Getting Sum of a Class Attribute (of type integer) In all Instances
Say that I have a class as such:
class Test {
var Test_Value: Int
init?(Detail_Test_Value: Int) {
self.Test_Value = Detail_Test_Value
}
}
Test_Value is an integer class attribute. Say I have many instances of the class Test, all with unique values of Test_Value. What I aim to do is to obtain the sum of Test_Value from all of the instances. What are potential ways of doing this?
swift
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
add a comment |
Say that I have a class as such:
class Test {
var Test_Value: Int
init?(Detail_Test_Value: Int) {
self.Test_Value = Detail_Test_Value
}
}
Test_Value is an integer class attribute. Say I have many instances of the class Test, all with unique values of Test_Value. What I aim to do is to obtain the sum of Test_Value from all of the instances. What are potential ways of doing this?
swift
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
add a comment |
Say that I have a class as such:
class Test {
var Test_Value: Int
init?(Detail_Test_Value: Int) {
self.Test_Value = Detail_Test_Value
}
}
Test_Value is an integer class attribute. Say I have many instances of the class Test, all with unique values of Test_Value. What I aim to do is to obtain the sum of Test_Value from all of the instances. What are potential ways of doing this?
swift
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
Say that I have a class as such:
class Test {
var Test_Value: Int
init?(Detail_Test_Value: Int) {
self.Test_Value = Detail_Test_Value
}
}
Test_Value is an integer class attribute. Say I have many instances of the class Test, all with unique values of Test_Value. What I aim to do is to obtain the sum of Test_Value from all of the instances. What are potential ways of doing this?
swift
swift
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
edited Nov 12 '18 at 5:06
rmaddy
238k27309375
238k27309375
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
asked Nov 12 '18 at 4:37
Lucas W
288
288
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is no magical "all instances of a class that I've created" function in Swift that I am aware of.
In order to sum up the values of all of your Test instances you need a way to track them all. You could add a class variable to hold an array of all of them, but you'd have to deal with the fact that that would cause them to all be held strongly and could cause a memory leak.
Edit:
See this link for various ways to manage an array of weak references: https://marcosantadev.com/swift-arrays-holding-elements-weak-references/
(I suggest the WeakRef approach at the end.)
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
XCode has a memory debugger, which lists all instances(addresses) of a class at runtime. I am wondering how is XCode doing it? When we enable memory debugger, the debugging gets paused, so I guess at that moment Memory Debugger starts looking up memory addresses. The question is how are they doing it?
– Puneet Sharma
Nov 12 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53256040%2fgetting-sum-of-a-class-attribute-of-type-integer-in-all-instances%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no magical "all instances of a class that I've created" function in Swift that I am aware of.
In order to sum up the values of all of your Test instances you need a way to track them all. You could add a class variable to hold an array of all of them, but you'd have to deal with the fact that that would cause them to all be held strongly and could cause a memory leak.
Edit:
See this link for various ways to manage an array of weak references: https://marcosantadev.com/swift-arrays-holding-elements-weak-references/
(I suggest the WeakRef approach at the end.)
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
XCode has a memory debugger, which lists all instances(addresses) of a class at runtime. I am wondering how is XCode doing it? When we enable memory debugger, the debugging gets paused, so I guess at that moment Memory Debugger starts looking up memory addresses. The question is how are they doing it?
– Puneet Sharma
Nov 12 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
There is no magical "all instances of a class that I've created" function in Swift that I am aware of.
In order to sum up the values of all of your Test instances you need a way to track them all. You could add a class variable to hold an array of all of them, but you'd have to deal with the fact that that would cause them to all be held strongly and could cause a memory leak.
Edit:
See this link for various ways to manage an array of weak references: https://marcosantadev.com/swift-arrays-holding-elements-weak-references/
(I suggest the WeakRef approach at the end.)
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
XCode has a memory debugger, which lists all instances(addresses) of a class at runtime. I am wondering how is XCode doing it? When we enable memory debugger, the debugging gets paused, so I guess at that moment Memory Debugger starts looking up memory addresses. The question is how are they doing it?
– Puneet Sharma
Nov 12 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
There is no magical "all instances of a class that I've created" function in Swift that I am aware of.
In order to sum up the values of all of your Test instances you need a way to track them all. You could add a class variable to hold an array of all of them, but you'd have to deal with the fact that that would cause them to all be held strongly and could cause a memory leak.
Edit:
See this link for various ways to manage an array of weak references: https://marcosantadev.com/swift-arrays-holding-elements-weak-references/
(I suggest the WeakRef approach at the end.)
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
There is no magical "all instances of a class that I've created" function in Swift that I am aware of.
In order to sum up the values of all of your Test instances you need a way to track them all. You could add a class variable to hold an array of all of them, but you'd have to deal with the fact that that would cause them to all be held strongly and could cause a memory leak.
Edit:
See this link for various ways to manage an array of weak references: https://marcosantadev.com/swift-arrays-holding-elements-weak-references/
(I suggest the WeakRef approach at the end.)
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
answered Nov 12 '18 at 4:41
Duncan C
92k13114196
92k13114196
XCode has a memory debugger, which lists all instances(addresses) of a class at runtime. I am wondering how is XCode doing it? When we enable memory debugger, the debugging gets paused, so I guess at that moment Memory Debugger starts looking up memory addresses. The question is how are they doing it?
– Puneet Sharma
Nov 12 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
XCode has a memory debugger, which lists all instances(addresses) of a class at runtime. I am wondering how is XCode doing it? When we enable memory debugger, the debugging gets paused, so I guess at that moment Memory Debugger starts looking up memory addresses. The question is how are they doing it?
– Puneet Sharma
Nov 12 '18 at 6:50
XCode has a memory debugger, which lists all instances(addresses) of a class at runtime. I am wondering how is XCode doing it? When we enable memory debugger, the debugging gets paused, so I guess at that moment Memory Debugger starts looking up memory addresses. The question is how are they doing it?
– Puneet Sharma
Nov 12 '18 at 6:50
XCode has a memory debugger, which lists all instances(addresses) of a class at runtime. I am wondering how is XCode doing it? When we enable memory debugger, the debugging gets paused, so I guess at that moment Memory Debugger starts looking up memory addresses. The question is how are they doing it?
– Puneet Sharma
Nov 12 '18 at 6:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53256040%2fgetting-sum-of-a-class-attribute-of-type-integer-in-all-instances%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
