Are there any practical differences between a belt pouch and component pouch in 5e?











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I am generating a 5e high-elf rogue for Waterdeep Dragon Heist and have chosen Message, which requires small pieces of copper wire. I've bought 2.5 foot of copper wire, cut to inches.



I have a belt pouch, but no component pouch. I have 14gp and a component pouch costs 25gp.



Is there any practical or fun differences between pouches? Are there any reasons why I would require a component pouch over a belt pouch? Storywise, would there be any problems getting into debt or get caught lifting a component pouch?










share|improve this question
























  • Class/background equipment lists mention a "belt pouch", equipment list mention "component pouch". For pregenerated characters, the Dragonborn Sorcerer equipment list mentions both types of pouch separately.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:17















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I am generating a 5e high-elf rogue for Waterdeep Dragon Heist and have chosen Message, which requires small pieces of copper wire. I've bought 2.5 foot of copper wire, cut to inches.



I have a belt pouch, but no component pouch. I have 14gp and a component pouch costs 25gp.



Is there any practical or fun differences between pouches? Are there any reasons why I would require a component pouch over a belt pouch? Storywise, would there be any problems getting into debt or get caught lifting a component pouch?










share|improve this question
























  • Class/background equipment lists mention a "belt pouch", equipment list mention "component pouch". For pregenerated characters, the Dragonborn Sorcerer equipment list mentions both types of pouch separately.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:17













up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











I am generating a 5e high-elf rogue for Waterdeep Dragon Heist and have chosen Message, which requires small pieces of copper wire. I've bought 2.5 foot of copper wire, cut to inches.



I have a belt pouch, but no component pouch. I have 14gp and a component pouch costs 25gp.



Is there any practical or fun differences between pouches? Are there any reasons why I would require a component pouch over a belt pouch? Storywise, would there be any problems getting into debt or get caught lifting a component pouch?










share|improve this question















I am generating a 5e high-elf rogue for Waterdeep Dragon Heist and have chosen Message, which requires small pieces of copper wire. I've bought 2.5 foot of copper wire, cut to inches.



I have a belt pouch, but no component pouch. I have 14gp and a component pouch costs 25gp.



Is there any practical or fun differences between pouches? Are there any reasons why I would require a component pouch over a belt pouch? Storywise, would there be any problems getting into debt or get caught lifting a component pouch?







dnd-5e equipment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 6 at 21:46









V2Blast

17.8k248113




17.8k248113










asked Nov 6 at 21:12









StuperUser

2,73012859




2,73012859












  • Class/background equipment lists mention a "belt pouch", equipment list mention "component pouch". For pregenerated characters, the Dragonborn Sorcerer equipment list mentions both types of pouch separately.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:17


















  • Class/background equipment lists mention a "belt pouch", equipment list mention "component pouch". For pregenerated characters, the Dragonborn Sorcerer equipment list mentions both types of pouch separately.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:17
















Class/background equipment lists mention a "belt pouch", equipment list mention "component pouch". For pregenerated characters, the Dragonborn Sorcerer equipment list mentions both types of pouch separately.
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:17




Class/background equipment lists mention a "belt pouch", equipment list mention "component pouch". For pregenerated characters, the Dragonborn Sorcerer equipment list mentions both types of pouch separately.
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:17










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










They are different. A component pouch is specialized equipment.



tl;dr The rules specifically require a component pouch which is a listed peice of equipment different from a pouch.



Rules specifically require a component pouch



The material component aspect of casting a spell specifically calls out the use of an arcane focus or component pouch.



Narrative explanation



Component pouch covers the cost of mundane components and does not require the caster to retrieve components from around their person (that might require use an object) while casting it.



Component pouch and pouch are different pieces of equipment



In the basic rules adventuring equipment, a pouch is 5sp while a component pouch is 25 gp. The component pouch takes the place of an arcane focus for a single classed spellcaster as elaborated on in the answer here.



The regular pouch does not take the place of the arcane focus, nor does it supply the mundane (no specifically cost listed) components of spells.



Can still cast message without the pouch.



Since the character directly owns the components, they can still cast the message spell. A component pouch or focus can be used in place of mundane components.




A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in “Equipment”) in place of the components specified for a spell.




