Appending child's Json::Value after appending parent's Json::Value does not change parent data, any...
I am constructing json from tree data, but when i add node_level_3 from node_level_2 after adding node_level_2 from node_level_1, node_level_2 does not has information abour node_level_3.
Here is my code.
node_level_1 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_1)["data"] = first_value;
if (some_other_string != "")
{
node_level_2 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_2)["data"] = some_other_string ;
(*node_level_1)["child"].append(*node_level_2);
}
if (another_string!= "")
{
node_level_3 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_3) ["data"] = another_string;
(*node_level_2) ["child"].append(*node_level_3 );
}
I guess the problem is that 'Json::Value.append() function' only copy its data, not pointer or reference. So If i change data of node_level_2, it does not affect previously added node_level_2.
How can i solve this problem??
Should i have to traverse all the bottom nodes(level #3) of tree, and construct parent tree node (level #2) and finally add all the parent to root node(level #1)? Is this only solution With JsonCpp ?
c++ jsoncpp
|
show 1 more comment
I am constructing json from tree data, but when i add node_level_3 from node_level_2 after adding node_level_2 from node_level_1, node_level_2 does not has information abour node_level_3.
Here is my code.
node_level_1 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_1)["data"] = first_value;
if (some_other_string != "")
{
node_level_2 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_2)["data"] = some_other_string ;
(*node_level_1)["child"].append(*node_level_2);
}
if (another_string!= "")
{
node_level_3 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_3) ["data"] = another_string;
(*node_level_2) ["child"].append(*node_level_3 );
}
I guess the problem is that 'Json::Value.append() function' only copy its data, not pointer or reference. So If i change data of node_level_2, it does not affect previously added node_level_2.
How can i solve this problem??
Should i have to traverse all the bottom nodes(level #3) of tree, and construct parent tree node (level #2) and finally add all the parent to root node(level #1)? Is this only solution With JsonCpp ?
c++ jsoncpp
Why do you use so much dynamic allocation and pointers? And did you expect that dereferencing one would result in a reference? It is not clear what you're trying to do.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 2 at 17:23
I was trying to convert excel-like data(multiple rows & cols) to json format. I had to add each col's data in a row into each json level. So i don't know how much parent json node will add child node(at the same col level).
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:05
Anyway i implemented tree traversing mechanism from the bottom colum to root colum. So i don't need to change parent node anymore after adding child node.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:10
You neither need nor want any of this dynamic allocation. You're leaking memory like a sieve!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 3 at 11:17
Maybe i should delete all the appended data from Json tree after using it. Like deleting from child node to parent node, like recursively.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 4 at 14:34
|
show 1 more comment
I am constructing json from tree data, but when i add node_level_3 from node_level_2 after adding node_level_2 from node_level_1, node_level_2 does not has information abour node_level_3.
Here is my code.
node_level_1 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_1)["data"] = first_value;
if (some_other_string != "")
{
node_level_2 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_2)["data"] = some_other_string ;
(*node_level_1)["child"].append(*node_level_2);
}
if (another_string!= "")
{
node_level_3 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_3) ["data"] = another_string;
(*node_level_2) ["child"].append(*node_level_3 );
}
I guess the problem is that 'Json::Value.append() function' only copy its data, not pointer or reference. So If i change data of node_level_2, it does not affect previously added node_level_2.
How can i solve this problem??
Should i have to traverse all the bottom nodes(level #3) of tree, and construct parent tree node (level #2) and finally add all the parent to root node(level #1)? Is this only solution With JsonCpp ?
c++ jsoncpp
I am constructing json from tree data, but when i add node_level_3 from node_level_2 after adding node_level_2 from node_level_1, node_level_2 does not has information abour node_level_3.
Here is my code.
node_level_1 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_1)["data"] = first_value;
if (some_other_string != "")
{
node_level_2 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_2)["data"] = some_other_string ;
(*node_level_1)["child"].append(*node_level_2);
}
if (another_string!= "")
{
node_level_3 = new Json::Value();
(*node_level_3) ["data"] = another_string;
(*node_level_2) ["child"].append(*node_level_3 );
}
I guess the problem is that 'Json::Value.append() function' only copy its data, not pointer or reference. So If i change data of node_level_2, it does not affect previously added node_level_2.
How can i solve this problem??
Should i have to traverse all the bottom nodes(level #3) of tree, and construct parent tree node (level #2) and finally add all the parent to root node(level #1)? Is this only solution With JsonCpp ?
c++ jsoncpp
c++ jsoncpp
asked Nov 22 '18 at 13:02
Knowledge DrillingKnowledge Drilling
3591415
3591415
Why do you use so much dynamic allocation and pointers? And did you expect that dereferencing one would result in a reference? It is not clear what you're trying to do.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 2 at 17:23
I was trying to convert excel-like data(multiple rows & cols) to json format. I had to add each col's data in a row into each json level. So i don't know how much parent json node will add child node(at the same col level).
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:05
Anyway i implemented tree traversing mechanism from the bottom colum to root colum. So i don't need to change parent node anymore after adding child node.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:10
You neither need nor want any of this dynamic allocation. You're leaking memory like a sieve!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 3 at 11:17
Maybe i should delete all the appended data from Json tree after using it. Like deleting from child node to parent node, like recursively.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 4 at 14:34
|
show 1 more comment
Why do you use so much dynamic allocation and pointers? And did you expect that dereferencing one would result in a reference? It is not clear what you're trying to do.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 2 at 17:23
I was trying to convert excel-like data(multiple rows & cols) to json format. I had to add each col's data in a row into each json level. So i don't know how much parent json node will add child node(at the same col level).
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:05
Anyway i implemented tree traversing mechanism from the bottom colum to root colum. So i don't need to change parent node anymore after adding child node.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:10
You neither need nor want any of this dynamic allocation. You're leaking memory like a sieve!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 3 at 11:17
Maybe i should delete all the appended data from Json tree after using it. Like deleting from child node to parent node, like recursively.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 4 at 14:34
Why do you use so much dynamic allocation and pointers? And did you expect that dereferencing one would result in a reference? It is not clear what you're trying to do.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 2 at 17:23
Why do you use so much dynamic allocation and pointers? And did you expect that dereferencing one would result in a reference? It is not clear what you're trying to do.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 2 at 17:23
I was trying to convert excel-like data(multiple rows & cols) to json format. I had to add each col's data in a row into each json level. So i don't know how much parent json node will add child node(at the same col level).
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:05
I was trying to convert excel-like data(multiple rows & cols) to json format. I had to add each col's data in a row into each json level. So i don't know how much parent json node will add child node(at the same col level).
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:05
Anyway i implemented tree traversing mechanism from the bottom colum to root colum. So i don't need to change parent node anymore after adding child node.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:10
Anyway i implemented tree traversing mechanism from the bottom colum to root colum. So i don't need to change parent node anymore after adding child node.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:10
You neither need nor want any of this dynamic allocation. You're leaking memory like a sieve!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 3 at 11:17
You neither need nor want any of this dynamic allocation. You're leaking memory like a sieve!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 3 at 11:17
Maybe i should delete all the appended data from Json tree after using it. Like deleting from child node to parent node, like recursively.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 4 at 14:34
Maybe i should delete all the appended data from Json tree after using it. Like deleting from child node to parent node, like recursively.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 4 at 14:34
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53431646%2fappending-childs-jsonvalue-after-appending-parents-jsonvalue-does-not-chan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53431646%2fappending-childs-jsonvalue-after-appending-parents-jsonvalue-does-not-chan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why do you use so much dynamic allocation and pointers? And did you expect that dereferencing one would result in a reference? It is not clear what you're trying to do.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 2 at 17:23
I was trying to convert excel-like data(multiple rows & cols) to json format. I had to add each col's data in a row into each json level. So i don't know how much parent json node will add child node(at the same col level).
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:05
Anyway i implemented tree traversing mechanism from the bottom colum to root colum. So i don't need to change parent node anymore after adding child node.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 3 at 11:10
You neither need nor want any of this dynamic allocation. You're leaking memory like a sieve!
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Jan 3 at 11:17
Maybe i should delete all the appended data from Json tree after using it. Like deleting from child node to parent node, like recursively.
– Knowledge Drilling
Jan 4 at 14:34