Omnet++ Question: Using Standard Container Classes for Fields of abstract L3Address SlectedNodes[]; // will...
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to use Standard Container Classes for Fields of abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector? I have made the following message declaration:
enter code here
packet PacketData {
@customize(true);
abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector<L3Address >
}
In the generated C++ code i write the following C++ file :
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include "PacketData_m.h"
class PacketDataPacket : public PacketData_Base
{
protected:
std::vector<L3Address> SlectedNodes;// SlectedNodes= SlectedNodes
// helper method
void unsupported() {throw cRuntimeError("unsupported method called");}
public:
// SlectedNodes methods
virtual L3Address getSlectedNodes(unsigned int k) {return SlectedNodes[k];}
virtual void setSlectedNodes(unsigned int k, const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes[k]=L3Address& SlectedNodes;}
virtual void addSlectedNodes(const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes.push_back(L3Address& SlectedNodes);}
virtual void setSlectedNodesArraySize(unsigned int size)
{SlectedNodes.resize(size);}
virtualL3Address getSlectedNodesArraySize() const {return
SlectedNodes.size();}
};
Register_Class(PacketData);
Some additional boilerplate code
PacketData_Base::PacketData(const char *name=nullptr, int kind=0)
:PacketData_Base(name,kind) {
}
PacketData_Base:: PacketData(constPacketData& other)
:PacketData_Base(other.getName()) {
operator=(other);
}
PacketData& operator=(const PacketData& other) {
if (&other==this) return *this;
PacketData_Base::operator=(other);
SlectedNodes = other.SlectedNodes;
}
virtualPacketData *dup() {
return newPacketData(*this);
}
Is this use of standard container classes (STL) as fields, but of
std::vector< L3Address> IntVector;
is true? is there any wrong?
omnet++
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to use Standard Container Classes for Fields of abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector? I have made the following message declaration:
enter code here
packet PacketData {
@customize(true);
abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector<L3Address >
}
In the generated C++ code i write the following C++ file :
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include "PacketData_m.h"
class PacketDataPacket : public PacketData_Base
{
protected:
std::vector<L3Address> SlectedNodes;// SlectedNodes= SlectedNodes
// helper method
void unsupported() {throw cRuntimeError("unsupported method called");}
public:
// SlectedNodes methods
virtual L3Address getSlectedNodes(unsigned int k) {return SlectedNodes[k];}
virtual void setSlectedNodes(unsigned int k, const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes[k]=L3Address& SlectedNodes;}
virtual void addSlectedNodes(const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes.push_back(L3Address& SlectedNodes);}
virtual void setSlectedNodesArraySize(unsigned int size)
{SlectedNodes.resize(size);}
virtualL3Address getSlectedNodesArraySize() const {return
SlectedNodes.size();}
};
Register_Class(PacketData);
Some additional boilerplate code
PacketData_Base::PacketData(const char *name=nullptr, int kind=0)
:PacketData_Base(name,kind) {
}
PacketData_Base:: PacketData(constPacketData& other)
:PacketData_Base(other.getName()) {
operator=(other);
}
PacketData& operator=(const PacketData& other) {
if (&other==this) return *this;
PacketData_Base::operator=(other);
SlectedNodes = other.SlectedNodes;
}
virtualPacketData *dup() {
return newPacketData(*this);
}
Is this use of standard container classes (STL) as fields, but of
std::vector< L3Address> IntVector;
is true? is there any wrong?
omnet++
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to use Standard Container Classes for Fields of abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector? I have made the following message declaration:
enter code here
packet PacketData {
@customize(true);
abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector<L3Address >
}
In the generated C++ code i write the following C++ file :
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include "PacketData_m.h"
class PacketDataPacket : public PacketData_Base
{
protected:
std::vector<L3Address> SlectedNodes;// SlectedNodes= SlectedNodes
// helper method
void unsupported() {throw cRuntimeError("unsupported method called");}
public:
// SlectedNodes methods
virtual L3Address getSlectedNodes(unsigned int k) {return SlectedNodes[k];}
virtual void setSlectedNodes(unsigned int k, const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes[k]=L3Address& SlectedNodes;}
virtual void addSlectedNodes(const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes.push_back(L3Address& SlectedNodes);}
virtual void setSlectedNodesArraySize(unsigned int size)
{SlectedNodes.resize(size);}
virtualL3Address getSlectedNodesArraySize() const {return
SlectedNodes.size();}
};
Register_Class(PacketData);
Some additional boilerplate code
PacketData_Base::PacketData(const char *name=nullptr, int kind=0)
:PacketData_Base(name,kind) {
}
PacketData_Base:: PacketData(constPacketData& other)
:PacketData_Base(other.getName()) {
operator=(other);
}
PacketData& operator=(const PacketData& other) {
if (&other==this) return *this;
PacketData_Base::operator=(other);
SlectedNodes = other.SlectedNodes;
}
virtualPacketData *dup() {
return newPacketData(*this);
}
Is this use of standard container classes (STL) as fields, but of
std::vector< L3Address> IntVector;
is true? is there any wrong?
omnet++
I want to use Standard Container Classes for Fields of abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector? I have made the following message declaration:
enter code here
packet PacketData {
@customize(true);
abstract L3Address SlectedNodes; // will use std::vector<L3Address >
}
In the generated C++ code i write the following C++ file :
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include "PacketData_m.h"
class PacketDataPacket : public PacketData_Base
{
protected:
std::vector<L3Address> SlectedNodes;// SlectedNodes= SlectedNodes
// helper method
void unsupported() {throw cRuntimeError("unsupported method called");}
public:
// SlectedNodes methods
virtual L3Address getSlectedNodes(unsigned int k) {return SlectedNodes[k];}
virtual void setSlectedNodes(unsigned int k, const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes[k]=L3Address& SlectedNodes;}
virtual void addSlectedNodes(const L3Address& SlectedNodes)
{SlectedNodes.push_back(L3Address& SlectedNodes);}
virtual void setSlectedNodesArraySize(unsigned int size)
{SlectedNodes.resize(size);}
virtualL3Address getSlectedNodesArraySize() const {return
SlectedNodes.size();}
};
Register_Class(PacketData);
Some additional boilerplate code
PacketData_Base::PacketData(const char *name=nullptr, int kind=0)
:PacketData_Base(name,kind) {
}
PacketData_Base:: PacketData(constPacketData& other)
:PacketData_Base(other.getName()) {
operator=(other);
}
PacketData& operator=(const PacketData& other) {
if (&other==this) return *this;
PacketData_Base::operator=(other);
SlectedNodes = other.SlectedNodes;
}
virtualPacketData *dup() {
return newPacketData(*this);
}
Is this use of standard container classes (STL) as fields, but of
std::vector< L3Address> IntVector;
is true? is there any wrong?
omnet++
omnet++
edited Nov 9 at 20:20
DaFois
1,85041418
1,85041418
asked Nov 9 at 16:53
محمد عسيري
63
63
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53230120%2fomnet-question-using-standard-container-classes-for-fields-of-abstract-l3addr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53230120%2fomnet-question-using-standard-container-classes-for-fields-of-abstract-l3addr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown