dynamically construct an array out of existing strings without new malloc












0















I want to dynamically allocate an array of strings.
So arr should consist of twenty pointers to the first character of each string.



For simplicity, each string is just the same, stored in base.
The first for loop should now create my array, which seems to work just fine.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main()
{
int n = 20;
char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n );

char* base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;
}

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
printf("%sn", *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i));
}
}


The seconds for loop creates a segmentation-fault during the second iteration.










share|improve this question


















  • 6





    sizeof(char*) + n is a problem

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:43






  • 2





    arr[i] is *(arr + i), not *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i). You have to use the sizeof operator only with the functions that operate on raw data via void * pointers. In the pointer arithmetic above, the size of one element is inferred from arr's type.

    – M Oehm
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:45













  • I hope you don't want to modify the things, your arr[0 ... 19] point to.

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:56











  • sizeof(char*) + n is actually a paste mistake

    – Core
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:01
















0















I want to dynamically allocate an array of strings.
So arr should consist of twenty pointers to the first character of each string.



For simplicity, each string is just the same, stored in base.
The first for loop should now create my array, which seems to work just fine.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main()
{
int n = 20;
char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n );

char* base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;
}

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
printf("%sn", *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i));
}
}


The seconds for loop creates a segmentation-fault during the second iteration.










share|improve this question


















  • 6





    sizeof(char*) + n is a problem

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:43






  • 2





    arr[i] is *(arr + i), not *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i). You have to use the sizeof operator only with the functions that operate on raw data via void * pointers. In the pointer arithmetic above, the size of one element is inferred from arr's type.

    – M Oehm
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:45













  • I hope you don't want to modify the things, your arr[0 ... 19] point to.

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:56











  • sizeof(char*) + n is actually a paste mistake

    – Core
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:01














0












0








0








I want to dynamically allocate an array of strings.
So arr should consist of twenty pointers to the first character of each string.



For simplicity, each string is just the same, stored in base.
The first for loop should now create my array, which seems to work just fine.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main()
{
int n = 20;
char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n );

char* base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;
}

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
printf("%sn", *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i));
}
}


The seconds for loop creates a segmentation-fault during the second iteration.










share|improve this question














I want to dynamically allocate an array of strings.
So arr should consist of twenty pointers to the first character of each string.



For simplicity, each string is just the same, stored in base.
The first for loop should now create my array, which seems to work just fine.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main()
{
int n = 20;
char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n );

char* base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;
}

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
printf("%sn", *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i));
}
}


The seconds for loop creates a segmentation-fault during the second iteration.







c pointers segmentation-fault malloc






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 19:41









CoreCore

664




664








  • 6





    sizeof(char*) + n is a problem

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:43






  • 2





    arr[i] is *(arr + i), not *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i). You have to use the sizeof operator only with the functions that operate on raw data via void * pointers. In the pointer arithmetic above, the size of one element is inferred from arr's type.

    – M Oehm
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:45













  • I hope you don't want to modify the things, your arr[0 ... 19] point to.

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:56











  • sizeof(char*) + n is actually a paste mistake

    – Core
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:01














  • 6





    sizeof(char*) + n is a problem

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:43






  • 2





    arr[i] is *(arr + i), not *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i). You have to use the sizeof operator only with the functions that operate on raw data via void * pointers. In the pointer arithmetic above, the size of one element is inferred from arr's type.

    – M Oehm
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:45













  • I hope you don't want to modify the things, your arr[0 ... 19] point to.

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:56











  • sizeof(char*) + n is actually a paste mistake

    – Core
    Nov 22 '18 at 9:01








6




6





sizeof(char*) + n is a problem

– David Bowling
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43





sizeof(char*) + n is a problem

– David Bowling
Nov 21 '18 at 19:43




2




2





arr[i] is *(arr + i), not *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i). You have to use the sizeof operator only with the functions that operate on raw data via void * pointers. In the pointer arithmetic above, the size of one element is inferred from arr's type.

– M Oehm
Nov 21 '18 at 19:45







arr[i] is *(arr + i), not *(arr + sizeof(char*) * i). You have to use the sizeof operator only with the functions that operate on raw data via void * pointers. In the pointer arithmetic above, the size of one element is inferred from arr's type.

– M Oehm
Nov 21 '18 at 19:45















I hope you don't want to modify the things, your arr[0 ... 19] point to.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 19:56





I hope you don't want to modify the things, your arr[0 ... 19] point to.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 19:56













sizeof(char*) + n is actually a paste mistake

– Core
Nov 22 '18 at 9:01





sizeof(char*) + n is actually a paste mistake

– Core
Nov 22 '18 at 9:01












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














Issues




  1. char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n ); allocates (most likely) 24 bytes which can only store (most likely) six char *.


  2. You don't need to try offset the address (*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;) by the base type. The offset is automatically adjusted by the sizeof the base type.



The following changes must be made:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(void)
{
int n = 20;
char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);

char *base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
arr[i] = base;

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
printf("%d: %sn", i, arr[i]);

return 0;
}


The preceding uses array notation. You can also use pointer notation if you'd like. Change arr[i] to *(arr + i).



Output




$ gcc main.c -o main.exe; ./main.exe
0: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
2: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
3: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
4: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
5: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
6: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
7: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
8: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
9: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
10: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
11: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
12: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
13: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
14: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
15: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
16: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
17: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
18: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
19: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz


As recommended by Swordfish you should use the const qualifier on arr and base:



const char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);
const char * const base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";


In this way:





  1. arr cannot change (without a warning/error) pointed to chars.

  2. Neither the address of base nor the pointed to chars can be changed (without a warning/error).


Thanks



To Tim Randall for catching a math error.






share|improve this answer


























  • @TimRandall Thanks for catching my math error.

    – Fiddling Bits
    Nov 21 '18 at 20:08











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419444%2fdynamically-construct-an-array-out-of-existing-strings-without-new-malloc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Issues




  1. char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n ); allocates (most likely) 24 bytes which can only store (most likely) six char *.


  2. You don't need to try offset the address (*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;) by the base type. The offset is automatically adjusted by the sizeof the base type.



The following changes must be made:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(void)
{
int n = 20;
char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);

char *base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
arr[i] = base;

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
printf("%d: %sn", i, arr[i]);

return 0;
}


The preceding uses array notation. You can also use pointer notation if you'd like. Change arr[i] to *(arr + i).



Output




$ gcc main.c -o main.exe; ./main.exe
0: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
2: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
3: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
4: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
5: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
6: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
7: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
8: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
9: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
10: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
11: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
12: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
13: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
14: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
15: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
16: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
17: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
18: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
19: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz


As recommended by Swordfish you should use the const qualifier on arr and base:



const char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);
const char * const base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";


In this way:





  1. arr cannot change (without a warning/error) pointed to chars.

  2. Neither the address of base nor the pointed to chars can be changed (without a warning/error).


Thanks



To Tim Randall for catching a math error.






share|improve this answer


























  • @TimRandall Thanks for catching my math error.

    – Fiddling Bits
    Nov 21 '18 at 20:08
















5














Issues




  1. char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n ); allocates (most likely) 24 bytes which can only store (most likely) six char *.


  2. You don't need to try offset the address (*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;) by the base type. The offset is automatically adjusted by the sizeof the base type.



The following changes must be made:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(void)
{
int n = 20;
char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);

char *base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
arr[i] = base;

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
printf("%d: %sn", i, arr[i]);

return 0;
}


The preceding uses array notation. You can also use pointer notation if you'd like. Change arr[i] to *(arr + i).



Output




$ gcc main.c -o main.exe; ./main.exe
0: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
2: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
3: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
4: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
5: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
6: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
7: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
8: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
9: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
10: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
11: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
12: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
13: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
14: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
15: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
16: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
17: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
18: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
19: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz


As recommended by Swordfish you should use the const qualifier on arr and base:



const char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);
const char * const base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";


In this way:





  1. arr cannot change (without a warning/error) pointed to chars.

  2. Neither the address of base nor the pointed to chars can be changed (without a warning/error).


Thanks



To Tim Randall for catching a math error.






share|improve this answer


























  • @TimRandall Thanks for catching my math error.

    – Fiddling Bits
    Nov 21 '18 at 20:08














5












5








5







Issues




  1. char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n ); allocates (most likely) 24 bytes which can only store (most likely) six char *.


  2. You don't need to try offset the address (*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;) by the base type. The offset is automatically adjusted by the sizeof the base type.



The following changes must be made:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(void)
{
int n = 20;
char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);

char *base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
arr[i] = base;

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
printf("%d: %sn", i, arr[i]);

return 0;
}


The preceding uses array notation. You can also use pointer notation if you'd like. Change arr[i] to *(arr + i).



Output




$ gcc main.c -o main.exe; ./main.exe
0: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
2: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
3: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
4: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
5: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
6: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
7: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
8: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
9: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
10: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
11: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
12: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
13: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
14: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
15: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
16: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
17: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
18: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
19: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz


As recommended by Swordfish you should use the const qualifier on arr and base:



const char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);
const char * const base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";


In this way:





  1. arr cannot change (without a warning/error) pointed to chars.

  2. Neither the address of base nor the pointed to chars can be changed (without a warning/error).


Thanks



To Tim Randall for catching a math error.






share|improve this answer















Issues




  1. char** arr = malloc( sizeof(char*) + n ); allocates (most likely) 24 bytes which can only store (most likely) six char *.


  2. You don't need to try offset the address (*(arr + sizeof(char*) * i) = base;) by the base type. The offset is automatically adjusted by the sizeof the base type.



The following changes must be made:



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int main(void)
{
int n = 20;
char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);

char *base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
arr[i] = base;

for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
printf("%d: %sn", i, arr[i]);

return 0;
}


The preceding uses array notation. You can also use pointer notation if you'd like. Change arr[i] to *(arr + i).



Output




$ gcc main.c -o main.exe; ./main.exe
0: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
2: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
3: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
4: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
5: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
6: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
7: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
8: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
9: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
10: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
11: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
12: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
13: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
14: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
15: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
16: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
17: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
18: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
19: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz


As recommended by Swordfish you should use the const qualifier on arr and base:



const char **arr = malloc(sizeof(char *) * n);
const char * const base = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";


In this way:





  1. arr cannot change (without a warning/error) pointed to chars.

  2. Neither the address of base nor the pointed to chars can be changed (without a warning/error).


Thanks



To Tim Randall for catching a math error.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 21 '18 at 20:05

























answered Nov 21 '18 at 19:50









Fiddling BitsFiddling Bits

7,12821939




7,12821939













  • @TimRandall Thanks for catching my math error.

    – Fiddling Bits
    Nov 21 '18 at 20:08



















  • @TimRandall Thanks for catching my math error.

    – Fiddling Bits
    Nov 21 '18 at 20:08

















@TimRandall Thanks for catching my math error.

– Fiddling Bits
Nov 21 '18 at 20:08





@TimRandall Thanks for catching my math error.

– Fiddling Bits
Nov 21 '18 at 20:08




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419444%2fdynamically-construct-an-array-out-of-existing-strings-without-new-malloc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

Zucchini