Where to save images within AWS? [closed]












0















I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2







share|improve this question













closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.























    0















    I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



    I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



    But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



    I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



    Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






    amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2







    share|improve this question













    closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


    Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.





















      0












      0








      0








      I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



      I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



      But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



      I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



      Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






      amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2







      share|improve this question














      I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



      I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



      But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



      I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



      Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






      amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2




      amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 18 '18 at 6:16









      Renato Souza de OliveiraRenato Souza de Oliveira

      5772816




      5772816




      closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


      Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









      closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


      Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer


























          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09


















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer


























          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09
















          1














          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer


























          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09














          1












          1








          1







          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer















          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 18 '18 at 7:01









          duskwuff

          147k19177233




          147k19177233










          answered Nov 18 '18 at 6:38









          Mostafiz RahmanMostafiz Rahman

          5,64333654




          5,64333654













          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09



















          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09

















          Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

          – duskwuff
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:01







          Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

          – duskwuff
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:01















          yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

          – Mostafiz Rahman
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:09





          yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

          – Mostafiz Rahman
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:09



          -

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

          圖片
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 I'm trying to build a Chat app UI, the idea of the Layout was pretty simple: When the input bar is focused, keyboard show up and "push" up the chat bar, as it's a grid, the ListView will resize to fit the screen: I update the input bar's margin to "push" it up: NSValue result = (NSValue)args.Notification.UserInfo.ObjectForKey(new NSString(UIKeyboard.FrameEndUserInfoKey)); CGSize keyboardSize = result.RectangleFValue.Size; if (Element != null){ Element.Margin = new Thickness(0, 0, 0,keyboardSize.Height); //push the entry up to keyboard height when keyboard is activated } And this is ...
          閱讀完整內容

          Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

          圖片
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 Can someone explain to me how to implement the post-redirect-get pattern in Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf? What subscribes on the database save method? @GetMapping("/register") public String showRegisterForm(Model model) { model.addAttribute("user", new User()); return "register"; } @PostMapping public String processRegisterForm(@Valid User user, BindingResult bindingResult) { if (bindingResult.hasErrors()) { return "register"; } else { userRepository.save(user); //what subscribes on this? //how to redirect on e.g. "/login"? ...
          閱讀完整內容

          Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()

          圖片
          -2 I am building a railway station model. I want a train to depart when I click a button. I want to call stopDelay() for that but I am not sure how to do that and from which place. anylogic share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 10:12 Anupam Singh Anupam Singh 1 Hi Anupam, welcome to SOF. Please check how to ask good questions, see link below. Your question is...
          閱讀完整內容