Swift 4 JSONEncoder returns empty JSON array
I have multiple Codeable classes that I want to convert to JSON strings.
class MyCodable: NSObject, Codable {
override init() {
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
}
class Category: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self);
//... assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var categoyId: Int64;
var categoryName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case categoryId
case categoryName
}
}
class Product: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
//..assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var productId: Int64;
var categoryId: Int64;
var productName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case productId
case categoryId
case productName
}
}
I have a utility class that I am using for the conversion.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode(objects: [MyCodable]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson(object: MyCodable) -> String {
var objects = [MyCodable]();
objects.append(object);
return encode(objects: objects);
}
}
The return value is always "[{}]" no matter what is inside the array of MyCodable objects. While debugging, I can see the values of the Category object are populated.
Since MyCodable has no properties, is that why the JSONEncoder does not print out the Category properties?.. Or why doesn't it print the Category properties?
I am having the same issue with the Product object.
The goal is to avoid having to customize the JSON conversion for every class I want to print to JSON.
ios swift xcode swift4 jsonencoder
add a comment |
I have multiple Codeable classes that I want to convert to JSON strings.
class MyCodable: NSObject, Codable {
override init() {
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
}
class Category: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self);
//... assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var categoyId: Int64;
var categoryName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case categoryId
case categoryName
}
}
class Product: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
//..assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var productId: Int64;
var categoryId: Int64;
var productName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case productId
case categoryId
case productName
}
}
I have a utility class that I am using for the conversion.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode(objects: [MyCodable]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson(object: MyCodable) -> String {
var objects = [MyCodable]();
objects.append(object);
return encode(objects: objects);
}
}
The return value is always "[{}]" no matter what is inside the array of MyCodable objects. While debugging, I can see the values of the Category object are populated.
Since MyCodable has no properties, is that why the JSONEncoder does not print out the Category properties?.. Or why doesn't it print the Category properties?
I am having the same issue with the Product object.
The goal is to avoid having to customize the JSON conversion for every class I want to print to JSON.
ios swift xcode swift4 jsonencoder
add a comment |
I have multiple Codeable classes that I want to convert to JSON strings.
class MyCodable: NSObject, Codable {
override init() {
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
}
class Category: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self);
//... assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var categoyId: Int64;
var categoryName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case categoryId
case categoryName
}
}
class Product: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
//..assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var productId: Int64;
var categoryId: Int64;
var productName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case productId
case categoryId
case productName
}
}
I have a utility class that I am using for the conversion.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode(objects: [MyCodable]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson(object: MyCodable) -> String {
var objects = [MyCodable]();
objects.append(object);
return encode(objects: objects);
}
}
The return value is always "[{}]" no matter what is inside the array of MyCodable objects. While debugging, I can see the values of the Category object are populated.
Since MyCodable has no properties, is that why the JSONEncoder does not print out the Category properties?.. Or why doesn't it print the Category properties?
I am having the same issue with the Product object.
The goal is to avoid having to customize the JSON conversion for every class I want to print to JSON.
ios swift xcode swift4 jsonencoder
I have multiple Codeable classes that I want to convert to JSON strings.
class MyCodable: NSObject, Codable {
override init() {
}
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
}
class Category: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
let values = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self);
//... assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var categoyId: Int64;
var categoryName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case categoryId
case categoryName
}
}
class Product: MyCodable {
required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
//..assign values and call super.init
}
override func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
}
var productId: Int64;
var categoryId: Int64;
var productName: String;
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case productId
case categoryId
case productName
}
}
I have a utility class that I am using for the conversion.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode(objects: [MyCodable]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson(object: MyCodable) -> String {
var objects = [MyCodable]();
objects.append(object);
return encode(objects: objects);
}
}
The return value is always "[{}]" no matter what is inside the array of MyCodable objects. While debugging, I can see the values of the Category object are populated.
Since MyCodable has no properties, is that why the JSONEncoder does not print out the Category properties?.. Or why doesn't it print the Category properties?
I am having the same issue with the Product object.
The goal is to avoid having to customize the JSON conversion for every class I want to print to JSON.
ios swift xcode swift4 jsonencoder
ios swift xcode swift4 jsonencoder
asked Nov 10 at 17:59
daddygames
309112
309112
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Your reasoning is correct, MyCodable has no properties, so there is nothing to read/write. You have actually stumbled across a bug of the swift JSON Encoder and Decoder. They do not handle inheritance well. So your Product and Category class become anonymous MyCodable class that have nothing to be encoded or decoded.
Looking at your code, I see no reason for the MyCodable class. Simply have Product and Category adhere to the Codable protocol. If you need the polymorphism of being able to refer to Product and Category in the same way, define a protoocl that adheres to Codable and have Product and Category adhere to the protocol you defined. In my eyes this is redundant however there could be use cases where it is a plausible solution.
add a comment |
Your mistake is that you're trying to use inheritance instead of generics. Your JSONUtil
class should be look like this.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode<T: Encodable>(objects: [T]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson<T: Encodable>(object: T) -> String {
return encode(objects: [object]);
}
}
I'm not sure why you're creating classes inheriting from NSObject
. You may be stuck in the old Objective-C ways 😜 Prefer to use struct
over class
, unless you always need the object to be copied by reference.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53241868%2fswift-4-jsonencoder-returns-empty-json-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your reasoning is correct, MyCodable has no properties, so there is nothing to read/write. You have actually stumbled across a bug of the swift JSON Encoder and Decoder. They do not handle inheritance well. So your Product and Category class become anonymous MyCodable class that have nothing to be encoded or decoded.
Looking at your code, I see no reason for the MyCodable class. Simply have Product and Category adhere to the Codable protocol. If you need the polymorphism of being able to refer to Product and Category in the same way, define a protoocl that adheres to Codable and have Product and Category adhere to the protocol you defined. In my eyes this is redundant however there could be use cases where it is a plausible solution.
add a comment |
Your reasoning is correct, MyCodable has no properties, so there is nothing to read/write. You have actually stumbled across a bug of the swift JSON Encoder and Decoder. They do not handle inheritance well. So your Product and Category class become anonymous MyCodable class that have nothing to be encoded or decoded.
Looking at your code, I see no reason for the MyCodable class. Simply have Product and Category adhere to the Codable protocol. If you need the polymorphism of being able to refer to Product and Category in the same way, define a protoocl that adheres to Codable and have Product and Category adhere to the protocol you defined. In my eyes this is redundant however there could be use cases where it is a plausible solution.
add a comment |
Your reasoning is correct, MyCodable has no properties, so there is nothing to read/write. You have actually stumbled across a bug of the swift JSON Encoder and Decoder. They do not handle inheritance well. So your Product and Category class become anonymous MyCodable class that have nothing to be encoded or decoded.
Looking at your code, I see no reason for the MyCodable class. Simply have Product and Category adhere to the Codable protocol. If you need the polymorphism of being able to refer to Product and Category in the same way, define a protoocl that adheres to Codable and have Product and Category adhere to the protocol you defined. In my eyes this is redundant however there could be use cases where it is a plausible solution.
Your reasoning is correct, MyCodable has no properties, so there is nothing to read/write. You have actually stumbled across a bug of the swift JSON Encoder and Decoder. They do not handle inheritance well. So your Product and Category class become anonymous MyCodable class that have nothing to be encoded or decoded.
Looking at your code, I see no reason for the MyCodable class. Simply have Product and Category adhere to the Codable protocol. If you need the polymorphism of being able to refer to Product and Category in the same way, define a protoocl that adheres to Codable and have Product and Category adhere to the protocol you defined. In my eyes this is redundant however there could be use cases where it is a plausible solution.
answered Nov 10 at 18:07
Jacob
289110
289110
add a comment |
add a comment |
Your mistake is that you're trying to use inheritance instead of generics. Your JSONUtil
class should be look like this.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode<T: Encodable>(objects: [T]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson<T: Encodable>(object: T) -> String {
return encode(objects: [object]);
}
}
I'm not sure why you're creating classes inheriting from NSObject
. You may be stuck in the old Objective-C ways 😜 Prefer to use struct
over class
, unless you always need the object to be copied by reference.
add a comment |
Your mistake is that you're trying to use inheritance instead of generics. Your JSONUtil
class should be look like this.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode<T: Encodable>(objects: [T]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson<T: Encodable>(object: T) -> String {
return encode(objects: [object]);
}
}
I'm not sure why you're creating classes inheriting from NSObject
. You may be stuck in the old Objective-C ways 😜 Prefer to use struct
over class
, unless you always need the object to be copied by reference.
add a comment |
Your mistake is that you're trying to use inheritance instead of generics. Your JSONUtil
class should be look like this.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode<T: Encodable>(objects: [T]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson<T: Encodable>(object: T) -> String {
return encode(objects: [object]);
}
}
I'm not sure why you're creating classes inheriting from NSObject
. You may be stuck in the old Objective-C ways 😜 Prefer to use struct
over class
, unless you always need the object to be copied by reference.
Your mistake is that you're trying to use inheritance instead of generics. Your JSONUtil
class should be look like this.
class JSONUtil: NSObject {
public static func encode<T: Encodable>(objects: [T]) -> String {
var json: String = "";
do {
let encoder = JSONEncoder();
encoder.outputFormatting = .prettyPrinted;
let jsonData = try encoder.encode(objects);
json = String(data: jsonData, encoding: String.Encoding.utf8)!
} catch let convertError { json = "[{error: '" + convertError.localizedDescription + "'}]"; }
return json;
}
public static func toJson<T: Encodable>(object: T) -> String {
return encode(objects: [object]);
}
}
I'm not sure why you're creating classes inheriting from NSObject
. You may be stuck in the old Objective-C ways 😜 Prefer to use struct
over class
, unless you always need the object to be copied by reference.
answered Nov 10 at 19:32
Guy Kogus
6,17311827
6,17311827
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53241868%2fswift-4-jsonencoder-returns-empty-json-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown