Calling a function of a module by using its name (a string)





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1398















What is the best way to go about calling a function given a string with the function's name in a Python program. For example, let's say that I have a module foo, and I have a string whose content is "bar". What is the best way to call foo.bar()?



I need to get the return value of the function, which is why I don't just use eval. I figured out how to do it by using eval to define a temp function that returns the result of that function call, but I'm hoping that there is a more elegant way to do this.










share|improve this question































    1398















    What is the best way to go about calling a function given a string with the function's name in a Python program. For example, let's say that I have a module foo, and I have a string whose content is "bar". What is the best way to call foo.bar()?



    I need to get the return value of the function, which is why I don't just use eval. I figured out how to do it by using eval to define a temp function that returns the result of that function call, but I'm hoping that there is a more elegant way to do this.










    share|improve this question



























      1398












      1398








      1398


      405






      What is the best way to go about calling a function given a string with the function's name in a Python program. For example, let's say that I have a module foo, and I have a string whose content is "bar". What is the best way to call foo.bar()?



      I need to get the return value of the function, which is why I don't just use eval. I figured out how to do it by using eval to define a temp function that returns the result of that function call, but I'm hoping that there is a more elegant way to do this.










      share|improve this question
















      What is the best way to go about calling a function given a string with the function's name in a Python program. For example, let's say that I have a module foo, and I have a string whose content is "bar". What is the best way to call foo.bar()?



      I need to get the return value of the function, which is why I don't just use eval. I figured out how to do it by using eval to define a temp function that returns the result of that function call, but I'm hoping that there is a more elegant way to do this.







      python object






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 23 at 15:03









      Tommy Herbert

      10.4k124151




      10.4k124151










      asked Aug 6 '08 at 3:36









      ricreericree

      11.9k133027




      11.9k133027
























          11 Answers
          11






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1678














          Assuming module foo with method bar:



          import foo
          method_to_call = getattr(foo, 'bar')
          result = method_to_call()


          As far as that goes, lines 2 and 3 can be compressed to:



          result = getattr(foo, 'bar')()


          if that makes more sense for your use case. You can use getattr in this fashion on class instance bound methods, module-level methods, class methods... the list goes on.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 5





            hasattr or getattr can be used to determine if a function is defined. I had a database mapping (eventType and handling functionName) and I wanted to make sure I never "forgot" to define an event handler in my python

            – Shaun
            Jun 3 '14 at 13:20






          • 5





            This works if you already know the module name. However, if you want the user to provide the module name as a string, this won't work.

            – Blairg23
            Jun 21 '14 at 7:39






          • 5





            If you need to avoid a NoneType is not callable exception, you could also employ the three-argument form of getattr: getattr(foo, 'bar', lambda: None). I apologize for the formatting; the stackexchange android app is apparently terrible.

            – geekofalltrades
            Aug 16 '14 at 18:01








          • 3





            See also the answer provided by @sastanin if you only care for example about your local/current module's functions.

            – NuSkooler
            Jun 19 '15 at 22:19






          • 2





            @Jane foo isn't a real module here, it is a placeholder for any module. Sorry for the confusion. I would consider editing the answer to use a real module, but it's been so heavily up-voted I'm not sure I should at this point.

            – Patrick Johnmeyer
            Jul 17 '18 at 19:54



















          446














          locals()["myfunction"]()


          or



          globals()["myfunction"]()


          locals returns a dictionary with a current local symbol table. globals returns a dictionary with global symbol table.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 36





            This method with globals/locals is good if the method you need to call is defined in the same module you are calling from.

            – Joelmob
            Oct 9 '14 at 21:36











          • @Joelmob is there any other way to get an object by string out of the root namespace?

            – Nick T
            Jan 26 '15 at 20:51













          • @NickT I am only aware of these methods, I don't think there are any others that fill same function as these, at least I can't think of a reason why there should be more.

            – Joelmob
            Jan 27 '15 at 12:34











          • I've got a reason for you (actually what led me here): Module A has a function F that needs to call a function by name. Module B imports Module A, and invokes function F with a request to call Function G, which is defined in Module B. This call fails because, apparently, function F only runs with the globals that are defined in Module F - so globals()['G'] = None.

            – David Stein
            Jan 30 '17 at 15:18



















          277














          Patrick's solution is probably the cleanest.
          If you need to dynamically pick up the module as well, you can import it like:



          module = __import__('foo')
          func = getattr(module, 'bar')
          func()





          share|improve this answer





















          • 83





            I do not understand that last comment. __import__ has its own right and the next sentence in the mentioned docs says: "Direct use of __import__() is rare, except in cases where you want to import a module whose name is only known at runtime". So: +1 for the given answer.

            – hoffmaje
            May 5 '12 at 9:33








          • 43





            Use importlib.import_module. The official docs say about __import__: "This is an advanced function that is not needed in everyday Python programming, unlike importlib.import_module()." docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#__import__

            – glarrain
            Aug 5 '13 at 22:07






          • 8





            @glarrain As long as you're ok with only support 2.7 and up.

            – Xiong Chiamiov
            Sep 14 '13 at 16:54











          • @Xiong Chaimiov, importlib.import_module is supported in 3.6 . See docs.python.org/3.6/library/…

            – cowlinator
            Oct 5 '17 at 19:28






          • 7





            @cowlinator Yes, 3.6 is part of "2.7 and up", both in strict versioning semantics and in release dates (it came about six years later). It also didn't exist for three years after my comment. ;) In the 3.x branch, the module has been around since 3.1. 2.7 and 3.1 are now pretty ancient; you'll still find servers hanging around that only support 2.6, but it's probably worth having importlib be the standard advice nowadays.

            – Xiong Chiamiov
            Oct 5 '17 at 23:55



















          93














          Just a simple contribution. If the class that we need to instance is in the same file, we can use something like this:



          # Get class from globals and create an instance
          m = globals()['our_class']()

          # Get the function (from the instance) that we need to call
          func = getattr(m, 'function_name')

          # Call it
          func()


          For example:



          class A:
          def __init__(self):
          pass

          def sampleFunc(self, arg):
          print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

          m = globals()['A']()
          func = getattr(m, 'sampleFunc')
          func('sample arg')

          # Sample, all on one line
          getattr(globals()['A'](), 'sampleFunc')('sample arg')


          And, if not a class:



          def sampleFunc(arg):
          print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

          globals()['sampleFunc']('sample arg')





          share|improve this answer

































            79














            Given a string, with a complete python path to a function, this is how I went about getting the result of said function:



            import importlib
            function_string = 'mypackage.mymodule.myfunc'
            mod_name, func_name = function_string.rsplit('.',1)
            mod = importlib.import_module(mod_name)
            func = getattr(mod, func_name)
            result = func()





            share|improve this answer
























            • This helped me. Its a lightweight version of __import__ function.

              – Pankaj Bhambhani
              Dec 16 '15 at 13:19



















            38














            The best answer according to the Python programming FAQ would be:



            functions = {'myfoo': foo.bar}

            mystring = 'myfoo'
            if mystring in functions:
            functions[mystring]()



            The primary advantage of this technique is that the strings do not need to match the names of the functions. This is also the primary technique used to emulate a case construct







            share|improve this answer































              36














              The answer (I hope) no one ever wanted



              Eval like behavior



              getattr(locals().get("foo") or globals().get("foo"), "bar")()


              Why not add auto-importing



              getattr(
              locals().get("foo") or
              globals().get("foo") or
              __import__("foo"),
              "bar")()


              In case we have extra dictionaries we want to check



              getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
              [locals().get, globals().get,
              self.__dict__.get, __import__])
              if x)),
              "bar")()


              We need to go deeper



              getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
              ([locals().get, globals().get, self.__dict__.get] +
              [d.get for d in (list(dd.values()) for dd in
              [locals(),globals(),self.__dict__]
              if isinstance(dd,dict))
              if isinstance(d,dict)] +
              [__import__]))
              if x)),
              "bar")()





              share|improve this answer































                22














                For what it's worth, if you needed to pass the function (or class) name and app name as a string, then you could do this:



                myFnName  = "MyFn"
                myAppName = "MyApp"
                app = sys.modules[myAppName]
                fn = getattr(app,myFnName)





                share|improve this answer
























                • Just a bit more generic is handler = getattr(sys.modules[__name__], myFnName)

                  – lony
                  Oct 6 '17 at 12:33



















                17














                Try this. While this still uses eval, it only uses it to summon the function from the current context. Then, you have the real function to use as you wish.



