over 5% in the 80's.
      – Rocky
      Nov 5 at 23:34






    • 6




      I had a money market account paying 16+ percent while carrying a 3% college loan. I was in no hurry to pay that off :->)
      – Bob Baerker
      Nov 5 at 23:41










    • Even long-term CDs payed around 17%. Savings and Loans that issued such paper were under sever stress when rates subsequently dropped.
      – RonJohn
      Nov 6 at 13:22










    • I haven't seen (g) in a long time. Aside, are you accepting students?
      – horse hair
      Nov 6 at 20:47


















    up vote
    5
    down vote













    There is an element of truth to this, but not in savings accounts. When I was very young, some family members bought a small amount of Savings Bonds issued by the U.S. government which at the time were offering in the vicinity of 9% interest. Twenty years later they were cashed in to help pay for my college education - a shame really considering they would have continued paying this for another (IIRC) twenty years, but in the grand scheme of things it wasn't a huge amount of missed opportunity, as the cashed in amount was somewhere around two to three thousand dollars.



    There are similar investment strategies you could pursue. They all revolve around the idea of locking in an interest rate in long term debt obligations with a debtor with very low risk of default. The U.S. Savings Bonds example is an outlier because they pay interest for a much longer period of time and don't "mature" in quite the same way as typical bond issues do.






    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      That depends on the contracts you have and probably also in the country, related with available products.



      In Germany, we have "Bausparverträge" (building saving contracts) where we pay a certain amount per year to save up some money. After reaching a certain threshold, we qualify for a loan at an interest rate defined on signing the contract (but are not required to take the loan).



      When you signed such a contract in a period of high interest, you have this high interest even nowadays. For examples, my two contracts from 2007 and 2013 both still come with an interest of 3%, without risk of the market. Compared to that, normal saving accounts offer in the range from 0.01% to about 0.5% (or 0.9% if you are lucky).



      The downside is that if I urgently need the money, the contract and its benefits are gone.



      Long story short, yes, it is possible to lock in a high interest rate if you choose the right product.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2




        "Treaty" is the wrong word in English. (It means an agreement between sovereign states or international organizations.) I think you are translating "der Vertrag", which in this context would be "contract" or more generally "agreement".
        – Martin Bonner
        Nov 6 at 9:27










      • @MartinBonner Thank you! Changed it.
        – glglgl
        Nov 6 at 9:56










      • I have one of those, and recently my bank told me they need to increase the administration fees because they are making a loss with the high interests.
        – Paŭlo Ebermann
        Nov 7 at 0:46










      • @PaŭloEbermann Same with me, but the interest still outweighs the (IIRC) 12 € per year they charge.
        – glglgl
        Nov 7 at 9:57










      • @PaŭloEbermann google around a little, banks have tried a lot of those over the years to get out of those contracts. Many of those tricks were later subject to court rulings against the banks. That might well be one of those, in which case you'd have to act, but it could make you quite some money. Making a loss on a contract in itself is no reason to unilaterally change the contract.
        – DonQuiKong
        Nov 7 at 9:58


















      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Savings accounts generally aren't for fixed amounts. There have, however, been special promotional offers for accounts with fixed interest rates. I think that has become rarer, and certainly finding one with an interest rate of 4.5% would be unlikely to say the least.






      share|improve this answer





















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "93"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101831%2fis-it-possible-to-lock-in-a-high-interest-rate-in-savings-when-general-interest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        51
        down vote



        accepted










        Flexible savings accounts are almost all variable interest, meaning the rates go up and down with market rates. The reason for this is that if they did not, people could pay into the fixed interest ones when rates elsewhere were low, and take money out when rates elsewhere were high (and invest it at a higher rate in other accounts), making a profit at the bank's expense.



        There is a vehicle for 'locking in' savings at high interest rates. This is an account where the interest rate is fixed, but the money is also locked into it. In America these are called Certificate of Deposit (CD). In Canada they are called Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GIC). In the UK and other places they are called Term Deposits. In essence you agree to lock your money into an account for a fixed amount of time, in return for a guaranteed rate of return. (There is usually a clause that allows you to take your money out early, often with a penalty.)






        share|improve this answer



























          up vote
          51
          down vote



          accepted










          Flexible savings accounts are almost all variable interest, meaning the rates go up and down with market rates. The reason for this is that if they did not, people could pay into the fixed interest ones when rates elsewhere were low, and take money out when rates elsewhere were high (and invest it at a higher rate in other accounts), making a profit at the bank's expense.



          There is a vehicle for 'locking in' savings at high interest rates. This is an account where the interest rate is fixed, but the money is also locked into it. In America these are called Certificate of Deposit (CD). In Canada they are called Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GIC). In the UK and other places they are called Term Deposits. In essence you agree to lock your money into an account for a fixed amount of time, in return for a guaranteed rate of return. (There is usually a clause that allows you to take your money out early, often with a penalty.)






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            51
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            51
            down vote



            accepted






            Flexible savings accounts are almost all variable interest, meaning the rates go up and down with market rates. The reason for this is that if they did not, people could pay into the fixed interest ones when rates elsewhere were low, and take money out when rates elsewhere were high (and invest it at a higher rate in other accounts), making a profit at the bank's expense.



            There is a vehicle for 'locking in' savings at high interest rates. This is an account where the interest rate is fixed, but the money is also locked into it. In America these are called Certificate of Deposit (CD). In Canada they are called Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GIC). In the UK and other places they are called Term Deposits. In essence you agree to lock your money into an account for a fixed amount of time, in return for a guaranteed rate of return. (There is usually a clause that allows you to take your money out early, often with a penalty.)






            share|improve this answer














            Flexible savings accounts are almost all variable interest, meaning the rates go up and down with market rates. The reason for this is that if they did not, people could pay into the fixed interest ones when rates elsewhere were low, and take money out when rates elsewhere were high (and invest it at a higher rate in other accounts), making a profit at the bank's expense.



            There is a vehicle for 'locking in' savings at high interest rates. This is an account where the interest rate is fixed, but the money is also locked into it. In America these are called Certificate of Deposit (CD). In Canada they are called Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GIC). In the UK and other places they are called Term Deposits. In essence you agree to lock your money into an account for a fixed amount of time, in return for a guaranteed rate of return. (There is usually a clause that allows you to take your money out early, often with a penalty.)







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 5 at 22:51

























            answered Nov 5 at 21:40









            DJClayworth

            13.9k14468




            13.9k14468
























                up vote
                13
                down vote














                I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s).




                Well, you heard wrong (g). In 1980-81 the Fed Funds rate peaked at 17.36%. Taxable money market funds were paying over 17%. Short term CDs were over 18%. The 10 and 30 year treasury bonds were over 15%. Baa corporate bonds were paying over 16%. Long term treasury and corporate bonds locked in these rates.



                I was fairly new to the market then. A market mentor of mine had recently retired and had sold his business for $600k. He put the bulk of it in 20-30 paper and happily cut coupons at an average rate of 15% until maturity. Think about that. 15% on say $500k is a tidy income of $75k per year. Not bad at all.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Yes, in Australia in the late 80s the short term money market was returning 19%. "Cash is king" was the order of the day.
                  – Peter K.
                  Nov 5 at 23:30










                • I remember having a basic savings account that returned over 5% in the 80's.
                  – Rocky
                  Nov 5 at 23:34






                • 6




                  I had a money market account paying 16+ percent while carrying a 3% college loan. I was in no hurry to pay that off :->)
                  – Bob Baerker
                  Nov 5 at 23:41










                • Even long-term CDs payed around 17%. Savings and Loans that issued such paper were under sever stress when rates subsequently dropped.
                  – RonJohn
                  Nov 6 at 13:22










                • I haven't seen (g) in a long time. Aside, are you accepting students?
                  – horse hair
                  Nov 6 at 20:47















                up vote
                13
                down vote














                I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s).




                Well, you heard wrong (g). In 1980-81 the Fed Funds rate peaked at 17.36%. Taxable money market funds were paying over 17%. Short term CDs were over 18%. The 10 and 30 year treasury bonds were over 15%. Baa corporate bonds were paying over 16%. Long term treasury and corporate bonds locked in these rates.



                I was fairly new to the market then. A market mentor of mine had recently retired and had sold his business for $600k. He put the bulk of it in 20-30 paper and happily cut coupons at an average rate of 15% until maturity. Think about that. 15% on say $500k is a tidy income of $75k per year. Not bad at all.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Yes, in Australia in the late 80s the short term money market was returning 19%. "Cash is king" was the order of the day.
                  – Peter K.
                  Nov 5 at 23:30










                • I remember having a basic savings account that returned over 5% in the 80's.
                  – Rocky
                  Nov 5 at 23:34






                • 6




                  I had a money market account paying 16+ percent while carrying a 3% college loan. I was in no hurry to pay that off :->)
                  – Bob Baerker
                  Nov 5 at 23:41










                • Even long-term CDs payed around 17%. Savings and Loans that issued such paper were under sever stress when rates subsequently dropped.
                  – RonJohn
                  Nov 6 at 13:22










                • I haven't seen (g) in a long time. Aside, are you accepting students?
                  – horse hair
                  Nov 6 at 20:47













                up vote
                13
                down vote










                up vote
                13
                down vote










                I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s).




                Well, you heard wrong (g). In 1980-81 the Fed Funds rate peaked at 17.36%. Taxable money market funds were paying over 17%. Short term CDs were over 18%. The 10 and 30 year treasury bonds were over 15%. Baa corporate bonds were paying over 16%. Long term treasury and corporate bonds locked in these rates.



                I was fairly new to the market then. A market mentor of mine had recently retired and had sold his business for $600k. He put the bulk of it in 20-30 paper and happily cut coupons at an average rate of 15% until maturity. Think about that. 15% on say $500k is a tidy income of $75k per year. Not bad at all.






                share|improve this answer













                I've heard anecdotes about high-interest savings accounts (4.5% around 2006, even 8% in the 80s).




                Well, you heard wrong (g). In 1980-81 the Fed Funds rate peaked at 17.36%. Taxable money market funds were paying over 17%. Short term CDs were over 18%. The 10 and 30 year treasury bonds were over 15%. Baa corporate bonds were paying over 16%. Long term treasury and corporate bonds locked in these rates.



                I was fairly new to the market then. A market mentor of mine had recently retired and had sold his business for $600k. He put the bulk of it in 20-30 paper and happily cut coupons at an average rate of 15% until maturity. Think about that. 15% on say $500k is a tidy income of $75k per year. Not bad at all.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 5 at 23:18









                Bob Baerker

                13k11847




                13k11847












                • Yes, in Australia in the late 80s the short term money market was returning 19%. "Cash is king" was the order of the day.
                  – Peter K.
                  Nov 5 at 23:30










                • I remember having a basic savings account that returned over 5% in the 80's.
                  – Rocky
                  Nov 5 at 23:34






                • 6




                  I had a money market account paying 16+ percent while carrying a 3% college loan. I was in no hurry to pay that off :->)
                  – Bob Baerker
                  Nov 5 at 23:41










                • Even long-term CDs payed around 17%. Savings and Loans that issued such paper were under sever stress when rates subsequently dropped.
                  – RonJohn
                  Nov 6 at 13:22










                • I haven't seen (g) in a long time. Aside, are you accepting students?
                  – horse hair
                  Nov 6 at 20:47


















                • Yes, in Australia in the late 80s the short term money market was returning 19%. "Cash is king" was the order of the day.
                  – Peter K.
                  Nov 5 at 23:30










                • I remember having a basic savings account that returned over 5% in the 80's.
                  – Rocky
                  Nov 5 at 23:34






                • 6




                  I had a money market account paying 16+ percent while carrying a 3% college loan. I was in no hurry to pay that off :->)
                  – Bob Baerker
                  Nov 5 at 23:41










                • Even long-term CDs payed around 17%. Savings and Loans that issued such paper were under sever stress when rates subsequently dropped.
                  – RonJohn
                  Nov 6 at 13:22










                • I haven't seen (g) in a long time. Aside, are you accepting students?
                  – horse hair
                  Nov 6 at 20:47
















                Yes, in Australia in the late 80s the short term money market was returning 19%. "Cash is king" was the order of the day.
                – Peter K.
                Nov 5 at 23:30




                Yes, in Australia in the late 80s the short term money market was returning 19%. "Cash is king" was the order of the day.
                – Peter K.
                Nov 5 at 23:30












                I remember having a basic savings account that returned over 5% in the 80's.
                – Rocky
                Nov 5 at 23:34




                I remember having a basic savings account that returned over 5% in the 80's.
                – Rocky
                Nov 5 at 23:34




                6




                6




                I had a money market account paying 16+ percent while carrying a 3% college loan. I was in no hurry to pay that off :->)
                – Bob Baerker
                Nov 5 at 23:41




                I had a money market account paying 16+ percent while carrying a 3% college loan. I was in no hurry to pay that off :->)
                – Bob Baerker
                Nov 5 at 23:41












                Even long-term CDs payed around 17%. Savings and Loans that issued such paper were under sever stress when rates subsequently dropped.
                – RonJohn
                Nov 6 at 13:22




                Even long-term CDs payed around 17%. Savings and Loans that issued such paper were under sever stress when rates subsequently dropped.
                – RonJohn
                Nov 6 at 13:22












                I haven't seen (g) in a long time. Aside, are you accepting students?
                – horse hair
                Nov 6 at 20:47




                I haven't seen (g) in a long time. Aside, are you accepting students?
                – horse hair
                Nov 6 at 20:47










                up vote
                5
                down vote













                There is an element of truth to this, but not in savings accounts. When I was very young, some family members bought a small amount of Savings Bonds issued by the U.S. government which at the time were offering in the vicinity of 9% interest. Twenty years later they were cashed in to help pay for my college education - a shame really considering they would have continued paying this for another (IIRC) twenty years, but in the grand scheme of things it wasn't a huge amount of missed opportunity, as the cashed in amount was somewhere around two to three thousand dollars.



                There are similar investment strategies you could pursue. They all revolve around the idea of locking in an interest rate in long term debt obligations with a debtor with very low risk of default. The U.S. Savings Bonds example is an outlier because they pay interest for a much longer period of time and don't "mature" in quite the same way as typical bond issues do.






                share|improve this answer



























                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote













                  There is an element of truth to this, but not in savings accounts. When I was very young, some family members bought a small amount of Savings Bonds issued by the U.S. government which at the time were offering in the vicinity of 9% interest. Twenty years later they were cashed in to help pay for my college education - a shame really considering they would have continued paying this for another (IIRC) twenty years, but in the grand scheme of things it wasn't a huge amount of missed opportunity, as the cashed in amount was somewhere around two to three thousand dollars.



                  There are similar investment strategies you could pursue. They all revolve around the idea of locking in an interest rate in long term debt obligations with a debtor with very low risk of default. The U.S. Savings Bonds example is an outlier because they pay interest for a much longer period of time and don't "mature" in quite the same way as typical bond issues do.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    5
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    5
                    down vote









                    There is an element of truth to this, but not in savings accounts. When I was very young, some family members bought a small amount of Savings Bonds issued by the U.S. government which at the time were offering in the vicinity of 9% interest. Twenty years later they were cashed in to help pay for my college education - a shame really considering they would have continued paying this for another (IIRC) twenty years, but in the grand scheme of things it wasn't a huge amount of missed opportunity, as the cashed in amount was somewhere around two to three thousand dollars.



                    There are similar investment strategies you could pursue. They all revolve around the idea of locking in an interest rate in long term debt obligations with a debtor with very low risk of default. The U.S. Savings Bonds example is an outlier because they pay interest for a much longer period of time and don't "mature" in quite the same way as typical bond issues do.






                    share|improve this answer














                    There is an element of truth to this, but not in savings accounts. When I was very young, some family members bought a small amount of Savings Bonds issued by the U.S. government which at the time were offering in the vicinity of 9% interest. Twenty years later they were cashed in to help pay for my college education - a shame really considering they would have continued paying this for another (IIRC) twenty years, but in the grand scheme of things it wasn't a huge amount of missed opportunity, as the cashed in amount was somewhere around two to three thousand dollars.



                    There are similar investment strategies you could pursue. They all revolve around the idea of locking in an interest rate in long term debt obligations with a debtor with very low risk of default. The U.S. Savings Bonds example is an outlier because they pay interest for a much longer period of time and don't "mature" in quite the same way as typical bond issues do.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 6 at 5:17

























                    answered Nov 6 at 5:11









                    Michael

                    7441715




                    7441715






















                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote













                        That depends on the contracts you have and probably also in the country, related with available products.



                        In Germany, we have "Bausparverträge" (building saving contracts) where we pay a certain amount per year to save up some money. After reaching a certain threshold, we qualify for a loan at an interest rate defined on signing the contract (but are not required to take the loan).



                        When you signed such a contract in a period of high interest, you have this high interest even nowadays. For examples, my two contracts from 2007 and 2013 both still come with an interest of 3%, without risk of the market. Compared to that, normal saving accounts offer in the range from 0.01% to about 0.5% (or 0.9% if you are lucky).



                        The downside is that if I urgently need the money, the contract and its benefits are gone.



                        Long story short, yes, it is possible to lock in a high interest rate if you choose the right product.






                        share|improve this answer



















                        • 2




                          "Treaty" is the wrong word in English. (It means an agreement between sovereign states or international organizations.) I think you are translating "der Vertrag", which in this context would be "contract" or more generally "agreement".
                          – Martin Bonner
                          Nov 6 at 9:27










                        • @MartinBonner Thank you! Changed it.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 6 at 9:56










                        • I have one of those, and recently my bank told me they need to increase the administration fees because they are making a loss with the high interests.
                          – Paŭlo Ebermann
                          Nov 7 at 0:46










                        • @PaŭloEbermann Same with me, but the interest still outweighs the (IIRC) 12 € per year they charge.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 7 at 9:57










                        • @PaŭloEbermann google around a little, banks have tried a lot of those over the years to get out of those contracts. Many of those tricks were later subject to court rulings against the banks. That might well be one of those, in which case you'd have to act, but it could make you quite some money. Making a loss on a contract in itself is no reason to unilaterally change the contract.
                          – DonQuiKong
                          Nov 7 at 9:58















                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote













                        That depends on the contracts you have and probably also in the country, related with available products.



                        In Germany, we have "Bausparverträge" (building saving contracts) where we pay a certain amount per year to save up some money. After reaching a certain threshold, we qualify for a loan at an interest rate defined on signing the contract (but are not required to take the loan).



                        When you signed such a contract in a period of high interest, you have this high interest even nowadays. For examples, my two contracts from 2007 and 2013 both still come with an interest of 3%, without risk of the market. Compared to that, normal saving accounts offer in the range from 0.01% to about 0.5% (or 0.9% if you are lucky).



                        The downside is that if I urgently need the money, the contract and its benefits are gone.



                        Long story short, yes, it is possible to lock in a high interest rate if you choose the right product.






                        share|improve this answer



















                        • 2




                          "Treaty" is the wrong word in English. (It means an agreement between sovereign states or international organizations.) I think you are translating "der Vertrag", which in this context would be "contract" or more generally "agreement".
                          – Martin Bonner
                          Nov 6 at 9:27










                        • @MartinBonner Thank you! Changed it.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 6 at 9:56










                        • I have one of those, and recently my bank told me they need to increase the administration fees because they are making a loss with the high interests.
                          – Paŭlo Ebermann
                          Nov 7 at 0:46










                        • @PaŭloEbermann Same with me, but the interest still outweighs the (IIRC) 12 € per year they charge.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 7 at 9:57










                        • @PaŭloEbermann google around a little, banks have tried a lot of those over the years to get out of those contracts. Many of those tricks were later subject to court rulings against the banks. That might well be one of those, in which case you'd have to act, but it could make you quite some money. Making a loss on a contract in itself is no reason to unilaterally change the contract.
                          – DonQuiKong
                          Nov 7 at 9:58













                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote










                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote









                        That depends on the contracts you have and probably also in the country, related with available products.



                        In Germany, we have "Bausparverträge" (building saving contracts) where we pay a certain amount per year to save up some money. After reaching a certain threshold, we qualify for a loan at an interest rate defined on signing the contract (but are not required to take the loan).



                        When you signed such a contract in a period of high interest, you have this high interest even nowadays. For examples, my two contracts from 2007 and 2013 both still come with an interest of 3%, without risk of the market. Compared to that, normal saving accounts offer in the range from 0.01% to about 0.5% (or 0.9% if you are lucky).



                        The downside is that if I urgently need the money, the contract and its benefits are gone.



                        Long story short, yes, it is possible to lock in a high interest rate if you choose the right product.






                        share|improve this answer














                        That depends on the contracts you have and probably also in the country, related with available products.



                        In Germany, we have "Bausparverträge" (building saving contracts) where we pay a certain amount per year to save up some money. After reaching a certain threshold, we qualify for a loan at an interest rate defined on signing the contract (but are not required to take the loan).



                        When you signed such a contract in a period of high interest, you have this high interest even nowadays. For examples, my two contracts from 2007 and 2013 both still come with an interest of 3%, without risk of the market. Compared to that, normal saving accounts offer in the range from 0.01% to about 0.5% (or 0.9% if you are lucky).



                        The downside is that if I urgently need the money, the contract and its benefits are gone.



                        Long story short, yes, it is possible to lock in a high interest rate if you choose the right product.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Nov 6 at 10:05

























                        answered Nov 6 at 7:37









                        glglgl

                        45739




                        45739








                        • 2




                          "Treaty" is the wrong word in English. (It means an agreement between sovereign states or international organizations.) I think you are translating "der Vertrag", which in this context would be "contract" or more generally "agreement".
                          – Martin Bonner
                          Nov 6 at 9:27










                        • @MartinBonner Thank you! Changed it.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 6 at 9:56










                        • I have one of those, and recently my bank told me they need to increase the administration fees because they are making a loss with the high interests.
                          – Paŭlo Ebermann
                          Nov 7 at 0:46










                        • @PaŭloEbermann Same with me, but the interest still outweighs the (IIRC) 12 € per year they charge.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 7 at 9:57










                        • @PaŭloEbermann google around a little, banks have tried a lot of those over the years to get out of those contracts. Many of those tricks were later subject to court rulings against the banks. That might well be one of those, in which case you'd have to act, but it could make you quite some money. Making a loss on a contract in itself is no reason to unilaterally change the contract.
                          – DonQuiKong
                          Nov 7 at 9:58














                        • 2




                          "Treaty" is the wrong word in English. (It means an agreement between sovereign states or international organizations.) I think you are translating "der Vertrag", which in this context would be "contract" or more generally "agreement".
                          – Martin Bonner
                          Nov 6 at 9:27










                        • @MartinBonner Thank you! Changed it.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 6 at 9:56










                        • I have one of those, and recently my bank told me they need to increase the administration fees because they are making a loss with the high interests.
                          – Paŭlo Ebermann
                          Nov 7 at 0:46










                        • @PaŭloEbermann Same with me, but the interest still outweighs the (IIRC) 12 € per year they charge.
                          – glglgl
                          Nov 7 at 9:57










                        • @PaŭloEbermann google around a little, banks have tried a lot of those over the years to get out of those contracts. Many of those tricks were later subject to court rulings against the banks. That might well be one of those, in which case you'd have to act, but it could make you quite some money. Making a loss on a contract in itself is no reason to unilaterally change the contract.
                          – DonQuiKong
                          Nov 7 at 9:58








                        2




                        2




                        "Treaty" is the wrong word in English. (It means an agreement between sovereign states or international organizations.) I think you are translating "der Vertrag", which in this context would be "contract" or more generally "agreement".
                        – Martin Bonner
                        Nov 6 at 9:27




                        "Treaty" is the wrong word in English. (It means an agreement between sovereign states or international organizations.) I think you are translating "der Vertrag", which in this context would be "contract" or more generally "agreement".
                        – Martin Bonner
                        Nov 6 at 9:27












                        @MartinBonner Thank you! Changed it.
                        – glglgl
                        Nov 6 at 9:56




                        @MartinBonner Thank you! Changed it.
                        – glglgl
                        Nov 6 at 9:56












                        I have one of those, and recently my bank told me they need to increase the administration fees because they are making a loss with the high interests.
                        – Paŭlo Ebermann
                        Nov 7 at 0:46




                        I have one of those, and recently my bank told me they need to increase the administration fees because they are making a loss with the high interests.
                        – Paŭlo Ebermann
                        Nov 7 at 0:46












                        @PaŭloEbermann Same with me, but the interest still outweighs the (IIRC) 12 € per year they charge.
                        – glglgl
                        Nov 7 at 9:57




                        @PaŭloEbermann Same with me, but the interest still outweighs the (IIRC) 12 € per year they charge.
                        – glglgl
                        Nov 7 at 9:57












                        @PaŭloEbermann google around a little, banks have tried a lot of those over the years to get out of those contracts. Many of those tricks were later subject to court rulings against the banks. That might well be one of those, in which case you'd have to act, but it could make you quite some money. Making a loss on a contract in itself is no reason to unilaterally change the contract.
                        – DonQuiKong
                        Nov 7 at 9:58




                        @PaŭloEbermann google around a little, banks have tried a lot of those over the years to get out of those contracts. Many of those tricks were later subject to court rulings against the banks. That might well be one of those, in which case you'd have to act, but it could make you quite some money. Making a loss on a contract in itself is no reason to unilaterally change the contract.
                        – DonQuiKong
                        Nov 7 at 9:58










                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Savings accounts generally aren't for fixed amounts. There have, however, been special promotional offers for accounts with fixed interest rates. I think that has become rarer, and certainly finding one with an interest rate of 4.5% would be unlikely to say the least.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Savings accounts generally aren't for fixed amounts. There have, however, been special promotional offers for accounts with fixed interest rates. I think that has become rarer, and certainly finding one with an interest rate of 4.5% would be unlikely to say the least.






                          share|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            Savings accounts generally aren't for fixed amounts. There have, however, been special promotional offers for accounts with fixed interest rates. I think that has become rarer, and certainly finding one with an interest rate of 4.5% would be unlikely to say the least.






                            share|improve this answer












                            Savings accounts generally aren't for fixed amounts. There have, however, been special promotional offers for accounts with fixed interest rates. I think that has become rarer, and certainly finding one with an interest rate of 4.5% would be unlikely to say the least.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 6 at 20:38









                            Acccumulation

                            2,608312




                            2,608312






























                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded



















































                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101831%2fis-it-possible-to-lock-in-a-high-interest-rate-in-savings-when-general-interest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

                                Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

                                Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()