cast class into another class or convert class to another












29















my question is shown in this code



I have class like that



public class  maincs
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
public int d;
}

public class sub1
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
}


public void methoda (sub1 model)
{
maincs mdata = new maincs(){a = model.a , b = model.b , c= model.c} ;

// is there is a way to directly cast class sub1 into main like that
mdata = (maincs) model;
}









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    This code doesn't make sense. Post code that compiles (it's not the cast that's the problem).

    – µBio
    Sep 8 '10 at 23:46








  • 9





    Quite harsh.. Missing a class keyword doesnt take the sense away.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 4:56













  • There are existing lightweight mapper libraries written already for exactly this purpose. They handle a lot more edge cases. You can google it.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 5:15













  • First and easy solution: automapper.org

    – Soren
    May 14 '14 at 9:08
















29















my question is shown in this code



I have class like that



public class  maincs
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
public int d;
}

public class sub1
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
}


public void methoda (sub1 model)
{
maincs mdata = new maincs(){a = model.a , b = model.b , c= model.c} ;

// is there is a way to directly cast class sub1 into main like that
mdata = (maincs) model;
}









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    This code doesn't make sense. Post code that compiles (it's not the cast that's the problem).

    – µBio
    Sep 8 '10 at 23:46








  • 9





    Quite harsh.. Missing a class keyword doesnt take the sense away.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 4:56













  • There are existing lightweight mapper libraries written already for exactly this purpose. They handle a lot more edge cases. You can google it.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 5:15













  • First and easy solution: automapper.org

    – Soren
    May 14 '14 at 9:08














29












29








29


16






my question is shown in this code



I have class like that



public class  maincs
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
public int d;
}

public class sub1
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
}


public void methoda (sub1 model)
{
maincs mdata = new maincs(){a = model.a , b = model.b , c= model.c} ;

// is there is a way to directly cast class sub1 into main like that
mdata = (maincs) model;
}









share|improve this question
















my question is shown in this code



I have class like that



public class  maincs
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
public int d;
}

public class sub1
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
}


public void methoda (sub1 model)
{
maincs mdata = new maincs(){a = model.a , b = model.b , c= model.c} ;

// is there is a way to directly cast class sub1 into main like that
mdata = (maincs) model;
}






c# casting class type-conversion






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 15 '16 at 9:31









Dor Cohen

10.6k1867142




10.6k1867142










asked Sep 8 '10 at 23:40









Khalid OmarKhalid Omar

1,10852342




1,10852342








  • 1





    This code doesn't make sense. Post code that compiles (it's not the cast that's the problem).

    – µBio
    Sep 8 '10 at 23:46








  • 9





    Quite harsh.. Missing a class keyword doesnt take the sense away.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 4:56













  • There are existing lightweight mapper libraries written already for exactly this purpose. They handle a lot more edge cases. You can google it.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 5:15













  • First and easy solution: automapper.org

    – Soren
    May 14 '14 at 9:08














  • 1





    This code doesn't make sense. Post code that compiles (it's not the cast that's the problem).

    – µBio
    Sep 8 '10 at 23:46








  • 9





    Quite harsh.. Missing a class keyword doesnt take the sense away.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 4:56













  • There are existing lightweight mapper libraries written already for exactly this purpose. They handle a lot more edge cases. You can google it.

    – nawfal
    Jan 16 '14 at 5:15













  • First and easy solution: automapper.org

    – Soren
    May 14 '14 at 9:08








1




1





This code doesn't make sense. Post code that compiles (it's not the cast that's the problem).

– µBio
Sep 8 '10 at 23:46







This code doesn't make sense. Post code that compiles (it's not the cast that's the problem).

– µBio
Sep 8 '10 at 23:46






9




9





Quite harsh.. Missing a class keyword doesnt take the sense away.

– nawfal
Jan 16 '14 at 4:56







Quite harsh.. Missing a class keyword doesnt take the sense away.

– nawfal
Jan 16 '14 at 4:56















There are existing lightweight mapper libraries written already for exactly this purpose. They handle a lot more edge cases. You can google it.

– nawfal
Jan 16 '14 at 5:15







There are existing lightweight mapper libraries written already for exactly this purpose. They handle a lot more edge cases. You can google it.

– nawfal
Jan 16 '14 at 5:15















First and easy solution: automapper.org

– Soren
May 14 '14 at 9:08





First and easy solution: automapper.org

– Soren
May 14 '14 at 9:08












9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















29














What he wants to say is:



"If you have two classes which share most of the same properties you can cast an object from class a to class b and automatically make the system understand the assignment via the shared property names?"



Option 1: Use reflection



Disadvantage : It's gonna slow you down more than you think.



Option 2: Make one class derive from another, the first one with common properties and other an extension of that.



Disadvantage: Coupled! if your're doing that for two layers in your application then the two layers will be coupled!



Let there be:



class customer
{
public string firstname { get; set; }
public string lastname { get; set; }
public int age { get; set; }
}
class employee
{
public string firstname { get; set; }
public int age { get; set; }
}


Now here is an extension for Object type:



public static T Cast<T>(this Object myobj)
{
Type objectType = myobj.GetType();
Type target = typeof(T);
var x = Activator.CreateInstance(target, false);
var z = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source ;
var d = from source in target.GetMembers().ToList()
where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source;
List<MemberInfo> members = d.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name)
.ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();
PropertyInfo propertyInfo;
object value;
foreach (var memberInfo in members)
{
propertyInfo = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name).GetValue(myobj,null);

propertyInfo.SetValue(x,value,null);
}
return (T)x;
}


Now you use it like this:



static void Main(string args)
{
var cus = new customer();
cus.firstname = "John";
cus.age = 3;
employee emp = cus.Cast<employee>();
}


Method cast checks common properties between two objects and does the assignment automatically.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    That what i mean exactly

    – Khalid Omar
    Sep 9 '10 at 1:54











  • Nice solution, but as you said, overhead and complexity :)

    – Noctis
    Apr 14 '14 at 0:19











  • I guess you have missed to make use of 'z' variable. It should be used when initializing 'members' var i.e. List<MemberInfo> members = z.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name) .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

    – Aamol
    Feb 27 '17 at 23:09








  • 2





    The extension method Cast will cause conflict with System.Linq Enumerable.Cast<TResult> and could result in an error that is hard to debug. Changing the name is recommended.

    – usefulBee
    Jan 16 '18 at 15:47





















51














You have already defined the conversion, you just need to take it one step further if you would like to be able to cast. For example:



public class sub1
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;

public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 obj)
{
maincs output = new maincs() { a = obj.a, b = obj.b, c = obj.c };
return output;
}
}


Which then allows you to do something like



static void Main()
{
sub1 mySub = new sub1();
maincs myMain = (maincs)mySub;
}





share|improve this answer



















  • 3





    Even better than the selected answer

    – Noctis
    Apr 14 '14 at 0:19






  • 1





    Great answer. Thanks.

    – Ellis
    Dec 22 '15 at 14:39











  • Are there any implications for converting/casting from one class to another with the exact props using your code?

    – Code
    Apr 5 '17 at 7:36



















27














Use JSON serialization and deserialization:



using Newtonsoft.Json;

Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
Class2 obj2 = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj1));




Or:



public class Class1
{
public static explicit operator Class2(Class1 obj)
{
return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
}
}


Which then allows you to do something like



static void Main()
{
Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
Class2 obj2 = (Class2)obj1;
}





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Yes, using Newtonsoft json serializer is quite simple and efficient. There is .Net serializer but I found Newtonsoft do well over .Net json serializer. I found this link which gives a brief comparision newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonNetVsDotNetSerializers.htm

    – Aamol
    Feb 28 '17 at 0:38






  • 1





    this seemed latest and worked best for my needs. upvoted!

    – Puerto
    Jun 12 '18 at 13:03



















5














You could change your class structure to:



public class maincs : sub1
{
public int d;
}

public class sub1
{
public int a;
public int b;
public int c;
}


Then you could keep a list of sub1 and cast some of them to mainc.






share|improve this answer


























  • This doesn't compile either. Maybe you forgot the class keyword

    – Carlos Muñoz
    Sep 8 '10 at 23:48













  • Oops, that's what I get for copy/paste.

    – Jake Pearson
    Sep 9 '10 at 2:04



















2














You can provide an explicit overload for the cast operator:



public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 val)
{
var ret = new maincs() { a = val.a, b = val.b, c = val.c };
return ret;
}


Another option would be to use an interface that has the a, b, and c properties and implement the interface on both of the classes. Then just have the parameter type to methoda be the interface instead of the class.






share|improve this answer































    1














    By using following code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



    public class CopyClass
    {
    /// <summary>
    /// Copy an object to destination object, only matching fields will be copied
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
    /// <param name="sourceObject">An object with matching fields of the destination object</param>
    /// <param name="destObject">Destination object, must already be created</param>
    public static void CopyObject<T>(object sourceObject, ref T destObject)
    {
    // If either the source, or destination is null, return
    if (sourceObject == null || destObject == null)
    return;

    // Get the type of each object
    Type sourceType = sourceObject.GetType();
    Type targetType = destObject.GetType();

    // Loop through the source properties
    foreach (PropertyInfo p in sourceType.GetProperties())
    {
    // Get the matching property in the destination object
    PropertyInfo targetObj = targetType.GetProperty(p.Name);
    // If there is none, skip
    if (targetObj == null)
    continue;

    // Set the value in the destination
    targetObj.SetValue(destObject, p.GetValue(sourceObject, null), null);
    }
    }
    }


    Call Method Like,



    ClassA objA = new ClassA();
    ClassB objB = new ClassB();

    CopyClass.CopyObject(objOfferMast, ref objB);


    It will copy objA into objB.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Please be aware that if you're using this solution, you might run into issues when classes have the same name for properties, but with different types. For example: public class A { public int Age{get;set;}} and public class B { public string Age{get;set;}} Will throw an exception, if you're trying to convert from A to B

      – Noctis
      Apr 14 '14 at 0:32













    • This type of conversion could also lead to some huge performance issues. Use it carefully and certainly not in for-loops

      – RPDeshaies
      Jun 16 '15 at 14:55



















    1














    There are some great answers here, I just wanted to add a little bit of type checking here as we cannot assume that if properties exist with the same name, that they are of the same type. Here is my offering, which extends on the previous, very excellent answer as I had a few little glitches with it.



    In this version I have allowed for the consumer to specify fields to be excluded, and also by default to exclude any database / model specific related properties.



        public static T Transform<T>(this object myobj, string excludeFields = null)
    {
    // Compose a list of unwanted members
    if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(excludeFields))
    excludeFields = string.Empty;
    excludeFields = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(excludeFields) ? excludeFields + "," : excludeFields;
    excludeFields += $"{nameof(DBTable.ID)},{nameof(DBTable.InstanceID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedBy)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedByID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedOn)}";

    var objectType = myobj.GetType();
    var targetType = typeof(T);
    var targetInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(targetType, false);

    // Find common members by name
    var sourceMembers = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
    where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
    select source;
    var targetMembers = from source in targetType.GetMembers().ToList()
    where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
    select source;
    var commonMembers = targetMembers.Where(memberInfo => sourceMembers.Select(c => c.Name)
    .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

    // Remove unwanted members
    commonMembers.RemoveWhere(x => x.Name.InList(excludeFields));

    foreach (var memberInfo in commonMembers)
    {
    if (!((PropertyInfo)memberInfo).CanWrite) continue;

    var targetProperty = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
    if (targetProperty == null) continue;

    var sourceProperty = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
    if (sourceProperty == null) continue;

    // Check source and target types are the same
    if (sourceProperty.PropertyType.Name != targetProperty.PropertyType.Name) continue;

    var value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name)?.GetValue(myobj, null);
    if (value == null) continue;

    // Set the value
    targetProperty.SetValue(targetInstance, value, null);
    }
    return (T)targetInstance;
    }





    share|improve this answer
























    • that will work as long as you dont have ENUMS in your object as properties

      – Natalia Z
      Jun 29 '18 at 15:28



















    1














    Using this code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



    JavaScriptSerializer JsonConvert = new JavaScriptSerializer(); 
    string serializeString = JsonConvert.Serialize(objectEntity);
    objectViewModel objVM = JsonConvert.Deserialize<objectViewModel>(serializeString);





    share|improve this answer































      0














      var obj =  _account.Retrieve(Email, hash);

      AccountInfoResponse accountInfoResponse = new AccountInfoResponse();

      if (obj != null)
      {
      accountInfoResponse =
      JsonConvert.
      DeserializeObject<AccountInfoResponse>
      (JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
      }


      image description






      share|improve this answer

























        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        });
        });
        }, "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f3672742%2fcast-class-into-another-class-or-convert-class-to-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        9 Answers
        9






        active

        oldest

        votes








        9 Answers
        9






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        29














        What he wants to say is:



        "If you have two classes which share most of the same properties you can cast an object from class a to class b and automatically make the system understand the assignment via the shared property names?"



        Option 1: Use reflection



        Disadvantage : It's gonna slow you down more than you think.



        Option 2: Make one class derive from another, the first one with common properties and other an extension of that.



        Disadvantage: Coupled! if your're doing that for two layers in your application then the two layers will be coupled!



        Let there be:



        class customer
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public string lastname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }
        class employee
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }


        Now here is an extension for Object type:



        public static T Cast<T>(this Object myobj)
        {
        Type objectType = myobj.GetType();
        Type target = typeof(T);
        var x = Activator.CreateInstance(target, false);
        var z = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source ;
        var d = from source in target.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source;
        List<MemberInfo> members = d.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name)
        .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();
        PropertyInfo propertyInfo;
        object value;
        foreach (var memberInfo in members)
        {
        propertyInfo = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
        value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name).GetValue(myobj,null);

        propertyInfo.SetValue(x,value,null);
        }
        return (T)x;
        }


        Now you use it like this:



        static void Main(string args)
        {
        var cus = new customer();
        cus.firstname = "John";
        cus.age = 3;
        employee emp = cus.Cast<employee>();
        }


        Method cast checks common properties between two objects and does the assignment automatically.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          That what i mean exactly

          – Khalid Omar
          Sep 9 '10 at 1:54











        • Nice solution, but as you said, overhead and complexity :)

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19











        • I guess you have missed to make use of 'z' variable. It should be used when initializing 'members' var i.e. List<MemberInfo> members = z.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name) .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

          – Aamol
          Feb 27 '17 at 23:09








        • 2





          The extension method Cast will cause conflict with System.Linq Enumerable.Cast<TResult> and could result in an error that is hard to debug. Changing the name is recommended.

          – usefulBee
          Jan 16 '18 at 15:47


















        29














        What he wants to say is:



        "If you have two classes which share most of the same properties you can cast an object from class a to class b and automatically make the system understand the assignment via the shared property names?"



        Option 1: Use reflection



        Disadvantage : It's gonna slow you down more than you think.



        Option 2: Make one class derive from another, the first one with common properties and other an extension of that.



        Disadvantage: Coupled! if your're doing that for two layers in your application then the two layers will be coupled!



        Let there be:



        class customer
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public string lastname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }
        class employee
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }


        Now here is an extension for Object type:



        public static T Cast<T>(this Object myobj)
        {
        Type objectType = myobj.GetType();
        Type target = typeof(T);
        var x = Activator.CreateInstance(target, false);
        var z = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source ;
        var d = from source in target.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source;
        List<MemberInfo> members = d.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name)
        .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();
        PropertyInfo propertyInfo;
        object value;
        foreach (var memberInfo in members)
        {
        propertyInfo = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
        value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name).GetValue(myobj,null);

        propertyInfo.SetValue(x,value,null);
        }
        return (T)x;
        }


        Now you use it like this:



        static void Main(string args)
        {
        var cus = new customer();
        cus.firstname = "John";
        cus.age = 3;
        employee emp = cus.Cast<employee>();
        }


        Method cast checks common properties between two objects and does the assignment automatically.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          That what i mean exactly

          – Khalid Omar
          Sep 9 '10 at 1:54











        • Nice solution, but as you said, overhead and complexity :)

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19











        • I guess you have missed to make use of 'z' variable. It should be used when initializing 'members' var i.e. List<MemberInfo> members = z.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name) .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

          – Aamol
          Feb 27 '17 at 23:09








        • 2





          The extension method Cast will cause conflict with System.Linq Enumerable.Cast<TResult> and could result in an error that is hard to debug. Changing the name is recommended.

          – usefulBee
          Jan 16 '18 at 15:47
















        29












        29








        29







        What he wants to say is:



        "If you have two classes which share most of the same properties you can cast an object from class a to class b and automatically make the system understand the assignment via the shared property names?"



        Option 1: Use reflection



        Disadvantage : It's gonna slow you down more than you think.



        Option 2: Make one class derive from another, the first one with common properties and other an extension of that.



        Disadvantage: Coupled! if your're doing that for two layers in your application then the two layers will be coupled!



        Let there be:



        class customer
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public string lastname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }
        class employee
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }


        Now here is an extension for Object type:



        public static T Cast<T>(this Object myobj)
        {
        Type objectType = myobj.GetType();
        Type target = typeof(T);
        var x = Activator.CreateInstance(target, false);
        var z = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source ;
        var d = from source in target.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source;
        List<MemberInfo> members = d.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name)
        .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();
        PropertyInfo propertyInfo;
        object value;
        foreach (var memberInfo in members)
        {
        propertyInfo = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
        value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name).GetValue(myobj,null);

        propertyInfo.SetValue(x,value,null);
        }
        return (T)x;
        }


        Now you use it like this:



        static void Main(string args)
        {
        var cus = new customer();
        cus.firstname = "John";
        cus.age = 3;
        employee emp = cus.Cast<employee>();
        }


        Method cast checks common properties between two objects and does the assignment automatically.






        share|improve this answer















        What he wants to say is:



        "If you have two classes which share most of the same properties you can cast an object from class a to class b and automatically make the system understand the assignment via the shared property names?"



        Option 1: Use reflection



        Disadvantage : It's gonna slow you down more than you think.



        Option 2: Make one class derive from another, the first one with common properties and other an extension of that.



        Disadvantage: Coupled! if your're doing that for two layers in your application then the two layers will be coupled!



        Let there be:



        class customer
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public string lastname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }
        class employee
        {
        public string firstname { get; set; }
        public int age { get; set; }
        }


        Now here is an extension for Object type:



        public static T Cast<T>(this Object myobj)
        {
        Type objectType = myobj.GetType();
        Type target = typeof(T);
        var x = Activator.CreateInstance(target, false);
        var z = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source ;
        var d = from source in target.GetMembers().ToList()
        where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property select source;
        List<MemberInfo> members = d.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name)
        .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();
        PropertyInfo propertyInfo;
        object value;
        foreach (var memberInfo in members)
        {
        propertyInfo = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
        value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name).GetValue(myobj,null);

        propertyInfo.SetValue(x,value,null);
        }
        return (T)x;
        }


        Now you use it like this:



        static void Main(string args)
        {
        var cus = new customer();
        cus.firstname = "John";
        cus.age = 3;
        employee emp = cus.Cast<employee>();
        }


        Method cast checks common properties between two objects and does the assignment automatically.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Dec 22 '15 at 15:34









        Ellis

        13813




        13813










        answered Sep 9 '10 at 1:42









        StackerStacker

        4,3161565123




        4,3161565123








        • 1





          That what i mean exactly

          – Khalid Omar
          Sep 9 '10 at 1:54











        • Nice solution, but as you said, overhead and complexity :)

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19











        • I guess you have missed to make use of 'z' variable. It should be used when initializing 'members' var i.e. List<MemberInfo> members = z.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name) .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

          – Aamol
          Feb 27 '17 at 23:09








        • 2





          The extension method Cast will cause conflict with System.Linq Enumerable.Cast<TResult> and could result in an error that is hard to debug. Changing the name is recommended.

          – usefulBee
          Jan 16 '18 at 15:47
















        • 1





          That what i mean exactly

          – Khalid Omar
          Sep 9 '10 at 1:54











        • Nice solution, but as you said, overhead and complexity :)

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19











        • I guess you have missed to make use of 'z' variable. It should be used when initializing 'members' var i.e. List<MemberInfo> members = z.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name) .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

          – Aamol
          Feb 27 '17 at 23:09








        • 2





          The extension method Cast will cause conflict with System.Linq Enumerable.Cast<TResult> and could result in an error that is hard to debug. Changing the name is recommended.

          – usefulBee
          Jan 16 '18 at 15:47










        1




        1





        That what i mean exactly

        – Khalid Omar
        Sep 9 '10 at 1:54





        That what i mean exactly

        – Khalid Omar
        Sep 9 '10 at 1:54













        Nice solution, but as you said, overhead and complexity :)

        – Noctis
        Apr 14 '14 at 0:19





        Nice solution, but as you said, overhead and complexity :)

        – Noctis
        Apr 14 '14 at 0:19













        I guess you have missed to make use of 'z' variable. It should be used when initializing 'members' var i.e. List<MemberInfo> members = z.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name) .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

        – Aamol
        Feb 27 '17 at 23:09







        I guess you have missed to make use of 'z' variable. It should be used when initializing 'members' var i.e. List<MemberInfo> members = z.Where(memberInfo => d.Select(c => c.Name) .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

        – Aamol
        Feb 27 '17 at 23:09






        2




        2





        The extension method Cast will cause conflict with System.Linq Enumerable.Cast<TResult> and could result in an error that is hard to debug. Changing the name is recommended.

        – usefulBee
        Jan 16 '18 at 15:47







        The extension method Cast will cause conflict with System.Linq Enumerable.Cast<TResult> and could result in an error that is hard to debug. Changing the name is recommended.

        – usefulBee
        Jan 16 '18 at 15:47















        51














        You have already defined the conversion, you just need to take it one step further if you would like to be able to cast. For example:



        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;

        public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 obj)
        {
        maincs output = new maincs() { a = obj.a, b = obj.b, c = obj.c };
        return output;
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        sub1 mySub = new sub1();
        maincs myMain = (maincs)mySub;
        }





        share|improve this answer



















        • 3





          Even better than the selected answer

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19






        • 1





          Great answer. Thanks.

          – Ellis
          Dec 22 '15 at 14:39











        • Are there any implications for converting/casting from one class to another with the exact props using your code?

          – Code
          Apr 5 '17 at 7:36
















        51














        You have already defined the conversion, you just need to take it one step further if you would like to be able to cast. For example:



        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;

        public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 obj)
        {
        maincs output = new maincs() { a = obj.a, b = obj.b, c = obj.c };
        return output;
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        sub1 mySub = new sub1();
        maincs myMain = (maincs)mySub;
        }





        share|improve this answer



















        • 3





          Even better than the selected answer

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19






        • 1





          Great answer. Thanks.

          – Ellis
          Dec 22 '15 at 14:39











        • Are there any implications for converting/casting from one class to another with the exact props using your code?

          – Code
          Apr 5 '17 at 7:36














        51












        51








        51







        You have already defined the conversion, you just need to take it one step further if you would like to be able to cast. For example:



        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;

        public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 obj)
        {
        maincs output = new maincs() { a = obj.a, b = obj.b, c = obj.c };
        return output;
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        sub1 mySub = new sub1();
        maincs myMain = (maincs)mySub;
        }





        share|improve this answer













        You have already defined the conversion, you just need to take it one step further if you would like to be able to cast. For example:



        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;

        public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 obj)
        {
        maincs output = new maincs() { a = obj.a, b = obj.b, c = obj.c };
        return output;
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        sub1 mySub = new sub1();
        maincs myMain = (maincs)mySub;
        }






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 8 '10 at 23:48









        Anthony PegramAnthony Pegram

        99.5k22193231




        99.5k22193231








        • 3





          Even better than the selected answer

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19






        • 1





          Great answer. Thanks.

          – Ellis
          Dec 22 '15 at 14:39











        • Are there any implications for converting/casting from one class to another with the exact props using your code?

          – Code
          Apr 5 '17 at 7:36














        • 3





          Even better than the selected answer

          – Noctis
          Apr 14 '14 at 0:19






        • 1





          Great answer. Thanks.

          – Ellis
          Dec 22 '15 at 14:39











        • Are there any implications for converting/casting from one class to another with the exact props using your code?

          – Code
          Apr 5 '17 at 7:36








        3




        3





        Even better than the selected answer

        – Noctis
        Apr 14 '14 at 0:19





        Even better than the selected answer

        – Noctis
        Apr 14 '14 at 0:19




        1




        1





        Great answer. Thanks.

        – Ellis
        Dec 22 '15 at 14:39





        Great answer. Thanks.

        – Ellis
        Dec 22 '15 at 14:39













        Are there any implications for converting/casting from one class to another with the exact props using your code?

        – Code
        Apr 5 '17 at 7:36





        Are there any implications for converting/casting from one class to another with the exact props using your code?

        – Code
        Apr 5 '17 at 7:36











        27














        Use JSON serialization and deserialization:



        using Newtonsoft.Json;

        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj1));




        Or:



        public class Class1
        {
        public static explicit operator Class2(Class1 obj)
        {
        return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = (Class2)obj1;
        }





        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          Yes, using Newtonsoft json serializer is quite simple and efficient. There is .Net serializer but I found Newtonsoft do well over .Net json serializer. I found this link which gives a brief comparision newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonNetVsDotNetSerializers.htm

          – Aamol
          Feb 28 '17 at 0:38






        • 1





          this seemed latest and worked best for my needs. upvoted!

          – Puerto
          Jun 12 '18 at 13:03
















        27














        Use JSON serialization and deserialization:



        using Newtonsoft.Json;

        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj1));




        Or:



        public class Class1
        {
        public static explicit operator Class2(Class1 obj)
        {
        return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = (Class2)obj1;
        }





        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          Yes, using Newtonsoft json serializer is quite simple and efficient. There is .Net serializer but I found Newtonsoft do well over .Net json serializer. I found this link which gives a brief comparision newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonNetVsDotNetSerializers.htm

          – Aamol
          Feb 28 '17 at 0:38






        • 1





          this seemed latest and worked best for my needs. upvoted!

          – Puerto
          Jun 12 '18 at 13:03














        27












        27








        27







        Use JSON serialization and deserialization:



        using Newtonsoft.Json;

        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj1));




        Or:



        public class Class1
        {
        public static explicit operator Class2(Class1 obj)
        {
        return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = (Class2)obj1;
        }





        share|improve this answer















        Use JSON serialization and deserialization:



        using Newtonsoft.Json;

        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj1));




        Or:



        public class Class1
        {
        public static explicit operator Class2(Class1 obj)
        {
        return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Class2>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
        }
        }


        Which then allows you to do something like



        static void Main()
        {
        Class1 obj1 = new Class1();
        Class2 obj2 = (Class2)obj1;
        }






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 9 '18 at 12:58

























        answered Jul 22 '16 at 5:45









        Tyler LongTyler Long

        10.9k67065




        10.9k67065








        • 1





          Yes, using Newtonsoft json serializer is quite simple and efficient. There is .Net serializer but I found Newtonsoft do well over .Net json serializer. I found this link which gives a brief comparision newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonNetVsDotNetSerializers.htm

          – Aamol
          Feb 28 '17 at 0:38






        • 1





          this seemed latest and worked best for my needs. upvoted!

          – Puerto
          Jun 12 '18 at 13:03














        • 1





          Yes, using Newtonsoft json serializer is quite simple and efficient. There is .Net serializer but I found Newtonsoft do well over .Net json serializer. I found this link which gives a brief comparision newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonNetVsDotNetSerializers.htm

          – Aamol
          Feb 28 '17 at 0:38






        • 1





          this seemed latest and worked best for my needs. upvoted!

          – Puerto
          Jun 12 '18 at 13:03








        1




        1





        Yes, using Newtonsoft json serializer is quite simple and efficient. There is .Net serializer but I found Newtonsoft do well over .Net json serializer. I found this link which gives a brief comparision newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonNetVsDotNetSerializers.htm

        – Aamol
        Feb 28 '17 at 0:38





        Yes, using Newtonsoft json serializer is quite simple and efficient. There is .Net serializer but I found Newtonsoft do well over .Net json serializer. I found this link which gives a brief comparision newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonNetVsDotNetSerializers.htm

        – Aamol
        Feb 28 '17 at 0:38




        1




        1





        this seemed latest and worked best for my needs. upvoted!

        – Puerto
        Jun 12 '18 at 13:03





        this seemed latest and worked best for my needs. upvoted!

        – Puerto
        Jun 12 '18 at 13:03











        5














        You could change your class structure to:



        public class maincs : sub1
        {
        public int d;
        }

        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;
        }


        Then you could keep a list of sub1 and cast some of them to mainc.






        share|improve this answer


























        • This doesn't compile either. Maybe you forgot the class keyword

          – Carlos Muñoz
          Sep 8 '10 at 23:48













        • Oops, that's what I get for copy/paste.

          – Jake Pearson
          Sep 9 '10 at 2:04
















        5














        You could change your class structure to:



        public class maincs : sub1
        {
        public int d;
        }

        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;
        }


        Then you could keep a list of sub1 and cast some of them to mainc.






        share|improve this answer


























        • This doesn't compile either. Maybe you forgot the class keyword

          – Carlos Muñoz
          Sep 8 '10 at 23:48













        • Oops, that's what I get for copy/paste.

          – Jake Pearson
          Sep 9 '10 at 2:04














        5












        5








        5







        You could change your class structure to:



        public class maincs : sub1
        {
        public int d;
        }

        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;
        }


        Then you could keep a list of sub1 and cast some of them to mainc.






        share|improve this answer















        You could change your class structure to:



        public class maincs : sub1
        {
        public int d;
        }

        public class sub1
        {
        public int a;
        public int b;
        public int c;
        }


        Then you could keep a list of sub1 and cast some of them to mainc.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Sep 9 '10 at 2:04

























        answered Sep 8 '10 at 23:46









        Jake PearsonJake Pearson

        18k86388




        18k86388













        • This doesn't compile either. Maybe you forgot the class keyword

          – Carlos Muñoz
          Sep 8 '10 at 23:48













        • Oops, that's what I get for copy/paste.

          – Jake Pearson
          Sep 9 '10 at 2:04



















        • This doesn't compile either. Maybe you forgot the class keyword

          – Carlos Muñoz
          Sep 8 '10 at 23:48













        • Oops, that's what I get for copy/paste.

          – Jake Pearson
          Sep 9 '10 at 2:04

















        This doesn't compile either. Maybe you forgot the class keyword

        – Carlos Muñoz
        Sep 8 '10 at 23:48







        This doesn't compile either. Maybe you forgot the class keyword

        – Carlos Muñoz
        Sep 8 '10 at 23:48















        Oops, that's what I get for copy/paste.

        – Jake Pearson
        Sep 9 '10 at 2:04





        Oops, that's what I get for copy/paste.

        – Jake Pearson
        Sep 9 '10 at 2:04











        2














        You can provide an explicit overload for the cast operator:



        public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 val)
        {
        var ret = new maincs() { a = val.a, b = val.b, c = val.c };
        return ret;
        }


        Another option would be to use an interface that has the a, b, and c properties and implement the interface on both of the classes. Then just have the parameter type to methoda be the interface instead of the class.






        share|improve this answer




























          2














          You can provide an explicit overload for the cast operator:



          public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 val)
          {
          var ret = new maincs() { a = val.a, b = val.b, c = val.c };
          return ret;
          }


          Another option would be to use an interface that has the a, b, and c properties and implement the interface on both of the classes. Then just have the parameter type to methoda be the interface instead of the class.






          share|improve this answer


























            2












            2








            2







            You can provide an explicit overload for the cast operator:



            public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 val)
            {
            var ret = new maincs() { a = val.a, b = val.b, c = val.c };
            return ret;
            }


            Another option would be to use an interface that has the a, b, and c properties and implement the interface on both of the classes. Then just have the parameter type to methoda be the interface instead of the class.






            share|improve this answer













            You can provide an explicit overload for the cast operator:



            public static explicit operator maincs(sub1 val)
            {
            var ret = new maincs() { a = val.a, b = val.b, c = val.c };
            return ret;
            }


            Another option would be to use an interface that has the a, b, and c properties and implement the interface on both of the classes. Then just have the parameter type to methoda be the interface instead of the class.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Sep 8 '10 at 23:50









            Chris ShafferChris Shaffer

            28.5k44160




            28.5k44160























                1














                By using following code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                public class CopyClass
                {
                /// <summary>
                /// Copy an object to destination object, only matching fields will be copied
                /// </summary>
                /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
                /// <param name="sourceObject">An object with matching fields of the destination object</param>
                /// <param name="destObject">Destination object, must already be created</param>
                public static void CopyObject<T>(object sourceObject, ref T destObject)
                {
                // If either the source, or destination is null, return
                if (sourceObject == null || destObject == null)
                return;

                // Get the type of each object
                Type sourceType = sourceObject.GetType();
                Type targetType = destObject.GetType();

                // Loop through the source properties
                foreach (PropertyInfo p in sourceType.GetProperties())
                {
                // Get the matching property in the destination object
                PropertyInfo targetObj = targetType.GetProperty(p.Name);
                // If there is none, skip
                if (targetObj == null)
                continue;

                // Set the value in the destination
                targetObj.SetValue(destObject, p.GetValue(sourceObject, null), null);
                }
                }
                }


                Call Method Like,



                ClassA objA = new ClassA();
                ClassB objB = new ClassB();

                CopyClass.CopyObject(objOfferMast, ref objB);


                It will copy objA into objB.






                share|improve this answer





















                • 1





                  Please be aware that if you're using this solution, you might run into issues when classes have the same name for properties, but with different types. For example: public class A { public int Age{get;set;}} and public class B { public string Age{get;set;}} Will throw an exception, if you're trying to convert from A to B

                  – Noctis
                  Apr 14 '14 at 0:32













                • This type of conversion could also lead to some huge performance issues. Use it carefully and certainly not in for-loops

                  – RPDeshaies
                  Jun 16 '15 at 14:55
















                1














                By using following code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                public class CopyClass
                {
                /// <summary>
                /// Copy an object to destination object, only matching fields will be copied
                /// </summary>
                /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
                /// <param name="sourceObject">An object with matching fields of the destination object</param>
                /// <param name="destObject">Destination object, must already be created</param>
                public static void CopyObject<T>(object sourceObject, ref T destObject)
                {
                // If either the source, or destination is null, return
                if (sourceObject == null || destObject == null)
                return;

                // Get the type of each object
                Type sourceType = sourceObject.GetType();
                Type targetType = destObject.GetType();

                // Loop through the source properties
                foreach (PropertyInfo p in sourceType.GetProperties())
                {
                // Get the matching property in the destination object
                PropertyInfo targetObj = targetType.GetProperty(p.Name);
                // If there is none, skip
                if (targetObj == null)
                continue;

                // Set the value in the destination
                targetObj.SetValue(destObject, p.GetValue(sourceObject, null), null);
                }
                }
                }


                Call Method Like,



                ClassA objA = new ClassA();
                ClassB objB = new ClassB();

                CopyClass.CopyObject(objOfferMast, ref objB);


                It will copy objA into objB.






                share|improve this answer





















                • 1





                  Please be aware that if you're using this solution, you might run into issues when classes have the same name for properties, but with different types. For example: public class A { public int Age{get;set;}} and public class B { public string Age{get;set;}} Will throw an exception, if you're trying to convert from A to B

                  – Noctis
                  Apr 14 '14 at 0:32













                • This type of conversion could also lead to some huge performance issues. Use it carefully and certainly not in for-loops

                  – RPDeshaies
                  Jun 16 '15 at 14:55














                1












                1








                1







                By using following code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                public class CopyClass
                {
                /// <summary>
                /// Copy an object to destination object, only matching fields will be copied
                /// </summary>
                /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
                /// <param name="sourceObject">An object with matching fields of the destination object</param>
                /// <param name="destObject">Destination object, must already be created</param>
                public static void CopyObject<T>(object sourceObject, ref T destObject)
                {
                // If either the source, or destination is null, return
                if (sourceObject == null || destObject == null)
                return;

                // Get the type of each object
                Type sourceType = sourceObject.GetType();
                Type targetType = destObject.GetType();

                // Loop through the source properties
                foreach (PropertyInfo p in sourceType.GetProperties())
                {
                // Get the matching property in the destination object
                PropertyInfo targetObj = targetType.GetProperty(p.Name);
                // If there is none, skip
                if (targetObj == null)
                continue;

                // Set the value in the destination
                targetObj.SetValue(destObject, p.GetValue(sourceObject, null), null);
                }
                }
                }


                Call Method Like,



                ClassA objA = new ClassA();
                ClassB objB = new ClassB();

                CopyClass.CopyObject(objOfferMast, ref objB);


                It will copy objA into objB.






                share|improve this answer















                By using following code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                public class CopyClass
                {
                /// <summary>
                /// Copy an object to destination object, only matching fields will be copied
                /// </summary>
                /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
                /// <param name="sourceObject">An object with matching fields of the destination object</param>
                /// <param name="destObject">Destination object, must already be created</param>
                public static void CopyObject<T>(object sourceObject, ref T destObject)
                {
                // If either the source, or destination is null, return
                if (sourceObject == null || destObject == null)
                return;

                // Get the type of each object
                Type sourceType = sourceObject.GetType();
                Type targetType = destObject.GetType();

                // Loop through the source properties
                foreach (PropertyInfo p in sourceType.GetProperties())
                {
                // Get the matching property in the destination object
                PropertyInfo targetObj = targetType.GetProperty(p.Name);
                // If there is none, skip
                if (targetObj == null)
                continue;

                // Set the value in the destination
                targetObj.SetValue(destObject, p.GetValue(sourceObject, null), null);
                }
                }
                }


                Call Method Like,



                ClassA objA = new ClassA();
                ClassB objB = new ClassB();

                CopyClass.CopyObject(objOfferMast, ref objB);


                It will copy objA into objB.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 16 '14 at 4:59









                nawfal

                43.6k36257304




                43.6k36257304










                answered Oct 4 '13 at 6:31









                Kailas ManeKailas Mane

                1,43211211




                1,43211211








                • 1





                  Please be aware that if you're using this solution, you might run into issues when classes have the same name for properties, but with different types. For example: public class A { public int Age{get;set;}} and public class B { public string Age{get;set;}} Will throw an exception, if you're trying to convert from A to B

                  – Noctis
                  Apr 14 '14 at 0:32













                • This type of conversion could also lead to some huge performance issues. Use it carefully and certainly not in for-loops

                  – RPDeshaies
                  Jun 16 '15 at 14:55














                • 1





                  Please be aware that if you're using this solution, you might run into issues when classes have the same name for properties, but with different types. For example: public class A { public int Age{get;set;}} and public class B { public string Age{get;set;}} Will throw an exception, if you're trying to convert from A to B

                  – Noctis
                  Apr 14 '14 at 0:32













                • This type of conversion could also lead to some huge performance issues. Use it carefully and certainly not in for-loops

                  – RPDeshaies
                  Jun 16 '15 at 14:55








                1




                1





                Please be aware that if you're using this solution, you might run into issues when classes have the same name for properties, but with different types. For example: public class A { public int Age{get;set;}} and public class B { public string Age{get;set;}} Will throw an exception, if you're trying to convert from A to B

                – Noctis
                Apr 14 '14 at 0:32







                Please be aware that if you're using this solution, you might run into issues when classes have the same name for properties, but with different types. For example: public class A { public int Age{get;set;}} and public class B { public string Age{get;set;}} Will throw an exception, if you're trying to convert from A to B

                – Noctis
                Apr 14 '14 at 0:32















                This type of conversion could also lead to some huge performance issues. Use it carefully and certainly not in for-loops

                – RPDeshaies
                Jun 16 '15 at 14:55





                This type of conversion could also lead to some huge performance issues. Use it carefully and certainly not in for-loops

                – RPDeshaies
                Jun 16 '15 at 14:55











                1














                There are some great answers here, I just wanted to add a little bit of type checking here as we cannot assume that if properties exist with the same name, that they are of the same type. Here is my offering, which extends on the previous, very excellent answer as I had a few little glitches with it.



                In this version I have allowed for the consumer to specify fields to be excluded, and also by default to exclude any database / model specific related properties.



                    public static T Transform<T>(this object myobj, string excludeFields = null)
                {
                // Compose a list of unwanted members
                if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(excludeFields))
                excludeFields = string.Empty;
                excludeFields = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(excludeFields) ? excludeFields + "," : excludeFields;
                excludeFields += $"{nameof(DBTable.ID)},{nameof(DBTable.InstanceID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedBy)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedByID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedOn)}";

                var objectType = myobj.GetType();
                var targetType = typeof(T);
                var targetInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(targetType, false);

                // Find common members by name
                var sourceMembers = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var targetMembers = from source in targetType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var commonMembers = targetMembers.Where(memberInfo => sourceMembers.Select(c => c.Name)
                .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

                // Remove unwanted members
                commonMembers.RemoveWhere(x => x.Name.InList(excludeFields));

                foreach (var memberInfo in commonMembers)
                {
                if (!((PropertyInfo)memberInfo).CanWrite) continue;

                var targetProperty = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (targetProperty == null) continue;

                var sourceProperty = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (sourceProperty == null) continue;

                // Check source and target types are the same
                if (sourceProperty.PropertyType.Name != targetProperty.PropertyType.Name) continue;

                var value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name)?.GetValue(myobj, null);
                if (value == null) continue;

                // Set the value
                targetProperty.SetValue(targetInstance, value, null);
                }
                return (T)targetInstance;
                }





                share|improve this answer
























                • that will work as long as you dont have ENUMS in your object as properties

                  – Natalia Z
                  Jun 29 '18 at 15:28
















                1














                There are some great answers here, I just wanted to add a little bit of type checking here as we cannot assume that if properties exist with the same name, that they are of the same type. Here is my offering, which extends on the previous, very excellent answer as I had a few little glitches with it.



                In this version I have allowed for the consumer to specify fields to be excluded, and also by default to exclude any database / model specific related properties.



                    public static T Transform<T>(this object myobj, string excludeFields = null)
                {
                // Compose a list of unwanted members
                if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(excludeFields))
                excludeFields = string.Empty;
                excludeFields = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(excludeFields) ? excludeFields + "," : excludeFields;
                excludeFields += $"{nameof(DBTable.ID)},{nameof(DBTable.InstanceID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedBy)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedByID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedOn)}";

                var objectType = myobj.GetType();
                var targetType = typeof(T);
                var targetInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(targetType, false);

                // Find common members by name
                var sourceMembers = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var targetMembers = from source in targetType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var commonMembers = targetMembers.Where(memberInfo => sourceMembers.Select(c => c.Name)
                .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

                // Remove unwanted members
                commonMembers.RemoveWhere(x => x.Name.InList(excludeFields));

                foreach (var memberInfo in commonMembers)
                {
                if (!((PropertyInfo)memberInfo).CanWrite) continue;

                var targetProperty = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (targetProperty == null) continue;

                var sourceProperty = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (sourceProperty == null) continue;

                // Check source and target types are the same
                if (sourceProperty.PropertyType.Name != targetProperty.PropertyType.Name) continue;

                var value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name)?.GetValue(myobj, null);
                if (value == null) continue;

                // Set the value
                targetProperty.SetValue(targetInstance, value, null);
                }
                return (T)targetInstance;
                }





                share|improve this answer
























                • that will work as long as you dont have ENUMS in your object as properties

                  – Natalia Z
                  Jun 29 '18 at 15:28














                1












                1








                1







                There are some great answers here, I just wanted to add a little bit of type checking here as we cannot assume that if properties exist with the same name, that they are of the same type. Here is my offering, which extends on the previous, very excellent answer as I had a few little glitches with it.



                In this version I have allowed for the consumer to specify fields to be excluded, and also by default to exclude any database / model specific related properties.



                    public static T Transform<T>(this object myobj, string excludeFields = null)
                {
                // Compose a list of unwanted members
                if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(excludeFields))
                excludeFields = string.Empty;
                excludeFields = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(excludeFields) ? excludeFields + "," : excludeFields;
                excludeFields += $"{nameof(DBTable.ID)},{nameof(DBTable.InstanceID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedBy)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedByID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedOn)}";

                var objectType = myobj.GetType();
                var targetType = typeof(T);
                var targetInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(targetType, false);

                // Find common members by name
                var sourceMembers = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var targetMembers = from source in targetType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var commonMembers = targetMembers.Where(memberInfo => sourceMembers.Select(c => c.Name)
                .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

                // Remove unwanted members
                commonMembers.RemoveWhere(x => x.Name.InList(excludeFields));

                foreach (var memberInfo in commonMembers)
                {
                if (!((PropertyInfo)memberInfo).CanWrite) continue;

                var targetProperty = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (targetProperty == null) continue;

                var sourceProperty = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (sourceProperty == null) continue;

                // Check source and target types are the same
                if (sourceProperty.PropertyType.Name != targetProperty.PropertyType.Name) continue;

                var value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name)?.GetValue(myobj, null);
                if (value == null) continue;

                // Set the value
                targetProperty.SetValue(targetInstance, value, null);
                }
                return (T)targetInstance;
                }





                share|improve this answer













                There are some great answers here, I just wanted to add a little bit of type checking here as we cannot assume that if properties exist with the same name, that they are of the same type. Here is my offering, which extends on the previous, very excellent answer as I had a few little glitches with it.



                In this version I have allowed for the consumer to specify fields to be excluded, and also by default to exclude any database / model specific related properties.



                    public static T Transform<T>(this object myobj, string excludeFields = null)
                {
                // Compose a list of unwanted members
                if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(excludeFields))
                excludeFields = string.Empty;
                excludeFields = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(excludeFields) ? excludeFields + "," : excludeFields;
                excludeFields += $"{nameof(DBTable.ID)},{nameof(DBTable.InstanceID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedBy)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedByID)},{nameof(AuditableBase.CreatedOn)}";

                var objectType = myobj.GetType();
                var targetType = typeof(T);
                var targetInstance = Activator.CreateInstance(targetType, false);

                // Find common members by name
                var sourceMembers = from source in objectType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var targetMembers = from source in targetType.GetMembers().ToList()
                where source.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property
                select source;
                var commonMembers = targetMembers.Where(memberInfo => sourceMembers.Select(c => c.Name)
                .ToList().Contains(memberInfo.Name)).ToList();

                // Remove unwanted members
                commonMembers.RemoveWhere(x => x.Name.InList(excludeFields));

                foreach (var memberInfo in commonMembers)
                {
                if (!((PropertyInfo)memberInfo).CanWrite) continue;

                var targetProperty = typeof(T).GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (targetProperty == null) continue;

                var sourceProperty = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name);
                if (sourceProperty == null) continue;

                // Check source and target types are the same
                if (sourceProperty.PropertyType.Name != targetProperty.PropertyType.Name) continue;

                var value = myobj.GetType().GetProperty(memberInfo.Name)?.GetValue(myobj, null);
                if (value == null) continue;

                // Set the value
                targetProperty.SetValue(targetInstance, value, null);
                }
                return (T)targetInstance;
                }






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 4 '18 at 22:42









                SpaceKatSpaceKat

                5316




                5316













                • that will work as long as you dont have ENUMS in your object as properties

                  – Natalia Z
                  Jun 29 '18 at 15:28



















                • that will work as long as you dont have ENUMS in your object as properties

                  – Natalia Z
                  Jun 29 '18 at 15:28

















                that will work as long as you dont have ENUMS in your object as properties

                – Natalia Z
                Jun 29 '18 at 15:28





                that will work as long as you dont have ENUMS in your object as properties

                – Natalia Z
                Jun 29 '18 at 15:28











                1














                Using this code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                JavaScriptSerializer JsonConvert = new JavaScriptSerializer(); 
                string serializeString = JsonConvert.Serialize(objectEntity);
                objectViewModel objVM = JsonConvert.Deserialize<objectViewModel>(serializeString);





                share|improve this answer




























                  1














                  Using this code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                  JavaScriptSerializer JsonConvert = new JavaScriptSerializer(); 
                  string serializeString = JsonConvert.Serialize(objectEntity);
                  objectViewModel objVM = JsonConvert.Deserialize<objectViewModel>(serializeString);





                  share|improve this answer


























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Using this code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                    JavaScriptSerializer JsonConvert = new JavaScriptSerializer(); 
                    string serializeString = JsonConvert.Serialize(objectEntity);
                    objectViewModel objVM = JsonConvert.Deserialize<objectViewModel>(serializeString);





                    share|improve this answer













                    Using this code you can copy any class object to another class object for same name and same type of properties.



                    JavaScriptSerializer JsonConvert = new JavaScriptSerializer(); 
                    string serializeString = JsonConvert.Serialize(objectEntity);
                    objectViewModel objVM = JsonConvert.Deserialize<objectViewModel>(serializeString);






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 20 '18 at 10:59









                    Yats_BhavsarYats_Bhavsar

                    463




                    463























                        0














                        var obj =  _account.Retrieve(Email, hash);

                        AccountInfoResponse accountInfoResponse = new AccountInfoResponse();

                        if (obj != null)
                        {
                        accountInfoResponse =
                        JsonConvert.
                        DeserializeObject<AccountInfoResponse>
                        (JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
                        }


                        image description






                        share|improve this answer






























                          0














                          var obj =  _account.Retrieve(Email, hash);

                          AccountInfoResponse accountInfoResponse = new AccountInfoResponse();

                          if (obj != null)
                          {
                          accountInfoResponse =
                          JsonConvert.
                          DeserializeObject<AccountInfoResponse>
                          (JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
                          }


                          image description






                          share|improve this answer




























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            var obj =  _account.Retrieve(Email, hash);

                            AccountInfoResponse accountInfoResponse = new AccountInfoResponse();

                            if (obj != null)
                            {
                            accountInfoResponse =
                            JsonConvert.
                            DeserializeObject<AccountInfoResponse>
                            (JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
                            }


                            image description






                            share|improve this answer















                            var obj =  _account.Retrieve(Email, hash);

                            AccountInfoResponse accountInfoResponse = new AccountInfoResponse();

                            if (obj != null)
                            {
                            accountInfoResponse =
                            JsonConvert.
                            DeserializeObject<AccountInfoResponse>
                            (JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj));
                            }


                            image description







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Nov 23 '18 at 6:51









                            Keyur PATEL

                            2,0941936




                            2,0941936










                            answered Nov 23 '18 at 6:21









                            Varun Tej Reddy PutchakayalaVarun Tej Reddy Putchakayala

                            1




                            1






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f3672742%2fcast-class-into-another-class-or-convert-class-to-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

                                Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

                                Zucchini