How to inject a Renderer to SimpleExoPlayer
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I use Exoplayer 2.9.0 and Audio 360
There are two renderers:
val videoRenderer = MediaCodecVideoRenderer(mActivity, MediaCodecSelector.DEFAULT)
val audioRenderer = OpusRenderer(mVideoHelper.audio360Sink)
I know how to inject it to an Exoplayer Object:
val render = arrayOf(videoRenderer, audioRenderer)
Exoplyer exoPlayer = ExoPlayerFactory.newInstance(render ,DefaultTrackSelector())
However, I only use SimpleExoPlayer. I wonder how to do the same for SimpleExoPlayer object? Alternatively, Is there a way to pass an ExoPlayer to a SimpleExoPlayer object ?
Thanks,
android exoplayer
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I use Exoplayer 2.9.0 and Audio 360
There are two renderers:
val videoRenderer = MediaCodecVideoRenderer(mActivity, MediaCodecSelector.DEFAULT)
val audioRenderer = OpusRenderer(mVideoHelper.audio360Sink)
I know how to inject it to an Exoplayer Object:
val render = arrayOf(videoRenderer, audioRenderer)
Exoplyer exoPlayer = ExoPlayerFactory.newInstance(render ,DefaultTrackSelector())
However, I only use SimpleExoPlayer. I wonder how to do the same for SimpleExoPlayer object? Alternatively, Is there a way to pass an ExoPlayer to a SimpleExoPlayer object ?
Thanks,
android exoplayer
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I use Exoplayer 2.9.0 and Audio 360
There are two renderers:
val videoRenderer = MediaCodecVideoRenderer(mActivity, MediaCodecSelector.DEFAULT)
val audioRenderer = OpusRenderer(mVideoHelper.audio360Sink)
I know how to inject it to an Exoplayer Object:
val render = arrayOf(videoRenderer, audioRenderer)
Exoplyer exoPlayer = ExoPlayerFactory.newInstance(render ,DefaultTrackSelector())
However, I only use SimpleExoPlayer. I wonder how to do the same for SimpleExoPlayer object? Alternatively, Is there a way to pass an ExoPlayer to a SimpleExoPlayer object ?
Thanks,
android exoplayer
I use Exoplayer 2.9.0 and Audio 360
There are two renderers:
val videoRenderer = MediaCodecVideoRenderer(mActivity, MediaCodecSelector.DEFAULT)
val audioRenderer = OpusRenderer(mVideoHelper.audio360Sink)
I know how to inject it to an Exoplayer Object:
val render = arrayOf(videoRenderer, audioRenderer)
Exoplyer exoPlayer = ExoPlayerFactory.newInstance(render ,DefaultTrackSelector())
However, I only use SimpleExoPlayer. I wonder how to do the same for SimpleExoPlayer object? Alternatively, Is there a way to pass an ExoPlayer to a SimpleExoPlayer object ?
Thanks,
android exoplayer
android exoplayer
asked Nov 9 at 23:08
Kevin
132
132
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
SimpleExoPlayer
gets its Renderers
off of a RendererFactory
which is passed in during SimpleExo initialization. The usual one you see is the DefaultRendererFactory
.
If you really only need those two Renderers
then you could pass in your own implementation of the RendererFactory
which just returns those two. Or you can consider using DefaultRendererFactory
modifying it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53234406%2fhow-to-inject-a-renderer-to-simpleexoplayer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
SimpleExoPlayer
gets its Renderers
off of a RendererFactory
which is passed in during SimpleExo initialization. The usual one you see is the DefaultRendererFactory
.
If you really only need those two Renderers
then you could pass in your own implementation of the RendererFactory
which just returns those two. Or you can consider using DefaultRendererFactory
modifying it.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
SimpleExoPlayer
gets its Renderers
off of a RendererFactory
which is passed in during SimpleExo initialization. The usual one you see is the DefaultRendererFactory
.
If you really only need those two Renderers
then you could pass in your own implementation of the RendererFactory
which just returns those two. Or you can consider using DefaultRendererFactory
modifying it.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
SimpleExoPlayer
gets its Renderers
off of a RendererFactory
which is passed in during SimpleExo initialization. The usual one you see is the DefaultRendererFactory
.
If you really only need those two Renderers
then you could pass in your own implementation of the RendererFactory
which just returns those two. Or you can consider using DefaultRendererFactory
modifying it.
SimpleExoPlayer
gets its Renderers
off of a RendererFactory
which is passed in during SimpleExo initialization. The usual one you see is the DefaultRendererFactory
.
If you really only need those two Renderers
then you could pass in your own implementation of the RendererFactory
which just returns those two. Or you can consider using DefaultRendererFactory
modifying it.
answered Nov 10 at 14:18
Kyle Venn
1,774822
1,774822
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53234406%2fhow-to-inject-a-renderer-to-simpleexoplayer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown