Where to save images within AWS? [closed]












0















I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2







share|improve this question













closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.























    0















    I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



    I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



    But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



    I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



    Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






    amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2







    share|improve this question













    closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


    Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.





















      0












      0








      0








      I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



      I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



      But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



      I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



      Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






      amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2







      share|improve this question














      I was discussing with friends about the best way to store files in amazon.



      I believed that an s3 bucket was the best way to save static files as images from a website.



      But friends said that it is not the best way to work with s3 because of the high cost of having this image requested many times.



      I need to know the best place to save images that will be rendered inside my site (which is inside an EC2 instance).



      Could someone clarify this doubt? Saving images inside the S3 in sites that have many requests is expensive?






      amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2




      amazon-web-services amazon-s3 amazon-ec2






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 18 '18 at 6:16









      Renato Souza de OliveiraRenato Souza de Oliveira

      5772816




      5772816




      closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


      Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









      closed as primarily opinion-based by AdrianHHH, greg-449, Kaushik Nayak, pirho, EdChum Nov 18 '18 at 9:38


      Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer


























          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09


















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer


























          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09
















          1














          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer


























          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09














          1












          1








          1







          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/






          share|improve this answer















          For storing static files like images AWS S3 is one of the best option.



          S3 is one of the cheapest cloud storage, you won't be charged for the number of times it's read, only amount of outbound traffic will bbe charged. For get requuest/put request there is also a charge, but you shouldn't need it as per my understanding, you can clarify your use case more precisely. You can also calculate the price here.



          Find all the storage services AWS offers here: https://aws.amazon.com/products/storage/







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 18 '18 at 7:01









          duskwuff

          147k19177233




          147k19177233










          answered Nov 18 '18 at 6:38









          Mostafiz RahmanMostafiz Rahman

          5,64333654




          5,64333654













          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09



















          • Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

            – duskwuff
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:01













          • yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

            – Mostafiz Rahman
            Nov 18 '18 at 7:09

















          Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

          – duskwuff
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:01







          Glacier is not at all appropriate for serving static content -- it's intended for cold storage (hence the name), and allows for neither public nor real-time access to stored data. I've removed it from your answer, as the rest of your answer is largely correct.

          – duskwuff
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:01















          yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

          – Mostafiz Rahman
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:09





          yeah, Glacier is more appropriate for data archive, not useful for this use case.

          – Mostafiz Rahman
          Nov 18 '18 at 7:09



          -

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

          圖片
          7 1 I am trying to replicate a diagram and have a minimal example. I don't know how to add additional tangents between the specified points and preserve smoothness. documentclass{article} usepackage{tikz} usetikzlibrary{calc,intersections} begin{document} begin{tikzpicture} % Axes draw [->, name path=x] (-1,0) -- (11,0) node [right] {$x$}; draw [->] (0,-1) -- (0,6) node [above] {$y$}; % Origin node at (0,0) [below left] {$0$}; % Points coordinate (start) at (1,-0.8); coordinate (c1) at (3,3); coordinate (c2) at (5.5,1.5); coordinate (c3) at (8,4); coordinate (end) at (10.5,-0.8); % show the points foreach n in {start,c1,c2,c3,end} fill [black] (n) circle (2pt) node [below] {}; % join the coordinates draw [thick,name path=curve] (start) to[out=70,in=180] (c1) to[out=0,in=180]
          閱讀完整內容

          Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

          圖片
          Main article: Taifa of Zaragoza Al-Mu'taman Ruler of Zaragoza Reign 1081–1085 Predecessor Ahmad al-Muqtadir Successor Al-Mustain II Born Zaragoza Died 1085 Full name Yusuf ibn Ahmad al-Mu'taman ibn Hūd House Banu Hud Yusuf ibn Ahmad al-Mu'taman ibn Hūd (Arabic: المؤتمن بالله يوسف إبن أحمد إبن هود ‎, al-Mutaman bi l-Lah , died c. 1085) was the third king of the Banu Hud dynasty who ruled over the Taifa of Zaragoza from 1081 to 1085. Yusuf al-Mutaman reigned during the height of power of Muslim Zaragoza , following the thriving period of his father Ahmad al-Muqtadir. He continued his father's efforts and created around him a court of intellectuals, living in the beautiful palace of Aljafería, nicknamed as "the palace of joy". Al-Mu'taman was also a scholarly king and a patron of science, philosophy and arts. As an example of a wise king, he knew astrology, philosophy, and especially mathematics, a discipline in which
          閱讀完整內容

          Zucchini

          圖片
          This article is about the vegetable. For other uses, see Zucchini (disambiguation). Zucchini (courgette) A striped and a uniform color zucchini Genus Cucurbita Species Cucurbita pepo Origin 19th century northern Italy The zucchini ( / z uː ˈ k iː n i / , American English) or courgette ( / k ʊər ˈ ʒ ɛ t / , British English) is a summer squash which can reach nearly 1 metre (100 cm; 39 in) in length, but is usually harvested when still immature at about 15 to 25 cm (6 to 10 in). [1] A zucchini is a thin-skinned cultivar of what in Britain and Ireland is referred to as a marrow. [2] [3] In South Africa, a zucchini is known as a baby marrow. Along with certain other squashes and pumpkins, the zucchini belongs to the species Cucurbita pepo . It can be dark or light green. A related hybrid, the golden zucchini, is a deep yellow or orange color. [4] In a culinary context, the zucchini is treated as a vegetable; it is usually cooked and presented as a savory dish o
          閱讀完整內容