Getting new data from Effect/Reducer/Action pattern












0















Okay, so I cant seem to figure out how to do this more efficiently. To be completely frank I don't really understand this pattern very well, but I got thrown in the deep-end. So I have a resolver getting the observable for an appropriate Plan for a form. However, due to the page I'm navigating from, I have done effectively a lightload of plan, which is stored in state. So when the load occurs instead of returning the fully hyrdated object, i get a light load. The only thing I've figured out how to fix is by removing it from state first. This seems silly. How can I configure the effect to do a remove/load, maybe by passing a param?



export class PlanResolver implements Resolve<Observable<Plan>> {

public plan$: Observable<Plan>;

constructor(public store: Store<fromRoot.State>) {
this.plan$ = store.select<Plan>(fromRoot.getSelectedPlan);
}

resolve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot) {
let id = +route.paramMap.get('id');

console.info(id);

this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Remove(id)); //This seems silly
this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Load(id));

return of(this.plan$);
}


reducer:



case PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess: {
return adapter.addOne(action.payload, {
...state,
selectedPlanId: state.selectedPlanId,
});
}

case PlanActionTypes.Load: {
return {
...state,
selectedPlanId: action.payload,
};
}


Effect:



@Effect()
loadPlan$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$
.ofType<Load>(PlanActionTypes.Load).pipe(
switchMap(action => this.planService.getPlan(action.payload)),
map((plan: Plan) => new LoadSuccess(plan)),
catchError(err => {
toastr.error(`Could not load plan.`);
console.error(err);
return of(new LoadFail(err));
})
);


Action:



 export class Load implements Action {
readonly type = PlanActionTypes.Load;

constructor(public payload: number) {}
}

export class LoadSuccess implements Action {
readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess;

constructor(public payload: Plan) {}
}

export class LoadFail implements Action {
readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadFail;

constructor(public payload: any) {}
}


EDIT:
So Im getting
Plan{
a: Value
b: value
c - z: null
}



and I'm expecting
Plan{
a:value
....
z: value
}



By removing first i get the expected result.










share|improve this question





























    0















    Okay, so I cant seem to figure out how to do this more efficiently. To be completely frank I don't really understand this pattern very well, but I got thrown in the deep-end. So I have a resolver getting the observable for an appropriate Plan for a form. However, due to the page I'm navigating from, I have done effectively a lightload of plan, which is stored in state. So when the load occurs instead of returning the fully hyrdated object, i get a light load. The only thing I've figured out how to fix is by removing it from state first. This seems silly. How can I configure the effect to do a remove/load, maybe by passing a param?



    export class PlanResolver implements Resolve<Observable<Plan>> {

    public plan$: Observable<Plan>;

    constructor(public store: Store<fromRoot.State>) {
    this.plan$ = store.select<Plan>(fromRoot.getSelectedPlan);
    }

    resolve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot) {
    let id = +route.paramMap.get('id');

    console.info(id);

    this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Remove(id)); //This seems silly
    this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Load(id));

    return of(this.plan$);
    }


    reducer:



    case PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess: {
    return adapter.addOne(action.payload, {
    ...state,
    selectedPlanId: state.selectedPlanId,
    });
    }

    case PlanActionTypes.Load: {
    return {
    ...state,
    selectedPlanId: action.payload,
    };
    }


    Effect:



    @Effect()
    loadPlan$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$
    .ofType<Load>(PlanActionTypes.Load).pipe(
    switchMap(action => this.planService.getPlan(action.payload)),
    map((plan: Plan) => new LoadSuccess(plan)),
    catchError(err => {
    toastr.error(`Could not load plan.`);
    console.error(err);
    return of(new LoadFail(err));
    })
    );


    Action:



     export class Load implements Action {
    readonly type = PlanActionTypes.Load;

    constructor(public payload: number) {}
    }

    export class LoadSuccess implements Action {
    readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess;

    constructor(public payload: Plan) {}
    }

    export class LoadFail implements Action {
    readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadFail;

    constructor(public payload: any) {}
    }


    EDIT:
    So Im getting
    Plan{
    a: Value
    b: value
    c - z: null
    }



    and I'm expecting
    Plan{
    a:value
    ....
    z: value
    }



    By removing first i get the expected result.










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      Okay, so I cant seem to figure out how to do this more efficiently. To be completely frank I don't really understand this pattern very well, but I got thrown in the deep-end. So I have a resolver getting the observable for an appropriate Plan for a form. However, due to the page I'm navigating from, I have done effectively a lightload of plan, which is stored in state. So when the load occurs instead of returning the fully hyrdated object, i get a light load. The only thing I've figured out how to fix is by removing it from state first. This seems silly. How can I configure the effect to do a remove/load, maybe by passing a param?



      export class PlanResolver implements Resolve<Observable<Plan>> {

      public plan$: Observable<Plan>;

      constructor(public store: Store<fromRoot.State>) {
      this.plan$ = store.select<Plan>(fromRoot.getSelectedPlan);
      }

      resolve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot) {
      let id = +route.paramMap.get('id');

      console.info(id);

      this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Remove(id)); //This seems silly
      this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Load(id));

      return of(this.plan$);
      }


      reducer:



      case PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess: {
      return adapter.addOne(action.payload, {
      ...state,
      selectedPlanId: state.selectedPlanId,
      });
      }

      case PlanActionTypes.Load: {
      return {
      ...state,
      selectedPlanId: action.payload,
      };
      }


      Effect:



      @Effect()
      loadPlan$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$
      .ofType<Load>(PlanActionTypes.Load).pipe(
      switchMap(action => this.planService.getPlan(action.payload)),
      map((plan: Plan) => new LoadSuccess(plan)),
      catchError(err => {
      toastr.error(`Could not load plan.`);
      console.error(err);
      return of(new LoadFail(err));
      })
      );


      Action:



       export class Load implements Action {
      readonly type = PlanActionTypes.Load;

      constructor(public payload: number) {}
      }

      export class LoadSuccess implements Action {
      readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess;

      constructor(public payload: Plan) {}
      }

      export class LoadFail implements Action {
      readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadFail;

      constructor(public payload: any) {}
      }


      EDIT:
      So Im getting
      Plan{
      a: Value
      b: value
      c - z: null
      }



      and I'm expecting
      Plan{
      a:value
      ....
      z: value
      }



      By removing first i get the expected result.










      share|improve this question
















      Okay, so I cant seem to figure out how to do this more efficiently. To be completely frank I don't really understand this pattern very well, but I got thrown in the deep-end. So I have a resolver getting the observable for an appropriate Plan for a form. However, due to the page I'm navigating from, I have done effectively a lightload of plan, which is stored in state. So when the load occurs instead of returning the fully hyrdated object, i get a light load. The only thing I've figured out how to fix is by removing it from state first. This seems silly. How can I configure the effect to do a remove/load, maybe by passing a param?



      export class PlanResolver implements Resolve<Observable<Plan>> {

      public plan$: Observable<Plan>;

      constructor(public store: Store<fromRoot.State>) {
      this.plan$ = store.select<Plan>(fromRoot.getSelectedPlan);
      }

      resolve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot) {
      let id = +route.paramMap.get('id');

      console.info(id);

      this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Remove(id)); //This seems silly
      this.store.dispatch(new PlanActions.Load(id));

      return of(this.plan$);
      }


      reducer:



      case PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess: {
      return adapter.addOne(action.payload, {
      ...state,
      selectedPlanId: state.selectedPlanId,
      });
      }

      case PlanActionTypes.Load: {
      return {
      ...state,
      selectedPlanId: action.payload,
      };
      }


      Effect:



      @Effect()
      loadPlan$: Observable<Action> = this.actions$
      .ofType<Load>(PlanActionTypes.Load).pipe(
      switchMap(action => this.planService.getPlan(action.payload)),
      map((plan: Plan) => new LoadSuccess(plan)),
      catchError(err => {
      toastr.error(`Could not load plan.`);
      console.error(err);
      return of(new LoadFail(err));
      })
      );


      Action:



       export class Load implements Action {
      readonly type = PlanActionTypes.Load;

      constructor(public payload: number) {}
      }

      export class LoadSuccess implements Action {
      readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadSuccess;

      constructor(public payload: Plan) {}
      }

      export class LoadFail implements Action {
      readonly type = PlanActionTypes.LoadFail;

      constructor(public payload: any) {}
      }


      EDIT:
      So Im getting
      Plan{
      a: Value
      b: value
      c - z: null
      }



      and I'm expecting
      Plan{
      a:value
      ....
      z: value
      }



      By removing first i get the expected result.







      angular typescript ngrx-store






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 14 '18 at 4:32







      Seth

















      asked Nov 14 '18 at 3:02









      SethSeth

      3201220




      3201220
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53292582%2fgetting-new-data-from-effect-reducer-action-pattern%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53292582%2fgetting-new-data-from-effect-reducer-action-pattern%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

          Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

          Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()