Ajax.ActionLink Alternative - Net Core





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















Earlier in MVC I used @Ajax.ActionLink for Ajax call and replaced container in my layout.



Now in .Net Core there is anything like AjaxHelper back then.



How can I form Ajax call without writing jquery script for every menu item in my dashboard.



I tried @Url.Action with anonymous Ajax parameters but that won't work.



@Url.Action("Index", "User", new
{
data_ajax = "true",
data_ajax_method = "GET",
data_ajax_mode = "replace",
data_ajax_update = "#replace"
}))"









share|improve this question























  • Do you miss js packages? Check the reference to jquery and jquery.unobtrusive-ajax scripts package dotnetthoughts.net/…

    – ocrenaka
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:20











  • I installed it via nuget, it didn't added any .js file to the wwwroot/js, Jquery Ajax works great.

    – Softouch
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:39


















1















Earlier in MVC I used @Ajax.ActionLink for Ajax call and replaced container in my layout.



Now in .Net Core there is anything like AjaxHelper back then.



How can I form Ajax call without writing jquery script for every menu item in my dashboard.



I tried @Url.Action with anonymous Ajax parameters but that won't work.



@Url.Action("Index", "User", new
{
data_ajax = "true",
data_ajax_method = "GET",
data_ajax_mode = "replace",
data_ajax_update = "#replace"
}))"









share|improve this question























  • Do you miss js packages? Check the reference to jquery and jquery.unobtrusive-ajax scripts package dotnetthoughts.net/…

    – ocrenaka
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:20











  • I installed it via nuget, it didn't added any .js file to the wwwroot/js, Jquery Ajax works great.

    – Softouch
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:39














1












1








1








Earlier in MVC I used @Ajax.ActionLink for Ajax call and replaced container in my layout.



Now in .Net Core there is anything like AjaxHelper back then.



How can I form Ajax call without writing jquery script for every menu item in my dashboard.



I tried @Url.Action with anonymous Ajax parameters but that won't work.



@Url.Action("Index", "User", new
{
data_ajax = "true",
data_ajax_method = "GET",
data_ajax_mode = "replace",
data_ajax_update = "#replace"
}))"









share|improve this question














Earlier in MVC I used @Ajax.ActionLink for Ajax call and replaced container in my layout.



Now in .Net Core there is anything like AjaxHelper back then.



How can I form Ajax call without writing jquery script for every menu item in my dashboard.



I tried @Url.Action with anonymous Ajax parameters but that won't work.



@Url.Action("Index", "User", new
{
data_ajax = "true",
data_ajax_method = "GET",
data_ajax_mode = "replace",
data_ajax_update = "#replace"
}))"






c# ajax asp.net-core






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 10 '18 at 15:10









SoftouchSoftouch

306




306













  • Do you miss js packages? Check the reference to jquery and jquery.unobtrusive-ajax scripts package dotnetthoughts.net/…

    – ocrenaka
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:20











  • I installed it via nuget, it didn't added any .js file to the wwwroot/js, Jquery Ajax works great.

    – Softouch
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:39



















  • Do you miss js packages? Check the reference to jquery and jquery.unobtrusive-ajax scripts package dotnetthoughts.net/…

    – ocrenaka
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:20











  • I installed it via nuget, it didn't added any .js file to the wwwroot/js, Jquery Ajax works great.

    – Softouch
    Aug 10 '18 at 15:39

















Do you miss js packages? Check the reference to jquery and jquery.unobtrusive-ajax scripts package dotnetthoughts.net/…

– ocrenaka
Aug 10 '18 at 15:20





Do you miss js packages? Check the reference to jquery and jquery.unobtrusive-ajax scripts package dotnetthoughts.net/…

– ocrenaka
Aug 10 '18 at 15:20













I installed it via nuget, it didn't added any .js file to the wwwroot/js, Jquery Ajax works great.

– Softouch
Aug 10 '18 at 15:39





I installed it via nuget, it didn't added any .js file to the wwwroot/js, Jquery Ajax works great.

– Softouch
Aug 10 '18 at 15:39












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














No. Honestly, you never needed it anyways. All it did was create a regular link and then add a trivial bit of JavaScript you can easily add yourself. Long and short, let it go:



<a class="menu-item" asp-action="Index" asp-controller="User">Click Me</a>


Then:



<script>
$('.menu-item').on('click', function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
$.get(this.href, function (html) {
$('#replace').html(html);
});
});
</script>


By binding to the class, you only need this one piece of JS for any link with a menu-item class.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f51789444%2fajax-actionlink-alternative-net-core%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    No. Honestly, you never needed it anyways. All it did was create a regular link and then add a trivial bit of JavaScript you can easily add yourself. Long and short, let it go:



    <a class="menu-item" asp-action="Index" asp-controller="User">Click Me</a>


    Then:



    <script>
    $('.menu-item').on('click', function (e) {
    e.preventDefault();
    $.get(this.href, function (html) {
    $('#replace').html(html);
    });
    });
    </script>


    By binding to the class, you only need this one piece of JS for any link with a menu-item class.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      No. Honestly, you never needed it anyways. All it did was create a regular link and then add a trivial bit of JavaScript you can easily add yourself. Long and short, let it go:



      <a class="menu-item" asp-action="Index" asp-controller="User">Click Me</a>


      Then:



      <script>
      $('.menu-item').on('click', function (e) {
      e.preventDefault();
      $.get(this.href, function (html) {
      $('#replace').html(html);
      });
      });
      </script>


      By binding to the class, you only need this one piece of JS for any link with a menu-item class.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        No. Honestly, you never needed it anyways. All it did was create a regular link and then add a trivial bit of JavaScript you can easily add yourself. Long and short, let it go:



        <a class="menu-item" asp-action="Index" asp-controller="User">Click Me</a>


        Then:



        <script>
        $('.menu-item').on('click', function (e) {
        e.preventDefault();
        $.get(this.href, function (html) {
        $('#replace').html(html);
        });
        });
        </script>


        By binding to the class, you only need this one piece of JS for any link with a menu-item class.






        share|improve this answer













        No. Honestly, you never needed it anyways. All it did was create a regular link and then add a trivial bit of JavaScript you can easily add yourself. Long and short, let it go:



        <a class="menu-item" asp-action="Index" asp-controller="User">Click Me</a>


        Then:



        <script>
        $('.menu-item').on('click', function (e) {
        e.preventDefault();
        $.get(this.href, function (html) {
        $('#replace').html(html);
        });
        });
        </script>


        By binding to the class, you only need this one piece of JS for any link with a menu-item class.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 10 '18 at 18:52









        Chris PrattChris Pratt

        161k21245310




        161k21245310
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f51789444%2fajax-actionlink-alternative-net-core%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

            Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

            Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()