                The main benefit for me from this is that you will get any eval-related errors at the point of summoning the function. Then you will get only the function-related errors when you call.



                def say_hello(name):
                print 'Hello {}!'.format(name)

                # get the function by name
                method_name = 'say_hello'
                method = eval(method_name)

                # call it like a regular function later
                args = ['friend']
                kwargs = {}
                method(*args, **kwargs)





                share|improve this answer





















                • 1





                  This would be risky. string can have anything and eval would end up eval-ling it without any consideration.

                  – iankit
                  Dec 30 '16 at 18:13






                • 2





                  Sure, you must be mindful of the context you are using it in, whether this will be appropriate or not, given those risks.

                  – tvt173
                  Jan 6 '17 at 18:48






                • 1





                  A function should not be responsible for validating it's parameters - that's the job of a different function. Saying that it's risky to use eval with a string is saying that use of every function is risky.

                  – red777
                  Aug 14 '18 at 11:01











                • You should never use eval unless strictly necessary. getattr(__module__, method_name) is a much better choice in this context.

                  – moi
                  Jan 14 at 12:05





















                13














                none of what was suggested helped me. I did discover this though.



                <object>.__getattribute__(<string name>)(<params>)


                I am using python 2.66



                Hope this helps






                share|improve this answer



















                • 10





                  In what aspect is this better than getattr() ?

                  – V13
                  Jul 29 '16 at 12:26






                • 1





                  Exactly what i wanted. Works like a charm! Perfect!! self.__getattribute__('title') is equal to self.title

                  – ioaniatr
                  Aug 6 '18 at 18:49













                • self.__getattribute__('title') doesn't work in any cases(don't know why) afterall, but func = getattr(self, 'title'); func(); does. So, maybe is better to use getattr() instead

                  – ioaniatr
                  Aug 16 '18 at 16:52








                • 5





                  Can people who don't know python please stop upvoting this junk? Use getattr instead.

                  – Aran-Fey
                  Oct 23 '18 at 5:19





















                0














                As this question How to dynamically call methods within a class using method-name assignment to a variable [duplicate] marked as a duplicate as this one, I am posting a related answer here:



                The scenario is, a method in a class want to call another method on the same class dynamically, I have added some details to original example which offers some wider scenario and clarity:



                class MyClass:
                def __init__(self, i):
                self.i = i

                def get(self):
                func = getattr(MyClass, 'function{}'.format(self.i))
                func(self, 12) # This one will work
                # self.func(12) # But this does NOT work.


                def function1(self, p1):
                print('function1: {}'.format(p1))
                # do other stuff

                def function2(self, p1):
                print('function2: {}'.format(p1))
                # do other stuff


                if __name__ == "__main__":
                class1 = MyClass(1)
                class1.get()
                class2 = MyClass(2)
                class2.get()



                Output (Python 3.7.x)



                function1: 12



                function2: 12







                share|improve this answer






















                  protected by Bo Persson Jan 6 '13 at 23:06



                  Thank you for your interest in this question.
                  Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                  Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














                  11 Answers
                  11






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  11 Answers
                  11






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  1678














                  Assuming module foo with method bar:



                  import foo
                  method_to_call = getattr(foo, 'bar')
                  result = method_to_call()


                  As far as that goes, lines 2 and 3 can be compressed to:



                  result = getattr(foo, 'bar')()


                  if that makes more sense for your use case. You can use getattr in this fashion on class instance bound methods, module-level methods, class methods... the list goes on.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 5





                    hasattr or getattr can be used to determine if a function is defined. I had a database mapping (eventType and handling functionName) and I wanted to make sure I never "forgot" to define an event handler in my python

                    – Shaun
                    Jun 3 '14 at 13:20






                  • 5





                    This works if you already know the module name. However, if you want the user to provide the module name as a string, this won't work.

                    – Blairg23
                    Jun 21 '14 at 7:39






                  • 5





                    If you need to avoid a NoneType is not callable exception, you could also employ the three-argument form of getattr: getattr(foo, 'bar', lambda: None). I apologize for the formatting; the stackexchange android app is apparently terrible.

                    – geekofalltrades
                    Aug 16 '14 at 18:01








                  • 3





                    See also the answer provided by @sastanin if you only care for example about your local/current module's functions.

                    – NuSkooler
                    Jun 19 '15 at 22:19






                  • 2





                    @Jane foo isn't a real module here, it is a placeholder for any module. Sorry for the confusion. I would consider editing the answer to use a real module, but it's been so heavily up-voted I'm not sure I should at this point.

                    – Patrick Johnmeyer
                    Jul 17 '18 at 19:54
















                  1678














                  Assuming module foo with method bar:



                  import foo
                  method_to_call = getattr(foo, 'bar')
                  result = method_to_call()


                  As far as that goes, lines 2 and 3 can be compressed to:



                  result = getattr(foo, 'bar')()


                  if that makes more sense for your use case. You can use getattr in this fashion on class instance bound methods, module-level methods, class methods... the list goes on.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 5





                    hasattr or getattr can be used to determine if a function is defined. I had a database mapping (eventType and handling functionName) and I wanted to make sure I never "forgot" to define an event handler in my python

                    – Shaun
                    Jun 3 '14 at 13:20






                  • 5





                    This works if you already know the module name. However, if you want the user to provide the module name as a string, this won't work.

                    – Blairg23
                    Jun 21 '14 at 7:39






                  • 5





                    If you need to avoid a NoneType is not callable exception, you could also employ the three-argument form of getattr: getattr(foo, 'bar', lambda: None). I apologize for the formatting; the stackexchange android app is apparently terrible.

                    – geekofalltrades
                    Aug 16 '14 at 18:01








                  • 3





                    See also the answer provided by @sastanin if you only care for example about your local/current module's functions.

                    – NuSkooler
                    Jun 19 '15 at 22:19






                  • 2





                    @Jane foo isn't a real module here, it is a placeholder for any module. Sorry for the confusion. I would consider editing the answer to use a real module, but it's been so heavily up-voted I'm not sure I should at this point.

                    – Patrick Johnmeyer
                    Jul 17 '18 at 19:54














                  1678












                  1678








                  1678







                  Assuming module foo with method bar:



                  import foo
                  method_to_call = getattr(foo, 'bar')
                  result = method_to_call()


                  As far as that goes, lines 2 and 3 can be compressed to:



                  result = getattr(foo, 'bar')()


                  if that makes more sense for your use case. You can use getattr in this fashion on class instance bound methods, module-level methods, class methods... the list goes on.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Assuming module foo with method bar:



                  import foo
                  method_to_call = getattr(foo, 'bar')
                  result = method_to_call()


                  As far as that goes, lines 2 and 3 can be compressed to:



                  result = getattr(foo, 'bar')()


                  if that makes more sense for your use case. You can use getattr in this fashion on class instance bound methods, module-level methods, class methods... the list goes on.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 22 '17 at 18:10









                  Ben Hoyt

                  6,35144276




                  6,35144276










                  answered Aug 6 '08 at 3:57









                  Patrick JohnmeyerPatrick Johnmeyer

                  19k22023




                  19k22023








                  • 5





                    hasattr or getattr can be used to determine if a function is defined. I had a database mapping (eventType and handling functionName) and I wanted to make sure I never "forgot" to define an event handler in my python

                    – Shaun
                    Jun 3 '14 at 13:20






                  • 5





                    This works if you already know the module name. However, if you want the user to provide the module name as a string, this won't work.

                    – Blairg23
                    Jun 21 '14 at 7:39






                  • 5





                    If you need to avoid a NoneType is not callable exception, you could also employ the three-argument form of getattr: getattr(foo, 'bar', lambda: None). I apologize for the formatting; the stackexchange android app is apparently terrible.

                    – geekofalltrades
                    Aug 16 '14 at 18:01








                  • 3





                    See also the answer provided by @sastanin if you only care for example about your local/current module's functions.

                    – NuSkooler
                    Jun 19 '15 at 22:19






                  • 2





                    @Jane foo isn't a real module here, it is a placeholder for any module. Sorry for the confusion. I would consider editing the answer to use a real module, but it's been so heavily up-voted I'm not sure I should at this point.

                    – Patrick Johnmeyer
                    Jul 17 '18 at 19:54














                  • 5





                    hasattr or getattr can be used to determine if a function is defined. I had a database mapping (eventType and handling functionName) and I wanted to make sure I never "forgot" to define an event handler in my python

                    – Shaun
                    Jun 3 '14 at 13:20






                  • 5





                    This works if you already know the module name. However, if you want the user to provide the module name as a string, this won't work.

                    – Blairg23
                    Jun 21 '14 at 7:39






                  • 5





                    If you need to avoid a NoneType is not callable exception, you could also employ the three-argument form of getattr: getattr(foo, 'bar', lambda: None). I apologize for the formatting; the stackexchange android app is apparently terrible.

                    – geekofalltrades
                    Aug 16 '14 at 18:01








                  • 3





                    See also the answer provided by @sastanin if you only care for example about your local/current module's functions.

                    – NuSkooler
                    Jun 19 '15 at 22:19






                  • 2





                    @Jane foo isn't a real module here, it is a placeholder for any module. Sorry for the confusion. I would consider editing the answer to use a real module, but it's been so heavily up-voted I'm not sure I should at this point.

                    – Patrick Johnmeyer
                    Jul 17 '18 at 19:54








                  5




                  5





                  hasattr or getattr can be used to determine if a function is defined. I had a database mapping (eventType and handling functionName) and I wanted to make sure I never "forgot" to define an event handler in my python

                  – Shaun
                  Jun 3 '14 at 13:20





                  hasattr or getattr can be used to determine if a function is defined. I had a database mapping (eventType and handling functionName) and I wanted to make sure I never "forgot" to define an event handler in my python

                  – Shaun
                  Jun 3 '14 at 13:20




                  5




                  5





                  This works if you already know the module name. However, if you want the user to provide the module name as a string, this won't work.

                  – Blairg23
                  Jun 21 '14 at 7:39





                  This works if you already know the module name. However, if you want the user to provide the module name as a string, this won't work.

                  – Blairg23
                  Jun 21 '14 at 7:39




                  5




                  5





                  If you need to avoid a NoneType is not callable exception, you could also employ the three-argument form of getattr: getattr(foo, 'bar', lambda: None). I apologize for the formatting; the stackexchange android app is apparently terrible.

                  – geekofalltrades
                  Aug 16 '14 at 18:01







                  If you need to avoid a NoneType is not callable exception, you could also employ the three-argument form of getattr: getattr(foo, 'bar', lambda: None). I apologize for the formatting; the stackexchange android app is apparently terrible.

                  – geekofalltrades
                  Aug 16 '14 at 18:01






                  3




                  3





                  See also the answer provided by @sastanin if you only care for example about your local/current module's functions.

                  – NuSkooler
                  Jun 19 '15 at 22:19





                  See also the answer provided by @sastanin if you only care for example about your local/current module's functions.

                  – NuSkooler
                  Jun 19 '15 at 22:19




                  2




                  2





                  @Jane foo isn't a real module here, it is a placeholder for any module. Sorry for the confusion. I would consider editing the answer to use a real module, but it's been so heavily up-voted I'm not sure I should at this point.

                  – Patrick Johnmeyer
                  Jul 17 '18 at 19:54





                  @Jane foo isn't a real module here, it is a placeholder for any module. Sorry for the confusion. I would consider editing the answer to use a real module, but it's been so heavily up-voted I'm not sure I should at this point.

                  – Patrick Johnmeyer
                  Jul 17 '18 at 19:54













                  446














                  locals()["myfunction"]()


                  or



                  globals()["myfunction"]()


                  locals returns a dictionary with a current local symbol table. globals returns a dictionary with global symbol table.






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 36





                    This method with globals/locals is good if the method you need to call is defined in the same module you are calling from.

                    – Joelmob
                    Oct 9 '14 at 21:36











                  • @Joelmob is there any other way to get an object by string out of the root namespace?

                    – Nick T
                    Jan 26 '15 at 20:51













                  • @NickT I am only aware of these methods, I don't think there are any others that fill same function as these, at least I can't think of a reason why there should be more.

                    – Joelmob
                    Jan 27 '15 at 12:34











                  • I've got a reason for you (actually what led me here): Module A has a function F that needs to call a function by name. Module B imports Module A, and invokes function F with a request to call Function G, which is defined in Module B. This call fails because, apparently, function F only runs with the globals that are defined in Module F - so globals()['G'] = None.

                    – David Stein
                    Jan 30 '17 at 15:18
















                  446














                  locals()["myfunction"]()


                  or



                  globals()["myfunction"]()


                  locals returns a dictionary with a current local symbol table. globals returns a dictionary with global symbol table.






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 36





                    This method with globals/locals is good if the method you need to call is defined in the same module you are calling from.

                    – Joelmob
                    Oct 9 '14 at 21:36











                  • @Joelmob is there any other way to get an object by string out of the root namespace?

                    – Nick T
                    Jan 26 '15 at 20:51













                  • @NickT I am only aware of these methods, I don't think there are any others that fill same function as these, at least I can't think of a reason why there should be more.

                    – Joelmob
                    Jan 27 '15 at 12:34











                  • I've got a reason for you (actually what led me here): Module A has a function F that needs to call a function by name. Module B imports Module A, and invokes function F with a request to call Function G, which is defined in Module B. This call fails because, apparently, function F only runs with the globals that are defined in Module F - so globals()['G'] = None.

                    – David Stein
                    Jan 30 '17 at 15:18














                  446












                  446








                  446







                  locals()["myfunction"]()


                  or



                  globals()["myfunction"]()


                  locals returns a dictionary with a current local symbol table. globals returns a dictionary with global symbol table.






                  share|improve this answer













                  locals()["myfunction"]()


                  or



                  globals()["myfunction"]()


                  locals returns a dictionary with a current local symbol table. globals returns a dictionary with global symbol table.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 7 '09 at 12:45









                  sastaninsastanin

                  28.1k984125




                  28.1k984125








                  • 36





                    This method with globals/locals is good if the method you need to call is defined in the same module you are calling from.

                    – Joelmob
                    Oct 9 '14 at 21:36











                  • @Joelmob is there any other way to get an object by string out of the root namespace?

                    – Nick T
                    Jan 26 '15 at 20:51













                  • @NickT I am only aware of these methods, I don't think there are any others that fill same function as these, at least I can't think of a reason why there should be more.

                    – Joelmob
                    Jan 27 '15 at 12:34











                  • I've got a reason for you (actually what led me here): Module A has a function F that needs to call a function by name. Module B imports Module A, and invokes function F with a request to call Function G, which is defined in Module B. This call fails because, apparently, function F only runs with the globals that are defined in Module F - so globals()['G'] = None.

                    – David Stein
                    Jan 30 '17 at 15:18














                  • 36





                    This method with globals/locals is good if the method you need to call is defined in the same module you are calling from.

                    – Joelmob
                    Oct 9 '14 at 21:36











                  • @Joelmob is there any other way to get an object by string out of the root namespace?

                    – Nick T
                    Jan 26 '15 at 20:51













                  • @NickT I am only aware of these methods, I don't think there are any others that fill same function as these, at least I can't think of a reason why there should be more.

                    – Joelmob
                    Jan 27 '15 at 12:34











                  • I've got a reason for you (actually what led me here): Module A has a function F that needs to call a function by name. Module B imports Module A, and invokes function F with a request to call Function G, which is defined in Module B. This call fails because, apparently, function F only runs with the globals that are defined in Module F - so globals()['G'] = None.

                    – David Stein
                    Jan 30 '17 at 15:18








                  36




                  36





                  This method with globals/locals is good if the method you need to call is defined in the same module you are calling from.

                  – Joelmob
                  Oct 9 '14 at 21:36





                  This method with globals/locals is good if the method you need to call is defined in the same module you are calling from.

                  – Joelmob
                  Oct 9 '14 at 21:36













                  @Joelmob is there any other way to get an object by string out of the root namespace?

                  – Nick T
                  Jan 26 '15 at 20:51







                  @Joelmob is there any other way to get an object by string out of the root namespace?

                  – Nick T
                  Jan 26 '15 at 20:51















                  @NickT I am only aware of these methods, I don't think there are any others that fill same function as these, at least I can't think of a reason why there should be more.

                  – Joelmob
                  Jan 27 '15 at 12:34





                  @NickT I am only aware of these methods, I don't think there are any others that fill same function as these, at least I can't think of a reason why there should be more.

                  – Joelmob
                  Jan 27 '15 at 12:34













                  I've got a reason for you (actually what led me here): Module A has a function F that needs to call a function by name. Module B imports Module A, and invokes function F with a request to call Function G, which is defined in Module B. This call fails because, apparently, function F only runs with the globals that are defined in Module F - so globals()['G'] = None.

                  – David Stein
                  Jan 30 '17 at 15:18





                  I've got a reason for you (actually what led me here): Module A has a function F that needs to call a function by name. Module B imports Module A, and invokes function F with a request to call Function G, which is defined in Module B. This call fails because, apparently, function F only runs with the globals that are defined in Module F - so globals()['G'] = None.

                  – David Stein
                  Jan 30 '17 at 15:18











                  277














                  Patrick's solution is probably the cleanest.
                  If you need to dynamically pick up the module as well, you can import it like:



                  module = __import__('foo')
                  func = getattr(module, 'bar')
                  func()





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 83





                    I do not understand that last comment. __import__ has its own right and the next sentence in the mentioned docs says: "Direct use of __import__() is rare, except in cases where you want to import a module whose name is only known at runtime". So: +1 for the given answer.

                    – hoffmaje
                    May 5 '12 at 9:33








                  • 43





                    Use importlib.import_module. The official docs say about __import__: "This is an advanced function that is not needed in everyday Python programming, unlike importlib.import_module()." docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#__import__

                    – glarrain
                    Aug 5 '13 at 22:07






                  • 8





                    @glarrain As long as you're ok with only support 2.7 and up.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Sep 14 '13 at 16:54











                  • @Xiong Chaimiov, importlib.import_module is supported in 3.6 . See docs.python.org/3.6/library/…

                    – cowlinator
                    Oct 5 '17 at 19:28






                  • 7





                    @cowlinator Yes, 3.6 is part of "2.7 and up", both in strict versioning semantics and in release dates (it came about six years later). It also didn't exist for three years after my comment. ;) In the 3.x branch, the module has been around since 3.1. 2.7 and 3.1 are now pretty ancient; you'll still find servers hanging around that only support 2.6, but it's probably worth having importlib be the standard advice nowadays.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Oct 5 '17 at 23:55
















                  277














                  Patrick's solution is probably the cleanest.
                  If you need to dynamically pick up the module as well, you can import it like:



                  module = __import__('foo')
                  func = getattr(module, 'bar')
                  func()





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 83





                    I do not understand that last comment. __import__ has its own right and the next sentence in the mentioned docs says: "Direct use of __import__() is rare, except in cases where you want to import a module whose name is only known at runtime". So: +1 for the given answer.

                    – hoffmaje
                    May 5 '12 at 9:33








                  • 43





                    Use importlib.import_module. The official docs say about __import__: "This is an advanced function that is not needed in everyday Python programming, unlike importlib.import_module()." docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#__import__

                    – glarrain
                    Aug 5 '13 at 22:07






                  • 8





                    @glarrain As long as you're ok with only support 2.7 and up.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Sep 14 '13 at 16:54











                  • @Xiong Chaimiov, importlib.import_module is supported in 3.6 . See docs.python.org/3.6/library/…

                    – cowlinator
                    Oct 5 '17 at 19:28






                  • 7





                    @cowlinator Yes, 3.6 is part of "2.7 and up", both in strict versioning semantics and in release dates (it came about six years later). It also didn't exist for three years after my comment. ;) In the 3.x branch, the module has been around since 3.1. 2.7 and 3.1 are now pretty ancient; you'll still find servers hanging around that only support 2.6, but it's probably worth having importlib be the standard advice nowadays.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Oct 5 '17 at 23:55














                  277












                  277








                  277







                  Patrick's solution is probably the cleanest.
                  If you need to dynamically pick up the module as well, you can import it like:



                  module = __import__('foo')
                  func = getattr(module, 'bar')
                  func()





                  share|improve this answer















                  Patrick's solution is probably the cleanest.
                  If you need to dynamically pick up the module as well, you can import it like:



                  module = __import__('foo')
                  func = getattr(module, 'bar')
                  func()






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 22 '17 at 18:08









                  Ben Hoyt

                  6,35144276




                  6,35144276










                  answered Aug 7 '08 at 11:35









                  HS.HS.

                  10.9k73346




                  10.9k73346








                  • 83





                    I do not understand that last comment. __import__ has its own right and the next sentence in the mentioned docs says: "Direct use of __import__() is rare, except in cases where you want to import a module whose name is only known at runtime". So: +1 for the given answer.

                    – hoffmaje
                    May 5 '12 at 9:33








                  • 43





                    Use importlib.import_module. The official docs say about __import__: "This is an advanced function that is not needed in everyday Python programming, unlike importlib.import_module()." docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#__import__

                    – glarrain
                    Aug 5 '13 at 22:07






                  • 8





                    @glarrain As long as you're ok with only support 2.7 and up.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Sep 14 '13 at 16:54











                  • @Xiong Chaimiov, importlib.import_module is supported in 3.6 . See docs.python.org/3.6/library/…

                    – cowlinator
                    Oct 5 '17 at 19:28






                  • 7





                    @cowlinator Yes, 3.6 is part of "2.7 and up", both in strict versioning semantics and in release dates (it came about six years later). It also didn't exist for three years after my comment. ;) In the 3.x branch, the module has been around since 3.1. 2.7 and 3.1 are now pretty ancient; you'll still find servers hanging around that only support 2.6, but it's probably worth having importlib be the standard advice nowadays.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Oct 5 '17 at 23:55














                  • 83





                    I do not understand that last comment. __import__ has its own right and the next sentence in the mentioned docs says: "Direct use of __import__() is rare, except in cases where you want to import a module whose name is only known at runtime". So: +1 for the given answer.

                    – hoffmaje
                    May 5 '12 at 9:33








                  • 43





                    Use importlib.import_module. The official docs say about __import__: "This is an advanced function that is not needed in everyday Python programming, unlike importlib.import_module()." docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#__import__

                    – glarrain
                    Aug 5 '13 at 22:07






                  • 8





                    @glarrain As long as you're ok with only support 2.7 and up.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Sep 14 '13 at 16:54











                  • @Xiong Chaimiov, importlib.import_module is supported in 3.6 . See docs.python.org/3.6/library/…

                    – cowlinator
                    Oct 5 '17 at 19:28






                  • 7





                    @cowlinator Yes, 3.6 is part of "2.7 and up", both in strict versioning semantics and in release dates (it came about six years later). It also didn't exist for three years after my comment. ;) In the 3.x branch, the module has been around since 3.1. 2.7 and 3.1 are now pretty ancient; you'll still find servers hanging around that only support 2.6, but it's probably worth having importlib be the standard advice nowadays.

                    – Xiong Chiamiov
                    Oct 5 '17 at 23:55








                  83




                  83





                  I do not understand that last comment. __import__ has its own right and the next sentence in the mentioned docs says: "Direct use of __import__() is rare, except in cases where you want to import a module whose name is only known at runtime". So: +1 for the given answer.

                  – hoffmaje
                  May 5 '12 at 9:33







                  I do not understand that last comment. __import__ has its own right and the next sentence in the mentioned docs says: "Direct use of __import__() is rare, except in cases where you want to import a module whose name is only known at runtime". So: +1 for the given answer.

                  – hoffmaje
                  May 5 '12 at 9:33






                  43




                  43





                  Use importlib.import_module. The official docs say about __import__: "This is an advanced function that is not needed in everyday Python programming, unlike importlib.import_module()." docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#__import__

                  – glarrain
                  Aug 5 '13 at 22:07





                  Use importlib.import_module. The official docs say about __import__: "This is an advanced function that is not needed in everyday Python programming, unlike importlib.import_module()." docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#__import__

                  – glarrain
                  Aug 5 '13 at 22:07




                  8




                  8





                  @glarrain As long as you're ok with only support 2.7 and up.

                  – Xiong Chiamiov
                  Sep 14 '13 at 16:54





                  @glarrain As long as you're ok with only support 2.7 and up.

                  – Xiong Chiamiov
                  Sep 14 '13 at 16:54













                  @Xiong Chaimiov, importlib.import_module is supported in 3.6 . See docs.python.org/3.6/library/…

                  – cowlinator
                  Oct 5 '17 at 19:28





                  @Xiong Chaimiov, importlib.import_module is supported in 3.6 . See docs.python.org/3.6/library/…

                  – cowlinator
                  Oct 5 '17 at 19:28




                  7




                  7





                  @cowlinator Yes, 3.6 is part of "2.7 and up", both in strict versioning semantics and in release dates (it came about six years later). It also didn't exist for three years after my comment. ;) In the 3.x branch, the module has been around since 3.1. 2.7 and 3.1 are now pretty ancient; you'll still find servers hanging around that only support 2.6, but it's probably worth having importlib be the standard advice nowadays.

                  – Xiong Chiamiov
                  Oct 5 '17 at 23:55





                  @cowlinator Yes, 3.6 is part of "2.7 and up", both in strict versioning semantics and in release dates (it came about six years later). It also didn't exist for three years after my comment. ;) In the 3.x branch, the module has been around since 3.1. 2.7 and 3.1 are now pretty ancient; you'll still find servers hanging around that only support 2.6, but it's probably worth having importlib be the standard advice nowadays.

                  – Xiong Chiamiov
                  Oct 5 '17 at 23:55











                  93














                  Just a simple contribution. If the class that we need to instance is in the same file, we can use something like this:



                  # Get class from globals and create an instance
                  m = globals()['our_class']()

                  # Get the function (from the instance) that we need to call
                  func = getattr(m, 'function_name')

                  # Call it
                  func()


                  For example:



                  class A:
                  def __init__(self):
                  pass

                  def sampleFunc(self, arg):
                  print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                  m = globals()['A']()
                  func = getattr(m, 'sampleFunc')
                  func('sample arg')

                  # Sample, all on one line
                  getattr(globals()['A'](), 'sampleFunc')('sample arg')


                  And, if not a class:



                  def sampleFunc(arg):
                  print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                  globals()['sampleFunc']('sample arg')





                  share|improve this answer






























                    93














                    Just a simple contribution. If the class that we need to instance is in the same file, we can use something like this:



                    # Get class from globals and create an instance
                    m = globals()['our_class']()

                    # Get the function (from the instance) that we need to call
                    func = getattr(m, 'function_name')

                    # Call it
                    func()


                    For example:



                    class A:
                    def __init__(self):
                    pass

                    def sampleFunc(self, arg):
                    print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                    m = globals()['A']()
                    func = getattr(m, 'sampleFunc')
                    func('sample arg')

                    # Sample, all on one line
                    getattr(globals()['A'](), 'sampleFunc')('sample arg')


                    And, if not a class:



                    def sampleFunc(arg):
                    print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                    globals()['sampleFunc']('sample arg')





                    share|improve this answer




























                      93












                      93








                      93







                      Just a simple contribution. If the class that we need to instance is in the same file, we can use something like this:



                      # Get class from globals and create an instance
                      m = globals()['our_class']()

                      # Get the function (from the instance) that we need to call
                      func = getattr(m, 'function_name')

                      # Call it
                      func()


                      For example:



                      class A:
                      def __init__(self):
                      pass

                      def sampleFunc(self, arg):
                      print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                      m = globals()['A']()
                      func = getattr(m, 'sampleFunc')
                      func('sample arg')

                      # Sample, all on one line
                      getattr(globals()['A'](), 'sampleFunc')('sample arg')


                      And, if not a class:



                      def sampleFunc(arg):
                      print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                      globals()['sampleFunc']('sample arg')





                      share|improve this answer















                      Just a simple contribution. If the class that we need to instance is in the same file, we can use something like this:



                      # Get class from globals and create an instance
                      m = globals()['our_class']()

                      # Get the function (from the instance) that we need to call
                      func = getattr(m, 'function_name')

                      # Call it
                      func()


                      For example:



                      class A:
                      def __init__(self):
                      pass

                      def sampleFunc(self, arg):
                      print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                      m = globals()['A']()
                      func = getattr(m, 'sampleFunc')
                      func('sample arg')

                      # Sample, all on one line
                      getattr(globals()['A'](), 'sampleFunc')('sample arg')


                      And, if not a class:



                      def sampleFunc(arg):
                      print('you called sampleFunc({})'.format(arg))

                      globals()['sampleFunc']('sample arg')






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Sep 22 '14 at 21:49









                      tbc0

                      8611016




                      8611016










                      answered Aug 19 '12 at 9:40









                      SourcegeekSourcegeek

                      93962




                      93962























                          79














                          Given a string, with a complete python path to a function, this is how I went about getting the result of said function:



                          import importlib
                          function_string = 'mypackage.mymodule.myfunc'
                          mod_name, func_name = function_string.rsplit('.',1)
                          mod = importlib.import_module(mod_name)
                          func = getattr(mod, func_name)
                          result = func()





                          share|improve this answer
























                          • This helped me. Its a lightweight version of __import__ function.

                            – Pankaj Bhambhani
                            Dec 16 '15 at 13:19
















                          79














                          Given a string, with a complete python path to a function, this is how I went about getting the result of said function:



                          import importlib
                          function_string = 'mypackage.mymodule.myfunc'
                          mod_name, func_name = function_string.rsplit('.',1)
                          mod = importlib.import_module(mod_name)
                          func = getattr(mod, func_name)
                          result = func()





                          share|improve this answer
























                          • This helped me. Its a lightweight version of __import__ function.

                            – Pankaj Bhambhani
                            Dec 16 '15 at 13:19














                          79












                          79








                          79







                          Given a string, with a complete python path to a function, this is how I went about getting the result of said function:



                          import importlib
                          function_string = 'mypackage.mymodule.myfunc'
                          mod_name, func_name = function_string.rsplit('.',1)
                          mod = importlib.import_module(mod_name)
                          func = getattr(mod, func_name)
                          result = func()





                          share|improve this answer













                          Given a string, with a complete python path to a function, this is how I went about getting the result of said function:



                          import importlib
                          function_string = 'mypackage.mymodule.myfunc'
                          mod_name, func_name = function_string.rsplit('.',1)
                          mod = importlib.import_module(mod_name)
                          func = getattr(mod, func_name)
                          result = func()






                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Oct 16 '13 at 0:24









                          ferrouswheelferrouswheel

                          2,2741822




                          2,2741822













                          • This helped me. Its a lightweight version of __import__ function.

                            – Pankaj Bhambhani
                            Dec 16 '15 at 13:19



















                          • This helped me. Its a lightweight version of __import__ function.

                            – Pankaj Bhambhani
                            Dec 16 '15 at 13:19

















                          This helped me. Its a lightweight version of __import__ function.

                          – Pankaj Bhambhani
                          Dec 16 '15 at 13:19





                          This helped me. Its a lightweight version of __import__ function.

                          – Pankaj Bhambhani
                          Dec 16 '15 at 13:19











                          38














                          The best answer according to the Python programming FAQ would be:



                          functions = {'myfoo': foo.bar}

                          mystring = 'myfoo'
                          if mystring in functions:
                          functions[mystring]()



                          The primary advantage of this technique is that the strings do not need to match the names of the functions. This is also the primary technique used to emulate a case construct







                          share|improve this answer




























                            38














                            The best answer according to the Python programming FAQ would be:



                            functions = {'myfoo': foo.bar}

                            mystring = 'myfoo'
                            if mystring in functions:
                            functions[mystring]()



                            The primary advantage of this technique is that the strings do not need to match the names of the functions. This is also the primary technique used to emulate a case construct







                            share|improve this answer


























                              38












                              38








                              38







                              The best answer according to the Python programming FAQ would be:



                              functions = {'myfoo': foo.bar}

                              mystring = 'myfoo'
                              if mystring in functions:
                              functions[mystring]()



                              The primary advantage of this technique is that the strings do not need to match the names of the functions. This is also the primary technique used to emulate a case construct







                              share|improve this answer













                              The best answer according to the Python programming FAQ would be:



                              functions = {'myfoo': foo.bar}

                              mystring = 'myfoo'
                              if mystring in functions:
                              functions[mystring]()



                              The primary advantage of this technique is that the strings do not need to match the names of the functions. This is also the primary technique used to emulate a case construct








                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Oct 24 '16 at 13:20







                              user3946687






























                                  36














                                  The answer (I hope) no one ever wanted



                                  Eval like behavior



                                  getattr(locals().get("foo") or globals().get("foo"), "bar")()


                                  Why not add auto-importing



                                  getattr(
                                  locals().get("foo") or
                                  globals().get("foo") or
                                  __import__("foo"),
                                  "bar")()


                                  In case we have extra dictionaries we want to check



                                  getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                  [locals().get, globals().get,
                                  self.__dict__.get, __import__])
                                  if x)),
                                  "bar")()


                                  We need to go deeper



                                  getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                  ([locals().get, globals().get, self.__dict__.get] +
                                  [d.get for d in (list(dd.values()) for dd in
                                  [locals(),globals(),self.__dict__]
                                  if isinstance(dd,dict))
                                  if isinstance(d,dict)] +
                                  [__import__]))
                                  if x)),
                                  "bar")()





                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    36














                                    The answer (I hope) no one ever wanted



                                    Eval like behavior



                                    getattr(locals().get("foo") or globals().get("foo"), "bar")()


                                    Why not add auto-importing



                                    getattr(
                                    locals().get("foo") or
                                    globals().get("foo") or
                                    __import__("foo"),
                                    "bar")()


                                    In case we have extra dictionaries we want to check



                                    getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                    [locals().get, globals().get,
                                    self.__dict__.get, __import__])
                                    if x)),
                                    "bar")()


                                    We need to go deeper



                                    getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                    ([locals().get, globals().get, self.__dict__.get] +
                                    [d.get for d in (list(dd.values()) for dd in
                                    [locals(),globals(),self.__dict__]
                                    if isinstance(dd,dict))
                                    if isinstance(d,dict)] +
                                    [__import__]))
                                    if x)),
                                    "bar")()





                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      36












                                      36








                                      36







                                      The answer (I hope) no one ever wanted



                                      Eval like behavior



                                      getattr(locals().get("foo") or globals().get("foo"), "bar")()


                                      Why not add auto-importing



                                      getattr(
                                      locals().get("foo") or
                                      globals().get("foo") or
                                      __import__("foo"),
                                      "bar")()


                                      In case we have extra dictionaries we want to check



                                      getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                      [locals().get, globals().get,
                                      self.__dict__.get, __import__])
                                      if x)),
                                      "bar")()


                                      We need to go deeper



                                      getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                      ([locals().get, globals().get, self.__dict__.get] +
                                      [d.get for d in (list(dd.values()) for dd in
                                      [locals(),globals(),self.__dict__]
                                      if isinstance(dd,dict))
                                      if isinstance(d,dict)] +
                                      [__import__]))
                                      if x)),
                                      "bar")()





                                      share|improve this answer













                                      The answer (I hope) no one ever wanted



                                      Eval like behavior



                                      getattr(locals().get("foo") or globals().get("foo"), "bar")()


                                      Why not add auto-importing



                                      getattr(
                                      locals().get("foo") or
                                      globals().get("foo") or
                                      __import__("foo"),
                                      "bar")()


                                      In case we have extra dictionaries we want to check



                                      getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                      [locals().get, globals().get,
                                      self.__dict__.get, __import__])
                                      if x)),
                                      "bar")()


                                      We need to go deeper



                                      getattr(next((x for x in (f("foo") for f in 
                                      ([locals().get, globals().get, self.__dict__.get] +
                                      [d.get for d in (list(dd.values()) for dd in
                                      [locals(),globals(),self.__dict__]
                                      if isinstance(dd,dict))
                                      if isinstance(d,dict)] +
                                      [__import__]))
                                      if x)),
                                      "bar")()






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Apr 9 '14 at 10:17









                                      0050000500500005

                                      1,92921833




                                      1,92921833























                                          22














                                          For what it's worth, if you needed to pass the function (or class) name and app name as a string, then you could do this:



                                          myFnName  = "MyFn"
                                          myAppName = "MyApp"
                                          app = sys.modules[myAppName]
                                          fn = getattr(app,myFnName)





                                          share|improve this answer
























                                          • Just a bit more generic is handler = getattr(sys.modules[__name__], myFnName)

                                            – lony
                                            Oct 6 '17 at 12:33
















                                          22














                                          For what it's worth, if you needed to pass the function (or class) name and app name as a string, then you could do this:



                                          myFnName  = "MyFn"
                                          myAppName = "MyApp"
                                          app = sys.modules[myAppName]
                                          fn = getattr(app,myFnName)





                                          share|improve this answer
























                                          • Just a bit more generic is handler = getattr(sys.modules[__name__], myFnName)

                                            – lony
                                            Oct 6 '17 at 12:33














                                          22












                                          22








                                          22







                                          For what it's worth, if you needed to pass the function (or class) name and app name as a string, then you could do this:



                                          myFnName  = "MyFn"
                                          myAppName = "MyApp"
                                          app = sys.modules[myAppName]
                                          fn = getattr(app,myFnName)





                                          share|improve this answer













                                          For what it's worth, if you needed to pass the function (or class) name and app name as a string, then you could do this:



                                          myFnName  = "MyFn"
                                          myAppName = "MyApp"
                                          app = sys.modules[myAppName]
                                          fn = getattr(app,myFnName)






                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered Feb 14 '12 at 5:55









                                          trubliphonetrubliphone

                                          1,50422336




                                          1,50422336













                                          • Just a bit more generic is handler = getattr(sys.modules[__name__], myFnName)

                                            – lony
                                            Oct 6 '17 at 12:33



















                                          • Just a bit more generic is handler = getattr(sys.modules[__name__], myFnName)

                                            – lony
                                            Oct 6 '17 at 12:33

















                                          Just a bit more generic is handler = getattr(sys.modules[__name__], myFnName)

                                          – lony
                                          Oct 6 '17 at 12:33





                                          Just a bit more generic is handler = getattr(sys.modules[__name__], myFnName)

                                          – lony
                                          Oct 6 '17 at 12:33











                                          17














                                          Try this. While this still uses eval, it only uses it to summon the function from the current context. Then, you have the real function to use as you wish.



                                          The main benefit for me from this is that you will get any eval-related errors at the point of summoning the function. Then you will get only the function-related errors when you call.



                                          def say_hello(name):
                                          print 'Hello {}!'.format(name)

                                          # get the function by name
                                          method_name = 'say_hello'
                                          method = eval(method_name)

                                          # call it like a regular function later
                                          args = ['friend']
                                          kwargs = {}
                                          method(*args, **kwargs)





                                          share|improve this answer





















                                          • 1





                                            This would be risky. string can have anything and eval would end up eval-ling it without any consideration.

                                            – iankit
                                            Dec 30 '16 at 18:13






                                          • 2





                                            Sure, you must be mindful of the context you are using it in, whether this will be appropriate or not, given those risks.

                                            – tvt173
                                            Jan 6 '17 at 18:48






                                          • 1





                                            A function should not be responsible for validating it's parameters - that's the job of a different function. Saying that it's risky to use eval with a string is saying that use of every function is risky.

                                            – red777
                                            Aug 14 '18 at 11:01











                                          • You should never use eval unless strictly necessary. getattr(__module__, method_name) is a much better choice in this context.

                                            – moi
                                            Jan 14 at 12:05


















                                          17














                                          Try this. While this still uses eval, it only uses it to summon the function from the current context. Then, you have the real function to use as you wish.



                                          The main benefit for me from this is that you will get any eval-related errors at the point of summoning the function. Then you will get only the function-related errors when you call.



                                          def say_hello(name):
                                          print 'Hello {}!'.format(name)

                                          # get the function by name
                                          method_name = 'say_hello'
                                          method = eval(method_name)

                                          # call it like a regular function later
                                          args = ['friend']
                                          kwargs = {}
                                          method(*args, **kwargs)





                                          share|improve this answer





















                                          • 1





                                            This would be risky. string can have anything and eval would end up eval-ling it without any consideration.

                                            – iankit
                                            Dec 30 '16 at 18:13






                                          • 2





                                            Sure, you must be mindful of the context you are using it in, whether this will be appropriate or not, given those risks.

                                            – tvt173
                                            Jan 6 '17 at 18:48






                                          • 1





                                            A function should not be responsible for validating it's parameters - that's the job of a different function. Saying that it's risky to use eval with a string is saying that use of every function is risky.

                                            – red777
                                            Aug 14 '18 at 11:01











                                          • You should never use eval unless strictly necessary. getattr(__module__, method_name) is a much better choice in this context.

                                            – moi
                                            Jan 14 at 12:05
















                                          17












                                          17








                                          17







                                          Try this. While this still uses eval, it only uses it to summon the function from the current context. Then, you have the real function to use as you wish.



                                          The main benefit for me from this is that you will get any eval-related errors at the point of summoning the function. Then you will get only the function-related errors when you call.



                                          def say_hello(name):
                                          print 'Hello {}!'.format(name)

                                          # get the function by name
                                          method_name = 'say_hello'
                                          method = eval(method_name)

                                          # call it like a regular function later
                                          args = ['friend']
                                          kwargs = {}
                                          method(*args, **kwargs)





                                          share|improve this answer















                                          Try this. While this still uses eval, it only uses it to summon the function from the current context. Then, you have the real function to use as you wish.



                                          The main benefit for me from this is that you will get any eval-related errors at the point of summoning the function. Then you will get only the function-related errors when you call.



                                          def say_hello(name):
                                          print 'Hello {}!'.format(name)

                                          # get the function by name
                                          method_name = 'say_hello'
                                          method = eval(method_name)

                                          # call it like a regular function later
                                          args = ['friend']
                                          kwargs = {}
                                          method(*args, **kwargs)






                                          share|improve this answer














                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer








                                          edited Dec 8 '16 at 18:09

























                                          answered Dec 7 '16 at 18:29









                                          tvt173tvt173

                                          904916




                                          904916








                                          • 1





                                            This would be risky. string can have anything and eval would end up eval-ling it without any consideration.

                                            – iankit
                                            Dec 30 '16 at 18:13






                                          • 2





                                            Sure, you must be mindful of the context you are using it in, whether this will be appropriate or not, given those risks.

                                            – tvt173
                                            Jan 6 '17 at 18:48






                                          • 1





                                            A function should not be responsible for validating it's parameters - that's the job of a different function. Saying that it's risky to use eval with a string is saying that use of every function is risky.

                                            – red777
                                            Aug 14 '18 at 11:01











                                          • You should never use eval unless strictly necessary. getattr(__module__, method_name) is a much better choice in this context.

                                            – moi
                                            Jan 14 at 12:05
















                                          • 1





                                            This would be risky. string can have anything and eval would end up eval-ling it without any consideration.

                                            – iankit
                                            Dec 30 '16 at 18:13






                                          • 2





                                            Sure, you must be mindful of the context you are using it in, whether this will be appropriate or not, given those risks.

                                            – tvt173
                                            Jan 6 '17 at 18:48






                                          • 1





                                            A function should not be responsible for validating it's parameters - that's the job of a different function. Saying that it's risky to use eval with a string is saying that use of every function is risky.

                                            – red777
                                            Aug 14 '18 at 11:01











                                          • You should never use eval unless strictly necessary. getattr(__module__, method_name) is a much better choice in this context.

                                            – moi
                                            Jan 14 at 12:05










                                          1




                                          1





                                          This would be risky. string can have anything and eval would end up eval-ling it without any consideration.

                                          – iankit
                                          Dec 30 '16 at 18:13





                                          This would be risky. string can have anything and eval would end up eval-ling it without any consideration.

                                          – iankit
                                          Dec 30 '16 at 18:13




                                          2




                                          2





                                          Sure, you must be mindful of the context you are using it in, whether this will be appropriate or not, given those risks.

                                          – tvt173
                                          Jan 6 '17 at 18:48





                                          Sure, you must be mindful of the context you are using it in, whether this will be appropriate or not, given those risks.

                                          – tvt173
                                          Jan 6 '17 at 18:48




                                          1




                                          1





                                          A function should not be responsible for validating it's parameters - that's the job of a different function. Saying that it's risky to use eval with a string is saying that use of every function is risky.

                                          – red777
                                          Aug 14 '18 at 11:01





                                          A function should not be responsible for validating it's parameters - that's the job of a different function. Saying that it's risky to use eval with a string is saying that use of every function is risky.

                                          – red777
                                          Aug 14 '18 at 11:01













                                          You should never use eval unless strictly necessary. getattr(__module__, method_name) is a much better choice in this context.

                                          – moi
                                          Jan 14 at 12:05







                                          You should never use eval unless strictly necessary. getattr(__module__, method_name) is a much better choice in this context.

                                          – moi
                                          Jan 14 at 12:05













                                          13














                                          none of what was suggested helped me. I did discover this though.



                                          <object>.__getattribute__(<string name>)(<params>)


                                          I am using python 2.66



                                          Hope this helps






                                          share|improve this answer



















                                          • 10





                                            In what aspect is this better than getattr() ?

                                            – V13
                                            Jul 29 '16 at 12:26






                                          • 1





                                            Exactly what i wanted. Works like a charm! Perfect!! self.__getattribute__('title') is equal to self.title

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 6 '18 at 18:49













                                          • self.__getattribute__('title') doesn't work in any cases(don't know why) afterall, but func = getattr(self, 'title'); func(); does. So, maybe is better to use getattr() instead

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 16 '18 at 16:52








                                          • 5





                                            Can people who don't know python please stop upvoting this junk? Use getattr instead.

                                            – Aran-Fey
                                            Oct 23 '18 at 5:19


















                                          13














                                          none of what was suggested helped me. I did discover this though.



                                          <object>.__getattribute__(<string name>)(<params>)


                                          I am using python 2.66



                                          Hope this helps






                                          share|improve this answer



















                                          • 10





                                            In what aspect is this better than getattr() ?

                                            – V13
                                            Jul 29 '16 at 12:26






                                          • 1





                                            Exactly what i wanted. Works like a charm! Perfect!! self.__getattribute__('title') is equal to self.title

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 6 '18 at 18:49













                                          • self.__getattribute__('title') doesn't work in any cases(don't know why) afterall, but func = getattr(self, 'title'); func(); does. So, maybe is better to use getattr() instead

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 16 '18 at 16:52








                                          • 5





                                            Can people who don't know python please stop upvoting this junk? Use getattr instead.

                                            – Aran-Fey
                                            Oct 23 '18 at 5:19
















                                          13












                                          13








                                          13







                                          none of what was suggested helped me. I did discover this though.



                                          <object>.__getattribute__(<string name>)(<params>)


                                          I am using python 2.66



                                          Hope this helps






                                          share|improve this answer













                                          none of what was suggested helped me. I did discover this though.



                                          <object>.__getattribute__(<string name>)(<params>)


                                          I am using python 2.66



                                          Hope this helps







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered Dec 28 '12 at 16:56









                                          NatdripNatdrip

                                          481416




                                          481416








                                          • 10





                                            In what aspect is this better than getattr() ?

                                            – V13
                                            Jul 29 '16 at 12:26






                                          • 1





                                            Exactly what i wanted. Works like a charm! Perfect!! self.__getattribute__('title') is equal to self.title

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 6 '18 at 18:49













                                          • self.__getattribute__('title') doesn't work in any cases(don't know why) afterall, but func = getattr(self, 'title'); func(); does. So, maybe is better to use getattr() instead

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 16 '18 at 16:52








                                          • 5





                                            Can people who don't know python please stop upvoting this junk? Use getattr instead.

                                            – Aran-Fey
                                            Oct 23 '18 at 5:19
















                                          • 10





                                            In what aspect is this better than getattr() ?

                                            – V13
                                            Jul 29 '16 at 12:26






                                          • 1





                                            Exactly what i wanted. Works like a charm! Perfect!! self.__getattribute__('title') is equal to self.title

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 6 '18 at 18:49













                                          • self.__getattribute__('title') doesn't work in any cases(don't know why) afterall, but func = getattr(self, 'title'); func(); does. So, maybe is better to use getattr() instead

                                            – ioaniatr
                                            Aug 16 '18 at 16:52








                                          • 5





                                            Can people who don't know python please stop upvoting this junk? Use getattr instead.

                                            – Aran-Fey
                                            Oct 23 '18 at 5:19










                                          10




                                          10





                                          In what aspect is this better than getattr() ?

                                          – V13
                                          Jul 29 '16 at 12:26





                                          In what aspect is this better than getattr() ?

                                          – V13
                                          Jul 29 '16 at 12:26




                                          1




                                          1





                                          Exactly what i wanted. Works like a charm! Perfect!! self.__getattribute__('title') is equal to self.title

                                          – ioaniatr
                                          Aug 6 '18 at 18:49







                                          Exactly what i wanted. Works like a charm! Perfect!! self.__getattribute__('title') is equal to self.title

                                          – ioaniatr
                                          Aug 6 '18 at 18:49















                                          self.__getattribute__('title') doesn't work in any cases(don't know why) afterall, but func = getattr(self, 'title'); func(); does. So, maybe is better to use getattr() instead

                                          – ioaniatr
                                          Aug 16 '18 at 16:52







                                          self.__getattribute__('title') doesn't work in any cases(don't know why) afterall, but func = getattr(self, 'title'); func(); does. So, maybe is better to use getattr() instead

                                          – ioaniatr
                                          Aug 16 '18 at 16:52






                                          5




                                          5





                                          Can people who don't know python please stop upvoting this junk? Use getattr instead.

                                          – Aran-Fey
                                          Oct 23 '18 at 5:19







                                          Can people who don't know python please stop upvoting this junk? Use getattr instead.

                                          – Aran-Fey
                                          Oct 23 '18 at 5:19













                                          0














                                          As this question How to dynamically call methods within a class using method-name assignment to a variable [duplicate] marked as a duplicate as this one, I am posting a related answer here:



                                          The scenario is, a method in a class want to call another method on the same class dynamically, I have added some details to original example which offers some wider scenario and clarity:



                                          class MyClass:
                                          def __init__(self, i):
                                          self.i = i

                                          def get(self):
                                          func = getattr(MyClass, 'function{}'.format(self.i))
                                          func(self, 12) # This one will work
                                          # self.func(12) # But this does NOT work.


                                          def function1(self, p1):
                                          print('function1: {}'.format(p1))
                                          # do other stuff

                                          def function2(self, p1):
                                          print('function2: {}'.format(p1))
                                          # do other stuff


                                          if __name__ == "__main__":
                                          class1 = MyClass(1)
                                          class1.get()
                                          class2 = MyClass(2)
                                          class2.get()



                                          Output (Python 3.7.x)



                                          function1: 12



                                          function2: 12







                                          share|improve this answer




























                                            0














                                            As this question How to dynamically call methods within a class using method-name assignment to a variable [duplicate] marked as a duplicate as this one, I am posting a related answer here:



                                            The scenario is, a method in a class want to call another method on the same class dynamically, I have added some details to original example which offers some wider scenario and clarity:



                                            class MyClass:
                                            def __init__(self, i):
                                            self.i = i

                                            def get(self):
                                            func = getattr(MyClass, 'function{}'.format(self.i))
                                            func(self, 12) # This one will work
                                            # self.func(12) # But this does NOT work.


                                            def function1(self, p1):
                                            print('function1: {}'.format(p1))
                                            # do other stuff

                                            def function2(self, p1):
                                            print('function2: {}'.format(p1))
                                            # do other stuff


                                            if __name__ == "__main__":
                                            class1 = MyClass(1)
                                            class1.get()
                                            class2 = MyClass(2)
                                            class2.get()



                                            Output (Python 3.7.x)



                                            function1: 12



                                            function2: 12







                                            share|improve this answer


























                                              0












                                              0








                                              0







                                              As this question How to dynamically call methods within a class using method-name assignment to a variable [duplicate] marked as a duplicate as this one, I am posting a related answer here:



                                              The scenario is, a method in a class want to call another method on the same class dynamically, I have added some details to original example which offers some wider scenario and clarity:



                                              class MyClass:
                                              def __init__(self, i):
                                              self.i = i

                                              def get(self):
                                              func = getattr(MyClass, 'function{}'.format(self.i))
                                              func(self, 12) # This one will work
                                              # self.func(12) # But this does NOT work.


                                              def function1(self, p1):
                                              print('function1: {}'.format(p1))
                                              # do other stuff

                                              def function2(self, p1):
                                              print('function2: {}'.format(p1))
                                              # do other stuff


                                              if __name__ == "__main__":
                                              class1 = MyClass(1)
                                              class1.get()
                                              class2 = MyClass(2)
                                              class2.get()



                                              Output (Python 3.7.x)



                                              function1: 12



                                              function2: 12







                                              share|improve this answer













                                              As this question How to dynamically call methods within a class using method-name assignment to a variable [duplicate] marked as a duplicate as this one, I am posting a related answer here:



                                              The scenario is, a method in a class want to call another method on the same class dynamically, I have added some details to original example which offers some wider scenario and clarity:



                                              class MyClass:
                                              def __init__(self, i):
                                              self.i = i

                                              def get(self):
                                              func = getattr(MyClass, 'function{}'.format(self.i))
                                              func(self, 12) # This one will work
                                              # self.func(12) # But this does NOT work.


                                              def function1(self, p1):
                                              print('function1: {}'.format(p1))
                                              # do other stuff

                                              def function2(self, p1):
                                              print('function2: {}'.format(p1))
                                              # do other stuff


                                              if __name__ == "__main__":
                                              class1 = MyClass(1)
                                              class1.get()
                                              class2 = MyClass(2)
                                              class2.get()



                                              Output (Python 3.7.x)



                                              function1: 12



                                              function2: 12








                                              share|improve this answer












                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer










                                              answered Mar 26 at 18:15









                                              SerjikSerjik

                                              5,26464360




                                              5,26464360

















                                                  protected by Bo Persson Jan 6 '13 at 23:06



                                                  Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                                  Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                                  Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                                  這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                                  Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

                                                  Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

                                                  Zucchini