Why do I get unnecessary column space when using `multicolumn` in type `X` columns?
3
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
add a comment |
3
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
Nov 17 '18 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
add a comment |
3
3
3
0
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
asked Nov 17 '18 at 20:42
Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,513312
1,513312
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
Nov 17 '18 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
add a comment |
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
Nov 17 '18 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
c column type: multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
Nov 17 '18 at 21:11
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
c column type: multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
Nov 17 '18 at 21:11
1
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:41
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq} and mathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq} and mathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
4
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460504%2fwhy-do-i-get-unnecessary-column-space-when-using-multicolumn-in-type-x-colu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
4
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:43
add a comment |
4
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:43
add a comment |
4
4
4
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
edited Nov 18 '18 at 4:11
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
answered Nov 17 '18 at 21:42
MicoMico
277k30380768
277k30380768
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:43
add a comment |
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:43
1
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:43
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:43
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460504%2fwhy-do-i-get-unnecessary-column-space-when-using-multicolumn-in-type-x-colu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
ccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
Nov 17 '18 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
Nov 17 '18 at 21:42