Copper wire not consumed



The message spell does not state that the component of the spell is consumed, so a single short piece of wire should be sufficient for as many castings as you like.






share|improve this answer























  • Why wouldn't a regular pouch filled with components not work? You're still reaching in and selecting your component, no?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:25












  • Component pouch does not require object interaction. Also, saves the accounting for the individual cost of each mundane component.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:27










  • You still need to access the spell's material components with a free hand
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:29










  • @NautArch holding onto something you're already holding does not cost you the object interaction on your turn. The spell caster with a pouch could draw a weapon and cast a spell on the same turn. The one without a pouch could not.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:30












  • Where does it state that interacting with a component pouch bypasses the Use an Object? Or that not having a component pouch requires Use an Object to access the component?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:33


















up vote
11
down vote













One is filled with components automatically and is watertight, the other is not



The Basic Rules lists under the Adventuring Gear:




Component Pouch. A component pouch is a small, watertight leather belt pouch...




Component pouches include components



The difference between the two is that the Component Pouch includes your components and is compartmentalized and watertight. It includes all components




except for those components that have a specific cost (as indicated in a spell's description).




A regular pouch is only going to be a regular pouch and you'll have to go and get your components. The regular pouch entry also mentions the subset of itself, the component pouch:




A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).




Once filled, they're the same thing



However, if you've gone to the trouble of finding all of your material components and put them in a standard pouch, you've effectively got a component pouch. However, should it get wet, your components may be ruined.



Character Sheets



The pregen character sheet has both pouch types. In this case, your character has both a filled component pouch and a second pouch.






share|improve this answer























  • That gear list has "Component pouch/25 gp/2 lb." and "Pouch/5 sp/1 lb."
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:19










  • The pouch description is distinct too: Pouch. A cloth or leather pouch can hold up to 20 sling bullets or 50 blowgun needles, among other things. A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:20












  • Nice, that would account for the price and weight difference.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:24










  • Filling a regular pouch with components is not enough to turn it into a component pouch because the regular pouch is neither compartmentalized, nor watertight.
    – Ruse
    Nov 7 at 3:30












  • Copper wire is pretty resistant to water damage
    – Dale M
    Nov 7 at 4:31


















up vote
3
down vote













The Component Pouch comes with the components.



The belt pouch is just a pouch. There is no need to buy the component pouch if you have the components already. This isn't a video game, where there is a quantitative difference between a component pouch and a pouch with components in it. It's just that when one entry lists component pouch, it comes with the components. If it is a belt pouch, it is just an empty pouch. So you could in play buy a belt pouch, put all the common components in it, then sell it as a component pouch, because that's exactly what it is. A belt pouch someone put components in and sold for 25gp.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Are all pouches small, watertight, leather belt like, and have with compartments?
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:47













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135070%2fare-there-any-practical-differences-between-a-belt-pouch-and-component-pouch-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest
































3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
7
down vote



accepted










They are different. A component pouch is specialized equipment.



tl;dr The rules specifically require a component pouch which is a listed peice of equipment different from a pouch.



Rules specifically require a component pouch



The material component aspect of casting a spell specifically calls out the use of an arcane focus or component pouch.



Narrative explanation



Component pouch covers the cost of mundane components and does not require the caster to retrieve components from around their person (that might require use an object) while casting it.



Component pouch and pouch are different pieces of equipment



In the basic rules adventuring equipment, a pouch is 5sp while a component pouch is 25 gp. The component pouch takes the place of an arcane focus for a single classed spellcaster as elaborated on in the answer here.



The regular pouch does not take the place of the arcane focus, nor does it supply the mundane (no specifically cost listed) components of spells.



Can still cast message without the pouch.



Since the character directly owns the components, they can still cast the message spell. A component pouch or focus can be used in place of mundane components.




A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in “Equipment”) in place of the components specified for a spell.




Copper wire not consumed



The message spell does not state that the component of the spell is consumed, so a single short piece of wire should be sufficient for as many castings as you like.






share|improve this answer























  • Why wouldn't a regular pouch filled with components not work? You're still reaching in and selecting your component, no?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:25












  • Component pouch does not require object interaction. Also, saves the accounting for the individual cost of each mundane component.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:27










  • You still need to access the spell's material components with a free hand
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:29










  • @NautArch holding onto something you're already holding does not cost you the object interaction on your turn. The spell caster with a pouch could draw a weapon and cast a spell on the same turn. The one without a pouch could not.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:30












  • Where does it state that interacting with a component pouch bypasses the Use an Object? Or that not having a component pouch requires Use an Object to access the component?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:33















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










They are different. A component pouch is specialized equipment.



tl;dr The rules specifically require a component pouch which is a listed peice of equipment different from a pouch.



Rules specifically require a component pouch



The material component aspect of casting a spell specifically calls out the use of an arcane focus or component pouch.



Narrative explanation



Component pouch covers the cost of mundane components and does not require the caster to retrieve components from around their person (that might require use an object) while casting it.



Component pouch and pouch are different pieces of equipment



In the basic rules adventuring equipment, a pouch is 5sp while a component pouch is 25 gp. The component pouch takes the place of an arcane focus for a single classed spellcaster as elaborated on in the answer here.



The regular pouch does not take the place of the arcane focus, nor does it supply the mundane (no specifically cost listed) components of spells.



Can still cast message without the pouch.



Since the character directly owns the components, they can still cast the message spell. A component pouch or focus can be used in place of mundane components.




A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in “Equipment”) in place of the components specified for a spell.




Copper wire not consumed



The message spell does not state that the component of the spell is consumed, so a single short piece of wire should be sufficient for as many castings as you like.






share|improve this answer























  • Why wouldn't a regular pouch filled with components not work? You're still reaching in and selecting your component, no?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:25












  • Component pouch does not require object interaction. Also, saves the accounting for the individual cost of each mundane component.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:27










  • You still need to access the spell's material components with a free hand
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:29










  • @NautArch holding onto something you're already holding does not cost you the object interaction on your turn. The spell caster with a pouch could draw a weapon and cast a spell on the same turn. The one without a pouch could not.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:30












  • Where does it state that interacting with a component pouch bypasses the Use an Object? Or that not having a component pouch requires Use an Object to access the component?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:33













up vote
7
down vote



accepted







up vote
7
down vote



accepted






They are different. A component pouch is specialized equipment.



tl;dr The rules specifically require a component pouch which is a listed peice of equipment different from a pouch.



Rules specifically require a component pouch



The material component aspect of casting a spell specifically calls out the use of an arcane focus or component pouch.



Narrative explanation



Component pouch covers the cost of mundane components and does not require the caster to retrieve components from around their person (that might require use an object) while casting it.



Component pouch and pouch are different pieces of equipment



In the basic rules adventuring equipment, a pouch is 5sp while a component pouch is 25 gp. The component pouch takes the place of an arcane focus for a single classed spellcaster as elaborated on in the answer here.



The regular pouch does not take the place of the arcane focus, nor does it supply the mundane (no specifically cost listed) components of spells.



Can still cast message without the pouch.



Since the character directly owns the components, they can still cast the message spell. A component pouch or focus can be used in place of mundane components.




A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in “Equipment”) in place of the components specified for a spell.




Copper wire not consumed



The message spell does not state that the component of the spell is consumed, so a single short piece of wire should be sufficient for as many castings as you like.






share|improve this answer














They are different. A component pouch is specialized equipment.



tl;dr The rules specifically require a component pouch which is a listed peice of equipment different from a pouch.



Rules specifically require a component pouch



The material component aspect of casting a spell specifically calls out the use of an arcane focus or component pouch.



Narrative explanation



Component pouch covers the cost of mundane components and does not require the caster to retrieve components from around their person (that might require use an object) while casting it.



Component pouch and pouch are different pieces of equipment



In the basic rules adventuring equipment, a pouch is 5sp while a component pouch is 25 gp. The component pouch takes the place of an arcane focus for a single classed spellcaster as elaborated on in the answer here.



The regular pouch does not take the place of the arcane focus, nor does it supply the mundane (no specifically cost listed) components of spells.



Can still cast message without the pouch.



Since the character directly owns the components, they can still cast the message spell. A component pouch or focus can be used in place of mundane components.




A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in “Equipment”) in place of the components specified for a spell.




Copper wire not consumed



The message spell does not state that the component of the spell is consumed, so a single short piece of wire should be sufficient for as many castings as you like.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 6 at 22:06

























answered Nov 6 at 21:22









Grosscol

6,4171454




6,4171454












  • Why wouldn't a regular pouch filled with components not work? You're still reaching in and selecting your component, no?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:25












  • Component pouch does not require object interaction. Also, saves the accounting for the individual cost of each mundane component.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:27










  • You still need to access the spell's material components with a free hand
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:29










  • @NautArch holding onto something you're already holding does not cost you the object interaction on your turn. The spell caster with a pouch could draw a weapon and cast a spell on the same turn. The one without a pouch could not.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:30












  • Where does it state that interacting with a component pouch bypasses the Use an Object? Or that not having a component pouch requires Use an Object to access the component?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:33


















  • Why wouldn't a regular pouch filled with components not work? You're still reaching in and selecting your component, no?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:25












  • Component pouch does not require object interaction. Also, saves the accounting for the individual cost of each mundane component.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:27










  • You still need to access the spell's material components with a free hand
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:29










  • @NautArch holding onto something you're already holding does not cost you the object interaction on your turn. The spell caster with a pouch could draw a weapon and cast a spell on the same turn. The one without a pouch could not.
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:30












  • Where does it state that interacting with a component pouch bypasses the Use an Object? Or that not having a component pouch requires Use an Object to access the component?
    – NautArch
    Nov 6 at 21:33
















Why wouldn't a regular pouch filled with components not work? You're still reaching in and selecting your component, no?
– NautArch
Nov 6 at 21:25






Why wouldn't a regular pouch filled with components not work? You're still reaching in and selecting your component, no?
– NautArch
Nov 6 at 21:25














Component pouch does not require object interaction. Also, saves the accounting for the individual cost of each mundane component.
– Grosscol
Nov 6 at 21:27




Component pouch does not require object interaction. Also, saves the accounting for the individual cost of each mundane component.
– Grosscol
Nov 6 at 21:27












You still need to access the spell's material components with a free hand
– NautArch
Nov 6 at 21:29




You still need to access the spell's material components with a free hand
– NautArch
Nov 6 at 21:29












@NautArch holding onto something you're already holding does not cost you the object interaction on your turn. The spell caster with a pouch could draw a weapon and cast a spell on the same turn. The one without a pouch could not.
– Grosscol
Nov 6 at 21:30






@NautArch holding onto something you're already holding does not cost you the object interaction on your turn. The spell caster with a pouch could draw a weapon and cast a spell on the same turn. The one without a pouch could not.
– Grosscol
Nov 6 at 21:30














Where does it state that interacting with a component pouch bypasses the Use an Object? Or that not having a component pouch requires Use an Object to access the component?
– NautArch
Nov 6 at 21:33




Where does it state that interacting with a component pouch bypasses the Use an Object? Or that not having a component pouch requires Use an Object to access the component?
– NautArch
Nov 6 at 21:33












up vote
11
down vote













One is filled with components automatically and is watertight, the other is not



The Basic Rules lists under the Adventuring Gear:




Component Pouch. A component pouch is a small, watertight leather belt pouch...




Component pouches include components



The difference between the two is that the Component Pouch includes your components and is compartmentalized and watertight. It includes all components




except for those components that have a specific cost (as indicated in a spell's description).




A regular pouch is only going to be a regular pouch and you'll have to go and get your components. The regular pouch entry also mentions the subset of itself, the component pouch:




A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).




Once filled, they're the same thing



However, if you've gone to the trouble of finding all of your material components and put them in a standard pouch, you've effectively got a component pouch. However, should it get wet, your components may be ruined.



Character Sheets



The pregen character sheet has both pouch types. In this case, your character has both a filled component pouch and a second pouch.






share|improve this answer























  • That gear list has "Component pouch/25 gp/2 lb." and "Pouch/5 sp/1 lb."
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:19










  • The pouch description is distinct too: Pouch. A cloth or leather pouch can hold up to 20 sling bullets or 50 blowgun needles, among other things. A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:20












  • Nice, that would account for the price and weight difference.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:24










  • Filling a regular pouch with components is not enough to turn it into a component pouch because the regular pouch is neither compartmentalized, nor watertight.
    – Ruse
    Nov 7 at 3:30












  • Copper wire is pretty resistant to water damage
    – Dale M
    Nov 7 at 4:31















up vote
11
down vote













One is filled with components automatically and is watertight, the other is not



The Basic Rules lists under the Adventuring Gear:




Component Pouch. A component pouch is a small, watertight leather belt pouch...




Component pouches include components



The difference between the two is that the Component Pouch includes your components and is compartmentalized and watertight. It includes all components




except for those components that have a specific cost (as indicated in a spell's description).




A regular pouch is only going to be a regular pouch and you'll have to go and get your components. The regular pouch entry also mentions the subset of itself, the component pouch:




A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).




Once filled, they're the same thing



However, if you've gone to the trouble of finding all of your material components and put them in a standard pouch, you've effectively got a component pouch. However, should it get wet, your components may be ruined.



Character Sheets



The pregen character sheet has both pouch types. In this case, your character has both a filled component pouch and a second pouch.






share|improve this answer























  • That gear list has "Component pouch/25 gp/2 lb." and "Pouch/5 sp/1 lb."
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:19










  • The pouch description is distinct too: Pouch. A cloth or leather pouch can hold up to 20 sling bullets or 50 blowgun needles, among other things. A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:20












  • Nice, that would account for the price and weight difference.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:24










  • Filling a regular pouch with components is not enough to turn it into a component pouch because the regular pouch is neither compartmentalized, nor watertight.
    – Ruse
    Nov 7 at 3:30












  • Copper wire is pretty resistant to water damage
    – Dale M
    Nov 7 at 4:31













up vote
11
down vote










up vote
11
down vote









One is filled with components automatically and is watertight, the other is not



The Basic Rules lists under the Adventuring Gear:




Component Pouch. A component pouch is a small, watertight leather belt pouch...




Component pouches include components



The difference between the two is that the Component Pouch includes your components and is compartmentalized and watertight. It includes all components




except for those components that have a specific cost (as indicated in a spell's description).




A regular pouch is only going to be a regular pouch and you'll have to go and get your components. The regular pouch entry also mentions the subset of itself, the component pouch:




A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).




Once filled, they're the same thing



However, if you've gone to the trouble of finding all of your material components and put them in a standard pouch, you've effectively got a component pouch. However, should it get wet, your components may be ruined.



Character Sheets



The pregen character sheet has both pouch types. In this case, your character has both a filled component pouch and a second pouch.






share|improve this answer














One is filled with components automatically and is watertight, the other is not



The Basic Rules lists under the Adventuring Gear:




Component Pouch. A component pouch is a small, watertight leather belt pouch...




Component pouches include components



The difference between the two is that the Component Pouch includes your components and is compartmentalized and watertight. It includes all components




except for those components that have a specific cost (as indicated in a spell's description).




A regular pouch is only going to be a regular pouch and you'll have to go and get your components. The regular pouch entry also mentions the subset of itself, the component pouch:




A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).




Once filled, they're the same thing



However, if you've gone to the trouble of finding all of your material components and put them in a standard pouch, you've effectively got a component pouch. However, should it get wet, your components may be ruined.



Character Sheets



The pregen character sheet has both pouch types. In this case, your character has both a filled component pouch and a second pouch.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 6 at 21:55

























answered Nov 6 at 21:16









NautArch

49.7k6173337




49.7k6173337












  • That gear list has "Component pouch/25 gp/2 lb." and "Pouch/5 sp/1 lb."
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:19










  • The pouch description is distinct too: Pouch. A cloth or leather pouch can hold up to 20 sling bullets or 50 blowgun needles, among other things. A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:20












  • Nice, that would account for the price and weight difference.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:24










  • Filling a regular pouch with components is not enough to turn it into a component pouch because the regular pouch is neither compartmentalized, nor watertight.
    – Ruse
    Nov 7 at 3:30












  • Copper wire is pretty resistant to water damage
    – Dale M
    Nov 7 at 4:31


















  • That gear list has "Component pouch/25 gp/2 lb." and "Pouch/5 sp/1 lb."
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:19










  • The pouch description is distinct too: Pouch. A cloth or leather pouch can hold up to 20 sling bullets or 50 blowgun needles, among other things. A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:20












  • Nice, that would account for the price and weight difference.
    – StuperUser
    Nov 6 at 21:24










