Using ANTLR4 to create functions with no argument
I am still new to ANTLR4 and I am trying to achieve the following
I have business rules which consist of logical operation
(A= 'text' or B < 1) and getDataDB
the function getDataDB does not take any argument. the function will retrieve some data to validate it and return either true or false.
my grammar is below
/*
* Test grammar
*/
grammar FunctionRule;
parse: expr EOF
;
expr
: expr binop expr #logicalExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=VARIABLE #variableExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=STRING #stringExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=NUMBER #numberExpression
| TRUE #booleanTrue
| FALSE #booleanFalse
| function #functionExpression
| VARIABLE #booleanVariable
| LEFTPAREN expr RIGHTPAREN #enclosedExpression
;
binop : AND | OR
;
compop: EQUAL | LT | GT | LTE | GTE | NE
;
function : ID {System.out.println("HELLLL");};
TRUE: 'true' | 'TRUE' ;
FALSE: 'false' | 'FALSE';
STRING: '"' ~([tnr]| '"')* '"'
;
ID : [getDataDB];
LEFTPAREN: '(';
RIGHTPAREN: ')';
EQUAL : '=' | 'EQ';
LT : '<' | 'LT';
GT : '>' | 'GT';
LTE : '<=' | 'LE';
GTE : '>=' | 'GE';
NE : '!=' | 'NE';
AND : 'AND' | '&' | 'and';
OR : 'OR' | 'or' | '|';
VARIABLE : [a-zA-Z]+[a-zA-Z0-9_.-]*;
NUMBER : [0-9]+ ('.'[0-9]+)?;
SPACE : [ trn] -> skip;
When I generate classes from the grammar, i did not see anything related to the function.
1-how do I define a function correctly in the grammar file.
2- where i can put the code for this function after creating the classes, is it only in the action clause, is there is a way to put the class name in the grammar where i can put the implementation
Thanks for the help!
function parsing antlr4 business-rules
add a comment |
I am still new to ANTLR4 and I am trying to achieve the following
I have business rules which consist of logical operation
(A= 'text' or B < 1) and getDataDB
the function getDataDB does not take any argument. the function will retrieve some data to validate it and return either true or false.
my grammar is below
/*
* Test grammar
*/
grammar FunctionRule;
parse: expr EOF
;
expr
: expr binop expr #logicalExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=VARIABLE #variableExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=STRING #stringExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=NUMBER #numberExpression
| TRUE #booleanTrue
| FALSE #booleanFalse
| function #functionExpression
| VARIABLE #booleanVariable
| LEFTPAREN expr RIGHTPAREN #enclosedExpression
;
binop : AND | OR
;
compop: EQUAL | LT | GT | LTE | GTE | NE
;
function : ID {System.out.println("HELLLL");};
TRUE: 'true' | 'TRUE' ;
FALSE: 'false' | 'FALSE';
STRING: '"' ~([tnr]| '"')* '"'
;
ID : [getDataDB];
LEFTPAREN: '(';
RIGHTPAREN: ')';
EQUAL : '=' | 'EQ';
LT : '<' | 'LT';
GT : '>' | 'GT';
LTE : '<=' | 'LE';
GTE : '>=' | 'GE';
NE : '!=' | 'NE';
AND : 'AND' | '&' | 'and';
OR : 'OR' | 'or' | '|';
VARIABLE : [a-zA-Z]+[a-zA-Z0-9_.-]*;
NUMBER : [0-9]+ ('.'[0-9]+)?;
SPACE : [ trn] -> skip;
When I generate classes from the grammar, i did not see anything related to the function.
1-how do I define a function correctly in the grammar file.
2- where i can put the code for this function after creating the classes, is it only in the action clause, is there is a way to put the class name in the grammar where i can put the implementation
Thanks for the help!
function parsing antlr4 business-rules
add a comment |
I am still new to ANTLR4 and I am trying to achieve the following
I have business rules which consist of logical operation
(A= 'text' or B < 1) and getDataDB
the function getDataDB does not take any argument. the function will retrieve some data to validate it and return either true or false.
my grammar is below
/*
* Test grammar
*/
grammar FunctionRule;
parse: expr EOF
;
expr
: expr binop expr #logicalExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=VARIABLE #variableExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=STRING #stringExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=NUMBER #numberExpression
| TRUE #booleanTrue
| FALSE #booleanFalse
| function #functionExpression
| VARIABLE #booleanVariable
| LEFTPAREN expr RIGHTPAREN #enclosedExpression
;
binop : AND | OR
;
compop: EQUAL | LT | GT | LTE | GTE | NE
;
function : ID {System.out.println("HELLLL");};
TRUE: 'true' | 'TRUE' ;
FALSE: 'false' | 'FALSE';
STRING: '"' ~([tnr]| '"')* '"'
;
ID : [getDataDB];
LEFTPAREN: '(';
RIGHTPAREN: ')';
EQUAL : '=' | 'EQ';
LT : '<' | 'LT';
GT : '>' | 'GT';
LTE : '<=' | 'LE';
GTE : '>=' | 'GE';
NE : '!=' | 'NE';
AND : 'AND' | '&' | 'and';
OR : 'OR' | 'or' | '|';
VARIABLE : [a-zA-Z]+[a-zA-Z0-9_.-]*;
NUMBER : [0-9]+ ('.'[0-9]+)?;
SPACE : [ trn] -> skip;
When I generate classes from the grammar, i did not see anything related to the function.
1-how do I define a function correctly in the grammar file.
2- where i can put the code for this function after creating the classes, is it only in the action clause, is there is a way to put the class name in the grammar where i can put the implementation
Thanks for the help!
function parsing antlr4 business-rules
I am still new to ANTLR4 and I am trying to achieve the following
I have business rules which consist of logical operation
(A= 'text' or B < 1) and getDataDB
the function getDataDB does not take any argument. the function will retrieve some data to validate it and return either true or false.
my grammar is below
/*
* Test grammar
*/
grammar FunctionRule;
parse: expr EOF
;
expr
: expr binop expr #logicalExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=VARIABLE #variableExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=STRING #stringExpression
| lhs=VARIABLE compop rhs=NUMBER #numberExpression
| TRUE #booleanTrue
| FALSE #booleanFalse
| function #functionExpression
| VARIABLE #booleanVariable
| LEFTPAREN expr RIGHTPAREN #enclosedExpression
;
binop : AND | OR
;
compop: EQUAL | LT | GT | LTE | GTE | NE
;
function : ID {System.out.println("HELLLL");};
TRUE: 'true' | 'TRUE' ;
FALSE: 'false' | 'FALSE';
STRING: '"' ~([tnr]| '"')* '"'
;
ID : [getDataDB];
LEFTPAREN: '(';
RIGHTPAREN: ')';
EQUAL : '=' | 'EQ';
LT : '<' | 'LT';
GT : '>' | 'GT';
LTE : '<=' | 'LE';
GTE : '>=' | 'GE';
NE : '!=' | 'NE';
AND : 'AND' | '&' | 'and';
OR : 'OR' | 'or' | '|';
VARIABLE : [a-zA-Z]+[a-zA-Z0-9_.-]*;
NUMBER : [0-9]+ ('.'[0-9]+)?;
SPACE : [ trn] -> skip;
When I generate classes from the grammar, i did not see anything related to the function.
1-how do I define a function correctly in the grammar file.
2- where i can put the code for this function after creating the classes, is it only in the action clause, is there is a way to put the class name in the grammar where i can put the implementation
Thanks for the help!
function parsing antlr4 business-rules
function parsing antlr4 business-rules
edited Nov 11 at 20:27
Jost
5,16262958
5,16262958
asked Nov 11 at 20:24
OceanWavez
4716
4716
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
ID : [getDataDB];
This means that ID matches a single letter that could be either one of g, e, t, D, a or B. What you likely wanted is ID: 'getDataDB'; which matches the string getDataDB. Note that calling this ID is highly misleading.
where i can put the code for this function
Are you writing an interpreter using a visitor? Then you'd put the code into the visitFunction method or rather in a getDataDB method that you call from visitFunction if the function name was equal to getDataDB (right now that would always be the case, but I'm assuming you eventually want to introduce more than one function).
Alternatively you could also structure your grammar slightly differently like this (removing the ID rule):
function : 'getDataDB' # GetDataDB
| 'otherFunction' # OtherFunction
;
Then you could define the functions in visitGetDataDB and visitOtherFunction respectively.
All that's assuming that you want function names to be keywords (which implies that there can't be user-definable functions). If you don't, you should not have separate tokens for function names, so zero-argument functions and variables become indistinguishable syntactically (unless you add a requirement to add () for functions, but it doesn't look like that's what you want). So you should just have one rule that could be either a variable or a zero-argument function and then check whether the given identifier is the name of a function in visitVariableOrNullaryFunction (which maybe you'd just call visitVariable for brevity).
Dear sepp2K, thanks for the answer, I managed to add my function implementation.
– OceanWavez
Nov 13 at 1:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252897%2fusing-antlr4-to-create-functions-with-no-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
ID : [getDataDB];
This means that ID matches a single letter that could be either one of g, e, t, D, a or B. What you likely wanted is ID: 'getDataDB'; which matches the string getDataDB. Note that calling this ID is highly misleading.
where i can put the code for this function
Are you writing an interpreter using a visitor? Then you'd put the code into the visitFunction method or rather in a getDataDB method that you call from visitFunction if the function name was equal to getDataDB (right now that would always be the case, but I'm assuming you eventually want to introduce more than one function).
Alternatively you could also structure your grammar slightly differently like this (removing the ID rule):
function : 'getDataDB' # GetDataDB
| 'otherFunction' # OtherFunction
;
Then you could define the functions in visitGetDataDB and visitOtherFunction respectively.
All that's assuming that you want function names to be keywords (which implies that there can't be user-definable functions). If you don't, you should not have separate tokens for function names, so zero-argument functions and variables become indistinguishable syntactically (unless you add a requirement to add () for functions, but it doesn't look like that's what you want). So you should just have one rule that could be either a variable or a zero-argument function and then check whether the given identifier is the name of a function in visitVariableOrNullaryFunction (which maybe you'd just call visitVariable for brevity).
Dear sepp2K, thanks for the answer, I managed to add my function implementation.
– OceanWavez
Nov 13 at 1:21
add a comment |
ID : [getDataDB];
This means that ID matches a single letter that could be either one of g, e, t, D, a or B. What you likely wanted is ID: 'getDataDB'; which matches the string getDataDB. Note that calling this ID is highly misleading.
where i can put the code for this function
Are you writing an interpreter using a visitor? Then you'd put the code into the visitFunction method or rather in a getDataDB method that you call from visitFunction if the function name was equal to getDataDB (right now that would always be the case, but I'm assuming you eventually want to introduce more than one function).
Alternatively you could also structure your grammar slightly differently like this (removing the ID rule):
function : 'getDataDB' # GetDataDB
| 'otherFunction' # OtherFunction
;
Then you could define the functions in visitGetDataDB and visitOtherFunction respectively.
All that's assuming that you want function names to be keywords (which implies that there can't be user-definable functions). If you don't, you should not have separate tokens for function names, so zero-argument functions and variables become indistinguishable syntactically (unless you add a requirement to add () for functions, but it doesn't look like that's what you want). So you should just have one rule that could be either a variable or a zero-argument function and then check whether the given identifier is the name of a function in visitVariableOrNullaryFunction (which maybe you'd just call visitVariable for brevity).
Dear sepp2K, thanks for the answer, I managed to add my function implementation.
– OceanWavez
Nov 13 at 1:21
add a comment |
ID : [getDataDB];
This means that ID matches a single letter that could be either one of g, e, t, D, a or B. What you likely wanted is ID: 'getDataDB'; which matches the string getDataDB. Note that calling this ID is highly misleading.
where i can put the code for this function
Are you writing an interpreter using a visitor? Then you'd put the code into the visitFunction method or rather in a getDataDB method that you call from visitFunction if the function name was equal to getDataDB (right now that would always be the case, but I'm assuming you eventually want to introduce more than one function).
Alternatively you could also structure your grammar slightly differently like this (removing the ID rule):
function : 'getDataDB' # GetDataDB
| 'otherFunction' # OtherFunction
;
Then you could define the functions in visitGetDataDB and visitOtherFunction respectively.
All that's assuming that you want function names to be keywords (which implies that there can't be user-definable functions). If you don't, you should not have separate tokens for function names, so zero-argument functions and variables become indistinguishable syntactically (unless you add a requirement to add () for functions, but it doesn't look like that's what you want). So you should just have one rule that could be either a variable or a zero-argument function and then check whether the given identifier is the name of a function in visitVariableOrNullaryFunction (which maybe you'd just call visitVariable for brevity).
ID : [getDataDB];
This means that ID matches a single letter that could be either one of g, e, t, D, a or B. What you likely wanted is ID: 'getDataDB'; which matches the string getDataDB. Note that calling this ID is highly misleading.
where i can put the code for this function
Are you writing an interpreter using a visitor? Then you'd put the code into the visitFunction method or rather in a getDataDB method that you call from visitFunction if the function name was equal to getDataDB (right now that would always be the case, but I'm assuming you eventually want to introduce more than one function).
Alternatively you could also structure your grammar slightly differently like this (removing the ID rule):
function : 'getDataDB' # GetDataDB
| 'otherFunction' # OtherFunction
;
Then you could define the functions in visitGetDataDB and visitOtherFunction respectively.
All that's assuming that you want function names to be keywords (which implies that there can't be user-definable functions). If you don't, you should not have separate tokens for function names, so zero-argument functions and variables become indistinguishable syntactically (unless you add a requirement to add () for functions, but it doesn't look like that's what you want). So you should just have one rule that could be either a variable or a zero-argument function and then check whether the given identifier is the name of a function in visitVariableOrNullaryFunction (which maybe you'd just call visitVariable for brevity).
answered Nov 11 at 22:26
sepp2k
293k38593609
293k38593609
Dear sepp2K, thanks for the answer, I managed to add my function implementation.
– OceanWavez
Nov 13 at 1:21
add a comment |
Dear sepp2K, thanks for the answer, I managed to add my function implementation.
– OceanWavez
Nov 13 at 1:21
Dear sepp2K, thanks for the answer, I managed to add my function implementation.
– OceanWavez
Nov 13 at 1:21
Dear sepp2K, thanks for the answer, I managed to add my function implementation.
– OceanWavez
Nov 13 at 1:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53252897%2fusing-antlr4-to-create-functions-with-no-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown