How can I handle this “which is not a subtype of overridden” error
I'm trying to write some validatable form interface in Kotlin. In the validation part I'm using https://github.com/kamedon/Validation.
Here is the very simple code I'm trying to run;
import com.kamedon.validation.Validation
abstract class Validatable {
abstract val validation: Validation<Any>
fun validate() = validation.validate(this)
}
class LoginForm : Validatable() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validation = Validation<LoginForm> {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
}
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val user = LoginForm()
val result = user.validate()
println(result)
}
This code gives me;
Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<out Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Out-projected type 'Validation<out Any>' prohibits the use of 'public final fun validate(value: T): Map<String, List<String>> defined in com.kamedon.validation.Validation'
If I use Validation<in Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<in Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<Any>
instead of Validation<LoginForm>
in LoginForm, the code runs but this time name and age inside of validation
are used from the class inside itself. I don't want to change this in respect of the usage of the library.
Is there anyway to use in
and out
keywords together or may be there is another way to achieve my goal.
generics kotlin generic-variance type-projection
add a comment |
I'm trying to write some validatable form interface in Kotlin. In the validation part I'm using https://github.com/kamedon/Validation.
Here is the very simple code I'm trying to run;
import com.kamedon.validation.Validation
abstract class Validatable {
abstract val validation: Validation<Any>
fun validate() = validation.validate(this)
}
class LoginForm : Validatable() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validation = Validation<LoginForm> {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
}
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val user = LoginForm()
val result = user.validate()
println(result)
}
This code gives me;
Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<out Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Out-projected type 'Validation<out Any>' prohibits the use of 'public final fun validate(value: T): Map<String, List<String>> defined in com.kamedon.validation.Validation'
If I use Validation<in Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<in Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<Any>
instead of Validation<LoginForm>
in LoginForm, the code runs but this time name and age inside of validation
are used from the class inside itself. I don't want to change this in respect of the usage of the library.
Is there anyway to use in
and out
keywords together or may be there is another way to achieve my goal.
generics kotlin generic-variance type-projection
add a comment |
I'm trying to write some validatable form interface in Kotlin. In the validation part I'm using https://github.com/kamedon/Validation.
Here is the very simple code I'm trying to run;
import com.kamedon.validation.Validation
abstract class Validatable {
abstract val validation: Validation<Any>
fun validate() = validation.validate(this)
}
class LoginForm : Validatable() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validation = Validation<LoginForm> {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
}
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val user = LoginForm()
val result = user.validate()
println(result)
}
This code gives me;
Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<out Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Out-projected type 'Validation<out Any>' prohibits the use of 'public final fun validate(value: T): Map<String, List<String>> defined in com.kamedon.validation.Validation'
If I use Validation<in Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<in Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<Any>
instead of Validation<LoginForm>
in LoginForm, the code runs but this time name and age inside of validation
are used from the class inside itself. I don't want to change this in respect of the usage of the library.
Is there anyway to use in
and out
keywords together or may be there is another way to achieve my goal.
generics kotlin generic-variance type-projection
I'm trying to write some validatable form interface in Kotlin. In the validation part I'm using https://github.com/kamedon/Validation.
Here is the very simple code I'm trying to run;
import com.kamedon.validation.Validation
abstract class Validatable {
abstract val validation: Validation<Any>
fun validate() = validation.validate(this)
}
class LoginForm : Validatable() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validation = Validation<LoginForm> {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
}
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val user = LoginForm()
val result = user.validate()
println(result)
}
This code gives me;
Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<out Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Out-projected type 'Validation<out Any>' prohibits the use of 'public final fun validate(value: T): Map<String, List<String>> defined in com.kamedon.validation.Validation'
If I use Validation<in Any>
in Validatable it says;
Kotlin: Type of 'validation' is not a subtype of the overridden property 'public abstract val validation: Validation<in Any> defined in Validatable'
If I use Validation<Any>
instead of Validation<LoginForm>
in LoginForm, the code runs but this time name and age inside of validation
are used from the class inside itself. I don't want to change this in respect of the usage of the library.
Is there anyway to use in
and out
keywords together or may be there is another way to achieve my goal.
generics kotlin generic-variance type-projection
generics kotlin generic-variance type-projection
asked Nov 21 '18 at 7:56
Onur Eren ElibolOnur Eren Elibol
1711110
1711110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You could make the abstract class Validatable
a generic class, and make the subclass provide an object which exposes both the Validation
object, and also itself as the target
to validate, e.g.
abstract class Validatable<T> {
protected class ValidationInfo<T>(val target: T, val validation: Validation<T>)
protected abstract val validationInfo: ValidationInfo<T>
fun validate() = validationInfo.let { it.validation.validate(it.target) }
}
class LoginForm : Validatable<LoginForm>() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validationInfo = ValidationInfo(this, Validation {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
})
}
I tried this but this time validation.validate(this) doesn't work. it requiresthis
asT
but receivesValidatable<T>
. Compiler complains for this.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 8:28
Yup, you're right, my mistake. I've updated my answer with a slightly different approach, though I think there must be a better way of doing this.
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 21 '18 at 9:00
Very clever solution. Thank you.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 10:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53407487%2fhow-can-i-handle-this-which-is-not-a-subtype-of-overridden-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You could make the abstract class Validatable
a generic class, and make the subclass provide an object which exposes both the Validation
object, and also itself as the target
to validate, e.g.
abstract class Validatable<T> {
protected class ValidationInfo<T>(val target: T, val validation: Validation<T>)
protected abstract val validationInfo: ValidationInfo<T>
fun validate() = validationInfo.let { it.validation.validate(it.target) }
}
class LoginForm : Validatable<LoginForm>() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validationInfo = ValidationInfo(this, Validation {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
})
}
I tried this but this time validation.validate(this) doesn't work. it requiresthis
asT
but receivesValidatable<T>
. Compiler complains for this.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 8:28
Yup, you're right, my mistake. I've updated my answer with a slightly different approach, though I think there must be a better way of doing this.
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 21 '18 at 9:00
Very clever solution. Thank you.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 10:38
add a comment |
You could make the abstract class Validatable
a generic class, and make the subclass provide an object which exposes both the Validation
object, and also itself as the target
to validate, e.g.
abstract class Validatable<T> {
protected class ValidationInfo<T>(val target: T, val validation: Validation<T>)
protected abstract val validationInfo: ValidationInfo<T>
fun validate() = validationInfo.let { it.validation.validate(it.target) }
}
class LoginForm : Validatable<LoginForm>() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validationInfo = ValidationInfo(this, Validation {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
})
}
I tried this but this time validation.validate(this) doesn't work. it requiresthis
asT
but receivesValidatable<T>
. Compiler complains for this.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 8:28
Yup, you're right, my mistake. I've updated my answer with a slightly different approach, though I think there must be a better way of doing this.
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 21 '18 at 9:00
Very clever solution. Thank you.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 10:38
add a comment |
You could make the abstract class Validatable
a generic class, and make the subclass provide an object which exposes both the Validation
object, and also itself as the target
to validate, e.g.
abstract class Validatable<T> {
protected class ValidationInfo<T>(val target: T, val validation: Validation<T>)
protected abstract val validationInfo: ValidationInfo<T>
fun validate() = validationInfo.let { it.validation.validate(it.target) }
}
class LoginForm : Validatable<LoginForm>() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validationInfo = ValidationInfo(this, Validation {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
})
}
You could make the abstract class Validatable
a generic class, and make the subclass provide an object which exposes both the Validation
object, and also itself as the target
to validate, e.g.
abstract class Validatable<T> {
protected class ValidationInfo<T>(val target: T, val validation: Validation<T>)
protected abstract val validationInfo: ValidationInfo<T>
fun validate() = validationInfo.let { it.validation.validate(it.target) }
}
class LoginForm : Validatable<LoginForm>() {
val name: String = "Onur"
val age: Int = 23
override val validationInfo = ValidationInfo(this, Validation {
"name" {
be { name.length >= 5 } not "5 characters or more"
be { name.length <= 10 } not "10 characters or less"
}
"age" {
be { age >= 20 } not "Over 20 years old"
}
})
}
edited Nov 21 '18 at 9:02
answered Nov 21 '18 at 8:08
Yoni GibbsYoni Gibbs
1,368113
1,368113
I tried this but this time validation.validate(this) doesn't work. it requiresthis
asT
but receivesValidatable<T>
. Compiler complains for this.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 8:28
Yup, you're right, my mistake. I've updated my answer with a slightly different approach, though I think there must be a better way of doing this.
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 21 '18 at 9:00
Very clever solution. Thank you.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 10:38
add a comment |
I tried this but this time validation.validate(this) doesn't work. it requiresthis
asT
but receivesValidatable<T>
. Compiler complains for this.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 8:28
Yup, you're right, my mistake. I've updated my answer with a slightly different approach, though I think there must be a better way of doing this.
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 21 '18 at 9:00
Very clever solution. Thank you.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 10:38
I tried this but this time validation.validate(this) doesn't work. it requires
this
as T
but receives Validatable<T>
. Compiler complains for this.– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 8:28
I tried this but this time validation.validate(this) doesn't work. it requires
this
as T
but receives Validatable<T>
. Compiler complains for this.– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 8:28
Yup, you're right, my mistake. I've updated my answer with a slightly different approach, though I think there must be a better way of doing this.
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 21 '18 at 9:00
Yup, you're right, my mistake. I've updated my answer with a slightly different approach, though I think there must be a better way of doing this.
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 21 '18 at 9:00
Very clever solution. Thank you.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 10:38
Very clever solution. Thank you.
– Onur Eren Elibol
Nov 21 '18 at 10:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53407487%2fhow-can-i-handle-this-which-is-not-a-subtype-of-overridden-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown