WorkManager: Call doWork() immediately for test purposes











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












If I have a PeriodicWorkRequest I can set a time intervall - which minimum is 15 minutes.
But how can I test if my doWork() method is working without waiting for 15 minutes?



Is it maybe possible to use OneTimeWorkRequest for test purposes?



Thanks in advance






android android-architecture-components android-workmanager







share|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    If I have a PeriodicWorkRequest I can set a time intervall - which minimum is 15 minutes.
    But how can I test if my doWork() method is working without waiting for 15 minutes?



    Is it maybe possible to use OneTimeWorkRequest for test purposes?



    Thanks in advance






    android android-architecture-components android-workmanager







    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      If I have a PeriodicWorkRequest I can set a time intervall - which minimum is 15 minutes.
      But how can I test if my doWork() method is working without waiting for 15 minutes?



      Is it maybe possible to use OneTimeWorkRequest for test purposes?



      Thanks in advance






      android android-architecture-components android-workmanager







      share|improve this question















      If I have a PeriodicWorkRequest I can set a time intervall - which minimum is 15 minutes.
      But how can I test if my doWork() method is working without waiting for 15 minutes?



      Is it maybe possible to use OneTimeWorkRequest for test purposes?



      Thanks in advance






      android android-architecture-components android-workmanager




      android android-architecture-components android-workmanager






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 5 at 17:30









      ianhanniballake

      101k14208220




      101k14208220










      asked Nov 5 at 17:25









      hideous

      456




      456
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, there is nothing stopping you from using OneTimeWorkRequest.



          val work = OneTimeWorkRequest.Builder(MyWorker::class.java).build()
          
WorkManager.getInstance().enqueue(work)


          Bear in mind, that this will not allow you to test that your Worker will fire after a set number of minutes, like when using PeriodicWorkRequest. It will however let you test that your code works, without needing to wait.






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53159273%2fworkmanager-call-dowork-immediately-for-test-purposes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest


















            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Yes, there is nothing stopping you from using OneTimeWorkRequest.



            val work = OneTimeWorkRequest.Builder(MyWorker::class.java).build()
            
WorkManager.getInstance().enqueue(work)


            Bear in mind, that this will not allow you to test that your Worker will fire after a set number of minutes, like when using PeriodicWorkRequest. It will however let you test that your code works, without needing to wait.






            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              Yes, there is nothing stopping you from using OneTimeWorkRequest.



              val work = OneTimeWorkRequest.Builder(MyWorker::class.java).build()
              
WorkManager.getInstance().enqueue(work)


              Bear in mind, that this will not allow you to test that your Worker will fire after a set number of minutes, like when using PeriodicWorkRequest. It will however let you test that your code works, without needing to wait.






              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                Yes, there is nothing stopping you from using OneTimeWorkRequest.



                val work = OneTimeWorkRequest.Builder(MyWorker::class.java).build()
                
WorkManager.getInstance().enqueue(work)


                Bear in mind, that this will not allow you to test that your Worker will fire after a set number of minutes, like when using PeriodicWorkRequest. It will however let you test that your code works, without needing to wait.






                share|improve this answer












                Yes, there is nothing stopping you from using OneTimeWorkRequest.



                val work = OneTimeWorkRequest.Builder(MyWorker::class.java).build()
                
WorkManager.getInstance().enqueue(work)


                Bear in mind, that this will not allow you to test that your Worker will fire after a set number of minutes, like when using PeriodicWorkRequest. It will however let you test that your code works, without needing to wait.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 7 at 8:56









                Knossos

                11.2k73970




                11.2k73970






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53159273%2fworkmanager-call-dowork-immediately-for-test-purposes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest






































































                    -

                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Hercules Kyvelos

                    圖片
                    Hercules Kyvelos Statistics Real name Hercules Kyvelos Nickname(s) The God Weight(s) Middleweight Light Middleweight Welterweight Height 5 ft 10 in (180 cm) Reach 72 in (183 cm) Nationality Canadian Born ( 1975-02-25 ) February 25, 1975 (age 43) Montreal, Quebec Stance Orthodox Boxing record Total fights 27 Wins 24 Wins by KO 12 Losses 3 Draws 0 No contests 0 Hercules Kyvelos Medal record Men's Boxing Representing   Canada Pan American Games 1995 Mar del Plata Welterweight Hercules Kyvelos (born February 25, 1975) is a Greek-Canadian boxer in the Welterweight division and is the former Canadian Welterweight Champion. [1] He fought at the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia. Contents 1 Early life 2 Amateur career 3 Pro career 3.1 WBO Welterweight Championship 3.2 Personal life 4 References 5 External links Early life Hercules was born in
                    閱讀完整內容

                    Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

                    圖片
                    7 1 I am trying to replicate a diagram and have a minimal example. I don't know how to add additional tangents between the specified points and preserve smoothness. documentclass{article} usepackage{tikz} usetikzlibrary{calc,intersections} begin{document} begin{tikzpicture} % Axes draw [->, name path=x] (-1,0) -- (11,0) node [right] {$x$}; draw [->] (0,-1) -- (0,6) node [above] {$y$}; % Origin node at (0,0) [below left] {$0$}; % Points coordinate (start) at (1,-0.8); coordinate (c1) at (3,3); coordinate (c2) at (5.5,1.5); coordinate (c3) at (8,4); coordinate (end) at (10.5,-0.8); % show the points foreach n in {start,c1,c2,c3,end} fill [black] (n) circle (2pt) node [below] {}; % join the coordinates draw [thick,name path=curve] (start) to[out=70,in=180] (c1) to[out=0,in=180]
                    閱讀完整內容

                    Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

                    圖片
                    Main article: Taifa of Zaragoza Al-Mu'taman Ruler of Zaragoza Reign 1081–1085 Predecessor Ahmad al-Muqtadir Successor Al-Mustain II Born Zaragoza Died 1085 Full name Yusuf ibn Ahmad al-Mu'taman ibn Hūd House Banu Hud Yusuf ibn Ahmad al-Mu'taman ibn Hūd (Arabic: المؤتمن بالله يوسف إبن أحمد إبن هود ‎, al-Mutaman bi l-Lah , died c. 1085) was the third king of the Banu Hud dynasty who ruled over the Taifa of Zaragoza from 1081 to 1085. Yusuf al-Mutaman reigned during the height of power of Muslim Zaragoza , following the thriving period of his father Ahmad al-Muqtadir. He continued his father's efforts and created around him a court of intellectuals, living in the beautiful palace of Aljafería, nicknamed as "the palace of joy". Al-Mu'taman was also a scholarly king and a patron of science, philosophy and arts. As an example of a wise king, he knew astrology, philosophy, and especially mathematics, a discipline in which
                    閱讀完整內容