  • Filling a regular pouch with components is not enough to turn it into a component pouch because the regular pouch is neither compartmentalized, nor watertight.
    – Ruse
    Nov 7 at 3:30












  • Copper wire is pretty resistant to water damage
    – Dale M
    Nov 7 at 4:31
















That gear list has "Component pouch/25 gp/2 lb." and "Pouch/5 sp/1 lb."
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:19




That gear list has "Component pouch/25 gp/2 lb." and "Pouch/5 sp/1 lb."
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:19












The pouch description is distinct too: Pouch. A cloth or leather pouch can hold up to 20 sling bullets or 50 blowgun needles, among other things. A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:20






The pouch description is distinct too: Pouch. A cloth or leather pouch can hold up to 20 sling bullets or 50 blowgun needles, among other things. A compartmentalized pouch for holding spell components is called a component pouch (described earlier in this section).
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:20














Nice, that would account for the price and weight difference.
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:24




Nice, that would account for the price and weight difference.
– StuperUser
Nov 6 at 21:24












Filling a regular pouch with components is not enough to turn it into a component pouch because the regular pouch is neither compartmentalized, nor watertight.
– Ruse
Nov 7 at 3:30






Filling a regular pouch with components is not enough to turn it into a component pouch because the regular pouch is neither compartmentalized, nor watertight.
– Ruse
Nov 7 at 3:30














Copper wire is pretty resistant to water damage
– Dale M
Nov 7 at 4:31




Copper wire is pretty resistant to water damage
– Dale M
Nov 7 at 4:31










up vote
3
down vote













The Component Pouch comes with the components.



The belt pouch is just a pouch. There is no need to buy the component pouch if you have the components already. This isn't a video game, where there is a quantitative difference between a component pouch and a pouch with components in it. It's just that when one entry lists component pouch, it comes with the components. If it is a belt pouch, it is just an empty pouch. So you could in play buy a belt pouch, put all the common components in it, then sell it as a component pouch, because that's exactly what it is. A belt pouch someone put components in and sold for 25gp.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Are all pouches small, watertight, leather belt like, and have with compartments?
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:47

















up vote
3
down vote













The Component Pouch comes with the components.



The belt pouch is just a pouch. There is no need to buy the component pouch if you have the components already. This isn't a video game, where there is a quantitative difference between a component pouch and a pouch with components in it. It's just that when one entry lists component pouch, it comes with the components. If it is a belt pouch, it is just an empty pouch. So you could in play buy a belt pouch, put all the common components in it, then sell it as a component pouch, because that's exactly what it is. A belt pouch someone put components in and sold for 25gp.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Are all pouches small, watertight, leather belt like, and have with compartments?
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:47















up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









The Component Pouch comes with the components.



The belt pouch is just a pouch. There is no need to buy the component pouch if you have the components already. This isn't a video game, where there is a quantitative difference between a component pouch and a pouch with components in it. It's just that when one entry lists component pouch, it comes with the components. If it is a belt pouch, it is just an empty pouch. So you could in play buy a belt pouch, put all the common components in it, then sell it as a component pouch, because that's exactly what it is. A belt pouch someone put components in and sold for 25gp.






share|improve this answer












The Component Pouch comes with the components.



The belt pouch is just a pouch. There is no need to buy the component pouch if you have the components already. This isn't a video game, where there is a quantitative difference between a component pouch and a pouch with components in it. It's just that when one entry lists component pouch, it comes with the components. If it is a belt pouch, it is just an empty pouch. So you could in play buy a belt pouch, put all the common components in it, then sell it as a component pouch, because that's exactly what it is. A belt pouch someone put components in and sold for 25gp.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 6 at 21:45









MarkTO

97713




97713








  • 1




    Are all pouches small, watertight, leather belt like, and have with compartments?
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:47
















  • 1




    Are all pouches small, watertight, leather belt like, and have with compartments?
    – Grosscol
    Nov 6 at 21:47










1




1




Are all pouches small, watertight, leather belt like, and have with compartments?
– Grosscol
Nov 6 at 21:47






Are all pouches small, watertight, leather belt like, and have with compartments?
– Grosscol
Nov 6 at 21:47




















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135070%2fare-there-any-practical-differences-between-a-belt-pouch-and-component-pouch-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest




















































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Hercules Kyvelos

Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud