How to prevent Liquibase from executing a modified version of the changelog?












0















I'm running Liquibase 3.6.2 and am looking for a way to prevent developers from modifying an existing changelog by adding/removing changesets. Liquibase defines a changeset as non-mutable; changing any parameter or dependency in a changeset will throw a violation error, but unfortunately, I do not see any way to prevent this from a changelog perspective.



Essentially, I'm trying to implement a convention that once a changelog is run, it can no longer be modified. New changesets must be added to a newer changelog instead.



Is there anyway I can accomplish this? How does everyone else manage non-mutability of changelogs?










share|improve this question























  • Could you please elaborate on "once a changelog is run"? There are multiple environments where changelog/changesets will be executed. Some of them do not exist yet - think about a new colleague joining your team in one month and setting up his local environment. Should changelog be open for modifications until then?

    – Illya Kysil
    Nov 22 '18 at 20:07











  • @IllyaKysil Your comment made me think a bit, and I've come to realize that you're right. In my mind, the definition is once a changelog is executed on a particular system, that it cannot be re-executed a second time. But then what prevents someone from having modified it and running the modified version on a clean DB? Nothing. So with a little more thought, it makes sense that it is based on the changesets and not the changelog. Thanks.

    – Eric B.
    Nov 27 '18 at 23:30
















0















I'm running Liquibase 3.6.2 and am looking for a way to prevent developers from modifying an existing changelog by adding/removing changesets. Liquibase defines a changeset as non-mutable; changing any parameter or dependency in a changeset will throw a violation error, but unfortunately, I do not see any way to prevent this from a changelog perspective.



Essentially, I'm trying to implement a convention that once a changelog is run, it can no longer be modified. New changesets must be added to a newer changelog instead.



Is there anyway I can accomplish this? How does everyone else manage non-mutability of changelogs?










share|improve this question























  • Could you please elaborate on "once a changelog is run"? There are multiple environments where changelog/changesets will be executed. Some of them do not exist yet - think about a new colleague joining your team in one month and setting up his local environment. Should changelog be open for modifications until then?

    – Illya Kysil
    Nov 22 '18 at 20:07











  • @IllyaKysil Your comment made me think a bit, and I've come to realize that you're right. In my mind, the definition is once a changelog is executed on a particular system, that it cannot be re-executed a second time. But then what prevents someone from having modified it and running the modified version on a clean DB? Nothing. So with a little more thought, it makes sense that it is based on the changesets and not the changelog. Thanks.

    – Eric B.
    Nov 27 '18 at 23:30














0












0








0


0






I'm running Liquibase 3.6.2 and am looking for a way to prevent developers from modifying an existing changelog by adding/removing changesets. Liquibase defines a changeset as non-mutable; changing any parameter or dependency in a changeset will throw a violation error, but unfortunately, I do not see any way to prevent this from a changelog perspective.



Essentially, I'm trying to implement a convention that once a changelog is run, it can no longer be modified. New changesets must be added to a newer changelog instead.



Is there anyway I can accomplish this? How does everyone else manage non-mutability of changelogs?










share|improve this question














I'm running Liquibase 3.6.2 and am looking for a way to prevent developers from modifying an existing changelog by adding/removing changesets. Liquibase defines a changeset as non-mutable; changing any parameter or dependency in a changeset will throw a violation error, but unfortunately, I do not see any way to prevent this from a changelog perspective.



Essentially, I'm trying to implement a convention that once a changelog is run, it can no longer be modified. New changesets must be added to a newer changelog instead.



Is there anyway I can accomplish this? How does everyone else manage non-mutability of changelogs?







liquibase






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 16 '18 at 16:42









Eric B.Eric B.

10.3k29105216




10.3k29105216













  • Could you please elaborate on "once a changelog is run"? There are multiple environments where changelog/changesets will be executed. Some of them do not exist yet - think about a new colleague joining your team in one month and setting up his local environment. Should changelog be open for modifications until then?

    – Illya Kysil
    Nov 22 '18 at 20:07











  • @IllyaKysil Your comment made me think a bit, and I've come to realize that you're right. In my mind, the definition is once a changelog is executed on a particular system, that it cannot be re-executed a second time. But then what prevents someone from having modified it and running the modified version on a clean DB? Nothing. So with a little more thought, it makes sense that it is based on the changesets and not the changelog. Thanks.

    – Eric B.
    Nov 27 '18 at 23:30



















  • Could you please elaborate on "once a changelog is run"? There are multiple environments where changelog/changesets will be executed. Some of them do not exist yet - think about a new colleague joining your team in one month and setting up his local environment. Should changelog be open for modifications until then?

    – Illya Kysil
    Nov 22 '18 at 20:07











  • @IllyaKysil Your comment made me think a bit, and I've come to realize that you're right. In my mind, the definition is once a changelog is executed on a particular system, that it cannot be re-executed a second time. But then what prevents someone from having modified it and running the modified version on a clean DB? Nothing. So with a little more thought, it makes sense that it is based on the changesets and not the changelog. Thanks.

    – Eric B.
    Nov 27 '18 at 23:30

















Could you please elaborate on "once a changelog is run"? There are multiple environments where changelog/changesets will be executed. Some of them do not exist yet - think about a new colleague joining your team in one month and setting up his local environment. Should changelog be open for modifications until then?

– Illya Kysil
Nov 22 '18 at 20:07





Could you please elaborate on "once a changelog is run"? There are multiple environments where changelog/changesets will be executed. Some of them do not exist yet - think about a new colleague joining your team in one month and setting up his local environment. Should changelog be open for modifications until then?

– Illya Kysil
Nov 22 '18 at 20:07













@IllyaKysil Your comment made me think a bit, and I've come to realize that you're right. In my mind, the definition is once a changelog is executed on a particular system, that it cannot be re-executed a second time. But then what prevents someone from having modified it and running the modified version on a clean DB? Nothing. So with a little more thought, it makes sense that it is based on the changesets and not the changelog. Thanks.

– Eric B.
Nov 27 '18 at 23:30





@IllyaKysil Your comment made me think a bit, and I've come to realize that you're right. In my mind, the definition is once a changelog is executed on a particular system, that it cannot be re-executed a second time. But then what prevents someone from having modified it and running the modified version on a clean DB? Nothing. So with a little more thought, it makes sense that it is based on the changesets and not the changelog. Thanks.

– Eric B.
Nov 27 '18 at 23:30












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53342083%2fhow-to-prevent-liquibase-from-executing-a-modified-version-of-the-changelog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53342083%2fhow-to-prevent-liquibase-from-executing-a-modified-version-of-the-changelog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

Xamarin.form Move up view when keyboard appear

Post-Redirect-Get with Spring WebFlux and Thymeleaf

Anylogic : not able to use stopDelay()