ASP.NET Core: A second operation started on this context before a previous operation completed
I'm receiving the following error intermittently on one of my SignalR methods:
Error: An unexpected error occurred invoking 'AcceptQueuedUser' on the
server. InvalidOperationException: A second operation started on this
context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members
are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
Anytime I run into this error, the first thing I check is to make sure all my async
method invocations are await
ed. However, I've gone through my entire code base looking for async methods that are missing an await
keyword. I've used regex to try and track it down as well as ReSharper's "Async method invocation without await expression" inspection on the entire solution. No dice.
I have a feeling this problem is related to SignalR, as I've never had this much trouble on normal API Endpoints/Controllers. I'm injecting my scoped DbContext
into my SignalR hub as I would on any normal Controller
:
public class ChatQueueHub<TUser> : Hub<IChatQueueHubClient>
where TUser : class, IChatRoomUser
{
private readonly IChatQueueRepository _chatQueueRepository;
/// <summary>
/// Default constructor
/// </summary>
public ChatQueueHub(IChatQueueRepository chatQueueRepository)
{
_chatQueueRepository = chatQueueRepository
}
public async Task<ApiResponse<string>> AcceptQueuedUser(int userQueueId)
{
// ...
await _chatQueueRepository.RemoveQueuedUserAsync(userQueueUser);
// ...
return new ApiResponse<string>(newChatroom.Id, BaseApiCode.Success);
}
}
Here I'm injecting IChatQueueRepository
which injects DbContext
into itself and performs all context operations.
I have a feeling this is due to some weird threading issue on SignalR, but I can't see anything abnormal in my code. As far as I know SignalR instantiates a new Hub for every RPC sent over the wire.
What are some other things I can look for that would cause A second operation started on this context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
aside from non-awaited async invocations?
Edit:
I see now that the ASP.NET Core Dependancy injection documentation says the following:
Entity Framework contexts should be added to the service
container using the scoped lifetime. This is handled automatically
with a call to the AddDbContext method when registering the database
context. Services that use the database context should also use the
scoped lifetime.
SignalR Hubs are Transient, so perhaps this is causing the problem. What is the correct way to access a DBContext from a SignalR Hub?
c# entity-framework asynchronous signalr
add a comment |
I'm receiving the following error intermittently on one of my SignalR methods:
Error: An unexpected error occurred invoking 'AcceptQueuedUser' on the
server. InvalidOperationException: A second operation started on this
context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members
are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
Anytime I run into this error, the first thing I check is to make sure all my async
method invocations are await
ed. However, I've gone through my entire code base looking for async methods that are missing an await
keyword. I've used regex to try and track it down as well as ReSharper's "Async method invocation without await expression" inspection on the entire solution. No dice.
I have a feeling this problem is related to SignalR, as I've never had this much trouble on normal API Endpoints/Controllers. I'm injecting my scoped DbContext
into my SignalR hub as I would on any normal Controller
:
public class ChatQueueHub<TUser> : Hub<IChatQueueHubClient>
where TUser : class, IChatRoomUser
{
private readonly IChatQueueRepository _chatQueueRepository;
/// <summary>
/// Default constructor
/// </summary>
public ChatQueueHub(IChatQueueRepository chatQueueRepository)
{
_chatQueueRepository = chatQueueRepository
}
public async Task<ApiResponse<string>> AcceptQueuedUser(int userQueueId)
{
// ...
await _chatQueueRepository.RemoveQueuedUserAsync(userQueueUser);
// ...
return new ApiResponse<string>(newChatroom.Id, BaseApiCode.Success);
}
}
Here I'm injecting IChatQueueRepository
which injects DbContext
into itself and performs all context operations.
I have a feeling this is due to some weird threading issue on SignalR, but I can't see anything abnormal in my code. As far as I know SignalR instantiates a new Hub for every RPC sent over the wire.
What are some other things I can look for that would cause A second operation started on this context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
aside from non-awaited async invocations?
Edit:
I see now that the ASP.NET Core Dependancy injection documentation says the following:
Entity Framework contexts should be added to the service
container using the scoped lifetime. This is handled automatically
with a call to the AddDbContext method when registering the database
context. Services that use the database context should also use the
scoped lifetime.
SignalR Hubs are Transient, so perhaps this is causing the problem. What is the correct way to access a DBContext from a SignalR Hub?
c# entity-framework asynchronous signalr
add a comment |
I'm receiving the following error intermittently on one of my SignalR methods:
Error: An unexpected error occurred invoking 'AcceptQueuedUser' on the
server. InvalidOperationException: A second operation started on this
context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members
are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
Anytime I run into this error, the first thing I check is to make sure all my async
method invocations are await
ed. However, I've gone through my entire code base looking for async methods that are missing an await
keyword. I've used regex to try and track it down as well as ReSharper's "Async method invocation without await expression" inspection on the entire solution. No dice.
