What's the key differences in existent approaches to mirror Kafka topics












1















Kafka MirrorMaker is a basic approach to mirror Kafka topics from source to target brokers. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit my requirements to be configurable enough.



My requirements are very simple:




  • the solution should be JVM application

  • if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it

  • solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names

  • it should reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed


According to this answer there are several alternative solutions to do this stuff:





  • MirrorTool-for-Kafka-Connect


  • Salesforce Mirus (based on Kafka Connect API)

  • Confluent's Replicator

  • Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality)


Moreover, KIP-382 was created to make Mirror Maker more flexible and configurable.



So, my question is what's the killer features of these solutions (comparing to others) and finally what's the better one according to provided requirements.










share|improve this question





























    1















    Kafka MirrorMaker is a basic approach to mirror Kafka topics from source to target brokers. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit my requirements to be configurable enough.



    My requirements are very simple:




    • the solution should be JVM application

    • if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it

    • solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names

    • it should reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed


    According to this answer there are several alternative solutions to do this stuff:





    • MirrorTool-for-Kafka-Connect


    • Salesforce Mirus (based on Kafka Connect API)

    • Confluent's Replicator

    • Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality)


    Moreover, KIP-382 was created to make Mirror Maker more flexible and configurable.



    So, my question is what's the killer features of these solutions (comparing to others) and finally what's the better one according to provided requirements.










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      Kafka MirrorMaker is a basic approach to mirror Kafka topics from source to target brokers. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit my requirements to be configurable enough.



      My requirements are very simple:




      • the solution should be JVM application

      • if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it

      • solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names

      • it should reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed


      According to this answer there are several alternative solutions to do this stuff:





      • MirrorTool-for-Kafka-Connect


      • Salesforce Mirus (based on Kafka Connect API)

      • Confluent's Replicator

      • Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality)


      Moreover, KIP-382 was created to make Mirror Maker more flexible and configurable.



      So, my question is what's the killer features of these solutions (comparing to others) and finally what's the better one according to provided requirements.










      share|improve this question
















      Kafka MirrorMaker is a basic approach to mirror Kafka topics from source to target brokers. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit my requirements to be configurable enough.



      My requirements are very simple:




      • the solution should be JVM application

      • if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it

      • solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names

      • it should reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed


      According to this answer there are several alternative solutions to do this stuff:





      • MirrorTool-for-Kafka-Connect


      • Salesforce Mirus (based on Kafka Connect API)

      • Confluent's Replicator

      • Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality)


      Moreover, KIP-382 was created to make Mirror Maker more flexible and configurable.



      So, my question is what's the killer features of these solutions (comparing to others) and finally what's the better one according to provided requirements.







      apache-kafka apache-kafka-connect






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 16 '18 at 17:27









      Matthias J. Sax

      29.4k35177




      29.4k35177










      asked Nov 16 '18 at 8:15









      yevtsyyevtsy

      8719




      8719
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          I see you are referring to my comment there...



          As for your bullets




          the solution should be JVM application




          All the listed ones are Java based




          if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it




          This is dependent on the Kafka broker version supporting the AdminClient API. Otherwise, as the MirrorMaker documentation says, you should create the destination topic before mirroring, otherwise you either get (1) denied to produce because auto topic creation is disable (2) problems seeing "consistent" data because a default configured topic was created.



          That being said, by default, MirrorMaker doesn't "propogate" topic configurations on its own. When I looked, MirrorTool similarly did not. I have not looked throughly at Mirus.



          Confluent Replicator does copy configurations and it will use the AdminClient.



          Replicator, MirrorTool, and Mirus are all based on Kafka Connect API. And KIP-382 will be as well




          Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality




          Kafka Streams can only communicate from() and to() a single cluster.



