Chord exceptions in City of New Orleans











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2












Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



F# C# F# D#m B F#



F# C# F# D#m B F#



D#m A#m C# G#



If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



| I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
|----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
| F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



Thanks!










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



    F# C# F# D#m B F#



    F# C# F# D#m B F#



    D#m A#m C# G#



    If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



    | I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
    |----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
    | F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


    So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



    Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



    Thanks!










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



      F# C# F# D#m B F#



      F# C# F# D#m B F#



      D#m A#m C# G#



      If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



      | I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
      |----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
      | F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


      So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



      Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



      Thanks!










      share|improve this question













      Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



      F# C# F# D#m B F#



      F# C# F# D#m B F#



      D#m A#m C# G#



      If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



      | I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
      |----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
      | F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


      So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



      Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



      Thanks!







      chord-theory chord-progressions roman-numerals






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 8 at 1:51









      dharmatech

      1333




      1333






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          14
          down vote



          accepted










          The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



          (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



          The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



          So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



          Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



          As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



          TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2




            If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
            – Alexander Nied
            Nov 8 at 4:16






          • 1




            So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
            – Alexander Nied
            Nov 8 at 7:21






          • 2




            I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
            – Dekkadeci
            Nov 8 at 11:26






          • 1




            "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
            – David K
            Nov 8 at 19:23






          • 1




            @ScottWallace Better than exhausting! :-)
            – Richard
            Nov 11 at 17:59


















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





          • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



            ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


            I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



          • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



            Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



            For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



            THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



            Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "240"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76274%2fchord-exceptions-in-city-of-new-orleans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              14
              down vote



              accepted










              The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



              (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



              The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



              So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



              Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



              As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



              TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 2




                If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 4:16






              • 1




                So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 7:21






              • 2




                I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
                – Dekkadeci
                Nov 8 at 11:26






              • 1




                "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
                – David K
                Nov 8 at 19:23






              • 1




                @ScottWallace Better than exhausting! :-)
                – Richard
                Nov 11 at 17:59















              up vote
              14
              down vote



              accepted










              The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



              (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



              The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



              So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



              Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



              As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



              TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 2




                If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 4:16






              • 1




                So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 7:21






              • 2




                I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
                – Dekkadeci
                Nov 8 at 11:26






              • 1




                "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
                – David K
                Nov 8 at 19:23






              • 1




                @ScottWallace Better than exhausting! :-)
                – Richard
                Nov 11 at 17:59













              up vote
              14
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              14
              down vote



              accepted






              The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



              (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



              The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



              So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



              Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



              As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



              TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






              share|improve this answer














              The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



              (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



              The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



              So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



              Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



              As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



              TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Nov 8 at 2:33

























              answered Nov 8 at 2:20









              Richard

              35.6k677151




              35.6k677151








              • 2




                If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 4:16






              • 1




                So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 7:21






              • 2




                I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
                – Dekkadeci
                Nov 8 at 11:26






              • 1




                "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
                – David K
                Nov 8 at 19:23






              • 1




                @ScottWallace Better than exhausting! :-)
                – Richard
                Nov 11 at 17:59














              • 2




                If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 4:16






              • 1




                So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
                – Alexander Nied
                Nov 8 at 7:21






              • 2




                I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
                – Dekkadeci
                Nov 8 at 11:26






              • 1




                "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
                – David K
                Nov 8 at 19:23






              • 1




                @ScottWallace Better than exhausting! :-)
                – Richard
                Nov 11 at 17:59








              2




              2




              If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
              – Alexander Nied
              Nov 8 at 4:16




              If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
              – Alexander Nied
              Nov 8 at 4:16




              1




              1




              So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
              – Alexander Nied
              Nov 8 at 7:21




              So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
              – Alexander Nied
              Nov 8 at 7:21




              2




              2




              I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
              – Dekkadeci
              Nov 8 at 11:26




              I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
              – Dekkadeci
              Nov 8 at 11:26




              1




              1




              "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
              – David K
              Nov 8 at 19:23




              "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
              – David K
              Nov 8 at 19:23




              1




              1




              @ScottWallace Better than exhausting! :-)
              – Richard
              Nov 11 at 17:59




              @ScottWallace Better than exhausting! :-)
              – Richard
              Nov 11 at 17:59










              up vote
              2
              down vote













              The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





              • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



                ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


                I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



              • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





                • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



                  ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


                  I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



                • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





                  • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



                    ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


                    I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



                  • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







                  share|improve this answer












                  The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





                  • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



                    ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


                    I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



                  • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 8 at 17:15









                  leftaroundabout

                  18.7k3383




                  18.7k3383






















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



                      Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



                      For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



                      THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



                      Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



                        Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



                        For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



                        THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



                        Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote









                          You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



                          Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



                          For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



                          THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



                          Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






                          share|improve this answer














                          You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



                          Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



                          For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



                          THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



                          Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Nov 8 at 19:18

























                          answered Nov 8 at 14:13









                          Laurence Payne

                          30.2k1453




                          30.2k1453






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76274%2fchord-exceptions-in-city-of-new-orleans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              這個網誌中的熱門文章

                              Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

                              Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

                              Zucchini