I have a feeling this problem is related to SignalR, as I've never had this much trouble on normal API Endpoints/Controllers. I'm injecting my scoped DbContext
into my SignalR hub as I would on any normal Controller
:
public class ChatQueueHub<TUser> : Hub<IChatQueueHubClient>
where TUser : class, IChatRoomUser
{
private readonly IChatQueueRepository _chatQueueRepository;
/// <summary>
/// Default constructor
/// </summary>
public ChatQueueHub(IChatQueueRepository chatQueueRepository)
{
_chatQueueRepository = chatQueueRepository
}
public async Task<ApiResponse<string>> AcceptQueuedUser(int userQueueId)
{
// ...
await _chatQueueRepository.RemoveQueuedUserAsync(userQueueUser);
// ...
return new ApiResponse<string>(newChatroom.Id, BaseApiCode.Success);
}
}
Here I'm injecting IChatQueueRepository
which injects DbContext
into itself and performs all context operations.
I have a feeling this is due to some weird threading issue on SignalR, but I can't see anything abnormal in my code. As far as I know SignalR instantiates a new Hub for every RPC sent over the wire.
What are some other things I can look for that would cause A second operation started on this context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
aside from non-awaited async invocations?
Edit:
I see now that the ASP.NET Core Dependancy injection documentation says the following:
Entity Framework contexts should be added to the service
container using the scoped lifetime. This is handled automatically
with a call to the AddDbContext method when registering the database
context. Services that use the database context should also use the
scoped lifetime.
SignalR Hubs are Transient, so perhaps this is causing the problem. What is the correct way to access a DBContext from a SignalR Hub?
c# entity-framework asynchronous signalr
I'm receiving the following error intermittently on one of my SignalR methods:
Error: An unexpected error occurred invoking 'AcceptQueuedUser' on the
server. InvalidOperationException: A second operation started on this
context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members
are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
Anytime I run into this error, the first thing I check is to make sure all my async
method invocations are await
ed. However, I've gone through my entire code base looking for async methods that are missing an await
keyword. I've used regex to try and track it down as well as ReSharper's "Async method invocation without await expression" inspection on the entire solution. No dice.
I have a feeling this problem is related to SignalR, as I've never had this much trouble on normal API Endpoints/Controllers. I'm injecting my scoped DbContext
into my SignalR hub as I would on any normal Controller
:
public class ChatQueueHub<TUser> : Hub<IChatQueueHubClient>
where TUser : class, IChatRoomUser
{
private readonly IChatQueueRepository _chatQueueRepository;
/// <summary>
/// Default constructor
/// </summary>
public ChatQueueHub(IChatQueueRepository chatQueueRepository)
{
_chatQueueRepository = chatQueueRepository
}
public async Task<ApiResponse<string>> AcceptQueuedUser(int userQueueId)
{
// ...
await _chatQueueRepository.RemoveQueuedUserAsync(userQueueUser);
// ...
return new ApiResponse<string>(newChatroom.Id, BaseApiCode.Success);
}
}
Here I'm injecting IChatQueueRepository
which injects DbContext
into itself and performs all context operations.
I have a feeling this is due to some weird threading issue on SignalR, but I can't see anything abnormal in my code. As far as I know SignalR instantiates a new Hub for every RPC sent over the wire.
What are some other things I can look for that would cause A second operation started on this context before a previous operation completed. Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe.
aside from non-awaited async invocations?
Edit:
I see now that the ASP.NET Core Dependancy injection documentation says the following:
Entity Framework contexts should be added to the service
container using the scoped lifetime. This is handled automatically
with a call to the AddDbContext method when registering the database
context. Services that use the database context should also use the
scoped lifetime.
SignalR Hubs are Transient, so perhaps this is causing the problem. What is the correct way to access a DBContext from a SignalR Hub?
c# entity-framework asynchronous signalr
c# entity-framework asynchronous signalr
edited Nov 21 '18 at 17:03
Brad
asked Nov 21 '18 at 16:52
BradBrad
3,256103955
3,256103955
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53416963%2fasp-net-core-a-second-operation-started-on-this-context-before-a-previous-opera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53416963%2fasp-net-core-a-second-operation-started-on-this-context-before-a-previous-opera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown