Low score in Linear Regression with discrete attributes
I'm trying to do a linear regression in my dataframe. The dataframe is about apple applications, and I want to predict the notes of applications. The notes are in following format:
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
...
5.0
My code is:
atributos = ['size_bytes','price','rating_count_tot','cont_rating','sup_devices_num','num_screenshots','num_lang','vpp_lic']
atrib_prev = ['nota']
X = np.array(data_regress.drop(['nota'],1))
y = np.array(data_regress['nota'])
X = preprocessing.scale(X)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = cross_validation.train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2)
clf = LinearRegression()
clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
accuracy = clf.score(X_test, y_test)
print(accuracy)
But my accuracy is 0.046295306696438665. I think this occurs because the linear model is predicting real values, while my 'note' is real, but at intervals. I don't know how to round this values before the clf.score
.
pandas jupyter-notebook sklearn-pandas
add a comment |
I'm trying to do a linear regression in my dataframe. The dataframe is about apple applications, and I want to predict the notes of applications. The notes are in following format:
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
...
5.0
My code is:
atributos = ['size_bytes','price','rating_count_tot','cont_rating','sup_devices_num','num_screenshots','num_lang','vpp_lic']
atrib_prev = ['nota']
X = np.array(data_regress.drop(['nota'],1))
y = np.array(data_regress['nota'])
X = preprocessing.scale(X)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = cross_validation.train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2)
clf = LinearRegression()
clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
accuracy = clf.score(X_test, y_test)
print(accuracy)
But my accuracy is 0.046295306696438665. I think this occurs because the linear model is predicting real values, while my 'note' is real, but at intervals. I don't know how to round this values before the clf.score
.
pandas jupyter-notebook sklearn-pandas
add a comment |
I'm trying to do a linear regression in my dataframe. The dataframe is about apple applications, and I want to predict the notes of applications. The notes are in following format:
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
...
5.0
My code is:
atributos = ['size_bytes','price','rating_count_tot','cont_rating','sup_devices_num','num_screenshots','num_lang','vpp_lic']
atrib_prev = ['nota']
X = np.array(data_regress.drop(['nota'],1))
y = np.array(data_regress['nota'])
X = preprocessing.scale(X)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = cross_validation.train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2)
clf = LinearRegression()
clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
accuracy = clf.score(X_test, y_test)
print(accuracy)
But my accuracy is 0.046295306696438665. I think this occurs because the linear model is predicting real values, while my 'note' is real, but at intervals. I don't know how to round this values before the clf.score
.
pandas jupyter-notebook sklearn-pandas
I'm trying to do a linear regression in my dataframe. The dataframe is about apple applications, and I want to predict the notes of applications. The notes are in following format:
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
...
5.0
My code is:
atributos = ['size_bytes','price','rating_count_tot','cont_rating','sup_devices_num','num_screenshots','num_lang','vpp_lic']
atrib_prev = ['nota']
X = np.array(data_regress.drop(['nota'],1))
y = np.array(data_regress['nota'])
X = preprocessing.scale(X)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = cross_validation.train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2)
clf = LinearRegression()
clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
accuracy = clf.score(X_test, y_test)
print(accuracy)
But my accuracy is 0.046295306696438665. I think this occurs because the linear model is predicting real values, while my 'note' is real, but at intervals. I don't know how to round this values before the clf.score
.
pandas jupyter-notebook sklearn-pandas
pandas jupyter-notebook sklearn-pandas
edited Nov 14 '18 at 12:56
Aqueous Carlos
293213
293213
asked Nov 13 '18 at 0:10
Giovanni BrogiatoGiovanni Brogiato
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
First, for regression models, clf.score()
calculates R-squared value, not accuracy. So you would need to decide if you want to treat this problem as a classification problem (For some fixed number of target labels) or a regression problem (for a real-valued target)
Secondly, if you insist on using regression models and not classification, you can call clf.predict()
to first get the predicted values and then round off as you want to, and then call r2_score()
on actual and predicted labels. Something like:
# Get actual predictions
y_pred = clf.predict(X_test)
# You will need to implement the round function yourself
y_pred_rounded = round(y_pred)
# Call the appropriate scorer
score = r2_score(y_test, y_pred_rounded)
You can look at the sklearn documentation here for available metrics in sklearn.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271929%2flow-score-in-linear-regression-with-discrete-attributes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
First, for regression models, clf.score()
calculates R-squared value, not accuracy. So you would need to decide if you want to treat this problem as a classification problem (For some fixed number of target labels) or a regression problem (for a real-valued target)
Secondly, if you insist on using regression models and not classification, you can call clf.predict()
to first get the predicted values and then round off as you want to, and then call r2_score()
on actual and predicted labels. Something like:
# Get actual predictions
y_pred = clf.predict(X_test)
# You will need to implement the round function yourself
y_pred_rounded = round(y_pred)
# Call the appropriate scorer
score = r2_score(y_test, y_pred_rounded)
You can look at the sklearn documentation here for available metrics in sklearn.
add a comment |
First, for regression models, clf.score()
calculates R-squared value, not accuracy. So you would need to decide if you want to treat this problem as a classification problem (For some fixed number of target labels) or a regression problem (for a real-valued target)
Secondly, if you insist on using regression models and not classification, you can call clf.predict()
to first get the predicted values and then round off as you want to, and then call r2_score()
on actual and predicted labels. Something like:
# Get actual predictions
y_pred = clf.predict(X_test)
# You will need to implement the round function yourself
y_pred_rounded = round(y_pred)
# Call the appropriate scorer
score = r2_score(y_test, y_pred_rounded)
You can look at the sklearn documentation here for available metrics in sklearn.
add a comment |
First, for regression models, clf.score()
calculates R-squared value, not accuracy. So you would need to decide if you want to treat this problem as a classification problem (For some fixed number of target labels) or a regression problem (for a real-valued target)
Secondly, if you insist on using regression models and not classification, you can call clf.predict()
to first get the predicted values and then round off as you want to, and then call r2_score()
on actual and predicted labels. Something like:
# Get actual predictions
y_pred = clf.predict(X_test)
# You will need to implement the round function yourself
y_pred_rounded = round(y_pred)
# Call the appropriate scorer
score = r2_score(y_test, y_pred_rounded)
You can look at the sklearn documentation here for available metrics in sklearn.
First, for regression models, clf.score()
calculates R-squared value, not accuracy. So you would need to decide if you want to treat this problem as a classification problem (For some fixed number of target labels) or a regression problem (for a real-valued target)
Secondly, if you insist on using regression models and not classification, you can call clf.predict()
to first get the predicted values and then round off as you want to, and then call r2_score()
on actual and predicted labels. Something like:
# Get actual predictions
y_pred = clf.predict(X_test)
# You will need to implement the round function yourself
y_pred_rounded = round(y_pred)
# Call the appropriate scorer
score = r2_score(y_test, y_pred_rounded)
You can look at the sklearn documentation here for available metrics in sklearn.
answered Nov 14 '18 at 14:25
Vivek KumarVivek Kumar
15.5k41953
15.5k41953
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271929%2flow-score-in-linear-regression-with-discrete-attributes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown