org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist while trying to...











up vote
33
down vote

favorite
5












I am trying to launch chrome with an URL, the browser launches and it does nothing after that.



I am seeing the below error after 1 minute:



Unable to open browser with url: 'https://www.google.com' (Root cause: org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist
(Driver info: chromedriver=2.39.562718 (9a2698cba08cf5a471a29d30c8b3e12becabb0e9),platform=Windows NT 10.0.15063 x86_64) (WARNING: The server did not provide any stacktrace information)


My configuration:



Chrome : 66
ChromeBrowser : 2.39.56



P.S everything works fine in Firefox










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Can you update the question with the code that is causing this error?
    – GPT14
    Jun 1 at 11:27










  • Have the same error. This is the most unstable framework I've ever used.
    – IKo
    Jul 2 at 19:12










  • There is a reported issue already. github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/issues/6077.
    – user3595231
    Jul 4 at 1:11










  • I received this error when vncserver crashed and I had no X display anymore
    – xtian
    Aug 21 at 15:10















up vote
33
down vote

favorite
5












I am trying to launch chrome with an URL, the browser launches and it does nothing after that.



I am seeing the below error after 1 minute:



Unable to open browser with url: 'https://www.google.com' (Root cause: org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist
(Driver info: chromedriver=2.39.562718 (9a2698cba08cf5a471a29d30c8b3e12becabb0e9),platform=Windows NT 10.0.15063 x86_64) (WARNING: The server did not provide any stacktrace information)


My configuration:



Chrome : 66
ChromeBrowser : 2.39.56



P.S everything works fine in Firefox










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Can you update the question with the code that is causing this error?
    – GPT14
    Jun 1 at 11:27










  • Have the same error. This is the most unstable framework I've ever used.
    – IKo
    Jul 2 at 19:12










  • There is a reported issue already. github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/issues/6077.
    – user3595231
    Jul 4 at 1:11










  • I received this error when vncserver crashed and I had no X display anymore
    – xtian
    Aug 21 at 15:10













up vote
33
down vote

favorite
5









up vote
33
down vote

favorite
5






5





I am trying to launch chrome with an URL, the browser launches and it does nothing after that.



I am seeing the below error after 1 minute:



Unable to open browser with url: 'https://www.google.com' (Root cause: org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist
(Driver info: chromedriver=2.39.562718 (9a2698cba08cf5a471a29d30c8b3e12becabb0e9),platform=Windows NT 10.0.15063 x86_64) (WARNING: The server did not provide any stacktrace information)


My configuration:



Chrome : 66
ChromeBrowser : 2.39.56



P.S everything works fine in Firefox










share|improve this question















I am trying to launch chrome with an URL, the browser launches and it does nothing after that.



I am seeing the below error after 1 minute:



Unable to open browser with url: 'https://www.google.com' (Root cause: org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist
(Driver info: chromedriver=2.39.562718 (9a2698cba08cf5a471a29d30c8b3e12becabb0e9),platform=Windows NT 10.0.15063 x86_64) (WARNING: The server did not provide any stacktrace information)


My configuration:



Chrome : 66
ChromeBrowser : 2.39.56



P.S everything works fine in Firefox







google-chrome selenium selenium-webdriver webdriver selenium-chromedriver






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 1 at 11:53









DebanjanB

37.4k73373




37.4k73373










asked Jun 1 at 11:21









Kumar Sampath

226128




226128








  • 1




    Can you update the question with the code that is causing this error?
    – GPT14
    Jun 1 at 11:27










  • Have the same error. This is the most unstable framework I've ever used.
    – IKo
    Jul 2 at 19:12










  • There is a reported issue already. github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/issues/6077.
    – user3595231
    Jul 4 at 1:11










  • I received this error when vncserver crashed and I had no X display anymore
    – xtian
    Aug 21 at 15:10














  • 1




    Can you update the question with the code that is causing this error?
    – GPT14
    Jun 1 at 11:27










  • Have the same error. This is the most unstable framework I've ever used.
    – IKo
    Jul 2 at 19:12










  • There is a reported issue already. github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/issues/6077.
    – user3595231
    Jul 4 at 1:11










  • I received this error when vncserver crashed and I had no X display anymore
    – xtian
    Aug 21 at 15:10








1




1




Can you update the question with the code that is causing this error?
– GPT14
Jun 1 at 11:27




Can you update the question with the code that is causing this error?
– GPT14
Jun 1 at 11:27












Have the same error. This is the most unstable framework I've ever used.
– IKo
Jul 2 at 19:12




Have the same error. This is the most unstable framework I've ever used.
– IKo
Jul 2 at 19:12












There is a reported issue already. github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/issues/6077.
– user3595231
Jul 4 at 1:11




There is a reported issue already. github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/issues/6077.
– user3595231
Jul 4 at 1:11












I received this error when vncserver crashed and I had no X display anymore
– xtian
Aug 21 at 15:10




I received this error when vncserver crashed and I had no X display anymore
– xtian
Aug 21 at 15:10












12 Answers
12






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
19
down vote













This error message...



org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist 


...implies that the ChromeDriver was unable to initiate/spawn a new WebBrowser i.e. Chrome Browser session.



Your code trials and the versioning information of all the binaries would have given us some hint about what's going wrong.



However as per Add --disable-dev-shm-usage to default launch flags seems adding the argument --disable-dev-shm-usage will temporary solve the issue.



If you desire to initiate/span a new Chrome Browser session you can use the following solution:



System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", "C:\path\to\chromedriver.exe");
ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
options.addArguments("start-maximized"); // open Browser in maximized mode
options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
options.addArguments("--no-sandbox"); // Bypass OS security model
WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
driver.get("https://google.com");




disable-dev-shm-usage



As per base_switches.cc disable-dev-shm-usage seems to be valid only on Linux OS:



#if defined(OS_LINUX) && !defined(OS_CHROMEOS)
// The /dev/shm partition is too small in certain VM environments, causing
// Chrome to fail or crash (see http://crbug.com/715363). Use this flag to
// work-around this issue (a temporary directory will always be used to create
// anonymous shared memory files).
const char kDisableDevShmUsage = "disable-dev-shm-usage";
#endif


In the discussion Add an option to use /tmp instead of /dev/shm David mentions:




I think it would depend on how are /dev/shm and /tmp mounted.
If they are both mounted as tmpfs I'm assuming there won't be any difference.
if for some reason /tmp is not mapped as tmpfs (and I think is mapped as tmpfs by default by systemd), chrome shared memory management always maps files into memory when creating an anonymous shared files, so even in that case shouldn't be much difference. I guess you could force telemetry tests with the flag enabled and see how it goes.



As for why not use by default, it was a pushed back by the shared memory team, I guess it makes sense it should be useing /dev/shm for shared memory by default.



Ultimately all this should be moving to use memfd_create, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon, since it will require refactoring Chrome memory management significantly.







share|improve this answer























  • But what caused this specific error about DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist, and why did it suddenly start popping up?
    – user9315861
    Jun 7 at 9:43






  • 2




    the arbitrary troubleshooting steps mentioned in "Additional Consideration" shouldn't be included in this answer.
    – Corey Goldberg
    Jun 7 at 14:11






  • 3




    The "Additional Consideration" items - they look like they're quite applicable to this issue. Especially this kind of situation where it hadn't been established exactly what caused the problem.
    – Pete Kelley
    Jun 11 at 17:01










  • removed "additional considerations"
    – Corey Goldberg
    Sep 25 at 17:51






  • 2




    From the deleted part of @DebanjanB's post, this can be caused by using a Chromedriver which does not support the version of the installed Chrome. This can happen, for example, if chrome is upgraded without upgrading Chromedriver.
    – expz
    Nov 29 at 21:12


















up vote
15
down vote













I started seeing this problem on Monday 2018-06-04. Our tests run each weekday. It appears that the only thing that changed was the google-chrome version (which had been updated to current) JVM and Selenium were recent versions on Linux box ( Java 1.8.0_151, selenium 3.12.0, google-chrome 67.0.3396.62, and xvfb-run).

Specifically adding the arguments "--no-sandbox" and "--disable-dev-shm-usage" stopped the error.
I'll look into these issues to find more info about the effect, and other questions as in what triggered google-chrome to update.



ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
...
options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage");





share|improve this answer























  • I want to clarify that this code was running each weekday on an Ubuntu Linux box, but equivalent code on Windows desktop ran OK even on Monday. I've found no info about what the functionality of the DevToolsActivePort file is for and that would be useful too. PK
    – Pete Kelley
    Jun 6 at 17:15








  • 1




    These options stopped the error for me too. pd: using a Rails stack.
    – Mario Pérez
    Jun 8 at 17:19










  • --no-sandbox was enough for me but I had to put it in first position
    – Olivier
    Sep 10 at 9:09










  • I still get [java] [1536892035.965][SEVERE]: Timed out receiving message from renderer: 60.000 errors even with this
    – Jonathan
    Sep 14 at 2:28










  • @Jonathan - Hi! can you supply some more detail, like which OS, which versions of the components you're using, or how you're invoking the process?
    – Pete Kelley
    Sep 17 at 12:13


















up vote
7
down vote













I had the same problem in python. The above helped. Here is what I used in python -



chrome_options = Options()
chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')
chrome_options.add_argument('--no-sandbox')
chrome_options.add_argument('--disable-dev-shm-usage')
driver = webdriver.Chrome('/path/to/your_chrome_driver_dir/chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)





share|improve this answer





















  • I solved my problem with upgrade chrome (I already had the latest chromedrive), hence I had to upgrade the usual browser as well.
    – axel_ande
    Sep 3 at 11:27


















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










Update:



I am able to get through the issue and now I am able to access the chrome with desired url.



Results of trying the provided solutions:



I tried all the settings as provided above but I was unable to resolve the issue



Explanation regarding the issue:



As per my observation DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist is caused when chrome is unable to find its reference in scoped_dirXXXXX folder.



Steps taken to solve the issue




  1. I have killed all the chrome processes and chrome driver processes.


  2. Added the below code to invoke the chrome



    System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver","pathto\chromedriver.exe");    
    ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
    options.setExperimentalOption("useAutomationExtension", false);
    WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
    driver.get(url);



Using the above steps I was able to resolve the issue.



Thanks for your answers.






share|improve this answer























  • I'll see if I get the same results. Thanks for sharing your solution!
    – Pete Kelley
    Jun 12 at 14:44






  • 2




    great. How did you solve it? @PeteKelley
    – alansiqueira27
    Jun 25 at 18:57


















up vote
6
down vote













We were having the same issues on our jenkins slaves (linux machine) and tried all the options above.



The only thing helped is setting the argument



chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')


But when we investigated further, noticed that XVFB screen doesn't started property and thats causing this error. After we fix XVFB screen, it resolved the issue.






share|improve this answer























  • this solved my problem, thanks
    – Charles Chow
    Aug 5 at 1:35










  • Can you please specify what was wrong with Xvfb?
    – grafa
    Sep 11 at 10:06










  • On some linux systems you have also to pass in --no-sandbox.
    – CSchulz
    Oct 4 at 9:42










  • this solved my issue, when running using C# (in this case the option looked like this: options.AddArgument("--headless");
    – ozz
    Dec 3 at 11:30


















up vote
1
down vote













I had the same issue, but in my case chrome previously was installed in user temp folder, after that was reinstalled to Program files. So any of solution provided here was not help me. But if provide path to chrome.exe all works:



chromeOptions.setBinary("C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe");


I hope this helps someone =)






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    It seems there are many possible causes for this error. In our case, the error happened because we had the following two lines in code:



    System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", chromeDriverPath);
    chromeOptions.setBinary(chromeDriverPath);


    It's solved by removing the second line.






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      No solution worked for my. But here is a workaround:



      maxcounter=5
      for counter in range(maxcounter):
      try:
      driver = webdriver.Chrome(chrome_options=options,
      service_log_path=logfile,
      service_args=["--verbose", "--log-path=%s" % logfile])
      break
      except WebDriverException as e:
      print("RETRYING INITIALIZATION OF WEBDRIVER! Error: %s" % str(e))
      time.sleep(10)
      if counter==maxcounter-1:
      raise WebDriverException("Maximum number of selenium-firefox-webdriver-retries exceeded.")





      share|improve this answer




























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        In my case it happened when I've tried to use my default user profile:



        ...
        options.addArguments("user-data-dir=D:\MyHomeDirectory\Google\Chrome\User Data");
        ...


        This triggered chrome to reuse processes already running in background, in such a way, that process started by chromedriver.exe was simply ended.



        Resolution: kill all chrome.exe processes running in background.






        share|improve this answer




























          up vote
          0
          down vote













          In my case, I was trying to create a runnable jar on Windows OS with chrome browser and want to run the same on headless mode in unix box with CentOs on it. And I was pointing my binary to a driver that I have downloaded and packaged with my suite. For me, this issue continue to occur irrespective of adding the below:



                  ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
          options.addArguments("--headless");
          options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
          System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.args", "--disable-logging");
          System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.silentOutput", "true");
          options.setBinary("/pointing/downloaded/driver/path/in/automationsuite");
          options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
          options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
          options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
          options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
          options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
          options.addArguments("window-size=1024,768"); // Bypass OS security model
          options.addArguments("--log-level=3"); // set log level
          options.addArguments("--silent");//
          options.setCapability("chrome.verbose", false); //disable logging
          driver = new ChromeDriver(options);


          Solution that I've tried and worked for me is, download the chrome and its tools on the host VM/Unix box, install and point the binary to this in the automation suite and bingo! It works :)



          Download command:
          wget https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64.rpm



          Install command:
          sudo yum install -y ./google-chrome-stable_current_*.rpm



          Update suite with below binary path of google-chrome:
          options.setBinary("/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome");



          And.. it works!






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            -2
            down vote













            I solve this problem by installing yum -y install gtk3-devel gtk3-devel-docs", it works ok



            My work env is :



            Selenium Version 3.12.0
            ChromeDriver Version v2.40
            Chrome 68 level


            Before:

            enter image description hereenter image description here



            After:

            enter image description hereenter image description here






            share|improve this answer



















            • 8




              From Review: Please don't post text in images. EDIT your answer and replace those images with text. Thanks
              – sɐunıɔןɐqɐp
              Jul 30 at 7:15






            • 1




              Does this solve the problem for anyone? This didn't solve the problem for me
              – Bendram
              Aug 31 at 13:25


















            up vote
            -2
            down vote













            Since this is the most active message for this type of error, I wanted to mention my solution (after spending hours to fix this).



            On Ubuntu 18.04, using Chrome 70 and Chromedriver 2.44, and Python3 I kept getting the same DevToolsActivePort error, even when I disabled all options listed above. The chromedriver log file as well as ps showed that the chromedriver I set in chrome_options.binary_location was running, but it always gave DevToolsActivePort error. When I removed chrome_options.binary_location='....' and add it to webdriver creation, I get it working fine.
            webdriver.Chrome('/path to ... /chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)



            Thanks everybody for your comments that make me understand and resolve the issue.






            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              });
              });
              }, "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f50642308%2forg-openqa-selenium-webdriverexception-unknown-error-devtoolsactiveport-file-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              12 Answers
              12






              active

              oldest

              votes








              12 Answers
              12






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              19
              down vote













              This error message...



              org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist 


              ...implies that the ChromeDriver was unable to initiate/spawn a new WebBrowser i.e. Chrome Browser session.



              Your code trials and the versioning information of all the binaries would have given us some hint about what's going wrong.



              However as per Add --disable-dev-shm-usage to default launch flags seems adding the argument --disable-dev-shm-usage will temporary solve the issue.



              If you desire to initiate/span a new Chrome Browser session you can use the following solution:



              System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", "C:\path\to\chromedriver.exe");
              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              options.addArguments("start-maximized"); // open Browser in maximized mode
              options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
              options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
              options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox"); // Bypass OS security model
              WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
              driver.get("https://google.com");




              disable-dev-shm-usage



              As per base_switches.cc disable-dev-shm-usage seems to be valid only on Linux OS:



              #if defined(OS_LINUX) && !defined(OS_CHROMEOS)
              // The /dev/shm partition is too small in certain VM environments, causing
              // Chrome to fail or crash (see http://crbug.com/715363). Use this flag to
              // work-around this issue (a temporary directory will always be used to create
              // anonymous shared memory files).
              const char kDisableDevShmUsage = "disable-dev-shm-usage";
              #endif


              In the discussion Add an option to use /tmp instead of /dev/shm David mentions:




              I think it would depend on how are /dev/shm and /tmp mounted.
              If they are both mounted as tmpfs I'm assuming there won't be any difference.
              if for some reason /tmp is not mapped as tmpfs (and I think is mapped as tmpfs by default by systemd), chrome shared memory management always maps files into memory when creating an anonymous shared files, so even in that case shouldn't be much difference. I guess you could force telemetry tests with the flag enabled and see how it goes.



              As for why not use by default, it was a pushed back by the shared memory team, I guess it makes sense it should be useing /dev/shm for shared memory by default.



              Ultimately all this should be moving to use memfd_create, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon, since it will require refactoring Chrome memory management significantly.







              share|improve this answer























              • But what caused this specific error about DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist, and why did it suddenly start popping up?
                – user9315861
                Jun 7 at 9:43






              • 2




                the arbitrary troubleshooting steps mentioned in "Additional Consideration" shouldn't be included in this answer.
                – Corey Goldberg
                Jun 7 at 14:11






              • 3




                The "Additional Consideration" items - they look like they're quite applicable to this issue. Especially this kind of situation where it hadn't been established exactly what caused the problem.
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 11 at 17:01










              • removed "additional considerations"
                – Corey Goldberg
                Sep 25 at 17:51






              • 2




                From the deleted part of @DebanjanB's post, this can be caused by using a Chromedriver which does not support the version of the installed Chrome. This can happen, for example, if chrome is upgraded without upgrading Chromedriver.
                – expz
                Nov 29 at 21:12















              up vote
              19
              down vote













              This error message...



              org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist 


              ...implies that the ChromeDriver was unable to initiate/spawn a new WebBrowser i.e. Chrome Browser session.



              Your code trials and the versioning information of all the binaries would have given us some hint about what's going wrong.



              However as per Add --disable-dev-shm-usage to default launch flags seems adding the argument --disable-dev-shm-usage will temporary solve the issue.



              If you desire to initiate/span a new Chrome Browser session you can use the following solution:



              System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", "C:\path\to\chromedriver.exe");
              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              options.addArguments("start-maximized"); // open Browser in maximized mode
              options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
              options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
              options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox"); // Bypass OS security model
              WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
              driver.get("https://google.com");




              disable-dev-shm-usage



              As per base_switches.cc disable-dev-shm-usage seems to be valid only on Linux OS:



              #if defined(OS_LINUX) && !defined(OS_CHROMEOS)
              // The /dev/shm partition is too small in certain VM environments, causing
              // Chrome to fail or crash (see http://crbug.com/715363). Use this flag to
              // work-around this issue (a temporary directory will always be used to create
              // anonymous shared memory files).
              const char kDisableDevShmUsage = "disable-dev-shm-usage";
              #endif


              In the discussion Add an option to use /tmp instead of /dev/shm David mentions:




              I think it would depend on how are /dev/shm and /tmp mounted.
              If they are both mounted as tmpfs I'm assuming there won't be any difference.
              if for some reason /tmp is not mapped as tmpfs (and I think is mapped as tmpfs by default by systemd), chrome shared memory management always maps files into memory when creating an anonymous shared files, so even in that case shouldn't be much difference. I guess you could force telemetry tests with the flag enabled and see how it goes.



              As for why not use by default, it was a pushed back by the shared memory team, I guess it makes sense it should be useing /dev/shm for shared memory by default.



              Ultimately all this should be moving to use memfd_create, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon, since it will require refactoring Chrome memory management significantly.







              share|improve this answer























              • But what caused this specific error about DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist, and why did it suddenly start popping up?
                – user9315861
                Jun 7 at 9:43






              • 2




                the arbitrary troubleshooting steps mentioned in "Additional Consideration" shouldn't be included in this answer.
                – Corey Goldberg
                Jun 7 at 14:11






              • 3




                The "Additional Consideration" items - they look like they're quite applicable to this issue. Especially this kind of situation where it hadn't been established exactly what caused the problem.
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 11 at 17:01










              • removed "additional considerations"
                – Corey Goldberg
                Sep 25 at 17:51






              • 2




                From the deleted part of @DebanjanB's post, this can be caused by using a Chromedriver which does not support the version of the installed Chrome. This can happen, for example, if chrome is upgraded without upgrading Chromedriver.
                – expz
                Nov 29 at 21:12













              up vote
              19
              down vote










              up vote
              19
              down vote









              This error message...



              org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist 


              ...implies that the ChromeDriver was unable to initiate/spawn a new WebBrowser i.e. Chrome Browser session.



              Your code trials and the versioning information of all the binaries would have given us some hint about what's going wrong.



              However as per Add --disable-dev-shm-usage to default launch flags seems adding the argument --disable-dev-shm-usage will temporary solve the issue.



              If you desire to initiate/span a new Chrome Browser session you can use the following solution:



              System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", "C:\path\to\chromedriver.exe");
              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              options.addArguments("start-maximized"); // open Browser in maximized mode
              options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
              options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
              options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox"); // Bypass OS security model
              WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
              driver.get("https://google.com");




              disable-dev-shm-usage



              As per base_switches.cc disable-dev-shm-usage seems to be valid only on Linux OS:



              #if defined(OS_LINUX) && !defined(OS_CHROMEOS)
              // The /dev/shm partition is too small in certain VM environments, causing
              // Chrome to fail or crash (see http://crbug.com/715363). Use this flag to
              // work-around this issue (a temporary directory will always be used to create
              // anonymous shared memory files).
              const char kDisableDevShmUsage = "disable-dev-shm-usage";
              #endif


              In the discussion Add an option to use /tmp instead of /dev/shm David mentions:




              I think it would depend on how are /dev/shm and /tmp mounted.
              If they are both mounted as tmpfs I'm assuming there won't be any difference.
              if for some reason /tmp is not mapped as tmpfs (and I think is mapped as tmpfs by default by systemd), chrome shared memory management always maps files into memory when creating an anonymous shared files, so even in that case shouldn't be much difference. I guess you could force telemetry tests with the flag enabled and see how it goes.



              As for why not use by default, it was a pushed back by the shared memory team, I guess it makes sense it should be useing /dev/shm for shared memory by default.



              Ultimately all this should be moving to use memfd_create, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon, since it will require refactoring Chrome memory management significantly.







              share|improve this answer














              This error message...



              org.openqa.selenium.WebDriverException: unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist 


              ...implies that the ChromeDriver was unable to initiate/spawn a new WebBrowser i.e. Chrome Browser session.



              Your code trials and the versioning information of all the binaries would have given us some hint about what's going wrong.



              However as per Add --disable-dev-shm-usage to default launch flags seems adding the argument --disable-dev-shm-usage will temporary solve the issue.



              If you desire to initiate/span a new Chrome Browser session you can use the following solution:



              System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", "C:\path\to\chromedriver.exe");
              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              options.addArguments("start-maximized"); // open Browser in maximized mode
              options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
              options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
              options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox"); // Bypass OS security model
              WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
              driver.get("https://google.com");




              disable-dev-shm-usage



              As per base_switches.cc disable-dev-shm-usage seems to be valid only on Linux OS:



              #if defined(OS_LINUX) && !defined(OS_CHROMEOS)
              // The /dev/shm partition is too small in certain VM environments, causing
              // Chrome to fail or crash (see http://crbug.com/715363). Use this flag to
              // work-around this issue (a temporary directory will always be used to create
              // anonymous shared memory files).
              const char kDisableDevShmUsage = "disable-dev-shm-usage";
              #endif


              In the discussion Add an option to use /tmp instead of /dev/shm David mentions:




              I think it would depend on how are /dev/shm and /tmp mounted.
              If they are both mounted as tmpfs I'm assuming there won't be any difference.
              if for some reason /tmp is not mapped as tmpfs (and I think is mapped as tmpfs by default by systemd), chrome shared memory management always maps files into memory when creating an anonymous shared files, so even in that case shouldn't be much difference. I guess you could force telemetry tests with the flag enabled and see how it goes.



              As for why not use by default, it was a pushed back by the shared memory team, I guess it makes sense it should be useing /dev/shm for shared memory by default.



              Ultimately all this should be moving to use memfd_create, but I don't think that's going to happen any time soon, since it will require refactoring Chrome memory management significantly.








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Sep 29 at 12:34









              danronmoon

              2,82542549




              2,82542549










              answered Jun 1 at 11:57









              DebanjanB

              37.4k73373




              37.4k73373












              • But what caused this specific error about DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist, and why did it suddenly start popping up?
                – user9315861
                Jun 7 at 9:43






              • 2




                the arbitrary troubleshooting steps mentioned in "Additional Consideration" shouldn't be included in this answer.
                – Corey Goldberg
                Jun 7 at 14:11






              • 3




                The "Additional Consideration" items - they look like they're quite applicable to this issue. Especially this kind of situation where it hadn't been established exactly what caused the problem.
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 11 at 17:01










              • removed "additional considerations"
                – Corey Goldberg
                Sep 25 at 17:51






              • 2




                From the deleted part of @DebanjanB's post, this can be caused by using a Chromedriver which does not support the version of the installed Chrome. This can happen, for example, if chrome is upgraded without upgrading Chromedriver.
                – expz
                Nov 29 at 21:12


















              • But what caused this specific error about DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist, and why did it suddenly start popping up?
                – user9315861
                Jun 7 at 9:43






              • 2




                the arbitrary troubleshooting steps mentioned in "Additional Consideration" shouldn't be included in this answer.
                – Corey Goldberg
                Jun 7 at 14:11






              • 3




                The "Additional Consideration" items - they look like they're quite applicable to this issue. Especially this kind of situation where it hadn't been established exactly what caused the problem.
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 11 at 17:01










              • removed "additional considerations"
                – Corey Goldberg
                Sep 25 at 17:51






              • 2




                From the deleted part of @DebanjanB's post, this can be caused by using a Chromedriver which does not support the version of the installed Chrome. This can happen, for example, if chrome is upgraded without upgrading Chromedriver.
                – expz
                Nov 29 at 21:12
















              But what caused this specific error about DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist, and why did it suddenly start popping up?
              – user9315861
              Jun 7 at 9:43




              But what caused this specific error about DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist, and why did it suddenly start popping up?
              – user9315861
              Jun 7 at 9:43




              2




              2




              the arbitrary troubleshooting steps mentioned in "Additional Consideration" shouldn't be included in this answer.
              – Corey Goldberg
              Jun 7 at 14:11




              the arbitrary troubleshooting steps mentioned in "Additional Consideration" shouldn't be included in this answer.
              – Corey Goldberg
              Jun 7 at 14:11




              3




              3




              The "Additional Consideration" items - they look like they're quite applicable to this issue. Especially this kind of situation where it hadn't been established exactly what caused the problem.
              – Pete Kelley
              Jun 11 at 17:01




              The "Additional Consideration" items - they look like they're quite applicable to this issue. Especially this kind of situation where it hadn't been established exactly what caused the problem.
              – Pete Kelley
              Jun 11 at 17:01












              removed "additional considerations"
              – Corey Goldberg
              Sep 25 at 17:51




              removed "additional considerations"
              – Corey Goldberg
              Sep 25 at 17:51




              2




              2




              From the deleted part of @DebanjanB's post, this can be caused by using a Chromedriver which does not support the version of the installed Chrome. This can happen, for example, if chrome is upgraded without upgrading Chromedriver.
              – expz
              Nov 29 at 21:12




              From the deleted part of @DebanjanB's post, this can be caused by using a Chromedriver which does not support the version of the installed Chrome. This can happen, for example, if chrome is upgraded without upgrading Chromedriver.
              – expz
              Nov 29 at 21:12












              up vote
              15
              down vote













              I started seeing this problem on Monday 2018-06-04. Our tests run each weekday. It appears that the only thing that changed was the google-chrome version (which had been updated to current) JVM and Selenium were recent versions on Linux box ( Java 1.8.0_151, selenium 3.12.0, google-chrome 67.0.3396.62, and xvfb-run).

              Specifically adding the arguments "--no-sandbox" and "--disable-dev-shm-usage" stopped the error.
              I'll look into these issues to find more info about the effect, and other questions as in what triggered google-chrome to update.



              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              ...
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage");





              share|improve this answer























              • I want to clarify that this code was running each weekday on an Ubuntu Linux box, but equivalent code on Windows desktop ran OK even on Monday. I've found no info about what the functionality of the DevToolsActivePort file is for and that would be useful too. PK
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 6 at 17:15








              • 1




                These options stopped the error for me too. pd: using a Rails stack.
                – Mario Pérez
                Jun 8 at 17:19










              • --no-sandbox was enough for me but I had to put it in first position
                – Olivier
                Sep 10 at 9:09










              • I still get [java] [1536892035.965][SEVERE]: Timed out receiving message from renderer: 60.000 errors even with this
                – Jonathan
                Sep 14 at 2:28










              • @Jonathan - Hi! can you supply some more detail, like which OS, which versions of the components you're using, or how you're invoking the process?
                – Pete Kelley
                Sep 17 at 12:13















              up vote
              15
              down vote













              I started seeing this problem on Monday 2018-06-04. Our tests run each weekday. It appears that the only thing that changed was the google-chrome version (which had been updated to current) JVM and Selenium were recent versions on Linux box ( Java 1.8.0_151, selenium 3.12.0, google-chrome 67.0.3396.62, and xvfb-run).

              Specifically adding the arguments "--no-sandbox" and "--disable-dev-shm-usage" stopped the error.
              I'll look into these issues to find more info about the effect, and other questions as in what triggered google-chrome to update.



              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              ...
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage");





              share|improve this answer























              • I want to clarify that this code was running each weekday on an Ubuntu Linux box, but equivalent code on Windows desktop ran OK even on Monday. I've found no info about what the functionality of the DevToolsActivePort file is for and that would be useful too. PK
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 6 at 17:15








              • 1




                These options stopped the error for me too. pd: using a Rails stack.
                – Mario Pérez
                Jun 8 at 17:19










              • --no-sandbox was enough for me but I had to put it in first position
                – Olivier
                Sep 10 at 9:09










              • I still get [java] [1536892035.965][SEVERE]: Timed out receiving message from renderer: 60.000 errors even with this
                – Jonathan
                Sep 14 at 2:28










              • @Jonathan - Hi! can you supply some more detail, like which OS, which versions of the components you're using, or how you're invoking the process?
                – Pete Kelley
                Sep 17 at 12:13













              up vote
              15
              down vote










              up vote
              15
              down vote









              I started seeing this problem on Monday 2018-06-04. Our tests run each weekday. It appears that the only thing that changed was the google-chrome version (which had been updated to current) JVM and Selenium were recent versions on Linux box ( Java 1.8.0_151, selenium 3.12.0, google-chrome 67.0.3396.62, and xvfb-run).

              Specifically adding the arguments "--no-sandbox" and "--disable-dev-shm-usage" stopped the error.
              I'll look into these issues to find more info about the effect, and other questions as in what triggered google-chrome to update.



              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              ...
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage");





              share|improve this answer














              I started seeing this problem on Monday 2018-06-04. Our tests run each weekday. It appears that the only thing that changed was the google-chrome version (which had been updated to current) JVM and Selenium were recent versions on Linux box ( Java 1.8.0_151, selenium 3.12.0, google-chrome 67.0.3396.62, and xvfb-run).

              Specifically adding the arguments "--no-sandbox" and "--disable-dev-shm-usage" stopped the error.
              I'll look into these issues to find more info about the effect, and other questions as in what triggered google-chrome to update.



              ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
              ...
              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage");






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jun 6 at 17:21

























              answered Jun 6 at 17:08









              Pete Kelley

              19810




              19810












              • I want to clarify that this code was running each weekday on an Ubuntu Linux box, but equivalent code on Windows desktop ran OK even on Monday. I've found no info about what the functionality of the DevToolsActivePort file is for and that would be useful too. PK
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 6 at 17:15








              • 1




                These options stopped the error for me too. pd: using a Rails stack.
                – Mario Pérez
                Jun 8 at 17:19










              • --no-sandbox was enough for me but I had to put it in first position
                – Olivier
                Sep 10 at 9:09










              • I still get [java] [1536892035.965][SEVERE]: Timed out receiving message from renderer: 60.000 errors even with this
                – Jonathan
                Sep 14 at 2:28










              • @Jonathan - Hi! can you supply some more detail, like which OS, which versions of the components you're using, or how you're invoking the process?
                – Pete Kelley
                Sep 17 at 12:13


















              • I want to clarify that this code was running each weekday on an Ubuntu Linux box, but equivalent code on Windows desktop ran OK even on Monday. I've found no info about what the functionality of the DevToolsActivePort file is for and that would be useful too. PK
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 6 at 17:15








              • 1




                These options stopped the error for me too. pd: using a Rails stack.
                – Mario Pérez
                Jun 8 at 17:19










              • --no-sandbox was enough for me but I had to put it in first position
                – Olivier
                Sep 10 at 9:09










              • I still get [java] [1536892035.965][SEVERE]: Timed out receiving message from renderer: 60.000 errors even with this
                – Jonathan
                Sep 14 at 2:28










              • @Jonathan - Hi! can you supply some more detail, like which OS, which versions of the components you're using, or how you're invoking the process?
                – Pete Kelley
                Sep 17 at 12:13
















              I want to clarify that this code was running each weekday on an Ubuntu Linux box, but equivalent code on Windows desktop ran OK even on Monday. I've found no info about what the functionality of the DevToolsActivePort file is for and that would be useful too. PK
              – Pete Kelley
              Jun 6 at 17:15






              I want to clarify that this code was running each weekday on an Ubuntu Linux box, but equivalent code on Windows desktop ran OK even on Monday. I've found no info about what the functionality of the DevToolsActivePort file is for and that would be useful too. PK
              – Pete Kelley
              Jun 6 at 17:15






              1




              1




              These options stopped the error for me too. pd: using a Rails stack.
              – Mario Pérez
              Jun 8 at 17:19




              These options stopped the error for me too. pd: using a Rails stack.
              – Mario Pérez
              Jun 8 at 17:19












              --no-sandbox was enough for me but I had to put it in first position
              – Olivier
              Sep 10 at 9:09




              --no-sandbox was enough for me but I had to put it in first position
              – Olivier
              Sep 10 at 9:09












              I still get [java] [1536892035.965][SEVERE]: Timed out receiving message from renderer: 60.000 errors even with this
              – Jonathan
              Sep 14 at 2:28




              I still get [java] [1536892035.965][SEVERE]: Timed out receiving message from renderer: 60.000 errors even with this
              – Jonathan
              Sep 14 at 2:28












              @Jonathan - Hi! can you supply some more detail, like which OS, which versions of the components you're using, or how you're invoking the process?
              – Pete Kelley
              Sep 17 at 12:13




              @Jonathan - Hi! can you supply some more detail, like which OS, which versions of the components you're using, or how you're invoking the process?
              – Pete Kelley
              Sep 17 at 12:13










              up vote
              7
              down vote













              I had the same problem in python. The above helped. Here is what I used in python -



              chrome_options = Options()
              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--no-sandbox')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--disable-dev-shm-usage')
              driver = webdriver.Chrome('/path/to/your_chrome_driver_dir/chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)





              share|improve this answer





















              • I solved my problem with upgrade chrome (I already had the latest chromedrive), hence I had to upgrade the usual browser as well.
                – axel_ande
                Sep 3 at 11:27















              up vote
              7
              down vote













              I had the same problem in python. The above helped. Here is what I used in python -



              chrome_options = Options()
              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--no-sandbox')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--disable-dev-shm-usage')
              driver = webdriver.Chrome('/path/to/your_chrome_driver_dir/chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)





              share|improve this answer





















              • I solved my problem with upgrade chrome (I already had the latest chromedrive), hence I had to upgrade the usual browser as well.
                – axel_ande
                Sep 3 at 11:27













              up vote
              7
              down vote










              up vote
              7
              down vote









              I had the same problem in python. The above helped. Here is what I used in python -



              chrome_options = Options()
              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--no-sandbox')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--disable-dev-shm-usage')
              driver = webdriver.Chrome('/path/to/your_chrome_driver_dir/chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)





              share|improve this answer












              I had the same problem in python. The above helped. Here is what I used in python -



              chrome_options = Options()
              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--no-sandbox')
              chrome_options.add_argument('--disable-dev-shm-usage')
              driver = webdriver.Chrome('/path/to/your_chrome_driver_dir/chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Jun 13 at 1:15









              Vinodh Periyasamy

              711




              711












              • I solved my problem with upgrade chrome (I already had the latest chromedrive), hence I had to upgrade the usual browser as well.
                – axel_ande
                Sep 3 at 11:27


















              • I solved my problem with upgrade chrome (I already had the latest chromedrive), hence I had to upgrade the usual browser as well.
                – axel_ande
                Sep 3 at 11:27
















              I solved my problem with upgrade chrome (I already had the latest chromedrive), hence I had to upgrade the usual browser as well.
              – axel_ande
              Sep 3 at 11:27




              I solved my problem with upgrade chrome (I already had the latest chromedrive), hence I had to upgrade the usual browser as well.
              – axel_ande
              Sep 3 at 11:27










              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted










              Update:



              I am able to get through the issue and now I am able to access the chrome with desired url.



              Results of trying the provided solutions:



              I tried all the settings as provided above but I was unable to resolve the issue



              Explanation regarding the issue:



              As per my observation DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist is caused when chrome is unable to find its reference in scoped_dirXXXXX folder.



              Steps taken to solve the issue




              1. I have killed all the chrome processes and chrome driver processes.


              2. Added the below code to invoke the chrome



                System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver","pathto\chromedriver.exe");    
                ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                options.setExperimentalOption("useAutomationExtension", false);
                WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
                driver.get(url);



              Using the above steps I was able to resolve the issue.



              Thanks for your answers.






              share|improve this answer























              • I'll see if I get the same results. Thanks for sharing your solution!
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 12 at 14:44






              • 2




                great. How did you solve it? @PeteKelley
                – alansiqueira27
                Jun 25 at 18:57















              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted










              Update:



              I am able to get through the issue and now I am able to access the chrome with desired url.



              Results of trying the provided solutions:



              I tried all the settings as provided above but I was unable to resolve the issue



              Explanation regarding the issue:



              As per my observation DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist is caused when chrome is unable to find its reference in scoped_dirXXXXX folder.



              Steps taken to solve the issue




              1. I have killed all the chrome processes and chrome driver processes.


              2. Added the below code to invoke the chrome



                System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver","pathto\chromedriver.exe");    
                ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                options.setExperimentalOption("useAutomationExtension", false);
                WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
                driver.get(url);



              Using the above steps I was able to resolve the issue.



              Thanks for your answers.






              share|improve this answer























              • I'll see if I get the same results. Thanks for sharing your solution!
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 12 at 14:44






              • 2




                great. How did you solve it? @PeteKelley
                – alansiqueira27
                Jun 25 at 18:57













              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted






              Update:



              I am able to get through the issue and now I am able to access the chrome with desired url.



              Results of trying the provided solutions:



              I tried all the settings as provided above but I was unable to resolve the issue



              Explanation regarding the issue:



              As per my observation DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist is caused when chrome is unable to find its reference in scoped_dirXXXXX folder.



              Steps taken to solve the issue




              1. I have killed all the chrome processes and chrome driver processes.


              2. Added the below code to invoke the chrome



                System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver","pathto\chromedriver.exe");    
                ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                options.setExperimentalOption("useAutomationExtension", false);
                WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
                driver.get(url);



              Using the above steps I was able to resolve the issue.



              Thanks for your answers.






              share|improve this answer














              Update:



              I am able to get through the issue and now I am able to access the chrome with desired url.



              Results of trying the provided solutions:



              I tried all the settings as provided above but I was unable to resolve the issue



              Explanation regarding the issue:



              As per my observation DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist is caused when chrome is unable to find its reference in scoped_dirXXXXX folder.



              Steps taken to solve the issue




              1. I have killed all the chrome processes and chrome driver processes.


              2. Added the below code to invoke the chrome



                System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver","pathto\chromedriver.exe");    
                ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                options.setExperimentalOption("useAutomationExtension", false);
                WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
                driver.get(url);



              Using the above steps I was able to resolve the issue.



              Thanks for your answers.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jul 10 at 7:09









              DebanjanB

              37.4k73373




              37.4k73373










              answered Jun 8 at 15:32









              Kumar Sampath

              226128




              226128












              • I'll see if I get the same results. Thanks for sharing your solution!
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 12 at 14:44






              • 2




                great. How did you solve it? @PeteKelley
                – alansiqueira27
                Jun 25 at 18:57


















              • I'll see if I get the same results. Thanks for sharing your solution!
                – Pete Kelley
                Jun 12 at 14:44






              • 2




                great. How did you solve it? @PeteKelley
                – alansiqueira27
                Jun 25 at 18:57
















              I'll see if I get the same results. Thanks for sharing your solution!
              – Pete Kelley
              Jun 12 at 14:44




              I'll see if I get the same results. Thanks for sharing your solution!
              – Pete Kelley
              Jun 12 at 14:44




              2




              2




              great. How did you solve it? @PeteKelley
              – alansiqueira27
              Jun 25 at 18:57




              great. How did you solve it? @PeteKelley
              – alansiqueira27
              Jun 25 at 18:57










              up vote
              6
              down vote













              We were having the same issues on our jenkins slaves (linux machine) and tried all the options above.



              The only thing helped is setting the argument



              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')


              But when we investigated further, noticed that XVFB screen doesn't started property and thats causing this error. After we fix XVFB screen, it resolved the issue.






              share|improve this answer























              • this solved my problem, thanks
                – Charles Chow
                Aug 5 at 1:35










              • Can you please specify what was wrong with Xvfb?
                – grafa
                Sep 11 at 10:06










              • On some linux systems you have also to pass in --no-sandbox.
                – CSchulz
                Oct 4 at 9:42










              • this solved my issue, when running using C# (in this case the option looked like this: options.AddArgument("--headless");
                – ozz
                Dec 3 at 11:30















              up vote
              6
              down vote













              We were having the same issues on our jenkins slaves (linux machine) and tried all the options above.



              The only thing helped is setting the argument



              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')


              But when we investigated further, noticed that XVFB screen doesn't started property and thats causing this error. After we fix XVFB screen, it resolved the issue.






              share|improve this answer























              • this solved my problem, thanks
                – Charles Chow
                Aug 5 at 1:35










              • Can you please specify what was wrong with Xvfb?
                – grafa
                Sep 11 at 10:06










              • On some linux systems you have also to pass in --no-sandbox.
                – CSchulz
                Oct 4 at 9:42










              • this solved my issue, when running using C# (in this case the option looked like this: options.AddArgument("--headless");
                – ozz
                Dec 3 at 11:30













              up vote
              6
              down vote










              up vote
              6
              down vote









              We were having the same issues on our jenkins slaves (linux machine) and tried all the options above.



              The only thing helped is setting the argument



              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')


              But when we investigated further, noticed that XVFB screen doesn't started property and thats causing this error. After we fix XVFB screen, it resolved the issue.






              share|improve this answer














              We were having the same issues on our jenkins slaves (linux machine) and tried all the options above.



              The only thing helped is setting the argument



              chrome_options.add_argument('--headless')


              But when we investigated further, noticed that XVFB screen doesn't started property and thats causing this error. After we fix XVFB screen, it resolved the issue.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Sep 6 at 14:43









              DebanjanB

              37.4k73373




              37.4k73373










              answered Jul 25 at 4:39









              Sreejith Edayillam

              611




              611












              • this solved my problem, thanks
                – Charles Chow
                Aug 5 at 1:35










              • Can you please specify what was wrong with Xvfb?
                – grafa
                Sep 11 at 10:06










              • On some linux systems you have also to pass in --no-sandbox.
                – CSchulz
                Oct 4 at 9:42










              • this solved my issue, when running using C# (in this case the option looked like this: options.AddArgument("--headless");
                – ozz
                Dec 3 at 11:30


















              • this solved my problem, thanks
                – Charles Chow
                Aug 5 at 1:35










              • Can you please specify what was wrong with Xvfb?
                – grafa
                Sep 11 at 10:06










              • On some linux systems you have also to pass in --no-sandbox.
                – CSchulz
                Oct 4 at 9:42










              • this solved my issue, when running using C# (in this case the option looked like this: options.AddArgument("--headless");
                – ozz
                Dec 3 at 11:30
















              this solved my problem, thanks
              – Charles Chow
              Aug 5 at 1:35




              this solved my problem, thanks
              – Charles Chow
              Aug 5 at 1:35












              Can you please specify what was wrong with Xvfb?
              – grafa
              Sep 11 at 10:06




              Can you please specify what was wrong with Xvfb?
              – grafa
              Sep 11 at 10:06












              On some linux systems you have also to pass in --no-sandbox.
              – CSchulz
              Oct 4 at 9:42




              On some linux systems you have also to pass in --no-sandbox.
              – CSchulz
              Oct 4 at 9:42












              this solved my issue, when running using C# (in this case the option looked like this: options.AddArgument("--headless");
              – ozz
              Dec 3 at 11:30




              this solved my issue, when running using C# (in this case the option looked like this: options.AddArgument("--headless");
              – ozz
              Dec 3 at 11:30










              up vote
              1
              down vote













              I had the same issue, but in my case chrome previously was installed in user temp folder, after that was reinstalled to Program files. So any of solution provided here was not help me. But if provide path to chrome.exe all works:



              chromeOptions.setBinary("C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe");


              I hope this helps someone =)






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                I had the same issue, but in my case chrome previously was installed in user temp folder, after that was reinstalled to Program files. So any of solution provided here was not help me. But if provide path to chrome.exe all works:



                chromeOptions.setBinary("C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe");


                I hope this helps someone =)






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  I had the same issue, but in my case chrome previously was installed in user temp folder, after that was reinstalled to Program files. So any of solution provided here was not help me. But if provide path to chrome.exe all works:



                  chromeOptions.setBinary("C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe");


                  I hope this helps someone =)






                  share|improve this answer












                  I had the same issue, but in my case chrome previously was installed in user temp folder, after that was reinstalled to Program files. So any of solution provided here was not help me. But if provide path to chrome.exe all works:



                  chromeOptions.setBinary("C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe");


                  I hope this helps someone =)







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jul 13 at 13:21









                  Sergiy Konoplyaniy

                  1917




                  1917






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      It seems there are many possible causes for this error. In our case, the error happened because we had the following two lines in code:



                      System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", chromeDriverPath);
                      chromeOptions.setBinary(chromeDriverPath);


                      It's solved by removing the second line.






                      share|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        It seems there are many possible causes for this error. In our case, the error happened because we had the following two lines in code:



                        System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", chromeDriverPath);
                        chromeOptions.setBinary(chromeDriverPath);


                        It's solved by removing the second line.






                        share|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          It seems there are many possible causes for this error. In our case, the error happened because we had the following two lines in code:



                          System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", chromeDriverPath);
                          chromeOptions.setBinary(chromeDriverPath);


                          It's solved by removing the second line.






                          share|improve this answer












                          It seems there are many possible causes for this error. In our case, the error happened because we had the following two lines in code:



                          System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", chromeDriverPath);
                          chromeOptions.setBinary(chromeDriverPath);


                          It's solved by removing the second line.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 3 at 23:45









                          shiuu

                          185




                          185






















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              No solution worked for my. But here is a workaround:



                              maxcounter=5
                              for counter in range(maxcounter):
                              try:
                              driver = webdriver.Chrome(chrome_options=options,
                              service_log_path=logfile,
                              service_args=["--verbose", "--log-path=%s" % logfile])
                              break
                              except WebDriverException as e:
                              print("RETRYING INITIALIZATION OF WEBDRIVER! Error: %s" % str(e))
                              time.sleep(10)
                              if counter==maxcounter-1:
                              raise WebDriverException("Maximum number of selenium-firefox-webdriver-retries exceeded.")





                              share|improve this answer

























                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                No solution worked for my. But here is a workaround:



                                maxcounter=5
                                for counter in range(maxcounter):
                                try:
                                driver = webdriver.Chrome(chrome_options=options,
                                service_log_path=logfile,
                                service_args=["--verbose", "--log-path=%s" % logfile])
                                break
                                except WebDriverException as e:
                                print("RETRYING INITIALIZATION OF WEBDRIVER! Error: %s" % str(e))
                                time.sleep(10)
                                if counter==maxcounter-1:
                                raise WebDriverException("Maximum number of selenium-firefox-webdriver-retries exceeded.")





                                share|improve this answer























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote










                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote









                                  No solution worked for my. But here is a workaround:



                                  maxcounter=5
                                  for counter in range(maxcounter):
                                  try:
                                  driver = webdriver.Chrome(chrome_options=options,
                                  service_log_path=logfile,
                                  service_args=["--verbose", "--log-path=%s" % logfile])
                                  break
                                  except WebDriverException as e:
                                  print("RETRYING INITIALIZATION OF WEBDRIVER! Error: %s" % str(e))
                                  time.sleep(10)
                                  if counter==maxcounter-1:
                                  raise WebDriverException("Maximum number of selenium-firefox-webdriver-retries exceeded.")





                                  share|improve this answer












                                  No solution worked for my. But here is a workaround:



                                  maxcounter=5
                                  for counter in range(maxcounter):
                                  try:
                                  driver = webdriver.Chrome(chrome_options=options,
                                  service_log_path=logfile,
                                  service_args=["--verbose", "--log-path=%s" % logfile])
                                  break
                                  except WebDriverException as e:
                                  print("RETRYING INITIALIZATION OF WEBDRIVER! Error: %s" % str(e))
                                  time.sleep(10)
                                  if counter==maxcounter-1:
                                  raise WebDriverException("Maximum number of selenium-firefox-webdriver-retries exceeded.")






                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered Oct 30 at 8:19









                                  Alex

                                  13.6k36122244




                                  13.6k36122244






















                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote













                                      In my case it happened when I've tried to use my default user profile:



                                      ...
                                      options.addArguments("user-data-dir=D:\MyHomeDirectory\Google\Chrome\User Data");
                                      ...


                                      This triggered chrome to reuse processes already running in background, in such a way, that process started by chromedriver.exe was simply ended.



                                      Resolution: kill all chrome.exe processes running in background.






                                      share|improve this answer

























                                        up vote
                                        0
                                        down vote













                                        In my case it happened when I've tried to use my default user profile:



                                        ...
                                        options.addArguments("user-data-dir=D:\MyHomeDirectory\Google\Chrome\User Data");
                                        ...


                                        This triggered chrome to reuse processes already running in background, in such a way, that process started by chromedriver.exe was simply ended.



                                        Resolution: kill all chrome.exe processes running in background.






                                        share|improve this answer























                                          up vote
                                          0
                                          down vote










                                          up vote
                                          0
                                          down vote









                                          In my case it happened when I've tried to use my default user profile:



                                          ...
                                          options.addArguments("user-data-dir=D:\MyHomeDirectory\Google\Chrome\User Data");
                                          ...


                                          This triggered chrome to reuse processes already running in background, in such a way, that process started by chromedriver.exe was simply ended.



                                          Resolution: kill all chrome.exe processes running in background.






                                          share|improve this answer












                                          In my case it happened when I've tried to use my default user profile:



                                          ...
                                          options.addArguments("user-data-dir=D:\MyHomeDirectory\Google\Chrome\User Data");
                                          ...


                                          This triggered chrome to reuse processes already running in background, in such a way, that process started by chromedriver.exe was simply ended.



                                          Resolution: kill all chrome.exe processes running in background.







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered Nov 15 at 13:21









                                          radzimir

                                          834




                                          834






















                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote













                                              In my case, I was trying to create a runnable jar on Windows OS with chrome browser and want to run the same on headless mode in unix box with CentOs on it. And I was pointing my binary to a driver that I have downloaded and packaged with my suite. For me, this issue continue to occur irrespective of adding the below:



                                                      ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                                              options.addArguments("--headless");
                                              options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
                                              System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.args", "--disable-logging");
                                              System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.silentOutput", "true");
                                              options.setBinary("/pointing/downloaded/driver/path/in/automationsuite");
                                              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                              options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
                                              options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
                                              options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
                                              options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                              options.addArguments("window-size=1024,768"); // Bypass OS security model
                                              options.addArguments("--log-level=3"); // set log level
                                              options.addArguments("--silent");//
                                              options.setCapability("chrome.verbose", false); //disable logging
                                              driver = new ChromeDriver(options);


                                              Solution that I've tried and worked for me is, download the chrome and its tools on the host VM/Unix box, install and point the binary to this in the automation suite and bingo! It works :)



                                              Download command:
                                              wget https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64.rpm



                                              Install command:
                                              sudo yum install -y ./google-chrome-stable_current_*.rpm



                                              Update suite with below binary path of google-chrome:
                                              options.setBinary("/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome");



                                              And.. it works!






                                              share|improve this answer

























                                                up vote
                                                0
                                                down vote













                                                In my case, I was trying to create a runnable jar on Windows OS with chrome browser and want to run the same on headless mode in unix box with CentOs on it. And I was pointing my binary to a driver that I have downloaded and packaged with my suite. For me, this issue continue to occur irrespective of adding the below:



                                                        ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                                                options.addArguments("--headless");
                                                options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
                                                System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.args", "--disable-logging");
                                                System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.silentOutput", "true");
                                                options.setBinary("/pointing/downloaded/driver/path/in/automationsuite");
                                                options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                                options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
                                                options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
                                                options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
                                                options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                                options.addArguments("window-size=1024,768"); // Bypass OS security model
                                                options.addArguments("--log-level=3"); // set log level
                                                options.addArguments("--silent");//
                                                options.setCapability("chrome.verbose", false); //disable logging
                                                driver = new ChromeDriver(options);


                                                Solution that I've tried and worked for me is, download the chrome and its tools on the host VM/Unix box, install and point the binary to this in the automation suite and bingo! It works :)



                                                Download command:
                                                wget https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64.rpm



                                                Install command:
                                                sudo yum install -y ./google-chrome-stable_current_*.rpm



                                                Update suite with below binary path of google-chrome:
                                                options.setBinary("/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome");



                                                And.. it works!






                                                share|improve this answer























                                                  up vote
                                                  0
                                                  down vote










                                                  up vote
                                                  0
                                                  down vote









                                                  In my case, I was trying to create a runnable jar on Windows OS with chrome browser and want to run the same on headless mode in unix box with CentOs on it. And I was pointing my binary to a driver that I have downloaded and packaged with my suite. For me, this issue continue to occur irrespective of adding the below:



                                                          ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                                                  options.addArguments("--headless");
                                                  options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
                                                  System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.args", "--disable-logging");
                                                  System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.silentOutput", "true");
                                                  options.setBinary("/pointing/downloaded/driver/path/in/automationsuite");
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                                  options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                                  options.addArguments("window-size=1024,768"); // Bypass OS security model
                                                  options.addArguments("--log-level=3"); // set log level
                                                  options.addArguments("--silent");//
                                                  options.setCapability("chrome.verbose", false); //disable logging
                                                  driver = new ChromeDriver(options);


                                                  Solution that I've tried and worked for me is, download the chrome and its tools on the host VM/Unix box, install and point the binary to this in the automation suite and bingo! It works :)



                                                  Download command:
                                                  wget https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64.rpm



                                                  Install command:
                                                  sudo yum install -y ./google-chrome-stable_current_*.rpm



                                                  Update suite with below binary path of google-chrome:
                                                  options.setBinary("/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome");



                                                  And.. it works!






                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                  In my case, I was trying to create a runnable jar on Windows OS with chrome browser and want to run the same on headless mode in unix box with CentOs on it. And I was pointing my binary to a driver that I have downloaded and packaged with my suite. For me, this issue continue to occur irrespective of adding the below:



                                                          ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();
                                                  options.addArguments("--headless");
                                                  options.addArguments("--no-sandbox");
                                                  System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.args", "--disable-logging");
                                                  System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.silentOutput", "true");
                                                  options.setBinary("/pointing/downloaded/driver/path/in/automationsuite");
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                                  options.addArguments("disable-infobars"); // disabling infobars
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-extensions"); // disabling extensions
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-gpu"); // applicable to windows os only
                                                  options.addArguments("--disable-dev-shm-usage"); // overcome limited resource problems
                                                  options.addArguments("window-size=1024,768"); // Bypass OS security model
                                                  options.addArguments("--log-level=3"); // set log level
                                                  options.addArguments("--silent");//
                                                  options.setCapability("chrome.verbose", false); //disable logging
                                                  driver = new ChromeDriver(options);


                                                  Solution that I've tried and worked for me is, download the chrome and its tools on the host VM/Unix box, install and point the binary to this in the automation suite and bingo! It works :)



                                                  Download command:
                                                  wget https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64.rpm



                                                  Install command:
                                                  sudo yum install -y ./google-chrome-stable_current_*.rpm



                                                  Update suite with below binary path of google-chrome:
                                                  options.setBinary("/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome");



                                                  And.. it works!







                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                  answered Nov 19 at 7:04









                                                  parvez basha

                                                  1




                                                  1






















                                                      up vote
                                                      -2
                                                      down vote













                                                      I solve this problem by installing yum -y install gtk3-devel gtk3-devel-docs", it works ok



                                                      My work env is :



                                                      Selenium Version 3.12.0
                                                      ChromeDriver Version v2.40
                                                      Chrome 68 level


                                                      Before:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here



                                                      After:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here






                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                      • 8




                                                        From Review: Please don't post text in images. EDIT your answer and replace those images with text. Thanks
                                                        – sɐunıɔןɐqɐp
                                                        Jul 30 at 7:15






                                                      • 1




                                                        Does this solve the problem for anyone? This didn't solve the problem for me
                                                        – Bendram
                                                        Aug 31 at 13:25















                                                      up vote
                                                      -2
                                                      down vote













                                                      I solve this problem by installing yum -y install gtk3-devel gtk3-devel-docs", it works ok



                                                      My work env is :



                                                      Selenium Version 3.12.0
                                                      ChromeDriver Version v2.40
                                                      Chrome 68 level


                                                      Before:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here



                                                      After:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here






                                                      share|improve this answer



















                                                      • 8




                                                        From Review: Please don't post text in images. EDIT your answer and replace those images with text. Thanks
                                                        – sɐunıɔןɐqɐp
                                                        Jul 30 at 7:15






                                                      • 1




                                                        Does this solve the problem for anyone? This didn't solve the problem for me
                                                        – Bendram
                                                        Aug 31 at 13:25













                                                      up vote
                                                      -2
                                                      down vote










                                                      up vote
                                                      -2
                                                      down vote









                                                      I solve this problem by installing yum -y install gtk3-devel gtk3-devel-docs", it works ok



                                                      My work env is :



                                                      Selenium Version 3.12.0
                                                      ChromeDriver Version v2.40
                                                      Chrome 68 level


                                                      Before:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here



                                                      After:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here






                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                      I solve this problem by installing yum -y install gtk3-devel gtk3-devel-docs", it works ok



                                                      My work env is :



                                                      Selenium Version 3.12.0
                                                      ChromeDriver Version v2.40
                                                      Chrome 68 level


                                                      Before:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here



                                                      After:

                                                      enter image description hereenter image description here







                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      edited Jul 30 at 7:54









                                                      JustBaron

                                                      2,01961728




                                                      2,01961728










                                                      answered Jul 30 at 6:43









                                                      何贤勇

                                                      52




                                                      52








                                                      • 8




                                                        From Review: Please don't post text in images. EDIT your answer and replace those images with text. Thanks
                                                        – sɐunıɔןɐqɐp
                                                        Jul 30 at 7:15






                                                      • 1




                                                        Does this solve the problem for anyone? This didn't solve the problem for me
                                                        – Bendram
                                                        Aug 31 at 13:25














                                                      • 8




                                                        From Review: Please don't post text in images. EDIT your answer and replace those images with text. Thanks
                                                        – sɐunıɔןɐqɐp
                                                        Jul 30 at 7:15






                                                      • 1




                                                        Does this solve the problem for anyone? This didn't solve the problem for me
                                                        – Bendram
                                                        Aug 31 at 13:25








                                                      8




                                                      8




                                                      From Review: Please don't post text in images. EDIT your answer and replace those images with text. Thanks
                                                      – sɐunıɔןɐqɐp
                                                      Jul 30 at 7:15




                                                      From Review: Please don't post text in images. EDIT your answer and replace those images with text. Thanks
                                                      – sɐunıɔןɐqɐp
                                                      Jul 30 at 7:15




                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      Does this solve the problem for anyone? This didn't solve the problem for me
                                                      – Bendram
                                                      Aug 31 at 13:25




                                                      Does this solve the problem for anyone? This didn't solve the problem for me
                                                      – Bendram
                                                      Aug 31 at 13:25










                                                      up vote
                                                      -2
                                                      down vote













                                                      Since this is the most active message for this type of error, I wanted to mention my solution (after spending hours to fix this).



                                                      On Ubuntu 18.04, using Chrome 70 and Chromedriver 2.44, and Python3 I kept getting the same DevToolsActivePort error, even when I disabled all options listed above. The chromedriver log file as well as ps showed that the chromedriver I set in chrome_options.binary_location was running, but it always gave DevToolsActivePort error. When I removed chrome_options.binary_location='....' and add it to webdriver creation, I get it working fine.
                                                      webdriver.Chrome('/path to ... /chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)



                                                      Thanks everybody for your comments that make me understand and resolve the issue.






                                                      share|improve this answer

























                                                        up vote
                                                        -2
                                                        down vote













                                                        Since this is the most active message for this type of error, I wanted to mention my solution (after spending hours to fix this).



                                                        On Ubuntu 18.04, using Chrome 70 and Chromedriver 2.44, and Python3 I kept getting the same DevToolsActivePort error, even when I disabled all options listed above. The chromedriver log file as well as ps showed that the chromedriver I set in chrome_options.binary_location was running, but it always gave DevToolsActivePort error. When I removed chrome_options.binary_location='....' and add it to webdriver creation, I get it working fine.
                                                        webdriver.Chrome('/path to ... /chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)



                                                        Thanks everybody for your comments that make me understand and resolve the issue.






                                                        share|improve this answer























                                                          up vote
                                                          -2
                                                          down vote










                                                          up vote
                                                          -2
                                                          down vote









                                                          Since this is the most active message for this type of error, I wanted to mention my solution (after spending hours to fix this).



                                                          On Ubuntu 18.04, using Chrome 70 and Chromedriver 2.44, and Python3 I kept getting the same DevToolsActivePort error, even when I disabled all options listed above. The chromedriver log file as well as ps showed that the chromedriver I set in chrome_options.binary_location was running, but it always gave DevToolsActivePort error. When I removed chrome_options.binary_location='....' and add it to webdriver creation, I get it working fine.
                                                          webdriver.Chrome('/path to ... /chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)



                                                          Thanks everybody for your comments that make me understand and resolve the issue.






                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                          Since this is the most active message for this type of error, I wanted to mention my solution (after spending hours to fix this).



                                                          On Ubuntu 18.04, using Chrome 70 and Chromedriver 2.44, and Python3 I kept getting the same DevToolsActivePort error, even when I disabled all options listed above. The chromedriver log file as well as ps showed that the chromedriver I set in chrome_options.binary_location was running, but it always gave DevToolsActivePort error. When I removed chrome_options.binary_location='....' and add it to webdriver creation, I get it working fine.
                                                          webdriver.Chrome('/path to ... /chromedriver',chrome_options=chrome_options)



                                                          Thanks everybody for your comments that make me understand and resolve the issue.







                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                          answered Nov 27 at 22:48









                                                          Obrc

                                                          1




                                                          1






























                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded




















































                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f50642308%2forg-openqa-selenium-webdriverexception-unknown-error-devtoolsactiveport-file-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                                              Tangent Lines Diagram Along Smooth Curve

                                                              Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud

                                                              Zucchini