XLib Disconnection Callback
I use XLib and XRand to get some information about the connected displays on an embedded system.
class Foo {
private:
Display *_display{};
public:
Foo() {
_display = XOpenDisplay(":0.0");
}
void getSomeInfo() const {
/* Get some info with _display */
}
~Foo() {
XCloseDisplay(_display);
}
}
The problem is, X server can be shut down (for low power or some other purposes) after the creation of Foo instance and before calling getSomeInfo(), which causes immediate death of my application because XLib tries to exit application in case of errors.
Is there any mechanism, like a callback, which would allow me to understand that X Server went down and I should not use the _display pointer anymore ?
xlib xrandr
add a comment |
I use XLib and XRand to get some information about the connected displays on an embedded system.
class Foo {
private:
Display *_display{};
public:
Foo() {
_display = XOpenDisplay(":0.0");
}
void getSomeInfo() const {
/* Get some info with _display */
}
~Foo() {
XCloseDisplay(_display);
}
}
The problem is, X server can be shut down (for low power or some other purposes) after the creation of Foo instance and before calling getSomeInfo(), which causes immediate death of my application because XLib tries to exit application in case of errors.
Is there any mechanism, like a callback, which would allow me to understand that X Server went down and I should not use the _display pointer anymore ?
xlib xrandr
Does "use XCB instead of Xlib" count as an answer? If so, I can provide that as an answer. XCB never callsexitfor you and it actually provides some error status codes.
– Uli Schlachter
Nov 29 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
I use XLib and XRand to get some information about the connected displays on an embedded system.
class Foo {
private:
Display *_display{};
public:
Foo() {
_display = XOpenDisplay(":0.0");
}
void getSomeInfo() const {
/* Get some info with _display */
}
~Foo() {
XCloseDisplay(_display);
}
}
The problem is, X server can be shut down (for low power or some other purposes) after the creation of Foo instance and before calling getSomeInfo(), which causes immediate death of my application because XLib tries to exit application in case of errors.
Is there any mechanism, like a callback, which would allow me to understand that X Server went down and I should not use the _display pointer anymore ?
xlib xrandr
I use XLib and XRand to get some information about the connected displays on an embedded system.
class Foo {
private:
Display *_display{};
public:
Foo() {
_display = XOpenDisplay(":0.0");
}
void getSomeInfo() const {
/* Get some info with _display */
}
~Foo() {
XCloseDisplay(_display);
}
}
The problem is, X server can be shut down (for low power or some other purposes) after the creation of Foo instance and before calling getSomeInfo(), which causes immediate death of my application because XLib tries to exit application in case of errors.
Is there any mechanism, like a callback, which would allow me to understand that X Server went down and I should not use the _display pointer anymore ?
xlib xrandr
xlib xrandr
asked Nov 20 '18 at 16:02
Murat ŞekerMurat Şeker
1,1751921
1,1751921
Does "use XCB instead of Xlib" count as an answer? If so, I can provide that as an answer. XCB never callsexitfor you and it actually provides some error status codes.
– Uli Schlachter
Nov 29 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
Does "use XCB instead of Xlib" count as an answer? If so, I can provide that as an answer. XCB never callsexitfor you and it actually provides some error status codes.
– Uli Schlachter
Nov 29 '18 at 16:24
Does "use XCB instead of Xlib" count as an answer? If so, I can provide that as an answer. XCB never calls
exit for you and it actually provides some error status codes.– Uli Schlachter
Nov 29 '18 at 16:24
Does "use XCB instead of Xlib" count as an answer? If so, I can provide that as an answer. XCB never calls
exit for you and it actually provides some error status codes.– Uli Schlachter
Nov 29 '18 at 16:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I fear that your only option is to use XSetIOErrorHandler and then do something ugly.
From https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/event-handling/protocol-errors/XSetIOErrorHandler.html:
The XSetIOErrorHandler() sets the fatal I/O error handler. Xlib calls the program's supplied error handler if any sort of system call error occurs (for example, the connection to the server was lost). This is assumed to be a fatal condition, and the called routine should not return. If the I/O error handler does return, the client process exits.
The "do something ugly" that I would suggest is to use setjmp and longjmp: Whenever you call any Xlib functions, you setjmp before. Your I/O error handling function then longjmps away to get away from the I/O error without your process exiting.
I have to say that I'm impressed :) but this kind of tricks are not allowed on our codebase.
– Murat Şeker
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
Good for you that such hacks are not allowed. Bad for you that then your only option is Xlib, I guess. (You are not allowed to interpose libc'sexit()to replace it with your own no-op function, right? ;-) )
– Uli Schlachter
Dec 3 '18 at 11:04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396936%2fxlib-disconnection-callback%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I fear that your only option is to use XSetIOErrorHandler and then do something ugly.
From https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/event-handling/protocol-errors/XSetIOErrorHandler.html:
The XSetIOErrorHandler() sets the fatal I/O error handler. Xlib calls the program's supplied error handler if any sort of system call error occurs (for example, the connection to the server was lost). This is assumed to be a fatal condition, and the called routine should not return. If the I/O error handler does return, the client process exits.
The "do something ugly" that I would suggest is to use setjmp and longjmp: Whenever you call any Xlib functions, you setjmp before. Your I/O error handling function then longjmps away to get away from the I/O error without your process exiting.
I have to say that I'm impressed :) but this kind of tricks are not allowed on our codebase.
– Murat Şeker
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
Good for you that such hacks are not allowed. Bad for you that then your only option is Xlib, I guess. (You are not allowed to interpose libc'sexit()to replace it with your own no-op function, right? ;-) )
– Uli Schlachter
Dec 3 '18 at 11:04
add a comment |
I fear that your only option is to use XSetIOErrorHandler and then do something ugly.
From https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/event-handling/protocol-errors/XSetIOErrorHandler.html:
The XSetIOErrorHandler() sets the fatal I/O error handler. Xlib calls the program's supplied error handler if any sort of system call error occurs (for example, the connection to the server was lost). This is assumed to be a fatal condition, and the called routine should not return. If the I/O error handler does return, the client process exits.
The "do something ugly" that I would suggest is to use setjmp and longjmp: Whenever you call any Xlib functions, you setjmp before. Your I/O error handling function then longjmps away to get away from the I/O error without your process exiting.
I have to say that I'm impressed :) but this kind of tricks are not allowed on our codebase.
– Murat Şeker
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
Good for you that such hacks are not allowed. Bad for you that then your only option is Xlib, I guess. (You are not allowed to interpose libc'sexit()to replace it with your own no-op function, right? ;-) )
– Uli Schlachter
Dec 3 '18 at 11:04
add a comment |
I fear that your only option is to use XSetIOErrorHandler and then do something ugly.
From https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/event-handling/protocol-errors/XSetIOErrorHandler.html:
The XSetIOErrorHandler() sets the fatal I/O error handler. Xlib calls the program's supplied error handler if any sort of system call error occurs (for example, the connection to the server was lost). This is assumed to be a fatal condition, and the called routine should not return. If the I/O error handler does return, the client process exits.
The "do something ugly" that I would suggest is to use setjmp and longjmp: Whenever you call any Xlib functions, you setjmp before. Your I/O error handling function then longjmps away to get away from the I/O error without your process exiting.
I fear that your only option is to use XSetIOErrorHandler and then do something ugly.
From https://tronche.com/gui/x/xlib/event-handling/protocol-errors/XSetIOErrorHandler.html:
The XSetIOErrorHandler() sets the fatal I/O error handler. Xlib calls the program's supplied error handler if any sort of system call error occurs (for example, the connection to the server was lost). This is assumed to be a fatal condition, and the called routine should not return. If the I/O error handler does return, the client process exits.
The "do something ugly" that I would suggest is to use setjmp and longjmp: Whenever you call any Xlib functions, you setjmp before. Your I/O error handling function then longjmps away to get away from the I/O error without your process exiting.
answered Nov 29 '18 at 16:24
Uli SchlachterUli Schlachter
5,0131729
5,0131729
I have to say that I'm impressed :) but this kind of tricks are not allowed on our codebase.
– Murat Şeker
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
Good for you that such hacks are not allowed. Bad for you that then your only option is Xlib, I guess. (You are not allowed to interpose libc'sexit()to replace it with your own no-op function, right? ;-) )
– Uli Schlachter
Dec 3 '18 at 11:04
add a comment |
I have to say that I'm impressed :) but this kind of tricks are not allowed on our codebase.
– Murat Şeker
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
Good for you that such hacks are not allowed. Bad for you that then your only option is Xlib, I guess. (You are not allowed to interpose libc'sexit()to replace it with your own no-op function, right? ;-) )
– Uli Schlachter
Dec 3 '18 at 11:04
I have to say that I'm impressed :) but this kind of tricks are not allowed on our codebase.
– Murat Şeker
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
I have to say that I'm impressed :) but this kind of tricks are not allowed on our codebase.
– Murat Şeker
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02
Good for you that such hacks are not allowed. Bad for you that then your only option is Xlib, I guess. (You are not allowed to interpose libc's
exit() to replace it with your own no-op function, right? ;-) )– Uli Schlachter
Dec 3 '18 at 11:04
Good for you that such hacks are not allowed. Bad for you that then your only option is Xlib, I guess. (You are not allowed to interpose libc's
exit() to replace it with your own no-op function, right? ;-) )– Uli Schlachter
Dec 3 '18 at 11:04
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396936%2fxlib-disconnection-callback%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Does "use XCB instead of Xlib" count as an answer? If so, I can provide that as an answer. XCB never calls
exitfor you and it actually provides some error status codes.– Uli Schlachter
Nov 29 '18 at 16:24