How should I use Mono.zipWith when including a function that returns a Mono?
I have a Mono that I want to combine with another Mono, as in:
val firstMono = Mono.just("thing");
val secondMono = Mono.just("other thing");
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function);
But I want the function to also return a Mono, without ending up with a Mono<Mono<?>>
The best I can come up with is:
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function)
.flatMap(identity());
but that seems like a bit of a hack.
I also thought of
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono)
.flatMap(function);
but in that case, I have to have the function accept a Tuple2 instead of the individual arguments, which is uglier.
Any thoughts?
java spring-webflux project-reactor
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
add a comment |
I have a Mono that I want to combine with another Mono, as in:
val firstMono = Mono.just("thing");
val secondMono = Mono.just("other thing");
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function);
But I want the function to also return a Mono, without ending up with a Mono<Mono<?>>
The best I can come up with is:
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function)
.flatMap(identity());
but that seems like a bit of a hack.
I also thought of
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono)
.flatMap(function);
but in that case, I have to have the function accept a Tuple2 instead of the individual arguments, which is uglier.
Any thoughts?
java spring-webflux project-reactor
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono).flatMap(pair -> function(pair.getT1(), pair.getT2()));...
– Alex Shesterov
Nov 12 '18 at 16:58
Yeah, I had that as well - works, but makes theMonochain uglier... Likely, I'm looking for something that doesn't exist - some operator that recognises that I'm working with anotherMono..flatZipWithwould've been nice...
– AndyB
Nov 12 '18 at 17:10
I'd go withvar thirdMono = firstMono.flatMap(left -> secondMono.flatMap(right -> function(left, right)));but I guess it's arguable whether this is in any way "prettier".
– korolar
Nov 12 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
I have a Mono that I want to combine with another Mono, as in:
val firstMono = Mono.just("thing");
val secondMono = Mono.just("other thing");
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function);
But I want the function to also return a Mono, without ending up with a Mono<Mono<?>>
The best I can come up with is:
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function)
.flatMap(identity());
but that seems like a bit of a hack.
I also thought of
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono)
.flatMap(function);
but in that case, I have to have the function accept a Tuple2 instead of the individual arguments, which is uglier.
Any thoughts?
java spring-webflux project-reactor
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
I have a Mono that I want to combine with another Mono, as in:
val firstMono = Mono.just("thing");
val secondMono = Mono.just("other thing");
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function);
But I want the function to also return a Mono, without ending up with a Mono<Mono<?>>
The best I can come up with is:
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono, function)
.flatMap(identity());
but that seems like a bit of a hack.
I also thought of
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono)
.flatMap(function);
but in that case, I have to have the function accept a Tuple2 instead of the individual arguments, which is uglier.
Any thoughts?
java spring-webflux project-reactor
java spring-webflux project-reactor
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:40
AndyB
9719
9719
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono).flatMap(pair -> function(pair.getT1(), pair.getT2()));...
– Alex Shesterov
Nov 12 '18 at 16:58
Yeah, I had that as well - works, but makes theMonochain uglier... Likely, I'm looking for something that doesn't exist - some operator that recognises that I'm working with anotherMono..flatZipWithwould've been nice...
– AndyB
Nov 12 '18 at 17:10
I'd go withvar thirdMono = firstMono.flatMap(left -> secondMono.flatMap(right -> function(left, right)));but I guess it's arguable whether this is in any way "prettier".
– korolar
Nov 12 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono).flatMap(pair -> function(pair.getT1(), pair.getT2()));...
– Alex Shesterov
Nov 12 '18 at 16:58
Yeah, I had that as well - works, but makes theMonochain uglier... Likely, I'm looking for something that doesn't exist - some operator that recognises that I'm working with anotherMono..flatZipWithwould've been nice...
– AndyB
Nov 12 '18 at 17:10
I'd go withvar thirdMono = firstMono.flatMap(left -> secondMono.flatMap(right -> function(left, right)));but I guess it's arguable whether this is in any way "prettier".
– korolar
Nov 12 '18 at 17:49
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono).flatMap(pair -> function(pair.getT1(), pair.getT2())); ...– Alex Shesterov
Nov 12 '18 at 16:58
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono).flatMap(pair -> function(pair.getT1(), pair.getT2())); ...– Alex Shesterov
Nov 12 '18 at 16:58
Yeah, I had that as well - works, but makes the
Mono chain uglier... Likely, I'm looking for something that doesn't exist - some operator that recognises that I'm working with another Mono. .flatZipWith would've been nice...– AndyB
Nov 12 '18 at 17:10
Yeah, I had that as well - works, but makes the
Mono chain uglier... Likely, I'm looking for something that doesn't exist - some operator that recognises that I'm working with another Mono. .flatZipWith would've been nice...– AndyB
Nov 12 '18 at 17:10
I'd go with
var thirdMono = firstMono.flatMap(left -> secondMono.flatMap(right -> function(left, right))); but I guess it's arguable whether this is in any way "prettier".– korolar
Nov 12 '18 at 17:49
I'd go with
var thirdMono = firstMono.flatMap(left -> secondMono.flatMap(right -> function(left, right))); but I guess it's arguable whether this is in any way "prettier".– korolar
Nov 12 '18 at 17:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I think your solution is good enough.
If you think that it seems like hack, you could place it in a separate utility method and change it when you find the better solution. Something like:
private static <T1, T2, O> Function<Mono<T1>, Publisher<O>> flatZipTransformer(
Mono<T2> p2, BiFunction<T1, T2, Mono<O>> function) {
return p1 -> Mono.zip(p1, p2, function).flatMap(Function.identity());
}
Now you could use it like:
firstMono.transform(flatZipTransformer(secondMono, function))
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
Thanks - I think I’ll stick with myflatMap(identity())solution then - just wanted to know if I was missing something...
– AndyB
Nov 14 '18 at 7:56
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53266514%2fhow-should-i-use-mono-zipwith-when-including-a-function-that-returns-a-mono%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think your solution is good enough.
If you think that it seems like hack, you could place it in a separate utility method and change it when you find the better solution. Something like:
private static <T1, T2, O> Function<Mono<T1>, Publisher<O>> flatZipTransformer(
Mono<T2> p2, BiFunction<T1, T2, Mono<O>> function) {
return p1 -> Mono.zip(p1, p2, function).flatMap(Function.identity());
}
Now you could use it like:
firstMono.transform(flatZipTransformer(secondMono, function))
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
Thanks - I think I’ll stick with myflatMap(identity())solution then - just wanted to know if I was missing something...
– AndyB
Nov 14 '18 at 7:56
add a comment |
I think your solution is good enough.
If you think that it seems like hack, you could place it in a separate utility method and change it when you find the better solution. Something like:
private static <T1, T2, O> Function<Mono<T1>, Publisher<O>> flatZipTransformer(
Mono<T2> p2, BiFunction<T1, T2, Mono<O>> function) {
return p1 -> Mono.zip(p1, p2, function).flatMap(Function.identity());
}
Now you could use it like:
firstMono.transform(flatZipTransformer(secondMono, function))
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
Thanks - I think I’ll stick with myflatMap(identity())solution then - just wanted to know if I was missing something...
– AndyB
Nov 14 '18 at 7:56
add a comment |
I think your solution is good enough.
If you think that it seems like hack, you could place it in a separate utility method and change it when you find the better solution. Something like:
private static <T1, T2, O> Function<Mono<T1>, Publisher<O>> flatZipTransformer(
Mono<T2> p2, BiFunction<T1, T2, Mono<O>> function) {
return p1 -> Mono.zip(p1, p2, function).flatMap(Function.identity());
}
Now you could use it like:
firstMono.transform(flatZipTransformer(secondMono, function))
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
I think your solution is good enough.
If you think that it seems like hack, you could place it in a separate utility method and change it when you find the better solution. Something like:
private static <T1, T2, O> Function<Mono<T1>, Publisher<O>> flatZipTransformer(
Mono<T2> p2, BiFunction<T1, T2, Mono<O>> function) {
return p1 -> Mono.zip(p1, p2, function).flatMap(Function.identity());
}
Now you could use it like:
firstMono.transform(flatZipTransformer(secondMono, function))
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:19
Alexander Pankin
63126
63126
Thanks - I think I’ll stick with myflatMap(identity())solution then - just wanted to know if I was missing something...
– AndyB
Nov 14 '18 at 7:56
add a comment |
Thanks - I think I’ll stick with myflatMap(identity())solution then - just wanted to know if I was missing something...
– AndyB
Nov 14 '18 at 7:56
Thanks - I think I’ll stick with my
flatMap(identity()) solution then - just wanted to know if I was missing something...– AndyB
Nov 14 '18 at 7:56
Thanks - I think I’ll stick with my
flatMap(identity()) solution then - just wanted to know if I was missing something...– AndyB
Nov 14 '18 at 7:56
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53266514%2fhow-should-i-use-mono-zipwith-when-including-a-function-that-returns-a-mono%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
val thirdMono = firstMono.zipWith(secondMono).flatMap(pair -> function(pair.getT1(), pair.getT2()));...– Alex Shesterov
Nov 12 '18 at 16:58
Yeah, I had that as well - works, but makes the
Monochain uglier... Likely, I'm looking for something that doesn't exist - some operator that recognises that I'm working with anotherMono..flatZipWithwould've been nice...– AndyB
Nov 12 '18 at 17:10
I'd go with
var thirdMono = firstMono.flatMap(left -> secondMono.flatMap(right -> function(left, right)));but I guess it's arguable whether this is in any way "prettier".– korolar
Nov 12 '18 at 17:49