GetQueuedCompletionStatus continues to select events on closed sockets












1















IOCP server works with WebSocket connections. When the browser sends a close frame, the server deletes this client, the closesocket function is calling in client's object destructor. But even after the socket was closed, the GetQueuedCompletionStatus function continues to select events from this socket. Of course the result is false and 0 bytes transferred, but Client ptr and OVERLAPPED ptr are not NULL, and GetLastError returns 1236 (ERROR_CONNECTION_ABORTED)... so yeah, it is aborted, and the closesocket was called... But why it is still here??? And how to stop receiving this "useless" events? I can call continue in thead's loop, but it will waste CPU time if the function will select this removed client forever.



Here is the part of worker thread's loop:



while(WAIT_OBJECT_0 != WaitForSingleObject(EventShutdown, 0)){
DWORD BytesTransfered = 0;
OVERLAPPED *asyncinfo = nullptr;
client *Client = nullptr;
BOOL QCS = GetQueuedCompletionStatus(hIOCP, &BytesTransfered, (PULONG_PTR)&Client, &asyncinfo, INFINITE);
if(!Client ) break;

switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){
case OP_TYPE_RECV:{
.....
switch( recv_buf[0] &0xFF ){
....
case FIN_CLOSE:
printf("FIN_CLOSE on client %un", Client->Socket());
default:{
RemoveClient(Client);
break;
}
}
}
case OP_TYPE_SEND:{
...
}
default:{
printf("Client %u (%lu bytes transferred, QCS is %d)n", Client->Socket(), BytesTransfered, QCS);
break;
}


Client's destructor:



client::~client(){
while(!HasOverlappedIoCompleted(&asyncinfo)) Sleep(0);
closesocket(socket);
if( a_ctx ) delete a_ctx;
if( q_ctx ) delete q_ctx;
delete data_buffer;
printf("Client %u deletedn", socket);
}


... and the server's log:




Client 296 from 127.0.0.1 (agent 1987)
Client 308 from 127.0.0.1
(supervisor)
Client 324 from 127.0.0.1 (supervisor)
TOTAL: 3
client(s)
Sending 33278 bytes to 324
Send finished for 324

Send finished for 308
Sending 40529 bytes to 324
Send finished
for 324
Sending 41128 bytes to 324
Send finished for 324

Sending 40430 bytes to 324
Send finished for 324
FIN_CLOSE on
client 324
Client 324 deleted
Client 324 (0 bytes transferred,
QCS is 0)
Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
Client
324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
Client 324 (0 bytes
transferred, QCS is 0)
Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is
0)




See that "324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)"? Socket 324 closed. Why it happens after destructor's message "Client 324 deleted"?










share|improve this question



























    1















    IOCP server works with WebSocket connections. When the browser sends a close frame, the server deletes this client, the closesocket function is calling in client's object destructor. But even after the socket was closed, the GetQueuedCompletionStatus function continues to select events from this socket. Of course the result is false and 0 bytes transferred, but Client ptr and OVERLAPPED ptr are not NULL, and GetLastError returns 1236 (ERROR_CONNECTION_ABORTED)... so yeah, it is aborted, and the closesocket was called... But why it is still here??? And how to stop receiving this "useless" events? I can call continue in thead's loop, but it will waste CPU time if the function will select this removed client forever.



    Here is the part of worker thread's loop:



    while(WAIT_OBJECT_0 != WaitForSingleObject(EventShutdown, 0)){
    DWORD BytesTransfered = 0;
    OVERLAPPED *asyncinfo = nullptr;
    client *Client = nullptr;
    BOOL QCS = GetQueuedCompletionStatus(hIOCP, &BytesTransfered, (PULONG_PTR)&Client, &asyncinfo, INFINITE);
    if(!Client ) break;

    switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){
    case OP_TYPE_RECV:{
    .....
    switch( recv_buf[0] &0xFF ){
    ....
    case FIN_CLOSE:
    printf("FIN_CLOSE on client %un", Client->Socket());
    default:{
    RemoveClient(Client);
    break;
    }
    }
    }
    case OP_TYPE_SEND:{
    ...
    }
    default:{
    printf("Client %u (%lu bytes transferred, QCS is %d)n", Client->Socket(), BytesTransfered, QCS);
    break;
    }


    Client's destructor:



    client::~client(){
    while(!HasOverlappedIoCompleted(&asyncinfo)) Sleep(0);
    closesocket(socket);
    if( a_ctx ) delete a_ctx;
    if( q_ctx ) delete q_ctx;
    delete data_buffer;
    printf("Client %u deletedn", socket);
    }


    ... and the server's log:




    Client 296 from 127.0.0.1 (agent 1987)
    Client 308 from 127.0.0.1
    (supervisor)
    Client 324 from 127.0.0.1 (supervisor)
    TOTAL: 3
    client(s)
    Sending 33278 bytes to 324
    Send finished for 324

    Send finished for 308
    Sending 40529 bytes to 324
    Send finished
    for 324
    Sending 41128 bytes to 324
    Send finished for 324

    Sending 40430 bytes to 324
    Send finished for 324
    FIN_CLOSE on
    client 324
    Client 324 deleted
    Client 324 (0 bytes transferred,
    QCS is 0)
    Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
    Client
    324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
    Client 324 (0 bytes
    transferred, QCS is 0)
    Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is
    0)




    See that "324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)"? Socket 324 closed. Why it happens after destructor's message "Client 324 deleted"?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      IOCP server works with WebSocket connections. When the browser sends a close frame, the server deletes this client, the closesocket function is calling in client's object destructor. But even after the socket was closed, the GetQueuedCompletionStatus function continues to select events from this socket. Of course the result is false and 0 bytes transferred, but Client ptr and OVERLAPPED ptr are not NULL, and GetLastError returns 1236 (ERROR_CONNECTION_ABORTED)... so yeah, it is aborted, and the closesocket was called... But why it is still here??? And how to stop receiving this "useless" events? I can call continue in thead's loop, but it will waste CPU time if the function will select this removed client forever.



      Here is the part of worker thread's loop:



      while(WAIT_OBJECT_0 != WaitForSingleObject(EventShutdown, 0)){
      DWORD BytesTransfered = 0;
      OVERLAPPED *asyncinfo = nullptr;
      client *Client = nullptr;
      BOOL QCS = GetQueuedCompletionStatus(hIOCP, &BytesTransfered, (PULONG_PTR)&Client, &asyncinfo, INFINITE);
      if(!Client ) break;

      switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){
      case OP_TYPE_RECV:{
      .....
      switch( recv_buf[0] &0xFF ){
      ....
      case FIN_CLOSE:
      printf("FIN_CLOSE on client %un", Client->Socket());
      default:{
      RemoveClient(Client);
      break;
      }
      }
      }
      case OP_TYPE_SEND:{
      ...
      }
      default:{
      printf("Client %u (%lu bytes transferred, QCS is %d)n", Client->Socket(), BytesTransfered, QCS);
      break;
      }


      Client's destructor:



      client::~client(){
      while(!HasOverlappedIoCompleted(&asyncinfo)) Sleep(0);
      closesocket(socket);
      if( a_ctx ) delete a_ctx;
      if( q_ctx ) delete q_ctx;
      delete data_buffer;
      printf("Client %u deletedn", socket);
      }


      ... and the server's log:




      Client 296 from 127.0.0.1 (agent 1987)
      Client 308 from 127.0.0.1
      (supervisor)
      Client 324 from 127.0.0.1 (supervisor)
      TOTAL: 3
      client(s)
      Sending 33278 bytes to 324
      Send finished for 324

      Send finished for 308
      Sending 40529 bytes to 324
      Send finished
      for 324
      Sending 41128 bytes to 324
      Send finished for 324

      Sending 40430 bytes to 324
      Send finished for 324
      FIN_CLOSE on
      client 324
      Client 324 deleted
      Client 324 (0 bytes transferred,
      QCS is 0)
      Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
      Client
      324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
      Client 324 (0 bytes
      transferred, QCS is 0)
      Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is
      0)




      See that "324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)"? Socket 324 closed. Why it happens after destructor's message "Client 324 deleted"?










      share|improve this question














      IOCP server works with WebSocket connections. When the browser sends a close frame, the server deletes this client, the closesocket function is calling in client's object destructor. But even after the socket was closed, the GetQueuedCompletionStatus function continues to select events from this socket. Of course the result is false and 0 bytes transferred, but Client ptr and OVERLAPPED ptr are not NULL, and GetLastError returns 1236 (ERROR_CONNECTION_ABORTED)... so yeah, it is aborted, and the closesocket was called... But why it is still here??? And how to stop receiving this "useless" events? I can call continue in thead's loop, but it will waste CPU time if the function will select this removed client forever.



      Here is the part of worker thread's loop:



      while(WAIT_OBJECT_0 != WaitForSingleObject(EventShutdown, 0)){
      DWORD BytesTransfered = 0;
      OVERLAPPED *asyncinfo = nullptr;
      client *Client = nullptr;
      BOOL QCS = GetQueuedCompletionStatus(hIOCP, &BytesTransfered, (PULONG_PTR)&Client, &asyncinfo, INFINITE);
      if(!Client ) break;

      switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){
      case OP_TYPE_RECV:{
      .....
      switch( recv_buf[0] &0xFF ){
      ....
      case FIN_CLOSE:
      printf("FIN_CLOSE on client %un", Client->Socket());
      default:{
      RemoveClient(Client);
      break;
      }
      }
      }
      case OP_TYPE_SEND:{
      ...
      }
      default:{
      printf("Client %u (%lu bytes transferred, QCS is %d)n", Client->Socket(), BytesTransfered, QCS);
      break;
      }


      Client's destructor:



      client::~client(){
      while(!HasOverlappedIoCompleted(&asyncinfo)) Sleep(0);
      closesocket(socket);
      if( a_ctx ) delete a_ctx;
      if( q_ctx ) delete q_ctx;
      delete data_buffer;
      printf("Client %u deletedn", socket);
      }


      ... and the server's log:




      Client 296 from 127.0.0.1 (agent 1987)
      Client 308 from 127.0.0.1
      (supervisor)
      Client 324 from 127.0.0.1 (supervisor)
      TOTAL: 3
      client(s)
      Sending 33278 bytes to 324
      Send finished for 324

      Send finished for 308
      Sending 40529 bytes to 324
      Send finished
      for 324
      Sending 41128 bytes to 324
      Send finished for 324

      Sending 40430 bytes to 324
      Send finished for 324
      FIN_CLOSE on
      client 324
      Client 324 deleted
      Client 324 (0 bytes transferred,
      QCS is 0)
      Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
      Client
      324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)
      Client 324 (0 bytes
      transferred, QCS is 0)
      Client 324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is
      0)




      See that "324 (0 bytes transferred, QCS is 0)"? Socket 324 closed. Why it happens after destructor's message "Client 324 deleted"?







      c++ winsock iocp






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 12:33









      IcemanIceman

      17819




      17819
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          I don't think you've included enough code to get a complete picture, but this line looks suspect:



          switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){


          This is problematic for a couple of reasons. First, GetQueuedCompletionStatus is not guaranteed to return 1 on success. MSDN promises only that it will return nonzero. Relying on a specific value for the success case is therefore risky. Second, you have no way to distinguish between a failed call and a successful call that returns 0 bytes. You should really separate your logic for managing the dequeue and for dispatching particular I/O events. This will make your code easier to understand and maintain.



