Stable extensions by line bundles on Riemann surfaces












4












$begingroup$


Is there a compact Riemann surface $X$ and a line bundle $L$ of negative degree on $X$, such that for any nontrivial extension
$$ 0 rightarrow L rightarrow E rightarrow L^{-1} rightarrow 0, $$
$E$ is a stable vector bundle on $X$? Any comment and reference is welcome, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    Is there a compact Riemann surface $X$ and a line bundle $L$ of negative degree on $X$, such that for any nontrivial extension
    $$ 0 rightarrow L rightarrow E rightarrow L^{-1} rightarrow 0, $$
    $E$ is a stable vector bundle on $X$? Any comment and reference is welcome, thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Is there a compact Riemann surface $X$ and a line bundle $L$ of negative degree on $X$, such that for any nontrivial extension
      $$ 0 rightarrow L rightarrow E rightarrow L^{-1} rightarrow 0, $$
      $E$ is a stable vector bundle on $X$? Any comment and reference is welcome, thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Is there a compact Riemann surface $X$ and a line bundle $L$ of negative degree on $X$, such that for any nontrivial extension
      $$ 0 rightarrow L rightarrow E rightarrow L^{-1} rightarrow 0, $$
      $E$ is a stable vector bundle on $X$? Any comment and reference is welcome, thank you.







      ag.algebraic-geometry vector-bundles riemann-surfaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 17 '18 at 8:00









      swalkerswalker

      33718




      33718






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          This never happens. Pick a point $pin X$; the exact sequence $0rightarrow L^{2}rightarrow L^{2}(p)rightarrow mathbb{C}_prightarrow 0$ gives rise to an exact sequence $0rightarrow mathbb{C}xrightarrow{ partial } H^1(L^2)longrightarrow H^1(L^2(p))rightarrow 0$. The class
          $e:=partial (1)$ in $H^1(L^2)cong operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1},L) $ maps to $0$ in $operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1}(-p),L) $, hence it defines a nontrivial extension of $L^{-1}$ by $L$ which becomes trivial when pulled back to $L^{-1}(-p)$. This means that the extension bundle $E$ contains $L^{-1}(-p)$, hence is not stable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! By the openness of stability, we know that the unstable extensions form a subvariety of Ext$^1(L^{-1},L)$ of codimension $ge 1$. Can we expect that the subvariety has codimension $>1$ for some general Riemann surfaces? For example $g(X) > 1$.
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:44










          • $begingroup$
            If $X$ is a Riemann surface of genus $g>1$, I proved that there always exist stable extension bundles.@abx
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:48










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, I think that quite generally the subvariety of unstable extensions has high codimension. You might have a look at a paper by A. Bertram, Moduli of rank-2 vector bundles, theta divisors, and the geometry of curves in projective space (J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 2, 429-469). He does a detailed analysis (in a slightly different situation) of the stability of extensions.
            $endgroup$
            – abx
            Nov 21 '18 at 6:32











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315512%2fstable-extensions-by-line-bundles-on-riemann-surfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10












          $begingroup$

          This never happens. Pick a point $pin X$; the exact sequence $0rightarrow L^{2}rightarrow L^{2}(p)rightarrow mathbb{C}_prightarrow 0$ gives rise to an exact sequence $0rightarrow mathbb{C}xrightarrow{ partial } H^1(L^2)longrightarrow H^1(L^2(p))rightarrow 0$. The class
          $e:=partial (1)$ in $H^1(L^2)cong operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1},L) $ maps to $0$ in $operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1}(-p),L) $, hence it defines a nontrivial extension of $L^{-1}$ by $L$ which becomes trivial when pulled back to $L^{-1}(-p)$. This means that the extension bundle $E$ contains $L^{-1}(-p)$, hence is not stable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! By the openness of stability, we know that the unstable extensions form a subvariety of Ext$^1(L^{-1},L)$ of codimension $ge 1$. Can we expect that the subvariety has codimension $>1$ for some general Riemann surfaces? For example $g(X) > 1$.
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:44










          • $begingroup$
            If $X$ is a Riemann surface of genus $g>1$, I proved that there always exist stable extension bundles.@abx
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:48










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, I think that quite generally the subvariety of unstable extensions has high codimension. You might have a look at a paper by A. Bertram, Moduli of rank-2 vector bundles, theta divisors, and the geometry of curves in projective space (J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 2, 429-469). He does a detailed analysis (in a slightly different situation) of the stability of extensions.
            $endgroup$
            – abx
            Nov 21 '18 at 6:32
















          10












          $begingroup$

          This never happens. Pick a point $pin X$; the exact sequence $0rightarrow L^{2}rightarrow L^{2}(p)rightarrow mathbb{C}_prightarrow 0$ gives rise to an exact sequence $0rightarrow mathbb{C}xrightarrow{ partial } H^1(L^2)longrightarrow H^1(L^2(p))rightarrow 0$. The class
          $e:=partial (1)$ in $H^1(L^2)cong operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1},L) $ maps to $0$ in $operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1}(-p),L) $, hence it defines a nontrivial extension of $L^{-1}$ by $L$ which becomes trivial when pulled back to $L^{-1}(-p)$. This means that the extension bundle $E$ contains $L^{-1}(-p)$, hence is not stable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! By the openness of stability, we know that the unstable extensions form a subvariety of Ext$^1(L^{-1},L)$ of codimension $ge 1$. Can we expect that the subvariety has codimension $>1$ for some general Riemann surfaces? For example $g(X) > 1$.
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:44










          • $begingroup$
            If $X$ is a Riemann surface of genus $g>1$, I proved that there always exist stable extension bundles.@abx
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:48










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, I think that quite generally the subvariety of unstable extensions has high codimension. You might have a look at a paper by A. Bertram, Moduli of rank-2 vector bundles, theta divisors, and the geometry of curves in projective space (J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 2, 429-469). He does a detailed analysis (in a slightly different situation) of the stability of extensions.
            $endgroup$
            – abx
            Nov 21 '18 at 6:32














          10












          10








          10





          $begingroup$

          This never happens. Pick a point $pin X$; the exact sequence $0rightarrow L^{2}rightarrow L^{2}(p)rightarrow mathbb{C}_prightarrow 0$ gives rise to an exact sequence $0rightarrow mathbb{C}xrightarrow{ partial } H^1(L^2)longrightarrow H^1(L^2(p))rightarrow 0$. The class
          $e:=partial (1)$ in $H^1(L^2)cong operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1},L) $ maps to $0$ in $operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1}(-p),L) $, hence it defines a nontrivial extension of $L^{-1}$ by $L$ which becomes trivial when pulled back to $L^{-1}(-p)$. This means that the extension bundle $E$ contains $L^{-1}(-p)$, hence is not stable.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This never happens. Pick a point $pin X$; the exact sequence $0rightarrow L^{2}rightarrow L^{2}(p)rightarrow mathbb{C}_prightarrow 0$ gives rise to an exact sequence $0rightarrow mathbb{C}xrightarrow{ partial } H^1(L^2)longrightarrow H^1(L^2(p))rightarrow 0$. The class
          $e:=partial (1)$ in $H^1(L^2)cong operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1},L) $ maps to $0$ in $operatorname{Ext}^1(L^{-1}(-p),L) $, hence it defines a nontrivial extension of $L^{-1}$ by $L$ which becomes trivial when pulled back to $L^{-1}(-p)$. This means that the extension bundle $E$ contains $L^{-1}(-p)$, hence is not stable.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 17 '18 at 9:58









          abxabx

          23.5k34885




          23.5k34885












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! By the openness of stability, we know that the unstable extensions form a subvariety of Ext$^1(L^{-1},L)$ of codimension $ge 1$. Can we expect that the subvariety has codimension $>1$ for some general Riemann surfaces? For example $g(X) > 1$.
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:44










          • $begingroup$
            If $X$ is a Riemann surface of genus $g>1$, I proved that there always exist stable extension bundles.@abx
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:48










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, I think that quite generally the subvariety of unstable extensions has high codimension. You might have a look at a paper by A. Bertram, Moduli of rank-2 vector bundles, theta divisors, and the geometry of curves in projective space (J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 2, 429-469). He does a detailed analysis (in a slightly different situation) of the stability of extensions.
            $endgroup$
            – abx
            Nov 21 '18 at 6:32


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much! By the openness of stability, we know that the unstable extensions form a subvariety of Ext$^1(L^{-1},L)$ of codimension $ge 1$. Can we expect that the subvariety has codimension $>1$ for some general Riemann surfaces? For example $g(X) > 1$.
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:44










          • $begingroup$
            If $X$ is a Riemann surface of genus $g>1$, I proved that there always exist stable extension bundles.@abx
            $endgroup$
            – swalker
            Nov 18 '18 at 2:48










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, I think that quite generally the subvariety of unstable extensions has high codimension. You might have a look at a paper by A. Bertram, Moduli of rank-2 vector bundles, theta divisors, and the geometry of curves in projective space (J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 2, 429-469). He does a detailed analysis (in a slightly different situation) of the stability of extensions.
            $endgroup$
            – abx
            Nov 21 '18 at 6:32
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much! By the openness of stability, we know that the unstable extensions form a subvariety of Ext$^1(L^{-1},L)$ of codimension $ge 1$. Can we expect that the subvariety has codimension $>1$ for some general Riemann surfaces? For example $g(X) > 1$.
          $endgroup$
          – swalker
          Nov 18 '18 at 2:44




          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much! By the openness of stability, we know that the unstable extensions form a subvariety of Ext$^1(L^{-1},L)$ of codimension $ge 1$. Can we expect that the subvariety has codimension $>1$ for some general Riemann surfaces? For example $g(X) > 1$.
          $endgroup$
          – swalker
          Nov 18 '18 at 2:44












          $begingroup$
          If $X$ is a Riemann surface of genus $g>1$, I proved that there always exist stable extension bundles.@abx
          $endgroup$
          – swalker
          Nov 18 '18 at 2:48




          $begingroup$
          If $X$ is a Riemann surface of genus $g>1$, I proved that there always exist stable extension bundles.@abx
          $endgroup$
          – swalker
          Nov 18 '18 at 2:48












          $begingroup$
          Yes, I think that quite generally the subvariety of unstable extensions has high codimension. You might have a look at a paper by A. Bertram, Moduli of rank-2 vector bundles, theta divisors, and the geometry of curves in projective space (J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 2, 429-469). He does a detailed analysis (in a slightly different situation) of the stability of extensions.
          $endgroup$
          – abx
          Nov 21 '18 at 6:32




          $begingroup$
          Yes, I think that quite generally the subvariety of unstable extensions has high codimension. You might have a look at a paper by A. Bertram, Moduli of rank-2 vector bundles, theta divisors, and the geometry of curves in projective space (J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 2, 429-469). He does a detailed analysis (in a slightly different situation) of the stability of extensions.
          $endgroup$
          – abx
          Nov 21 '18 at 6:32


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315512%2fstable-extensions-by-line-bundles-on-riemann-surfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Academy of Television Arts & Sciences

          L'Équipe

          1995 France bombings