          You might as well just use MirrorMaker because it's a wrapper around Producer/Consumer already, and supports one cluster to another. If you need custom features, that's what the MessageHandler interface is for.




          solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names




          Each one can do that, but MirrorMaker requires extra/custom code. See example by @gwenshap




          reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed




          That's the tricky one... Usually, you just bounce the Java process because most configurations are only loaded at startup. The exception being whitelist or topics.regex for finding new topics to consume.




          KIP-382




          Hard to say that'll be accepted. While it was thoughly written, and I personally think it's reasonably scoped, it somewhat defeats the purpose of having Replicator for Confluent. The AvroConverter for Confluent Schema Registry is open sourced, and with large majority of Kafka commits and support happening out of Confluent, it's a conflict of interest as, AFAICT, that's the only missing piece between Replicator and the other Connect implementations... Case in point, MirrorTool had a KIP, but it was seemingly rejected on the mailing list with the explanation of "Kafka Connect is a pluggable ecosystem, and anyone can go ahead and install this mirroring extension, but it shouldn't be part of the core Kafka Connect project", or at least that's how I read it.





          What's "better" is a matter of opinion, and there are still other options (Apache Nifi or Streamsets come to mind). Even using kafkacat and netcat you can hack together cluster syncing.



          If you need Avro support and are paying for an enterprise license, then you might as well use Replicator.



          One thing that might be important to point out, that if you are mirroring a topic that is not using the DefaultPartitioner, then data will be reshuffled into the DefaultPartitioner on the destination cluster if you don't otherwise configure the destination Kafka producer to use the same partition value or partitioner class as the source Kafka Producer.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Is Replicator an option? it supports the custom name, it can talk to different brokers from source and sink and you can even apply so transformations. Also kafka connect will help with the configuration updates and such. What do you think?

            – Renato Mefi
            Nov 18 '18 at 13:49








          • 1





            @RenatoMefi thank you for the answer, but Replicator isn't open source solution, so it's not an option for me

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 10:44











          • @yevtsy is there anything else you want me to address?

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 11:25











          • @cricket_007 thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my delayed response. Yes, I have several more questions. The most valuable for me in the answers is the understanding the key difference in the solutions. You'd mentioned DefaultPartitioner imeplementation and working in a single cluster. It's smth I looked for. Do you know any other differences in solutions for this task based on Kafka Connect API and Kafka Streams?

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:50











          • Well, as pointed out, Kafka Streams is not a mirroring solution. The Connect API or a raw Producer/Consumer such as what MirrorMaker wraps are your only building blocks for this problem. The implementation details of successful delivery (and ordering) and offset translation (if you care) are extra

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:37













          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53333860%2fwhats-the-key-differences-in-existent-approaches-to-mirror-kafka-topics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          I see you are referring to my comment there...



          As for your bullets




          the solution should be JVM application




          All the listed ones are Java based




          if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it




          This is dependent on the Kafka broker version supporting the AdminClient API. Otherwise, as the MirrorMaker documentation says, you should create the destination topic before mirroring, otherwise you either get (1) denied to produce because auto topic creation is disable (2) problems seeing "consistent" data because a default configured topic was created.



          That being said, by default, MirrorMaker doesn't "propogate" topic configurations on its own. When I looked, MirrorTool similarly did not. I have not looked throughly at Mirus.



          Confluent Replicator does copy configurations and it will use the AdminClient.



          Replicator, MirrorTool, and Mirus are all based on Kafka Connect API. And KIP-382 will be as well




          Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality




          Kafka Streams can only communicate from() and to() a single cluster.



          You might as well just use MirrorMaker because it's a wrapper around Producer/Consumer already, and supports one cluster to another. If you need custom features, that's what the MessageHandler interface is for.




          solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names




          Each one can do that, but MirrorMaker requires extra/custom code. See example by @gwenshap




          reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed




          That's the tricky one... Usually, you just bounce the Java process because most configurations are only loaded at startup. The exception being whitelist or topics.regex for finding new topics to consume.




          KIP-382




          Hard to say that'll be accepted. While it was thoughly written, and I personally think it's reasonably scoped, it somewhat defeats the purpose of having Replicator for Confluent. The AvroConverter for Confluent Schema Registry is open sourced, and with large majority of Kafka commits and support happening out of Confluent, it's a conflict of interest as, AFAICT, that's the only missing piece between Replicator and the other Connect implementations... Case in point, MirrorTool had a KIP, but it was seemingly rejected on the mailing list with the explanation of "Kafka Connect is a pluggable ecosystem, and anyone can go ahead and install this mirroring extension, but it shouldn't be part of the core Kafka Connect project", or at least that's how I read it.





          What's "better" is a matter of opinion, and there are still other options (Apache Nifi or Streamsets come to mind). Even using kafkacat and netcat you can hack together cluster syncing.



          If you need Avro support and are paying for an enterprise license, then you might as well use Replicator.



          One thing that might be important to point out, that if you are mirroring a topic that is not using the DefaultPartitioner, then data will be reshuffled into the DefaultPartitioner on the destination cluster if you don't otherwise configure the destination Kafka producer to use the same partition value or partitioner class as the source Kafka Producer.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Is Replicator an option? it supports the custom name, it can talk to different brokers from source and sink and you can even apply so transformations. Also kafka connect will help with the configuration updates and such. What do you think?

            – Renato Mefi
            Nov 18 '18 at 13:49








          • 1





            @RenatoMefi thank you for the answer, but Replicator isn't open source solution, so it's not an option for me

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 10:44











          • @yevtsy is there anything else you want me to address?

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 11:25











          • @cricket_007 thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my delayed response. Yes, I have several more questions. The most valuable for me in the answers is the understanding the key difference in the solutions. You'd mentioned DefaultPartitioner imeplementation and working in a single cluster. It's smth I looked for. Do you know any other differences in solutions for this task based on Kafka Connect API and Kafka Streams?

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:50











          • Well, as pointed out, Kafka Streams is not a mirroring solution. The Connect API or a raw Producer/Consumer such as what MirrorMaker wraps are your only building blocks for this problem. The implementation details of successful delivery (and ordering) and offset translation (if you care) are extra

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:37


















          1














          I see you are referring to my comment there...



          As for your bullets




          the solution should be JVM application




          All the listed ones are Java based




          if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it




          This is dependent on the Kafka broker version supporting the AdminClient API. Otherwise, as the MirrorMaker documentation says, you should create the destination topic before mirroring, otherwise you either get (1) denied to produce because auto topic creation is disable (2) problems seeing "consistent" data because a default configured topic was created.



          That being said, by default, MirrorMaker doesn't "propogate" topic configurations on its own. When I looked, MirrorTool similarly did not. I have not looked throughly at Mirus.



          Confluent Replicator does copy configurations and it will use the AdminClient.



          Replicator, MirrorTool, and Mirus are all based on Kafka Connect API. And KIP-382 will be as well




          Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality




          Kafka Streams can only communicate from() and to() a single cluster.



          You might as well just use MirrorMaker because it's a wrapper around Producer/Consumer already, and supports one cluster to another. If you need custom features, that's what the MessageHandler interface is for.




          solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names




          Each one can do that, but MirrorMaker requires extra/custom code. See example by @gwenshap




          reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed




          That's the tricky one... Usually, you just bounce the Java process because most configurations are only loaded at startup. The exception being whitelist or topics.regex for finding new topics to consume.




          KIP-382




          Hard to say that'll be accepted. While it was thoughly written, and I personally think it's reasonably scoped, it somewhat defeats the purpose of having Replicator for Confluent. The AvroConverter for Confluent Schema Registry is open sourced, and with large majority of Kafka commits and support happening out of Confluent, it's a conflict of interest as, AFAICT, that's the only missing piece between Replicator and the other Connect implementations... Case in point, MirrorTool had a KIP, but it was seemingly rejected on the mailing list with the explanation of "Kafka Connect is a pluggable ecosystem, and anyone can go ahead and install this mirroring extension, but it shouldn't be part of the core Kafka Connect project", or at least that's how I read it.





          What's "better" is a matter of opinion, and there are still other options (Apache Nifi or Streamsets come to mind). Even using kafkacat and netcat you can hack together cluster syncing.



          If you need Avro support and are paying for an enterprise license, then you might as well use Replicator.



          One thing that might be important to point out, that if you are mirroring a topic that is not using the DefaultPartitioner, then data will be reshuffled into the DefaultPartitioner on the destination cluster if you don't otherwise configure the destination Kafka producer to use the same partition value or partitioner class as the source Kafka Producer.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Is Replicator an option? it supports the custom name, it can talk to different brokers from source and sink and you can even apply so transformations. Also kafka connect will help with the configuration updates and such. What do you think?

            – Renato Mefi
            Nov 18 '18 at 13:49








          • 1





            @RenatoMefi thank you for the answer, but Replicator isn't open source solution, so it's not an option for me

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 10:44











          • @yevtsy is there anything else you want me to address?

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 11:25











          • @cricket_007 thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my delayed response. Yes, I have several more questions. The most valuable for me in the answers is the understanding the key difference in the solutions. You'd mentioned DefaultPartitioner imeplementation and working in a single cluster. It's smth I looked for. Do you know any other differences in solutions for this task based on Kafka Connect API and Kafka Streams?

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:50











          • Well, as pointed out, Kafka Streams is not a mirroring solution. The Connect API or a raw Producer/Consumer such as what MirrorMaker wraps are your only building blocks for this problem. The implementation details of successful delivery (and ordering) and offset translation (if you care) are extra

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:37
















          1












          1








          1







          I see you are referring to my comment there...



          As for your bullets




          the solution should be JVM application




          All the listed ones are Java based




          if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it




          This is dependent on the Kafka broker version supporting the AdminClient API. Otherwise, as the MirrorMaker documentation says, you should create the destination topic before mirroring, otherwise you either get (1) denied to produce because auto topic creation is disable (2) problems seeing "consistent" data because a default configured topic was created.



          That being said, by default, MirrorMaker doesn't "propogate" topic configurations on its own. When I looked, MirrorTool similarly did not. I have not looked throughly at Mirus.



          Confluent Replicator does copy configurations and it will use the AdminClient.



          Replicator, MirrorTool, and Mirus are all based on Kafka Connect API. And KIP-382 will be as well




          Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality




          Kafka Streams can only communicate from() and to() a single cluster.



          You might as well just use MirrorMaker because it's a wrapper around Producer/Consumer already, and supports one cluster to another. If you need custom features, that's what the MessageHandler interface is for.




          solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names




          Each one can do that, but MirrorMaker requires extra/custom code. See example by @gwenshap




          reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed




          That's the tricky one... Usually, you just bounce the Java process because most configurations are only loaded at startup. The exception being whitelist or topics.regex for finding new topics to consume.




          KIP-382




          Hard to say that'll be accepted. While it was thoughly written, and I personally think it's reasonably scoped, it somewhat defeats the purpose of having Replicator for Confluent. The AvroConverter for Confluent Schema Registry is open sourced, and with large majority of Kafka commits and support happening out of Confluent, it's a conflict of interest as, AFAICT, that's the only missing piece between Replicator and the other Connect implementations... Case in point, MirrorTool had a KIP, but it was seemingly rejected on the mailing list with the explanation of "Kafka Connect is a pluggable ecosystem, and anyone can go ahead and install this mirroring extension, but it shouldn't be part of the core Kafka Connect project", or at least that's how I read it.





          What's "better" is a matter of opinion, and there are still other options (Apache Nifi or Streamsets come to mind). Even using kafkacat and netcat you can hack together cluster syncing.



          If you need Avro support and are paying for an enterprise license, then you might as well use Replicator.



          One thing that might be important to point out, that if you are mirroring a topic that is not using the DefaultPartitioner, then data will be reshuffled into the DefaultPartitioner on the destination cluster if you don't otherwise configure the destination Kafka producer to use the same partition value or partitioner class as the source Kafka Producer.






          share|improve this answer















          I see you are referring to my comment there...



          As for your bullets




          the solution should be JVM application




          All the listed ones are Java based




          if destination topic doesn't exist, creates it




          This is dependent on the Kafka broker version supporting the AdminClient API. Otherwise, as the MirrorMaker documentation says, you should create the destination topic before mirroring, otherwise you either get (1) denied to produce because auto topic creation is disable (2) problems seeing "consistent" data because a default configured topic was created.



          That being said, by default, MirrorMaker doesn't "propogate" topic configurations on its own. When I looked, MirrorTool similarly did not. I have not looked throughly at Mirus.



          Confluent Replicator does copy configurations and it will use the AdminClient.



          Replicator, MirrorTool, and Mirus are all based on Kafka Connect API. And KIP-382 will be as well




          Build my own application (based on Kafka Streams functionality




          Kafka Streams can only communicate from() and to() a single cluster.



          You might as well just use MirrorMaker because it's a wrapper around Producer/Consumer already, and supports one cluster to another. If you need custom features, that's what the MessageHandler interface is for.




          solution should have the ability to add prefixes/suffixes to destination topic names




          Each one can do that, but MirrorMaker requires extra/custom code. See example by @gwenshap




          reload and apply configurations on the fly if they're changed




          That's the tricky one... Usually, you just bounce the Java process because most configurations are only loaded at startup. The exception being whitelist or topics.regex for finding new topics to consume.




          KIP-382




          Hard to say that'll be accepted. While it was thoughly written, and I personally think it's reasonably scoped, it somewhat defeats the purpose of having Replicator for Confluent. The AvroConverter for Confluent Schema Registry is open sourced, and with large majority of Kafka commits and support happening out of Confluent, it's a conflict of interest as, AFAICT, that's the only missing piece between Replicator and the other Connect implementations... Case in point, MirrorTool had a KIP, but it was seemingly rejected on the mailing list with the explanation of "Kafka Connect is a pluggable ecosystem, and anyone can go ahead and install this mirroring extension, but it shouldn't be part of the core Kafka Connect project", or at least that's how I read it.





          What's "better" is a matter of opinion, and there are still other options (Apache Nifi or Streamsets come to mind). Even using kafkacat and netcat you can hack together cluster syncing.



          If you need Avro support and are paying for an enterprise license, then you might as well use Replicator.



          One thing that might be important to point out, that if you are mirroring a topic that is not using the DefaultPartitioner, then data will be reshuffled into the DefaultPartitioner on the destination cluster if you don't otherwise configure the destination Kafka producer to use the same partition value or partitioner class as the source Kafka Producer.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 18 '18 at 0:17

























          answered Nov 16 '18 at 9:08









          cricket_007cricket_007

          81.1k1142111




          81.1k1142111













          • Is Replicator an option? it supports the custom name, it can talk to different brokers from source and sink and you can even apply so transformations. Also kafka connect will help with the configuration updates and such. What do you think?

            – Renato Mefi
            Nov 18 '18 at 13:49








          • 1





            @RenatoMefi thank you for the answer, but Replicator isn't open source solution, so it's not an option for me

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 10:44











          • @yevtsy is there anything else you want me to address?

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 11:25











          • @cricket_007 thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my delayed response. Yes, I have several more questions. The most valuable for me in the answers is the understanding the key difference in the solutions. You'd mentioned DefaultPartitioner imeplementation and working in a single cluster. It's smth I looked for. Do you know any other differences in solutions for this task based on Kafka Connect API and Kafka Streams?

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:50











          • Well, as pointed out, Kafka Streams is not a mirroring solution. The Connect API or a raw Producer/Consumer such as what MirrorMaker wraps are your only building blocks for this problem. The implementation details of successful delivery (and ordering) and offset translation (if you care) are extra

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:37





















          • Is Replicator an option? it supports the custom name, it can talk to different brokers from source and sink and you can even apply so transformations. Also kafka connect will help with the configuration updates and such. What do you think?

            – Renato Mefi
            Nov 18 '18 at 13:49








          • 1





            @RenatoMefi thank you for the answer, but Replicator isn't open source solution, so it's not an option for me

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 10:44











          • @yevtsy is there anything else you want me to address?

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 11:25











          • @cricket_007 thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my delayed response. Yes, I have several more questions. The most valuable for me in the answers is the understanding the key difference in the solutions. You'd mentioned DefaultPartitioner imeplementation and working in a single cluster. It's smth I looked for. Do you know any other differences in solutions for this task based on Kafka Connect API and Kafka Streams?

            – yevtsy
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:50











          • Well, as pointed out, Kafka Streams is not a mirroring solution. The Connect API or a raw Producer/Consumer such as what MirrorMaker wraps are your only building blocks for this problem. The implementation details of successful delivery (and ordering) and offset translation (if you care) are extra

            – cricket_007
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:37



















          Is Replicator an option? it supports the custom name, it can talk to different brokers from source and sink and you can even apply so transformations. Also kafka connect will help with the configuration updates and such. What do you think?

          – Renato Mefi
          Nov 18 '18 at 13:49







          Is Replicator an option? it supports the custom name, it can talk to different brokers from source and sink and you can even apply so transformations. Also kafka connect will help with the configuration updates and such. What do you think?

          – Renato Mefi
          Nov 18 '18 at 13:49






          1




          1





          @RenatoMefi thank you for the answer, but Replicator isn't open source solution, so it's not an option for me

          – yevtsy
          Nov 20 '18 at 10:44





          @RenatoMefi thank you for the answer, but Replicator isn't open source solution, so it's not an option for me

          – yevtsy
          Nov 20 '18 at 10:44













          @yevtsy is there anything else you want me to address?

          – cricket_007
          Nov 20 '18 at 11:25





          @yevtsy is there anything else you want me to address?

          – cricket_007
          Nov 20 '18 at 11:25













          @cricket_007 thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my delayed response. Yes, I have several more questions. The most valuable for me in the answers is the understanding the key difference in the solutions. You'd mentioned DefaultPartitioner imeplementation and working in a single cluster. It's smth I looked for. Do you know any other differences in solutions for this task based on Kafka Connect API and Kafka Streams?

          – yevtsy
          Nov 20 '18 at 14:50





          @cricket_007 thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my delayed response. Yes, I have several more questions. The most valuable for me in the answers is the understanding the key difference in the solutions. You'd mentioned DefaultPartitioner imeplementation and working in a single cluster. It's smth I looked for. Do you know any other differences in solutions for this task based on Kafka Connect API and Kafka Streams?

          – yevtsy
          Nov 20 '18 at 14:50













          Well, as pointed out, Kafka Streams is not a mirroring solution. The Connect API or a raw Producer/Consumer such as what MirrorMaker wraps are your only building blocks for this problem. The implementation details of successful delivery (and ordering) and offset translation (if you care) are extra

          – cricket_007
          Nov 20 '18 at 15:37







          Well, as pointed out, Kafka Streams is not a mirroring solution. The Connect API or a raw Producer/Consumer such as what MirrorMaker wraps are your only building blocks for this problem. The implementation details of successful delivery (and ordering) and offset translation (if you care) are extra

          – cricket_007
          Nov 20 '18 at 15:37




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53333860%2fwhats-the-key-differences-in-existent-approaches-to-mirror-kafka-topics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

          Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

          Zucchini