          You must also remember that there are two sides to every socket. There are the structures and socket handle you associate with it in user space, and then there are kernel objects that manage the low level details. Just because you close your handle on the user side does not mean that the kernel objects go away. Kernel objects are referenced counted and will generally linger on until all I/O involving those objects is complete.



          That's why you can still get I/O notifications for a socket after it has been "destroyed" from your program's point of view. With sockets in particular, the shut down sequence will take place after you have closed your handle (because you did not explicitly shut down the socket before then).



          Instead of destroying your Client object in response to a specific message, just close the socket handle and clean up your other structures in response to the abort notification. You might also consider doing a graceful disconnect rather than aborting the connection.






          share|improve this answer
























          • When I close connection on C++ client, I'm getting error code 64 on server (ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED) and all operations ends. But the browser won't close its sockets, so the connection descriptor stays in kernel. It is strange... I need to clear this descriptor somehow. If it happens in a singlethreaded server, I'm afraid to think what will be when I'll add some threads ))

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:44











          • Indeed! I read about the closesocket function - it does not mean that the events associated with it will stop. So I just need to ignore these events?

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:51











          • Possibly, but the fact that you apparently get multiple events for a single close is concerning. Like I said, I think some details are missing from the question.

            – Peter Ruderman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:54











          • I also found the reason why the connection does not close from both sides. According to WebSocket specification, the browser waits for echo-close from server and don't terminates the connection instantly. )

            – Iceman
            Nov 21 '18 at 5:24











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53393101%2fgetqueuedcompletionstatus-continues-to-select-events-on-closed-sockets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          I don't think you've included enough code to get a complete picture, but this line looks suspect:



          switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){


          This is problematic for a couple of reasons. First, GetQueuedCompletionStatus is not guaranteed to return 1 on success. MSDN promises only that it will return nonzero. Relying on a specific value for the success case is therefore risky. Second, you have no way to distinguish between a failed call and a successful call that returns 0 bytes. You should really separate your logic for managing the dequeue and for dispatching particular I/O events. This will make your code easier to understand and maintain.



          You must also remember that there are two sides to every socket. There are the structures and socket handle you associate with it in user space, and then there are kernel objects that manage the low level details. Just because you close your handle on the user side does not mean that the kernel objects go away. Kernel objects are referenced counted and will generally linger on until all I/O involving those objects is complete.



          That's why you can still get I/O notifications for a socket after it has been "destroyed" from your program's point of view. With sockets in particular, the shut down sequence will take place after you have closed your handle (because you did not explicitly shut down the socket before then).



          Instead of destroying your Client object in response to a specific message, just close the socket handle and clean up your other structures in response to the abort notification. You might also consider doing a graceful disconnect rather than aborting the connection.






          share|improve this answer
























          • When I close connection on C++ client, I'm getting error code 64 on server (ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED) and all operations ends. But the browser won't close its sockets, so the connection descriptor stays in kernel. It is strange... I need to clear this descriptor somehow. If it happens in a singlethreaded server, I'm afraid to think what will be when I'll add some threads ))

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:44











          • Indeed! I read about the closesocket function - it does not mean that the events associated with it will stop. So I just need to ignore these events?

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:51











          • Possibly, but the fact that you apparently get multiple events for a single close is concerning. Like I said, I think some details are missing from the question.

            – Peter Ruderman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:54











          • I also found the reason why the connection does not close from both sides. According to WebSocket specification, the browser waits for echo-close from server and don't terminates the connection instantly. )

            – Iceman
            Nov 21 '18 at 5:24
















          1














          I don't think you've included enough code to get a complete picture, but this line looks suspect:



          switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){


          This is problematic for a couple of reasons. First, GetQueuedCompletionStatus is not guaranteed to return 1 on success. MSDN promises only that it will return nonzero. Relying on a specific value for the success case is therefore risky. Second, you have no way to distinguish between a failed call and a successful call that returns 0 bytes. You should really separate your logic for managing the dequeue and for dispatching particular I/O events. This will make your code easier to understand and maintain.



          You must also remember that there are two sides to every socket. There are the structures and socket handle you associate with it in user space, and then there are kernel objects that manage the low level details. Just because you close your handle on the user side does not mean that the kernel objects go away. Kernel objects are referenced counted and will generally linger on until all I/O involving those objects is complete.



          That's why you can still get I/O notifications for a socket after it has been "destroyed" from your program's point of view. With sockets in particular, the shut down sequence will take place after you have closed your handle (because you did not explicitly shut down the socket before then).



          Instead of destroying your Client object in response to a specific message, just close the socket handle and clean up your other structures in response to the abort notification. You might also consider doing a graceful disconnect rather than aborting the connection.






          share|improve this answer
























          • When I close connection on C++ client, I'm getting error code 64 on server (ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED) and all operations ends. But the browser won't close its sockets, so the connection descriptor stays in kernel. It is strange... I need to clear this descriptor somehow. If it happens in a singlethreaded server, I'm afraid to think what will be when I'll add some threads ))

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:44











          • Indeed! I read about the closesocket function - it does not mean that the events associated with it will stop. So I just need to ignore these events?

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:51











          • Possibly, but the fact that you apparently get multiple events for a single close is concerning. Like I said, I think some details are missing from the question.

            – Peter Ruderman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:54











          • I also found the reason why the connection does not close from both sides. According to WebSocket specification, the browser waits for echo-close from server and don't terminates the connection instantly. )

            – Iceman
            Nov 21 '18 at 5:24














          1












          1








          1







          I don't think you've included enough code to get a complete picture, but this line looks suspect:



          switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){


          This is problematic for a couple of reasons. First, GetQueuedCompletionStatus is not guaranteed to return 1 on success. MSDN promises only that it will return nonzero. Relying on a specific value for the success case is therefore risky. Second, you have no way to distinguish between a failed call and a successful call that returns 0 bytes. You should really separate your logic for managing the dequeue and for dispatching particular I/O events. This will make your code easier to understand and maintain.



          You must also remember that there are two sides to every socket. There are the structures and socket handle you associate with it in user space, and then there are kernel objects that manage the low level details. Just because you close your handle on the user side does not mean that the kernel objects go away. Kernel objects are referenced counted and will generally linger on until all I/O involving those objects is complete.



          That's why you can still get I/O notifications for a socket after it has been "destroyed" from your program's point of view. With sockets in particular, the shut down sequence will take place after you have closed your handle (because you did not explicitly shut down the socket before then).



          Instead of destroying your Client object in response to a specific message, just close the socket handle and clean up your other structures in response to the abort notification. You might also consider doing a graceful disconnect rather than aborting the connection.






          share|improve this answer













          I don't think you've included enough code to get a complete picture, but this line looks suspect:



          switch( QCS * (BytesTransfered > 0) * Client->OpCode() ){


          This is problematic for a couple of reasons. First, GetQueuedCompletionStatus is not guaranteed to return 1 on success. MSDN promises only that it will return nonzero. Relying on a specific value for the success case is therefore risky. Second, you have no way to distinguish between a failed call and a successful call that returns 0 bytes. You should really separate your logic for managing the dequeue and for dispatching particular I/O events. This will make your code easier to understand and maintain.



          You must also remember that there are two sides to every socket. There are the structures and socket handle you associate with it in user space, and then there are kernel objects that manage the low level details. Just because you close your handle on the user side does not mean that the kernel objects go away. Kernel objects are referenced counted and will generally linger on until all I/O involving those objects is complete.



          That's why you can still get I/O notifications for a socket after it has been "destroyed" from your program's point of view. With sockets in particular, the shut down sequence will take place after you have closed your handle (because you did not explicitly shut down the socket before then).



          Instead of destroying your Client object in response to a specific message, just close the socket handle and clean up your other structures in response to the abort notification. You might also consider doing a graceful disconnect rather than aborting the connection.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 '18 at 14:22









          Peter RudermanPeter Ruderman

          10.2k2352




          10.2k2352













          • When I close connection on C++ client, I'm getting error code 64 on server (ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED) and all operations ends. But the browser won't close its sockets, so the connection descriptor stays in kernel. It is strange... I need to clear this descriptor somehow. If it happens in a singlethreaded server, I'm afraid to think what will be when I'll add some threads ))

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:44











          • Indeed! I read about the closesocket function - it does not mean that the events associated with it will stop. So I just need to ignore these events?

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:51











          • Possibly, but the fact that you apparently get multiple events for a single close is concerning. Like I said, I think some details are missing from the question.

            – Peter Ruderman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:54











          • I also found the reason why the connection does not close from both sides. According to WebSocket specification, the browser waits for echo-close from server and don't terminates the connection instantly. )

            – Iceman
            Nov 21 '18 at 5:24



















          • When I close connection on C++ client, I'm getting error code 64 on server (ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED) and all operations ends. But the browser won't close its sockets, so the connection descriptor stays in kernel. It is strange... I need to clear this descriptor somehow. If it happens in a singlethreaded server, I'm afraid to think what will be when I'll add some threads ))

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 14:44











          • Indeed! I read about the closesocket function - it does not mean that the events associated with it will stop. So I just need to ignore these events?

            – Iceman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:51











          • Possibly, but the fact that you apparently get multiple events for a single close is concerning. Like I said, I think some details are missing from the question.

            – Peter Ruderman
            Nov 20 '18 at 16:54











          • I also found the reason why the connection does not close from both sides. According to WebSocket specification, the browser waits for echo-close from server and don't terminates the connection instantly. )

            – Iceman
            Nov 21 '18 at 5:24

















          When I close connection on C++ client, I'm getting error code 64 on server (ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED) and all operations ends. But the browser won't close its sockets, so the connection descriptor stays in kernel. It is strange... I need to clear this descriptor somehow. If it happens in a singlethreaded server, I'm afraid to think what will be when I'll add some threads ))

          – Iceman
          Nov 20 '18 at 14:44





          When I close connection on C++ client, I'm getting error code 64 on server (ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED) and all operations ends. But the browser won't close its sockets, so the connection descriptor stays in kernel. It is strange... I need to clear this descriptor somehow. If it happens in a singlethreaded server, I'm afraid to think what will be when I'll add some threads ))

          – Iceman
          Nov 20 '18 at 14:44













          Indeed! I read about the closesocket function - it does not mean that the events associated with it will stop. So I just need to ignore these events?

          – Iceman
          Nov 20 '18 at 16:51





          Indeed! I read about the closesocket function - it does not mean that the events associated with it will stop. So I just need to ignore these events?

          – Iceman
          Nov 20 '18 at 16:51













          Possibly, but the fact that you apparently get multiple events for a single close is concerning. Like I said, I think some details are missing from the question.

          – Peter Ruderman
          Nov 20 '18 at 16:54





          Possibly, but the fact that you apparently get multiple events for a single close is concerning. Like I said, I think some details are missing from the question.

          – Peter Ruderman
          Nov 20 '18 at 16:54













          I also found the reason why the connection does not close from both sides. According to WebSocket specification, the browser waits for echo-close from server and don't terminates the connection instantly. )

          – Iceman
          Nov 21 '18 at 5:24





          I also found the reason why the connection does not close from both sides. According to WebSocket specification, the browser waits for echo-close from server and don't terminates the connection instantly. )

          – Iceman
          Nov 21 '18 at 5:24




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53393101%2fgetqueuedcompletionstatus-continues-to-select-events-on-closed-sockets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

          Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

          Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()