iOS frameworks: Swift framework sizes are more than Objective C
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am creating a swift framework which is having more size than objective C framework with same purpose any reason?
are there any ways to reduce the size of the framework?
ios objective-c swift
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am creating a swift framework which is having more size than objective C framework with same purpose any reason?
are there any ways to reduce the size of the framework?
ios objective-c swift
Until ABI stability is completed, the frameworks need to carry the Swift binaries with it - from my "extremely basic" understanding. Once ABI stability has been obtained, it won't be necessary for the framework to include the base API, as it can be stored on the device. There was a mention of it in the recent WWDC, maybe the Swift state of union, but I can't remeber
– MadProgrammer
Nov 8 at 5:03
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am creating a swift framework which is having more size than objective C framework with same purpose any reason?
are there any ways to reduce the size of the framework?
ios objective-c swift
I am creating a swift framework which is having more size than objective C framework with same purpose any reason?
are there any ways to reduce the size of the framework?
ios objective-c swift
ios objective-c swift
asked Nov 8 at 4:54
santhosh
456412
456412
Until ABI stability is completed, the frameworks need to carry the Swift binaries with it - from my "extremely basic" understanding. Once ABI stability has been obtained, it won't be necessary for the framework to include the base API, as it can be stored on the device. There was a mention of it in the recent WWDC, maybe the Swift state of union, but I can't remeber
– MadProgrammer
Nov 8 at 5:03
add a comment |
Until ABI stability is completed, the frameworks need to carry the Swift binaries with it - from my "extremely basic" understanding. Once ABI stability has been obtained, it won't be necessary for the framework to include the base API, as it can be stored on the device. There was a mention of it in the recent WWDC, maybe the Swift state of union, but I can't remeber
– MadProgrammer
Nov 8 at 5:03
Until ABI stability is completed, the frameworks need to carry the Swift binaries with it - from my "extremely basic" understanding. Once ABI stability has been obtained, it won't be necessary for the framework to include the base API, as it can be stored on the device. There was a mention of it in the recent WWDC, maybe the Swift state of union, but I can't remeber
– MadProgrammer
Nov 8 at 5:03
Until ABI stability is completed, the frameworks need to carry the Swift binaries with it - from my "extremely basic" understanding. Once ABI stability has been obtained, it won't be necessary for the framework to include the base API, as it can be stored on the device. There was a mention of it in the recent WWDC, maybe the Swift state of union, but I can't remeber
– MadProgrammer
Nov 8 at 5:03
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53201752%2fios-frameworks-swift-framework-sizes-are-more-than-objective-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Until ABI stability is completed, the frameworks need to carry the Swift binaries with it - from my "extremely basic" understanding. Once ABI stability has been obtained, it won't be necessary for the framework to include the base API, as it can be stored on the device. There was a mention of it in the recent WWDC, maybe the Swift state of union, but I can't remeber
– MadProgrammer
Nov 8 at 5:03