Remove files that start with but don't contain











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to remove a lot of files at once but need to be specific as to not remove any of the files I actually need.



I have a ton of corrupt files that start master- but there are valid files that start with master-2018



So, I want to do something like



rm -rf master-* --exclude master-2018*


Is that I need possible?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    These files sound important. Why not copy/move the master-2018* files somewhere else first, and then just remove all the rest?
    – Konrad Rudolph
    Nov 7 at 10:32















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to remove a lot of files at once but need to be specific as to not remove any of the files I actually need.



I have a ton of corrupt files that start master- but there are valid files that start with master-2018



So, I want to do something like



rm -rf master-* --exclude master-2018*


Is that I need possible?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    These files sound important. Why not copy/move the master-2018* files somewhere else first, and then just remove all the rest?
    – Konrad Rudolph
    Nov 7 at 10:32













up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to remove a lot of files at once but need to be specific as to not remove any of the files I actually need.



I have a ton of corrupt files that start master- but there are valid files that start with master-2018



So, I want to do something like



rm -rf master-* --exclude master-2018*


Is that I need possible?










share|improve this question















I'm trying to remove a lot of files at once but need to be specific as to not remove any of the files I actually need.



I have a ton of corrupt files that start master- but there are valid files that start with master-2018



So, I want to do something like



rm -rf master-* --exclude master-2018*


Is that I need possible?







linux filenames rm






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 6 at 23:44









Jeff Schaller

36.1k952119




36.1k952119










asked Nov 6 at 23:02









Dan James Palmer

1314




1314








  • 6




    These files sound important. Why not copy/move the master-2018* files somewhere else first, and then just remove all the rest?
    – Konrad Rudolph
    Nov 7 at 10:32














  • 6




    These files sound important. Why not copy/move the master-2018* files somewhere else first, and then just remove all the rest?
    – Konrad Rudolph
    Nov 7 at 10:32








6




6




These files sound important. Why not copy/move the master-2018* files somewhere else first, and then just remove all the rest?
– Konrad Rudolph
Nov 7 at 10:32




These files sound important. Why not copy/move the master-2018* files somewhere else first, and then just remove all the rest?
– Konrad Rudolph
Nov 7 at 10:32










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
17
down vote



accepted










Yes you can use more than one pattern with find:



$ find -name 'master-*' ! -name 'master-2018*' -print0 -prune |
xargs -0 echo rm -fr


(remove the echo if you're satisfied with the dry run)



You should add a -maxdepth 1 predicate just after find if you only want ro remove files from the current directory, ie master-1991 but no subdir/master-1991.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    but the OP is using rm -rf, -delete will only work if the dir is empty.
    – mosvy
    Nov 6 at 23:49






  • 1




    This worked great, thank you
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 7 at 0:27






  • 1




    Is there any advantage in using find … -print0 | xargs … over a simple find … -exec or find … -execdir?
    – Sparhawk
    Nov 7 at 6:17






  • 1




    @Sparhawk Efficiency. -exec will start a new process for every hit, while xargs will only start one extra process.
    – Stig Hemmer
    Nov 7 at 8:59






  • 3




    @Sparhawk yes, the fact that find and xargs are run in parallel. find ... -exec cmd {} + (with the + at the end) will fit as many arguments as it can to cmd (just like xargs), but find will still have to wait for it to finish before proceeding further. The disadvantage of find -print0 | xargs -0 is that is not standard -- it's pretty well supported though (GNU, *BSD, busybox, android, solaris if used with gxargs).
    – mosvy
    Nov 7 at 9:17


















up vote
10
down vote













In bash:



shopt -s extglob
echo rm master-!(2018*)


Remove the echo if it looks correct.



The above uses bash's extended globbing facility to match files that start with master- but who do not have 2018 immediately following, then followed by anything (*).






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    If all files you want to delete has pattern like master-YYYY*, you can use those patterns:



    rm -rf master-???[0-79]*
    rm -rf master-??[02-9]*
    rm -rf master-?[1-9]*
    rm -rf master-[013-9]*


    The goal is to ommit digits from a year number, so on first place after master- we need to ommit (don't remove) digit 2, on 2nd place digit 0, on 3rd place digit 1, and on 4th place - digit 8
    I tried it just a minute before, and is enough to run only first two of them.



    Second method:
    You can move master-2018 to another dir, e.g. /tmp,
    then remove everything with master-*, and move back your master-2018 from tmp.



    mkdir /tmp/backup
    mv -r master-2018* /tmp/backup
    rm -rf master-*
    mv -r /tmp/backup/* .





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Ahh so, rm -rf master-????[2019-9999]* would remove all files from master-2019* to master-9999*?
      – Dan James Palmer
      Nov 6 at 23:22










    • No, it not works this way. You can not specify numbers in [ ] braces. Only digits. You specify which digits will be places in the place of [xxxxxxx]. So max possibilities is range from 0 to 9 like this [0-9] or this [0123456789]. This can replace only one character from file name. rob@vps:mast$ ls master-1990 master-1994 master-2006 master-2010 master-2014 master-2018 master-1991 master-1995 master-2007 master-2009 master-2013 master-2017 rob@vps:mast$ rm master-[2000-2019]* rob@vps:mast$ ls empty directory`
      – Robert Zabkiewicz
      Nov 6 at 23:27








    • 3




      none of your commands will remove a file with the name master-of-puppets
      – mosvy
      Nov 6 at 23:42











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480241%2fremove-files-that-start-with-but-dont-contain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    17
    down vote



    accepted










    Yes you can use more than one pattern with find:



    $ find -name 'master-*' ! -name 'master-2018*' -print0 -prune |
    xargs -0 echo rm -fr


    (remove the echo if you're satisfied with the dry run)



    You should add a -maxdepth 1 predicate just after find if you only want ro remove files from the current directory, ie master-1991 but no subdir/master-1991.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 2




      but the OP is using rm -rf, -delete will only work if the dir is empty.
      – mosvy
      Nov 6 at 23:49






    • 1




      This worked great, thank you
      – Dan James Palmer
      Nov 7 at 0:27






    • 1




      Is there any advantage in using find … -print0 | xargs … over a simple find … -exec or find … -execdir?
      – Sparhawk
      Nov 7 at 6:17






    • 1




      @Sparhawk Efficiency. -exec will start a new process for every hit, while xargs will only start one extra process.
      – Stig Hemmer
      Nov 7 at 8:59






    • 3




      @Sparhawk yes, the fact that find and xargs are run in parallel. find ... -exec cmd {} + (with the + at the end) will fit as many arguments as it can to cmd (just like xargs), but find will still have to wait for it to finish before proceeding further. The disadvantage of find -print0 | xargs -0 is that is not standard -- it's pretty well supported though (GNU, *BSD, busybox, android, solaris if used with gxargs).
      – mosvy
      Nov 7 at 9:17















    up vote
    17
    down vote



    accepted










    Yes you can use more than one pattern with find:



    $ find -name 'master-*' ! -name 'master-2018*' -print0 -prune |
    xargs -0 echo rm -fr


    (remove the echo if you're satisfied with the dry run)



    You should add a -maxdepth 1 predicate just after find if you only want ro remove files from the current directory, ie master-1991 but no subdir/master-1991.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 2




      but the OP is using rm -rf, -delete will only work if the dir is empty.
      – mosvy
      Nov 6 at 23:49






    • 1




      This worked great, thank you
      – Dan James Palmer
      Nov 7 at 0:27






    • 1




      Is there any advantage in using find … -print0 | xargs … over a simple find … -exec or find … -execdir?
      – Sparhawk
      Nov 7 at 6:17






    • 1




      @Sparhawk Efficiency. -exec will start a new process for every hit, while xargs will only start one extra process.
      – Stig Hemmer
      Nov 7 at 8:59






    • 3




      @Sparhawk yes, the fact that find and xargs are run in parallel. find ... -exec cmd {} + (with the + at the end) will fit as many arguments as it can to cmd (just like xargs), but find will still have to wait for it to finish before proceeding further. The disadvantage of find -print0 | xargs -0 is that is not standard -- it's pretty well supported though (GNU, *BSD, busybox, android, solaris if used with gxargs).
      – mosvy
      Nov 7 at 9:17













    up vote
    17
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    17
    down vote



    accepted






    Yes you can use more than one pattern with find:



    $ find -name 'master-*' ! -name 'master-2018*' -print0 -prune |
    xargs -0 echo rm -fr


    (remove the echo if you're satisfied with the dry run)



    You should add a -maxdepth 1 predicate just after find if you only want ro remove files from the current directory, ie master-1991 but no subdir/master-1991.






    share|improve this answer














    Yes you can use more than one pattern with find:



    $ find -name 'master-*' ! -name 'master-2018*' -print0 -prune |
    xargs -0 echo rm -fr


    (remove the echo if you're satisfied with the dry run)



    You should add a -maxdepth 1 predicate just after find if you only want ro remove files from the current directory, ie master-1991 but no subdir/master-1991.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 7 at 21:35

























    answered Nov 6 at 23:32









    mosvy

    4,323221




    4,323221








    • 2




      but the OP is using rm -rf, -delete will only work if the dir is empty.
      – mosvy
      Nov 6 at 23:49






    • 1




      This worked great, thank you
      – Dan James Palmer
      Nov 7 at 0:27






    • 1




      Is there any advantage in using find … -print0 | xargs … over a simple find … -exec or find … -execdir?
      – Sparhawk
      Nov 7 at 6:17






    • 1




      @Sparhawk Efficiency. -exec will start a new process for every hit, while xargs will only start one extra process.
      – Stig Hemmer
      Nov 7 at 8:59






    • 3




      @Sparhawk yes, the fact that find and xargs are run in parallel. find ... -exec cmd {} + (with the + at the end) will fit as many arguments as it can to cmd (just like xargs), but find will still have to wait for it to finish before proceeding further. The disadvantage of find -print0 | xargs -0 is that is not standard -- it's pretty well supported though (GNU, *BSD, busybox, android, solaris if used with gxargs).
      – mosvy
      Nov 7 at 9:17














    • 2




      but the OP is using rm -rf, -delete will only work if the dir is empty.
      – mosvy
      Nov 6 at 23:49






    • 1




      This worked great, thank you
      – Dan James Palmer
      Nov 7 at 0:27






    • 1




      Is there any advantage in using find … -print0 | xargs … over a simple find … -exec or find … -execdir?
      – Sparhawk
      Nov 7 at 6:17






    • 1




      @Sparhawk Efficiency. -exec will start a new process for every hit, while xargs will only start one extra process.
      – Stig Hemmer
      Nov 7 at 8:59






    • 3




      @Sparhawk yes, the fact that find and xargs are run in parallel. find ... -exec cmd {} + (with the + at the end) will fit as many arguments as it can to cmd (just like xargs), but find will still have to wait for it to finish before proceeding further. The disadvantage of find -print0 | xargs -0 is that is not standard -- it's pretty well supported though (GNU, *BSD, busybox, android, solaris if used with gxargs).
      – mosvy
      Nov 7 at 9:17








    2




    2




    but the OP is using rm -rf, -delete will only work if the dir is empty.
    – mosvy
    Nov 6 at 23:49




    but the OP is using rm -rf, -delete will only work if the dir is empty.
    – mosvy
    Nov 6 at 23:49




    1




    1




    This worked great, thank you
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 7 at 0:27




    This worked great, thank you
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 7 at 0:27




    1




    1




    Is there any advantage in using find … -print0 | xargs … over a simple find … -exec or find … -execdir?
    – Sparhawk
    Nov 7 at 6:17




    Is there any advantage in using find … -print0 | xargs … over a simple find … -exec or find … -execdir?
    – Sparhawk
    Nov 7 at 6:17




    1




    1




    @Sparhawk Efficiency. -exec will start a new process for every hit, while xargs will only start one extra process.
    – Stig Hemmer
    Nov 7 at 8:59




    @Sparhawk Efficiency. -exec will start a new process for every hit, while xargs will only start one extra process.
    – Stig Hemmer
    Nov 7 at 8:59




    3




    3




    @Sparhawk yes, the fact that find and xargs are run in parallel. find ... -exec cmd {} + (with the + at the end) will fit as many arguments as it can to cmd (just like xargs), but find will still have to wait for it to finish before proceeding further. The disadvantage of find -print0 | xargs -0 is that is not standard -- it's pretty well supported though (GNU, *BSD, busybox, android, solaris if used with gxargs).
    – mosvy
    Nov 7 at 9:17




    @Sparhawk yes, the fact that find and xargs are run in parallel. find ... -exec cmd {} + (with the + at the end) will fit as many arguments as it can to cmd (just like xargs), but find will still have to wait for it to finish before proceeding further. The disadvantage of find -print0 | xargs -0 is that is not standard -- it's pretty well supported though (GNU, *BSD, busybox, android, solaris if used with gxargs).
    – mosvy
    Nov 7 at 9:17












    up vote
    10
    down vote













    In bash:



    shopt -s extglob
    echo rm master-!(2018*)


    Remove the echo if it looks correct.



    The above uses bash's extended globbing facility to match files that start with master- but who do not have 2018 immediately following, then followed by anything (*).






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      10
      down vote













      In bash:



      shopt -s extglob
      echo rm master-!(2018*)


      Remove the echo if it looks correct.



      The above uses bash's extended globbing facility to match files that start with master- but who do not have 2018 immediately following, then followed by anything (*).






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        10
        down vote










        up vote
        10
        down vote









        In bash:



        shopt -s extglob
        echo rm master-!(2018*)


        Remove the echo if it looks correct.



        The above uses bash's extended globbing facility to match files that start with master- but who do not have 2018 immediately following, then followed by anything (*).






        share|improve this answer












        In bash:



        shopt -s extglob
        echo rm master-!(2018*)


        Remove the echo if it looks correct.



        The above uses bash's extended globbing facility to match files that start with master- but who do not have 2018 immediately following, then followed by anything (*).







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 6 at 23:44









        Jeff Schaller

        36.1k952119




        36.1k952119






















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            If all files you want to delete has pattern like master-YYYY*, you can use those patterns:



            rm -rf master-???[0-79]*
            rm -rf master-??[02-9]*
            rm -rf master-?[1-9]*
            rm -rf master-[013-9]*


            The goal is to ommit digits from a year number, so on first place after master- we need to ommit (don't remove) digit 2, on 2nd place digit 0, on 3rd place digit 1, and on 4th place - digit 8
            I tried it just a minute before, and is enough to run only first two of them.



            Second method:
            You can move master-2018 to another dir, e.g. /tmp,
            then remove everything with master-*, and move back your master-2018 from tmp.



            mkdir /tmp/backup
            mv -r master-2018* /tmp/backup
            rm -rf master-*
            mv -r /tmp/backup/* .





            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Ahh so, rm -rf master-????[2019-9999]* would remove all files from master-2019* to master-9999*?
              – Dan James Palmer
              Nov 6 at 23:22










            • No, it not works this way. You can not specify numbers in [ ] braces. Only digits. You specify which digits will be places in the place of [xxxxxxx]. So max possibilities is range from 0 to 9 like this [0-9] or this [0123456789]. This can replace only one character from file name. rob@vps:mast$ ls master-1990 master-1994 master-2006 master-2010 master-2014 master-2018 master-1991 master-1995 master-2007 master-2009 master-2013 master-2017 rob@vps:mast$ rm master-[2000-2019]* rob@vps:mast$ ls empty directory`
              – Robert Zabkiewicz
              Nov 6 at 23:27








            • 3




              none of your commands will remove a file with the name master-of-puppets
              – mosvy
              Nov 6 at 23:42















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            If all files you want to delete has pattern like master-YYYY*, you can use those patterns:



            rm -rf master-???[0-79]*
            rm -rf master-??[02-9]*
            rm -rf master-?[1-9]*
            rm -rf master-[013-9]*


            The goal is to ommit digits from a year number, so on first place after master- we need to ommit (don't remove) digit 2, on 2nd place digit 0, on 3rd place digit 1, and on 4th place - digit 8
            I tried it just a minute before, and is enough to run only first two of them.



            Second method:
            You can move master-2018 to another dir, e.g. /tmp,
            then remove everything with master-*, and move back your master-2018 from tmp.



            mkdir /tmp/backup
            mv -r master-2018* /tmp/backup
            rm -rf master-*
            mv -r /tmp/backup/* .





            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Ahh so, rm -rf master-????[2019-9999]* would remove all files from master-2019* to master-9999*?
              – Dan James Palmer
              Nov 6 at 23:22










            • No, it not works this way. You can not specify numbers in [ ] braces. Only digits. You specify which digits will be places in the place of [xxxxxxx]. So max possibilities is range from 0 to 9 like this [0-9] or this [0123456789]. This can replace only one character from file name. rob@vps:mast$ ls master-1990 master-1994 master-2006 master-2010 master-2014 master-2018 master-1991 master-1995 master-2007 master-2009 master-2013 master-2017 rob@vps:mast$ rm master-[2000-2019]* rob@vps:mast$ ls empty directory`
              – Robert Zabkiewicz
              Nov 6 at 23:27








            • 3




              none of your commands will remove a file with the name master-of-puppets
              – mosvy
              Nov 6 at 23:42













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            If all files you want to delete has pattern like master-YYYY*, you can use those patterns:



            rm -rf master-???[0-79]*
            rm -rf master-??[02-9]*
            rm -rf master-?[1-9]*
            rm -rf master-[013-9]*


            The goal is to ommit digits from a year number, so on first place after master- we need to ommit (don't remove) digit 2, on 2nd place digit 0, on 3rd place digit 1, and on 4th place - digit 8
            I tried it just a minute before, and is enough to run only first two of them.



            Second method:
            You can move master-2018 to another dir, e.g. /tmp,
            then remove everything with master-*, and move back your master-2018 from tmp.



            mkdir /tmp/backup
            mv -r master-2018* /tmp/backup
            rm -rf master-*
            mv -r /tmp/backup/* .





            share|improve this answer














            If all files you want to delete has pattern like master-YYYY*, you can use those patterns:



            rm -rf master-???[0-79]*
            rm -rf master-??[02-9]*
            rm -rf master-?[1-9]*
            rm -rf master-[013-9]*


            The goal is to ommit digits from a year number, so on first place after master- we need to ommit (don't remove) digit 2, on 2nd place digit 0, on 3rd place digit 1, and on 4th place - digit 8
            I tried it just a minute before, and is enough to run only first two of them.



            Second method:
            You can move master-2018 to another dir, e.g. /tmp,
            then remove everything with master-*, and move back your master-2018 from tmp.



            mkdir /tmp/backup
            mv -r master-2018* /tmp/backup
            rm -rf master-*
            mv -r /tmp/backup/* .






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 6 at 23:24

























            answered Nov 6 at 23:18









            Robert Zabkiewicz

            11




            11








            • 1




              Ahh so, rm -rf master-????[2019-9999]* would remove all files from master-2019* to master-9999*?
              – Dan James Palmer
              Nov 6 at 23:22










            • No, it not works this way. You can not specify numbers in [ ] braces. Only digits. You specify which digits will be places in the place of [xxxxxxx]. So max possibilities is range from 0 to 9 like this [0-9] or this [0123456789]. This can replace only one character from file name. rob@vps:mast$ ls master-1990 master-1994 master-2006 master-2010 master-2014 master-2018 master-1991 master-1995 master-2007 master-2009 master-2013 master-2017 rob@vps:mast$ rm master-[2000-2019]* rob@vps:mast$ ls empty directory`
              – Robert Zabkiewicz
              Nov 6 at 23:27








            • 3




              none of your commands will remove a file with the name master-of-puppets
              – mosvy
              Nov 6 at 23:42














            • 1




              Ahh so, rm -rf master-????[2019-9999]* would remove all files from master-2019* to master-9999*?
              – Dan James Palmer
              Nov 6 at 23:22










            • No, it not works this way. You can not specify numbers in [ ] braces. Only digits. You specify which digits will be places in the place of [xxxxxxx]. So max possibilities is range from 0 to 9 like this [0-9] or this [0123456789]. This can replace only one character from file name. rob@vps:mast$ ls master-1990 master-1994 master-2006 master-2010 master-2014 master-2018 master-1991 master-1995 master-2007 master-2009 master-2013 master-2017 rob@vps:mast$ rm master-[2000-2019]* rob@vps:mast$ ls empty directory`
              – Robert Zabkiewicz
              Nov 6 at 23:27








            • 3




              none of your commands will remove a file with the name master-of-puppets
              – mosvy
              Nov 6 at 23:42








            1




            1




            Ahh so, rm -rf master-????[2019-9999]* would remove all files from master-2019* to master-9999*?
            – Dan James Palmer
            Nov 6 at 23:22




            Ahh so, rm -rf master-????[2019-9999]* would remove all files from master-2019* to master-9999*?
            – Dan James Palmer
            Nov 6 at 23:22












            No, it not works this way. You can not specify numbers in [ ] braces. Only digits. You specify which digits will be places in the place of [xxxxxxx]. So max possibilities is range from 0 to 9 like this [0-9] or this [0123456789]. This can replace only one character from file name. rob@vps:mast$ ls master-1990 master-1994 master-2006 master-2010 master-2014 master-2018 master-1991 master-1995 master-2007 master-2009 master-2013 master-2017 rob@vps:mast$ rm master-[2000-2019]* rob@vps:mast$ ls empty directory`
            – Robert Zabkiewicz
            Nov 6 at 23:27






            No, it not works this way. You can not specify numbers in [ ] braces. Only digits. You specify which digits will be places in the place of [xxxxxxx]. So max possibilities is range from 0 to 9 like this [0-9] or this [0123456789]. This can replace only one character from file name. rob@vps:mast$ ls master-1990 master-1994 master-2006 master-2010 master-2014 master-2018 master-1991 master-1995 master-2007 master-2009 master-2013 master-2017 rob@vps:mast$ rm master-[2000-2019]* rob@vps:mast$ ls empty directory`
            – Robert Zabkiewicz
            Nov 6 at 23:27






            3




            3




            none of your commands will remove a file with the name master-of-puppets
            – mosvy
            Nov 6 at 23:42




            none of your commands will remove a file with the name master-of-puppets
            – mosvy
            Nov 6 at 23:42


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480241%2fremove-files-that-start-with-but-dont-contain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

            Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

            Zucchini