Does Rust have an equivalent of -Ofast -march=native?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







2















Does Rust have an equivalent of CFLAGS="-Ofast -march=native" C gcc compiler optimizations?
                                                                                                                                                                              










share|improve this question































    2















    Does Rust have an equivalent of CFLAGS="-Ofast -march=native" C gcc compiler optimizations?
                                                                                                                                                                                  










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      Does Rust have an equivalent of CFLAGS="-Ofast -march=native" C gcc compiler optimizations?
                                                                                                                                                                                    










      share|improve this question
















      Does Rust have an equivalent of CFLAGS="-Ofast -march=native" C gcc compiler optimizations?
                                                                                                                                                                                    







      rust






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:44









      Shepmaster

      164k16341489




      164k16341489










      asked Nov 25 '18 at 10:40









      timkofutimkofu

      1,09111019




      1,09111019
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          To optimise for the native CPU, you can use



          RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native"


          I think LLVM optimises for speed (or more specifically, throughput) by default; I couldn't really find documentation on this, but this is what the source code suggests.



          You should be able to select a different cost model using e.g.



          RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native -C llvm-args='-cost-kind=latency'"


          but I haven't tried this, nor do I know any details about the effect of this switch.






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53466667%2fdoes-rust-have-an-equivalent-of-ofast-march-native%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            To optimise for the native CPU, you can use



            RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native"


            I think LLVM optimises for speed (or more specifically, throughput) by default; I couldn't really find documentation on this, but this is what the source code suggests.



            You should be able to select a different cost model using e.g.



            RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native -C llvm-args='-cost-kind=latency'"


            but I haven't tried this, nor do I know any details about the effect of this switch.






            share|improve this answer




























              2














              To optimise for the native CPU, you can use



              RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native"


              I think LLVM optimises for speed (or more specifically, throughput) by default; I couldn't really find documentation on this, but this is what the source code suggests.



              You should be able to select a different cost model using e.g.



              RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native -C llvm-args='-cost-kind=latency'"


              but I haven't tried this, nor do I know any details about the effect of this switch.






              share|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2







                To optimise for the native CPU, you can use



                RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native"


                I think LLVM optimises for speed (or more specifically, throughput) by default; I couldn't really find documentation on this, but this is what the source code suggests.



                You should be able to select a different cost model using e.g.



                RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native -C llvm-args='-cost-kind=latency'"


                but I haven't tried this, nor do I know any details about the effect of this switch.






                share|improve this answer













                To optimise for the native CPU, you can use



                RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native"


                I think LLVM optimises for speed (or more specifically, throughput) by default; I couldn't really find documentation on this, but this is what the source code suggests.



                You should be able to select a different cost model using e.g.



                RUSTFLAGS="-C target-cpu=native -C llvm-args='-cost-kind=latency'"


                but I haven't tried this, nor do I know any details about the effect of this switch.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 25 '18 at 12:37









                Sven MarnachSven Marnach

                363k80760704




                363k80760704
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53466667%2fdoes-rust-have-an-equivalent-of-ofast-march-native%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

                    Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

                    Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()